Andrew,
not to hijack but you might want to look at a patton sbc to transcode...
Mike
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Stiles Watson wrote:
> Thanks for the update. I'll check it out.
>
> Stiles
>
>
> On 05/05/2012 11:40 PM, Andrew Radke wrote:
>
> Hi Stiles
>
> 3CX released an update about a
Thanks for the update. I'll check it out.
Stiles
On 05/05/2012 11:40 PM, Andrew Radke wrote:
Hi Stiles
3CX released an update about a week ago that for the very first time
allowed it to work with a PBX that isn't visible from the Internet.
A lot of the confusion on all sides was due to it i
http://code.google.com/p/csipsimple/issues/detail?id=1500
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Radke wrote:
> Hi Philippe
>
> I did like the look of CSipSImple. Two things it is missing that we need
> are G729 and the ability to transfer calls. Otherwise I would definitely
> say it would be my
Hi Philippe
I did like the look of CSipSImple. Two things it is missing that
we need are G729 and the ability to transfer calls. Otherwise I
would definitely say it would be my choice in SIP client.
And yes, I wish I could do away with G729 but we ha
After this discussion a few weeks ago, I purchased several Galaxy Player 4
units for testing, each loaded with the CSipSimple software. We've been so
pleased with their performance that we've added these to our arsenal, as
their noise handling, service time (> 8 hours), and integration with a
maint
Hi Mike,
It hasn't been two weeks work. Just bits and pieces over two weeks
as I make a change and see how reliable it is.
Also there is a very large area to cover that has good wifi
coverage already.
As far as the keepalive settings, it seems
Well, if cost is no option, and at this point you've blown 2 weeks... bite
the bullet and get some Polycom 8440's. Heavy duty and they have the
Polycom SIP firmware that is known to work well.
Bria should have a setting for WiFi keepalive. I thought csipsimple also
had such a setting...
Batter
Hi all,
I've being working with this now for about two weeks with some good and bad and
mixed results. This email will hopefully be a summary of where I have gotten
too and also a request for suggestions and experiences from others.
So the short summary would be that they very work well when th
Hi Stiles
3CX released an update about a week ago that for the very first
time allowed it to work with a PBX that isn't visible from the
Internet.
A lot of the confusion on all sides was due to it it being
completely broken. Now so long as you
Well, I'd still like to get the 3CX iphone client working, but I
downloaded Media5Fone and was able to get it registered and working in a
matter of minutes over both wifi and 3G.
Stiles
On 04/18/2012 12:45 PM, Stiles Watson wrote:
Beat me up all you want, I can take it.
Here are the 3CX ipho
Beat me up all you want, I can take it.
Here are the 3CX iphone app settings. The items in () are my values.
Account
* Name: (Test)
* Display Name: (blank)
Credentials
* User: (195)
* ID: (195)
* Password: (PIN for 195)
Server Settings
* I'm out of Office [ON/OFF]: (OFF) - should use
oh my lord... you asterisk guys kill me.
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/DNS+Concepts+for+sipXecs
sipXecs likes to do things by DNS... Don't mess with IP's... learn about
SRV records
Mike
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Stiles Watson wrote:
> Where?
>
> I changed Local PBX
Where?
I changed Local PBX IP to sip domain, but it still does not work.
Stiles
On 04/18/2012 11:24 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
try sip domain...
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Stiles Watson
mailto:wat...@datatek-net.com>> wrote:
What are the settings to get the 3CX softphone working
try sip domain...
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Stiles Watson wrote:
> What are the settings to get the 3CX softphone working with sipX? Tony,
> you mention it here and I see that it is listed as a supported softphone on
> the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/List+of+Feat
What are the settings to get the 3CX softphone working with sipX? Tony,
you mention it here and I see that it is listed as a supported softphone
on the wiki:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/List+of+Features
But no setup is detailed.
The iphone is connected via wifi on the local net
You just have to start them once, and then the Acrobits apps will run in
the background. You can enable a function that allows them to receive calls
via the push notifications mechanism, but that requires authenticating
externally. We never did the push notifications piece. Instead we used
their me
The last generation didn't have a Mic. Not sure about current units.
You can however use them with a headset / mic.
Bria does work on the iPod Touch.
That little Samsung 3.5" has it all over that thing though for like $150
US. The 4" is around $200 and the 5" is $250.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 18, 20
Thanks Philippe
I'll look in to testing the Acrobits apps. Do they effectively start
and run in the background automatically or do they need to be run
once manually to get going?
Has anyone tried using iPod Touchs as a handset for a SIP phone? I
think they m
i have one of the galaxy players... handset, speakerphone and bluetooth.
my son (10) uses the galaxy player with a googlevoice account that routes
to his gtalk account and then uses talkatone w/gtalk account (would be nice
if they allowed us to route to SIP uri's). this really is a pretty sweet
Curious about the Galaxy Player, can it be used as a handset, or is it
speakerphone only or bluetooth required?
Regarding iPhone apps, we tried Acrobits SIP and Acrobits Groundwire (a few
more biz features such as transferring), both are polished apps and worked
very well. As Tony pointed out, bat
In your case I would test coverage with "any" app, besides counterpath, you
can try the free 3cx (Android and iOS) app and others. The biggest thing
you will find with wifi -- battery life/talktime (especially when received
wifi signals are weak), don't hold up nearly as long as DECT. So your wifi
Andrew,
There are very good smartphone apps. Counterpath has Bria and there is
also the freely available csipsimple for Android. From a tablet
perspective both also function there and Counterpath has Bria for iPhone
and iPad as well. I'm currently beta testing the latest Bria for Android
which
Hi Tony,
We are looking at outdoor coverage but with a lot of trees and vegetation.
Considering your response it shows that things have changed in recent years too…
We do also have large wifi coverage already and are constantly increasing it.
In the past it seemed that wifi was considered unive
Yes sir, you're right... give me a day or so to pop up the wiki page.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> To further elaborate on the Polycom Kirk DECT line, its awesome. The small
> server is inexpensive, but realize there are many phones and all of them
> are not the same.
To further elaborate on the Polycom Kirk DECT line, its awesome. The small
server is inexpensive, but realize there are many phones and all of them
are not the same. Also realize these handsets are made in different models
for different environments (healthcare, office, industrial/manufacturing).
We're using 32 KIRK 5020 and 6020 phones with great results. We use the
6000 KIRK server, but the 300 server should work for you (max 12 phones)
and can extend with repeaters at a much lower price.
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, Andrew Radke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a query to see what the current
You need to explain what kind of coverage you need and what kind of
wireless infrastructure you have (if any).
Snom makes a dect phone which also has wireless repeaters and should work
fine. The battery life and talk time is very good and does not interfere
with wifi at all.
If you have a wifi in
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Radke
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:54 PM
To: sipx-users
Subject: [sipx-users] Cordless phones
Hi all,
Just a query to see what the current thoughts are on cordless phones.
We probably need 2-3 phones fairly
Hi all,
Just a query to see what the current thoughts are on cordless phones.
We probably need 2-3 phones fairly soon that can transfer calls. It would be
nice (but not immediately required) to have the phones capable of switching
between multiple base stations due to the physical area to be co
Hi,
I used for a long time a Siemens C470 ip. It is definitely targeted to
the home market, but very nice in phone usability and battery life. Is
not meant to be connected to a pbx. Moh with sipx does not work and I
had issues with blind transfers. It does not support BLF. Other phones
cannot c
n...@ineos,
Date:
25/03/2009 10:30
Subject:
RE: [sipx-users] cordless phones
Snom has a new wireless deskphone coming that might work for this
application.
Mike
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [
mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
kenny.mitch...@ineos.com
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] cordless phones
I tried a couple of the wireless phones, as I have a need to build up
and tear down large portacabin villages on a regular basis. We bought
in two or three wireless types but were not impressed with any of them,
and had a problem with sticky fingered
>> seriously, no one but me (and tony) is using cordless phones with sipx?
Been trying to. Tried several WiFi, but all were not good in a production
environment. Problems varied, but most of them had nothing to do with SipX.
WiFi VoIP needs some serious development. No one seems to have done it
I tried a couple of the wireless phones, as I have a need to build up and
tear down large portacabin villages on a regular basis. We bought in two
or three wireless types but were not impressed with any of them, and had a
problem with sticky fingered people walking off with them thinking they
lf Of Tony Graziano
>> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:00 PM
>> To: mew...@gmail.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] cordless phones
>>
>> FWIW - I tried using WIFI. Hitachi, Linksys and HP. Hitachi was the
>> most reliable, fairly diff
no
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:00 PM
> To: mew...@gmail.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] cordless phones
>
> FWIW - I tried using WIFI. Hitachi, Linksys and HP. Hitachi was the
> most reliable, fairly difficult to use and is now a dead product line
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of milosz
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:51 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] cordless phones
>
> seriously, no one but me (and tony) is using cordless phone
I use linksys spa3102s and just attach regular analog cordless phones
to them. It may not be what you're looking for, but it's cheap (if
you have existing analog cordless phones to use) and it works well.
On 23-Mar-09, at 12:03 PM, "milosz" wrote:
> seriously, no one but me (and tony) is
my issues with the snoms are:
-two out of five phones had the loudspeaker fail within a few months of use
-firmware issues documented on this list
-keys are tiny and it's very easy to misdial
-awkward interface
-the users hate them (ostensibly due to above)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tony G
FWIW - I tried using WIFI. Hitachi, Linksys and HP. Hitachi was the most
reliable, fairly difficult to use and is now a dead product line.
Michael Picher might be able to give some insight on the Aastra DECT stuff
though.
i'm not sure what else is out there. We use the Snom's as a backup for wh
seriously, no one but me (and tony) is using cordless phones with sipx?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:15 PM, milosz wrote:
> hi all,
>
> what are people using for cordless handsets? i am not happy with my
> snom m3's right now.
>
> milosz
>
___
sipx-users
hi all,
what are people using for cordless handsets? i am not happy with my
snom m3's right now.
milosz
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipf
We've bought and tested several WLAN phones. In the end we dumped them all and
opted for SNOM m3 DECT 6.0 phones. The m3 now has repeaters to increase range,
and they are not at all expensive to deploy.
At the same time Aastra carries a more robust repeater/range design based more
for the facto
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 17:20 -0700, Fernando García Morales wrote:
> I’m looking for some cordless phones (not for WLNA), does anybody have
> any experience in this kind of phones. The main reason of using
> cordless ipPhones instead of wireless is that here at the company they
> have 2 different ne
Hi All.
Im looking for some cordless phones (not for WLNA), does anybody have any
experience in this kind of phones. The main reason of using cordless
ipPhones instead of wireless is that here at the company they have 2
different network segments 1 for the LAN and a different one for the
wirel
45 matches
Mail list logo
