gt;>
>> bob
>>
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Francis Tinio
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 9:48 AM
>> To: Tony Graziano
>> Cc: sipx-users
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-u
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Francis Tinio wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I'll be in my client's office later and should be able to troubleshoot
> further.
>
> Thanks again
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Robert Joly wrote:
>
> three phones so that their registration process gets captured and then d
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Robert Joly wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I deployed another sipx server (server is remote
> >> located with public IP (firewall is within server, no NAT).
> >> I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3 phones are created via
> >> phone group, so all have the sa
You should be using firmware 3_1_3_RevC and nothing later with 4.0.4.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Francis Tinio wrote:
> I'm running the latest stable of sipx. 4.0.4 I think.
>
> For polycom, it's ip500 and the latest software and bootrom are buggy, so I
> downgraded 1 version down. I don't
ip500 cannot use firmware 2.1.3 and below. it cannot use any newer. and 2.1.3
seems buggy that everytime i use it, the icons do not show right so i'm using
2.1.2.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> You should be using firmware 3_1_3_RevC and nothing later with 4.0.4.
>
> On T
Graziano
Cc: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] deployed new sipx server3 phone
extensions,only 1 is accessible inbound
also, one thing I noticed is that when I first configured the
1st extension, it was able to accept inbound calls. But once I
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 16:46 -0500, Francis Tinio wrote:
>
> I deployed another sipx server (server is remote located with public
> IP (firewall is within server, no NAT). I provisioned 3 polycom
> phones. All 3 phones are created via phone group, so all have the
> same settings. All 3 phones h
the calls are getting through to the sipx server. up to the operator at least.
it's the extensions themselves showing offline. if I call an extension from
one of the phones they are also not accessible.
how can I debug or troubleshoot this?
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote
>> Hi
>>
>> I deployed another sipx server (server is remote
>> located with public IP (firewall is within server, no NAT).
>> I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3 phones are created via
>> phone group, so all have the same settings. All 3 phones
>> have successfully regist
Thanks!
I'll be in my client's office later and should be able to troubleshoot further.
Thanks again
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Robert Joly wrote:
> three phones so that their registration process gets captured and then do a
> failing
___
sipx-us
dvance,
bob
From: Francis Tinio [mailto:fti...@toqen.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:15 AM
To: Joly, Robert AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
Cc: Tony Graziano; sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] deployed new sipx server....3 phone
extensions,only 1 is accessible inbound
also, one thing I noticed is that when I first configured the 1st extension, it
was able to accept inbound calls. But once I provisioned the next 2 phones,
only the last provisioned phone was accepting calls and the 1st would now
reflect as user offline (although it still shows registered and c
I'm running the latest stable of sipx. 4.0.4 I think.
For polycom, it's ip500 and the latest software and bootrom are buggy, so I
downgraded 1 version down. I don't think the problem is with the firmware
though.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 16:46
Yes we use remote users. actually all phones are remote located. the server is
hosted by us in our datacenter, and the phones are in our client's office. For
ITSP, we use Gafachi, and outbound and inbound are working fine to and from
their end. Incoming calls get routed properly to the operat
ony Graziano
> Cc: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] deployed new sipx server3 phone extensions,only
> 1 is accessible inbound
>
> also, one thing I noticed is that when I first configured the 1st extension,
> it was able to accept inbound calls. But once I provisioned
shouldn't it be easier to deploy since there is not dual NAT (nat on server
end, and nat on client end) to worry about? the server has a public IP
accessible and I just blocked all unnecessary ports. I believe the no audio or
one way issue is attributed to the server being behind NAT and the p
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Francis Tinio wrote:
> Hi
>
> I deployed another sipx server (server is remote located with public IP
> (firewall is within server, no NAT). I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3
> phones are created via phone group, so all have the same settings. All 3
> phone
Hi
I deployed another sipx server (server is remote located with public IP
(firewall is within server, no NAT). I provisioned 3 polycom phones. All 3
phones are created via phone group, so all have the same settings. All 3
phones have successfully registered with the server as well and all
18 matches
Mail list logo
