Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell [list-s...@secnap.com] I did find that in the 'advanced settings', I needed to put in something (like recommended on isn site) a prefix of

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 2:59 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Mine works without 012.   Feel free to comment on the JIR. Though I hate to use prefixes that are system specific, I never think its a good idea. I can dial 1234 it stays local, I dial 1234*256, it knows its an ISN number, does the lookup and rou

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
Mine works without 012. [?] Feel free to comment on the JIR. Though I hate to use prefixes that are system specific, I never think its a good idea. I can dial 1234 it stays local, I dial 1234*256, it knows its an ISN number, does the lookup and routes the call. I don't think it should be that hard

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 2:31 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Coincidentally, you made my point that I was suggesting enabling that > should be in DIAL PLAN, it logically makes more sense (at least from > enable/disable) to be placed there. > > I did find that in the 'advanced settings', I needed to put in someth

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
Which is why I was looking for input. My post earlier today... "What I do find is that ISN dialing, which used to be defined "allow ISN dialing" was located under Domain or Internet calling. Now it is under the registrar. Hurray it works! But, I am wondering "why" it is under registrar? I under

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Coincidentally, you made my point that I was suggesting enabling that should be in DIAL PLAN, it logically make

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
Coincidentally, you made my point that I was suggesting enabling that should be in DIAL PLAN, it logically makes more sense (at least from enable/disable) to be placed there. On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 6/24/10 2:00 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > gimme a break...

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 2:00 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: gimme a break... are you really asking that? Where are all the services in sipx listed? I know you know the answer. brain fried, looking for ^Registrar.. didn't see SIP registerar. O -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 1:57 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: where is the registrar in sipx? never mind, found it. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
gimme a break... are you really asking that? Where are all the services in sipx listed? I know you know the answer. On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > where is the registrar in sipx? > > > On 6/24/10 1:54 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > Um. If you go to the registrar in sipx

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
where is the registrar in sipx? On 6/24/10 1:54 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Um. If you go to the registrar in sipx and turn on ISN dialing, you can dial 1234*256. The "*" means "@" and "256" will resolve to "loligo.com". That's what its all about! On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Michael Scheidel

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
Um. If you go to the registrar in sipx and turn on ISN dialing, you can dial 1234*256. The "*" means "@" and "256" will resolve to "loligo.com". That's what its all about! On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 6/24/10 1:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > No. If you dont

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 1:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: No. If you dont use an ITAD it does not matter. interesting. yes, I remember this from a while back, forgot all about it. oh, I can't dial 1234*256 we got a 4 digit extension and 1234 belongs to the CFO :-( It's a global DB (you configure the r

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
No. If you dont use an ITAD it does not matter. It's a global DB (you configure the records in their system after a free application is approved). Optionally you can have the lookups done in your DNS. There's a lookup and DNS component from their registry when they host the records, and points bac

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 10:00 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: where is 'registrar'? I don't remember doing anything to enable or disable ISN/SIP calling (you can sip me on my extention @, or any alias, including alphanumeric aliases) so you are saying this is a function of your ITSP, when you register y

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
I think ISN is a great idea. We implement it and so do a lot of customers. I'm just trying to make it easier to enable for others. ISN assignments are free, and very handy to dial a sip uri eqivalent from a numeric keypad. On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 6/24/10 8:5

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/24/10 8:58 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: What I do find is that ISN dialing, which used to be defined "allow ISN dialing" was located under Domain or Internet calling. Now it is under the registrar. where is 'registrar'? I don't remember doing anything to enable or disable ISN/SIP calling

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2010-06-24 Thread Tony Graziano
Ok. I am dredging this back up... sorry. In 4.2 I can do Internet dialing by default using the default sbc, sipXbridge-1. I do not have to enable Internet dialing by default to dial by sip URI. What I do find is that ISN dialing, which used to be defined "allow ISN dialing" was located under Doma

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2009-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:40 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > > I am testing some functionality with sipXbridge. I am curious if ISN > > dialing is supported via sipXbridge. > > > > What I think I know: > > > > Internet calling does not need to

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2009-10-28 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:40 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > I am testing some functionality with sipXbridge. I am curious if ISN > dialing is supported via sipXbridge. > > What I think I know: > > Internet calling does not need to be enabled if using sipXbridge, it > does it natively. > sipXbridge

[sipx-users] sipXbridge and ISN

2009-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
I am testing some functionality with sipXbridge. I am curious if ISN dialing is supported via sipXbridge. What I think I know: Internet calling does not need to be enabled if using sipXbridge, it does it natively. sipXbridge does ITSP trunking sipXbridge supports remote workers (Nat traversal, vi