Re: [sipx-users] Avaya 4621 converted to SIP - One way audio

2012-05-10 Thread Cyril Constantin
you use a different >> hardphone other than the Avaya? >> >> The quick glances I gave at the pcap files said to me it was going to FS >> and it showed an invalid header from the UA. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Cyril Constantin &l

Re: [sipx-users] Avaya 4621 converted to SIP - One way audio

2012-04-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
connected to my softphone I can hear the voicemail from sipxecs and RTP stream coming from Avaya mic in the mean time but no sound on Avaya speaker --When it works: - I answer it from Avaya Phone then I have both way audio. Best Regards 2012/4/27 Cyril Constantin > I have already onl

Re: [sipx-users] Avaya 4621 converted to SIP - One way audio

2012-04-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
d see if it is any > different... > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Cyril Constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> HI Tony, >> >> There is no ICE or STUN activated, there is also no port range >> configuration on Jitsi, I'm in

Re: [sipx-users] Avaya 4621 converted to SIP - One way audio

2012-04-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
t; On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Cyril Constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I have converted my Avaya 4621 phone form H.323 to SIP with latest >> firmware in order to migrate all my Avaya users to Sipxecs :) but I'm >>

Re: [sipx-users] Jitsi provisionning

2012-04-18 Thread Cyril Constantin
Below this is the link for provisioning documentation: http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Documentation/Provisioning It's a really good software and I'm pretty sure that it will interest some people. Best Regards. 2012/4/18 Gerald Drouillard > On 4/17/2012 5:49 PM, Cyril Constantin

Re: [sipx-users] Jitsi provisionning

2012-04-18 Thread cyril . constantin
Yes, I'm registered with sipxecs for sip and xmpp, I only got issue with xmpp due to a setting on openfire which couldn't let me register, I have removed xmpp.fqdn which comes with default install of sipxecs and now it's working, so on openfire there is only xmpp.domain. Best Regards -Ori

Re: [sipx-users] Cordes Phone

2012-04-18 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, Asterisk is able to handle SRV, I'm using it in combination with sipxecs. Regards -Original Message- From: Michael Picher Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:04:25 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for u

Re: [sipx-users] Jitsi provisionning

2012-04-18 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, Thanks Michael for your feedback, if there is any developper who wants to move forward on it, it will be really appreciated :) as this softphone is open source and ready to be deployed into company. Have a nice day all. Best Regards -Original Message- From: Michael Picher Sender:

[sipx-users] Jitsi provisionning

2012-04-17 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi Guys, I just would like to know if there is any plan to integrate Jitsi into provisioning phone? They now have a stable release since beginning of April. http://jitsi.org/ Thanks a lot for your feedback. Best Regards. Cyril ___ sipx-users mailing

Re: [sipx-users] automated export cdr

2012-04-05 Thread Cyril Constantin
requirement was to have a script running each open day to extract data from the previous day (call per agent per day) and also once per week to extract data from agent for the entire week, so you should modify the postgresql request following your needs. I hope it can help you. Best Regards Cyril

Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-29 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, Any idea about the script name used to do it? Best Regards --Message d'origine-- De: Douglas Hubler À: cyril.constan...@gmail.com À: Sipx-users Discussion List for users of sipXecs software Objet: Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-28 Thread cyril . constantin
12 20:13:04 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08 On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Cyril Constantin wrote: >

Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-28 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi Guys, Any idea how to force Primary server to collect data from redundant server which didn't have been taken from call_state_events table ? Thanks a lot in advance. 2012/3/27 Cyril Constantin > Hi Guys, > > After a postgresql restart calls made from this server are corre

Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
dant server request below I can see the 15 calls: select * from call_state_events where event_time between '2012-03-26 00:00:00.000' and '2012-03-26 22:00:00.000' and from_url like '%Stelly%'; Thanks a lot in advance for your suggestions. Best Regards. 2012/3/27 Cyr

Re: [sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
, same case on primary it's ok. So only one redundant server have trouble, all CSE are not sent properly to primary. Do I have to restart postgresql ? Best Regards 2012/3/27 Cyril Constantin > Hi Guys, > > I have a Sipxecs primary and two redundant servers, when users are > conne

[sipx-users] CDR from HA not sent to primary- Sipxecs 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08

2012-03-27 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi Guys, I have a Sipxecs primary and two redundant servers, when users are connected to one of the specific HA server all calls made by users are not logged to CDR table view_cdrs on primary server. When I go into CDR database of this HA server and check by doing request below I'm able to see al

Re: [sipx-users] Web portal access restricted to CDR report only

2012-01-06 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi Guys, Is it possible to have this patch for release 4.4 ? I'm really interested to have it. Best Regards. Cyril 2011/12/20 andrewpitman > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: d9hywsrhstjrpymk-ssscd2is

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs on vmware?

2012-01-04 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, I have put 20 agents for several days on one VM (under xen) without any issue, voice quality was really good. Best Regards -Original Message- From: "m...@grounded.net" Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:47:18 To: sipx-users Reply-To: m...@ground

Re: [sipx-users] Rrecord calls

2012-01-04 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi, I'm using oreca since some years for call and screen recordings on large call center environment it's really a nice and cheap solution. Best Regards. 2012/1/4 Tony Graziano > by following their deployment guidelines, they can record any rtp traffic > on yourt segment. > > sipx has a proxy

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx upgrade from 4.4 to latest repository release - GUI not available error 500 - Unable to read OGNL expression

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
g.log. Have a nice evening. Best Regards. Cyril 2011/12/13 George Niculae > > On Dec 13, 2011 3:30 AM, "Cyril Constantin" > wrote: > > > > I just tried but same result: > > > > [root@ps0sipx01 tmp]# sipxproc -r ConfigServer > > {"

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx upgrade from 4.4 to latest repository release - GUI not available error 500 - Unable to read OGNL expression

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
I just tried but same result: [root@ps0sipx01 tmp]# sipxproc -r ConfigServer {"ConfigServer"=>true} 2011/12/13 Tony Graziano > Did you try > > sipxproc -r ConfigServer > > If it doesn't start look at your sipxconfig.log. > On Dec 12, 2011 8:12 PM, "

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx upgrade from 4.4 to latest repository release - GUI not available error 500 - Unable to read OGNL expression

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
I can't because I don't have access to the GUI, if you know how to do it by command line, it will be appreciated. Thanks 2011/12/13 Tony Graziano > DD you send all the sercvers their profiles after updating? > On Dec 12, 2011 7:55 PM, "Cyril Constantin" > wrot

[sipx-users] Sipx upgrade from 4.4 to latest repository release - GUI not available error 500 - Unable to read OGNL expression

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
Hi Guys, I just have upgraded my sipxecs server 4.4 to latest release by using yum update like in the wiki below: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Upgrade+to+Latest+Stable+Version but I'm getting this webpage error when I'm trying to connect on GUI HTTP ERROR: 500 Unable to read OGNL

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV - HA Cluster

2011-12-12 Thread cyril . constantin
I confirm that it comes with default installation. -Original Message- From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:29:02 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software

Re: [sipx-users] Web portal access restricted to CDR report only

2011-12-12 Thread cyril . constantin
Ok thanks a lot for your feedback. Best Regards --Message d'origine-- De: andrewpitman Expéditeur : sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org À: Sipx-users Discussion List for users of sipXecs software Répondre à: Sipx-users Discussion List for users of sipXecs software Objet: Re: [sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV - HA Cluster

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
ck the wiki for these tests. > http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/DNS+Concepts+for+sipXecs > > whether these things are set to master / slave or set to manual makes no > difference if DNS is working properly. > > mike > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Cyril Con

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV - HA Cluster

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
nge on all of your servers. > > Then you just need to keep up with any zone file changes... > > Mike > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Cyril Constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have followed Sipx wiki and it look

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV - HA Cluster

2011-12-12 Thread Cyril Constantin
se the setting cannot be pushed down to > the other servers. > > I think you might want to look instead at the timing of the records, etc. > and whether you sent profiles after making the change to the master. > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 AM, cyril constantin < > c

[sipx-users] DNS SRV - HA Cluster

2011-12-12 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I have HA cluster with three servers. Like I have posted three months ago Bria 3.2.1 (the latest) doesn't support DNS SRV with Weight of 0 for the three servers and will always use the same server to register all phone which is annoying to load balance all my users on the three servers s

Re: [sipx-users] Web portal access restricted to CDR report only

2011-12-10 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi andrew, Thanks a lot for your work, let us know when it will be done. Do you think that it can be included in release 4.6? Have a nice week-end. Best Regards --Message d'origine-- De: andrewpitman Expéditeur : sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org À: Sipx-users Discussion List for u

Re: [sipx-users] Web portal access restricted to CDR report only

2011-12-08 Thread cyril constantin
> into. > > Mike > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Do you know if there is a way to allow users to access only to CDR >> reports from Web Portal ? I'm running ver

[sipx-users] Web portal access restricted to CDR report only

2011-12-08 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, Do you know if there is a way to allow users to access only to CDR reports from Web Portal ? I'm running version 4.4. I have users who needs CDR report only, so I don't want to grant them with superadmin access. Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback. Best Regards. Cyril __

Re: [sipx-users] Appliance Hardware

2011-10-07 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, At the beginning I got 30 users on Xen Virtual Machine, 10GB of disk and 4GB of memory, but for redundancy purpose I have added 2 redundant others VM with 1GB (still 10GB of disk on these new VM)of memory and reduced the primary to 2GB memory. All users are load balanced through the 3 serv

Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance

2011-09-21 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, When I have used the value zero all users where registered on the same server. When I have used a value different of zero in this case all users were load balanced correclty, and I don't have issue since severeal days. So a value of zero doesn't work correclty with Bria. Regards -Orig

Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance

2011-09-21 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, To resolve this problem I have changed DNS configuration from: _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sipx01.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sipx02.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sip

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-09 Thread cyril constantin
Mike > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok cool so I was raising a JIRA do I need to continue ? If you fix it next >> week does it will be included into #Update 11 ? >> >> because I really n

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-09 Thread cyril constantin
as well. > > > Michael Picher wrote on 09-09-2011 17:16:06: > > > > > I'd open a Jira if you think there's something to be improved... > > > > > http://track.sipfoundry.org > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:11 AM, cyril constanti

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-09 Thread cyril constantin
to see if you can do > a manual xmpp only account (like gmail) without specifying hostname. > > we "should" have the new provisioning "spreadsheet" from them if we need to > make changes instead of aiming in the dark. > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, cyr

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-09 Thread cyril constantin
> problem with the firt setup. > > > > Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincères salutations > > > > Paul Scheepens > > > > As I have said before, if Bria is not getting their act together then > they > > are in real trouble. > > Sin

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-09 Thread cyril constantin
Anyone knows where I can change in a config file the XMPP hostname per the XMPP domain name for Bria provisioning as it looks impossible to do from GUI ? Regards. 2011/9/9 Michael Picher > yea, but Polycom phones can monitor your presence as can other XMPP users > connected to sipXecs. > > > O

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-08 Thread cyril . constantin
3.2.1 the latest -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:20:49 To: Cc: Sipx-users Discussion List for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1 what is the exact bria version you are running? On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-08 Thread cyril . constantin
My config is generated by sipx when I'm using provisioning functionnality. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:41:48 To: ; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1 I'm familiar with some of t

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-08 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi Tony, The hostname is already created as an alias on the domain menu of sipxecs, it has been done automatically when I have upgraded sipxecs in the past to #update 9. So why it works when I change into Bria ps0sipx01.webcti.local to webcti.local if they don't support XMPP SRV ? It looks th

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-09-08 Thread cyril constantin
ay to have it working is to change this domain. So do there is anyway to modify the provisioning domain name on Sipxecs or maybe someone has found a way to have it working? Best Regards. Cyril 2011/8/19 cyril constantin > Hi, > > I have found how to do it, I have activated the Ope

Re: [sipx-users] Service Observing

2011-09-06 Thread cyril . constantin
I'm recording around 200 000 calls per day with audio and screen, I'm one of their biggest customer regarding my usage (audio + screen), the have biggest customer for audio part. I'm using their packet sniffing solution, I have my avaya clan and medpro traffic mirrored to a network port where

Re: [sipx-users] Service Observing

2011-09-06 Thread cyril constantin
recording solution in-line that might work if it has a > monitor function. > > Thanks, > Mike > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Matt White wrote: > >> >>> On 9/6/2011 at 06:26 AM, in message >> , >> cyril >> constantin wrote: >>

Re: [sipx-users] Service Observing

2011-09-06 Thread cyril constantin
Ok thanks a lot for your feedback. Have a nice day 2011/9/6 Tony Graziano > Not at this time. > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:26 AM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Do there is any way to do a servic

[sipx-users] Service Observing

2011-09-06 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, Do there is any way to do a service observing, I mean when a person is in communication with somebody and that his supervisor wants to hear it's communication in real time? Best Regards. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.or

Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance

2011-09-06 Thread cyril constantin
domain has more then 1 sip SRV records with equal priority then >> Bria will pick one of them. >> I do remember that newer Bria's always picks the first SRV, so if your DNS >> does not "round-robin" the replies then all Bria's will register with >>

[sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance

2011-09-06 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I have configured several users with Bria 3 with provisioning, my provisioning URL is my Primary Sipxecs servers so all my users are registered to this primary server and doesn't load balance to others cluster server, so do there is any way to keep the ability to use DNS SRV for load bala

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-08-19 Thread cyril constantin
via the web interface. I hope it will help others users who will have this need. Best Regards. Cyril 2011/8/18 cyril constantin > Hi, > > I don't know it, but after searching on the web it looks to be an XMPP > Gateway integrated into sipx, do there is a specific interface or con

Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-08-18 Thread cyril constantin
Hi, I don't know it, but after searching on the web it looks to be an XMPP Gateway integrated into sipx, do there is a specific interface or config file that I can modify ? Regards 2011/8/18 Tony Graziano > have you looked at the kraken interface? > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at

[sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1

2011-08-18 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I have observed that when I add my users into IM group I can see them properly into Bria 3.2.1 and see their presence without problem, but I'm unable to send instant message, if I add manually my user into Bria for example a user 46006 I'll be able to send instant message. When I check t

[sipx-users] Instant Message users groups

2011-08-18 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, Do there is any way to have my sip user being into one IM group for example IT and to be able to see another IM group for example Telesales without being visible into Telesales group? because I've tried to add to my sip user the both group but I'm displayed into IT and Telesales IM group,

Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 update #10

2011-08-18 Thread cyril constantin
t as decided in release policy. Yum update > after installation is recommended for getting these updates. > - Thanks goes Douglas for fix and Roman Gelfand and Cyril Constantin > for your bug reports! > > Build Log > === > commit 97ba58d4d427dc6a5113a1c18

Re: [sipx-users] click to call functionnality - Sipxecs 4.4.0update 9

2011-08-18 Thread cyril constantin
It work perfectly well since I have added ulaw and now it's working perfectly well. Thanks a lot Tony for your feedback. Have a nice day. Best Regards. 2011/8/17 > I have certainly allowed G711ulaw before the upgrade but due to another > issue that I was investigating I have forced only to G7

Re: [sipx-users] click to call functionnality - Sipxecs 4.4.0update 9

2011-08-17 Thread cyril . constantin
I have certainly allowed G711ulaw before the upgrade but due to another issue that I was investigating I have forced only to G711alaw. Maybe if it has never been implemented before it could be great to have G711alaw support for people not using ulaw (out of USA) Thanks for your feedback. Cyril

Re: [sipx-users] click to call functionnality - Sipxecs 4.4.0update 9

2011-08-17 Thread cyril . constantin
I don't know if it's use G711ulaw only, but I don't see the interest to have only one codec able to do click to call functionnality. I'll add g711ulaw to my list of codec tomorrow morning and repeat the test. Best Regards -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano Sender: sipx-users-boun...

[sipx-users] click to call functionnality - Sipxecs 4.4.0 update 9

2011-08-17 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I have upgrade sipxecs with the release of yesterday (update 9), since it I'm not able to have click to call from phonebook working properly. When I click on a contact and push button "call", it call me correctly (Bria softphone) but when I answer the call it's hangup directly the line i

Re: [sipx-users] Custom Dial Plans after Sipx Upgrade (latest stableversion)

2011-08-16 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, I have the same issue. It looks that permissions are not correctly authorized to users if it's a custom Permissions made by myself and not a System Permissions already configured with sipx. If I use into my dialplan my permission it will not work, until I change it by a system permission

[sipx-users] Outbound calls through unmanaged gateway Asterisk

2011-08-12 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I'm trying to figure out an issue, I'm connected with sipxecs to Asterisk configured like an unmanaged gateway, Asterisk is connected to Avaya with H323 and then use Avaya PSTN connection for outbound calls. Call from sip peers on Asterisk to PSTN Avaya works without issue. Call from Sip

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs in call center environment

2011-08-04 Thread cyril constantin
Yes I feel it's like a suicide, but I'm studying different solution of Avaya replacement per open-source solution but it looks to be complicated to have it or not sufficiently mature Regarding SS7 I want to keep my Volt Delta switches to handle SS7 protocol and then just send calls to Asterisk thr

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs in call center environment

2011-08-04 Thread cyril constantin
teways there's less chance of call disruption. > > Mike > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:40 AM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Currently my production config is: >> >> In front I have SS7 switches (to receive call from carri

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs in call center environment

2011-08-04 Thread cyril constantin
with > uninterrupted rtp... if you were using a pri or other telco gateways > the sbc is unneccessary too, just a good pstn gateway. > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:13 AM, cyril constantin > wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for your feedback, so no one is using sipxe

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs in call center environment

2011-08-04 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, Thanks for your feedback, so no one is using sipxecs for this amount of calls per day ? My call center are running 24/24 7/7 so when I see that I need to restart services for small changes on sipxecs I can't imagine rollout that in production yet (I'm running stable version), for example

[sipx-users] Sipxecs in call center environment

2011-08-03 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi Guys, I just want to know if one of you have experience with sipxecs on call center environment, for handling in my case 200 000 calls per day and 350 agents connected simultaneously during peak hours? I'm really interested by replacing my Avaya per sipxecs regarding what I have observed on

Re: [sipx-users] ACD Queue Audo

2011-08-03 Thread cyril . constantin
Max, If there is no way yet to do it from the web interface, you can easily write a bash script which will merge all your file into one by using sox command line tool. Best Regards -Original Message- From: Max DiOrio Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011

Re: [sipx-users] ACD Queue Audo

2011-08-03 Thread cyril . constantin
In this case for sure it will be a pain for you to manage it -Original Message- From: Max DiOrio Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:46:29 To: cyril.constan...@gmail.com; Discussion listfor users of sipXecs software Subject: RE: [sipx-users] ACD Queue Audo We frequently change the files to match w

Re: [sipx-users] ACD Queue Audo

2011-08-03 Thread cyril . constantin
Hi, Why you don't use audio editor software like audacity or wavpad to have your three files in only one wav file? Regards Cyril -Original Message- From: Max DiOrio Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:06:39 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] Problem for calling load balanced users

2011-07-27 Thread cyril constantin
ok thanks for information 2011/7/27 Michael Picher > move this to sipx-users please. re-state your configuration and problem > over there. > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:24 AM, cyril constantin < > cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >&

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] Problem for calling load balanced users

2011-07-27 Thread cyril constantin
Hi Guys, I have followed Douglas recommendation, with expire-spread --summary it's a usefull command which helped me to see that primary and redundant can't see each others, I restarted the primary and then I was able to see this on Primary: Database: registration Timestamp: 2011-07-27T10:09:18

Re: [sipx-users] ACD MoH and stutter tone

2011-07-25 Thread cyril . constantin
It can't do just a reload? -Original Message- From: Michael Picher Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:44:59 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users]