Re: [SLUG] Guide me please ...

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> thanks. That's just a tiny bit too terse for me. > I've got debootstrap_0.2.45-0.2_i386.deb > Next I'm looking at a netinstall CD. > Do a net install, install debootstrap, up/down grade to the version I need > to build for? 1. Install something sane on your development machine that won't pun

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Martin Pool
On 06/04/2006, at 11:26 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote: On Thu, April 6, 2006 11:01 am, Peter Chubb wrote: "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Edit the file afterwards; delete all but the base64 encoded part. Voytek> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]# { echo 'begin-base64 644 x.wav'; c

Re: [SLUG] Guide me please ...

2006-04-05 Thread jam
On Thursday 06 April 2006 13:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I need to install a debian woody system to compile some bits for an > > embedded box. > > You absolutely need woody for API/ABI compat with the embedded box you're > building for? I'll assume yes for my answers. :-):-) > > > 1) can I ins

Re: [SLUG] SLUG codefest: this Sunday, 9th April

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> There will be short talks given by Ben Leslie, Robert Collins and Andrew > Bennetts. Some people will head off for a yum cha lunch at Golden Harbour > in Chinatown and attendees are welcome to come. Approximate cost will be > $25. Justin Randell and I will be mucking around in the shallow end

Re: [SLUG] Guide me please ...

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I need to install a debian woody system to compile some bits for an > embedded box. You absolutely need woody for API/ABI compat with the embedded box you're building for? I'll assume yes for my answers. :-) > 1) can I install ubuntu and use that? Not directly, however... > 2) If I can't, w

[SLUG] Guide me please ...

2006-04-05 Thread jam
Hi (wow this weeks hot topic) I need to install a debian woody system to compile some bits for an embedded box. 1) can I install ubuntu and use that? 2) If I can't, what's the quick easy way to get up n running. I assume the rest of the development system is purely apt-get. Thanks James -- SL

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:41:07AM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote: > I have "Mail version 8.1 6/6/93" Oh dear. Please, install mutt or something. > > { echo 'begin-base64 644 x.wav'; cat file; echo ; } | uudecode > > get 'iilegal line' You can use openssl to en,decode base64; google for it. I

Re: [SLUG] Tonights Talk On Blender - Cancelled

2006-04-05 Thread James Purser
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:11 +1000, CaT wrote: > Is this a cancellation type of cancel or a postponement type of cancel? > :) > This is a postponement cancellation. If I can't get our speaker to attend (he has declared himself too sick), then I shall drag out Blender myself and give a demonstratio

Re: [SLUG] Tonights Talk On Blender - Cancelled

2006-04-05 Thread CaT
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:58:15PM +1000, James Purser wrote: > Apologies to all, but due to unforeseen circumstances, I am going to > have to cancel tonights talk on Blender which was to be held at the > SCLUG meeting. Is this a cancellation type of cancel or a postponement type of cancel? :) -

[SLUG] Re: [SCLUG] Tonights Talk On Blender - Cancelled

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 14:58 +1000, James Purser wrote: > Apologies to all, but due to unforeseen circumstances, I am going to > have to cancel tonights talk on Blender which was to be held at the > SCLUG meeting. > > The meeting will still be going ahead as usual. If anyone has anything > they wo

[SLUG] Tonights Talk On Blender - Cancelled

2006-04-05 Thread James Purser
Apologies to all, but due to unforeseen circumstances, I am going to have to cancel tonights talk on Blender which was to be held at the SCLUG meeting. The meeting will still be going ahead as usual. If anyone has anything they would like to talk about, or any questions they would like answered,

[SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Matt Palmer
[This is going way off-topic; followups to slug-chat please] On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:45:29AM +1000, Philip Greggs wrote: > Members want SLUG to expend it's resources for the General Interest. > General interest means all members regardless of the colour and form of their > Linux distributions.

Re: Cross Distro Matrix [Was: RE: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads (was: presidents report)]

2006-04-05 Thread James Polley
On 4/6/06, Craige McWhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:40 +1000, Visser, Martin wrote: > > > One project that I want to kick-off in fact is a sort of quick reference > > matrix that describes how a particular administrative function can be > > done across the major platfo

Re: [SLUG] tonight

2006-04-05 Thread CaT
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:43:10AM +1000, ashley maher wrote: > G'day, > > A reminder for tonight. > > Tonight's SCLUG meeting Scott McCoy will be doing a presentation on > Blender - a visual 3D animation application. > > Scott will show you how you can have profession video animations at home >

RE: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Roger Barnes
> >Self-interest (enlightened, if possible) is the best driver > there is. > >Pure selflessness isn't really in vogue any more, and I > don't think it > >works really well without an external influence to keep your > focused anyway. > > > > Now, you've confirmed what bystanders have only hea

[SLUG] SCLUG Tonight

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
G'day, I've been asked about times and trains etc. Meeting starts at 7.30pm The City Rail Timetable says the 5:36pm from Central will arrive at North Wollongong at 7pm. It then takes 15 - 20 min to walk to UoW. As UoW is the worst place to get around if you let me know you're on the North Wollo

Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> The rumour vines says this: intending members using other distros are > discouraged altogether from becoming members. The President's report was > making this plain and clear - declining membership in recent years. I don't think this is accurate at all. Membership has been declining due to the

Re: [SLUG] setting up sound card in RHEL3

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, April 6, 2006 11:20 am, Steve Lindsay wrote: > On 4/5/06, Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've never really grasped completely how sound works on linux, but I > know that if you run "aplay -l" you'll get a list of the cards that alsa > knows about. eg. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

RE: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads (was: presidents report)

2006-04-05 Thread jam
[snip] > As far as the specific post to which I responded, my aim was purely to > counter Peter's obvious frustration with Linux in general - very > specifically his comment " why why why can't Linux ever just work?" . I > merely hoped to demonstrate that it can and it does, at least from my > exp

[SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Philip Greggs
Matt wrote: **CUT* >> > neutral. It is perceived SLUG is driven by self-interest. There are > >Self-interest (enlightened, if possible) is the best driver there is. Pure >selflessness isn't really in vogue any more, and I don't think it works >really well witho

[SLUG] tonight

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
G'day, A reminder for tonight. Tonight's SCLUG meeting Scott McCoy will be doing a presentation on Blender - a visual 3D animation application. Scott will show you how you can have profession video animations at home just like they use at WIN Television. The particulars: * Location: Univ

[SLUG] SLUG codefest: this Sunday, 9th April

2006-04-05 Thread Mary Gardiner
Hi all, A reminder about the codefest this coming Sunday. (If you have any questions for me personally, please make sure to Cc me, I am not subscribed to slug@slug.org.au). --- Event details --- SLUG coders will be gathering together for a day of coding and talking about coding. Date: Sun

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, April 6, 2006 11:01 am, Peter Chubb wrote: >> "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Edit the file afterwards; delete all but the base64 encoded part. > Voytek> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]# { echo 'begin-base64 644 x.wav'; cat test; > Voytek> echo ; } | uudecode uude

Re: top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-05 Thread Jim Lemon
James Purser wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 12:40 +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: I would dearly love to move to palimpsest-posting, but given the Yep, Peter, you've nailed it. | I want to see side posting implemented

Re: [SLUG] setting up sound card in RHEL3

2006-04-05 Thread Steve Lindsay
On 4/5/06, Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've inserted an Ensoniq PCI sound crad in a RHEL3, on power up, the > 'altered hardware' picked it up as Ensqniq ES1370 > > how can I test if I have sound support from command line ? > (and, to tell me if I plugged speakers in correct jack...)

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, April 6, 2006 10:33 am, Michael Fox wrote: > On 4/6/06, Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> # munpack >> -bash: munpack: command not found >> # metamail >> -bash: metamail: command not found >> > > And for those commands to work you of course need them installed via > the correct

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Voytek> On Thu, April 6, 2006 10:28 am, Peter Chubb wrote: >>> "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Most mime-compliant mailers have base64 coding/decoding built in. Voytek> is there a command here to detach it

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, April 6, 2006 10:28 am, Peter Chubb wrote: >> "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Most mime-compliant mailers have base64 coding/decoding built in. I have "Mail version 8.1 6/6/93" ]# mail Mail version 8.1 6/6/93. Type ? for help. "/var/spool/mail/root": 1 messa

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Michael Fox
On 4/6/06, Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # munpack > -bash: munpack: command not found > # metamail > -bash: metamail: command not found And for those commands to work you of course need them installed via the correct package on your distro (or compiled/installed from source) -- SLUG

Re: [SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Voytek" == Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Voytek> is there a way to decode base64 with uudecode ? # uudecode < Voytek> test uudecode: stdin: No `begin' line Most mime-compliant mailers have base64 coding/decoding built in. uudecode expects a begin 644 filename line at the st

[SLUG] decodeing base64 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
is there a way to decode base64 with uudecode ? # uudecode < test uudecode: stdin: No `begin' line file has: --voicemail_012343058987690970 Content-Type: audio/x-WAV; name="msg.WAV" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Voicemail sound attachment. Content-Disposition: attac

Re: [SLUG] festy

2006-04-05 Thread Lindsay Holmwood
On 4/6/06, Peter Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 22:13 +1000, Lindsay Holmwood wrote: > > > We're looking at holding another Installfest this year combined with a > > Deckfest, so it'll give people an install and information about the > > apps on their desktop. > > Attempts

Re: [SLUG] Re: DEC Storage Works

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:51:05AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > OCFS2 and GFS are supported in Ubuntu from 5.10 onwards. > > Nice! > > I believe OCFS2 made it into the standard kernel very recently; 2.6.16? Yeah - though it has been in our .12 and .15 kernels for 5.10 and 6.06. It is pretty

Cross Distro Matrix [Was: RE: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads (was: presidents report)]

2006-04-05 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:40 +1000, Visser, Martin wrote: > One project that I want to kick-off in fact is a sort of quick reference > matrix that describes how a particular administrative function can be > done across the major platforms. That'd be brilliant. Happy to help in any way if it's need

Re: [SLUG] MS Exchange replacement

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 07:53 +1000, ashley maher wrote: > Morning, > Thanks to everybody who responded. Regards, Ashley -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Re: DEC Storage Works

2006-04-05 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:51:05AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > OCFS2 and GFS are supported in Ubuntu from 5.10 onwards. Nice! I believe OCFS2 made it into the standard kernel very recently; 2.6.16? Matt -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and

RE: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads (was: presidents report)

2006-04-05 Thread Visser, Martin
I guess I feel obligated to respond. I can only assume that my "naming" puts me in the basket as one of the "rude / inconsiderate / ill-informed posters". I am almost certain I have never been rude on this list (please let me know otherwise), and as I usually write a draft and think at least a lit

Re: [SLUG] MS Exchange replacement

2006-04-05 Thread Menno Schaaf
Kolab was just recently featured in the GWN (Gentoo Weekly Newsletter). Might be something worth looking at, although I don't have any experiance with it personally On 4/6/06, ashley maher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Morning, > > Clearly I phrased my first question badly. (Thanks to those who ha

Re: [SLUG] MS Exchange replacement

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> What would people use for a MS Exchange FOSS replacement? ie linux server, > outlook clients, with calendaring important. > So I've been asked "if FOSS is so good show me". Ya gotta love a > challenge. "Good" "Exchange Replacement" "FOSS" Pick any two. That's unfortunately the way it is r

Re: [SLUG] Re: DEC Storage Works

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > 3) other stuff? > > You may be able to get GFS for a really recent Debian, 2.6.9 kernel or > thereabouts. You will probably need OCFS if you want this to work on > earlier / 2.4 kernels. OCFS2 and GFS are supported in Ubuntu from 5.10 onwards. - Jeff -- GUADEC 2006: Vilanova i la GeltrĂș

[SLUG] MS Exchange replacement

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
Morning, Clearly I phrased my first question badly. (Thanks to those who have responded.) What would people use for a MS Exchange FOSS replacement? ie linux server, outlook clients, with calendaring important. A mate works in a MS based business and is having problems with their exchange server.

Re: [SLUG] shared calendaring

2006-04-05 Thread dave kempe
Peter Hardy wrote: It does shared calendaring by way of a proprietary plugin for Outlook that'll set you back around $US30 per head for a handful of licences. Less for larger volumes. i hear the vtiger plugin is free dave -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ S

Re: [SLUG] shared calendaring

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Hardy
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:38 +1000, ashley maher wrote: > At a meeting tonight I was asked about shared calendaring on linux that > plays well with outlook. At the moment I'm trialling Sugar CRM[1]. I'm using the open source release, but there's a couple of others with varying levels of features an

[SLUG] festy

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Hardy
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 22:13 +1000, Lindsay Holmwood wrote: > On 4/5/06, Craige McWhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While many SCLUG members are involved in SLUG, unfortunately it's a been > > a while (years?) since SLUG has run an install fest. Something to think > > about. > > November 2004,

Re: [SLUG] shared calendaring

2006-04-05 Thread tuxta2
Simon Males wrote: ashley maher wrote: G'day, At a meeting tonight I was asked about shared calendaring on linux that plays well with outlook. Going through the slug mailing list archives looks like this gets asked regularly. I did some googling based on previous answers. I thought worth as

[SLUG] Re: DEC Storage Works

2006-04-05 Thread Del
Slightly related, well it is multi-channel {:-), but does anyone have any experience with using a DEC Storage works array under dual linux hosts?[1] 1) can it be done? Yes. It's a filesystem issue, not specifically a host issue, although you do need to make sure that your storageworks array

DEC Storage Works Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Terry Collins
Del wrote: > e.g. to get multi-path fibre SCSI working through a SAN backend, Slightly related, well it is multi-channel {:-), but does anyone have any experience with using a DEC Storage works array under dual linux hosts?[1] 1) can it be done? 2) which distros?[2] 3) other stuff? TIA [1] f

Re: [SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Terry Collins
Jeff Waugh wrote: I can think of a few broader topics which would make *vastly* more > sense (and be less risky) than 'data centre'. Like Linux On Old/Ancient Hardware {:-) Says someone with 3 sparc, 3 Dec & 1 Axil boxen underfoot -- Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au ww

Re: [SLUG] shared calendaring

2006-04-05 Thread Simon Males
ashley maher wrote: G'day, At a meeting tonight I was asked about shared calendaring on linux that plays well with outlook. Going through the slug mailing list archives looks like this gets asked regularly. I did some googling based on previous answers. I thought worth asking again. What are

[SLUG] setting up sound card in RHEL3

2006-04-05 Thread Voytek Eymont
I've inserted an Ensoniq PCI sound crad in a RHEL3, on power up, the 'altered hardware' picked it up as Ensqniq ES1370 how can I test if I have sound support from command line ? (and, to tell me if I plugged speakers in correct jack...) dmsg has es1370: version v0.38 time 18:22:00 Oct 3 2003 PC

[Fwd: Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads]

2006-04-05 Thread Ken Wilson
My experience when I first attended SLUG after a Redhat 7.2 install with problems with my cd burner was to be told by someone that we are mostly Debian users here. I went away and didnt come back for a couple of years, tried various distros RHEL3, Mandrake, Xandros, then changed hardware and picke

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Scott Sinclair
Craige McWhirter wrote: While many SCLUG members are involved in SLUG, unfortunately it's a been a while (years?) since SLUG has run an install fest. Something to think about. At the AGM last month, it was brought up the idea of not having installfests as such, but instead 'deckfests' [1], wh

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Ken Wilson
there was a redhat users group that got in touch and were encouraged to become a sig if they wanted last year Ken James Purser wrote: In keeping with the current discussion, a thought occurs. As I understand it, there is a SLUG Debian Special Interest Group, for those who either use or develop

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Lindsay Holmwood
On 4/5/06, Craige McWhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While many SCLUG members are involved in SLUG, unfortunately it's a been > a while (years?) since SLUG has run an install fest. Something to think > about. November 2004, admittantly. We found that the last few Installfests we ran were attra

[SLUG] shared calendaring

2006-04-05 Thread ashley maher
G'day, At a meeting tonight I was asked about shared calendaring on linux that plays well with outlook. Going through the slug mailing list archives looks like this gets asked regularly. I did some googling based on previous answers. I thought worth asking again. What are people using at the mom

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads - Genuine question.

2006-04-05 Thread CaT
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:54:56PM +1000, Ben Donohue wrote: > Does a Debian distro have auto updates such as Red Hat? You can use cron-apt if I understand you. > However I'm willing to give it another go. Is there a way to easily > patch it up to date? > I'm talking about point and click type o

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads - Genuine question.

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Does a Debian distro have auto updates such as Red Hat? > I use CentOS where I can update the packages very easily. > I tried Debian once but the install was too hard at the time. > However I'm willing to give it another go. Is there a way to easily > patch it up to date? > I'm talking about p

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads - Genuine question.

2006-04-05 Thread Ben Donohue
Does a Debian distro have auto updates such as Red Hat? I use CentOS where I can update the packages very easily. I tried Debian once but the install was too hard at the time. However I'm willing to give it another go. Is there a way to easily patch it up to date? I'm talking about point and cli

[SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:58:00PM +1000, Craige McWhirter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:06 +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > > > The first was incredibly successful > > > The third, which was run just a few weeks ago, was apparently > > a raging success as well > > I was at one and three. Both

Re: [SLUG] Voice to text

2006-04-05 Thread Ben Donohue
Heh, once one of my team was asked how to do voice to text. The reply was "play it and be ready with a notepad and a pencil." Ben -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads (was: presidents report)

2006-04-05 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:58 +1000, Del wrote: > * Craige McWhirter (responding to a post about RHCE exams by saying >"or even better, do the LPI[1] exams". For the sake of issue separation, it's a bit of stretch to bring in my preference for vendor neutral qualifications as anti-RedHat sent

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:06 +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > The first was incredibly successful > The third, which was run just a few weeks ago, was apparently > a raging success as well I was at one and three. Both were great. The third one, held a few weekends ago, was the best install fest I've

Re: [SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Chubb
> "del" == del <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: del> To take another Dean Hamstead thread back to the list: >> If you have problems with you SAN drivers in redhat, perhaps you >> should be calling redhat or your vendor - not asking on slug. del> (a) SLUG stands for "Sydney Linux Users Group". I

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Dean Hamstead wrote: > Im only replying to this email as i was mentioned in it. > > May i start of by saying that i do agree with dels comments that > some people really aren't interested in assisting with non-debian > concerns. I'm a Debian and Ubuntu user. Its been many years since I last used

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I'm in. Where do we start? Mailing list? Pub meet? Figure out a venue (JSBH isn't so hospitable anymore), and send an announce to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can probably get venue tips from the other SIG organisers, who have been looking for places. - Jeff -- GUADEC 2006: Vilanova i la GeltrĂș

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Del
James Purser wrote: In keeping with the current discussion, a thought occurs. As I understand it, there is a SLUG Debian Special Interest Group, for those who either use or develop for Debian. Could not something similar be setup for FC/RH users? I'm in. Where do we start? Mailing list? Pub

Re: [SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Del wrote: >So (in the interests of improving SLUG) perhaps it's time for a data >centers mailing list @slug.org.au -- keep it vendor neutral and get >some of the folks working in the larger data centers involved. A possible >new source of SLUG members, and maybe some

Re: [SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Del
Jeff Waugh wrote: So (in the interests of improving SLUG) perhaps it's time for a data centers mailing list @slug.org.au I think that's an extremely awkward 'first topic split' for SLUG. It was a tough call to split off the chat list a few years back, but ultimately I think that was success

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> In keeping with the current discussion, a thought occurs. As I understand > it, there is a SLUG Debian Special Interest Group, for those who either > use or develop for Debian. Could not something similar be setup for FC/RH > users? Absolutely - but no one's done the work (cf. Matt's post). :-

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread James Purser
In keeping with the current discussion, a thought occurs. As I understand it, there is a SLUG Debian Special Interest Group, for those who either use or develop for Debian. Could not something similar be setup for FC/RH users? -- James Purser Producer/Presenter - Linux Australia Update http://k-si

Re: [SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> So (in the interests of improving SLUG) perhaps it's time for a data > centers mailing list @slug.org.au I think that's an extremely awkward 'first topic split' for SLUG. It was a tough call to split off the chat list a few years back, but ultimately I think that was successful. If we were to

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Del
You're not the last RH user nor sysadmin on the list :) Glad to hear it. :) -- Del -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > neutral. It is perceived SLUG is driven by self-interest. There are > > Self-interest (enlightened, if possible) is the best driver there is. > Pure selflessness isn't really in vogue any more, and I don't think it > works really well without an external influence to keep your focused > anyw

[SLUG] data centers

2006-04-05 Thread Del
To take another Dean Hamstead thread back to the list: If you have problems with you SAN drivers in redhat, perhaps you should be calling redhat or your vendor - not asking on slug. (a) SLUG stands for "Sydney Linux Users Group". I don't see anything in the title that implies "Sydney Linux n

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread John Clarke
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:25:58 +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Del wrote: > > > >>re-inventing the wheel. further, one asks another flame-bait question - > >>are there actually really savy redhat users? on this list? > > > >Yes. Me. (I think I'm the last one who ha

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Del wrote: > >>re-inventing the wheel. further, one asks another flame-bait question - >>are there actually really savy redhat users? on this list? > >Yes. Me. (I think I'm the last one who hasn't been scared off -- I >certainly know other experienced Red Hat users a

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Dean Hamstead wrote: >we debian users can be quite elitist. "Dean Hamstead does not represent myself nor the Debian project." >of the q&a's seem to be very low level. thus, it may be that many of the >more advanced users see recommending debian as a way of skipping o

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread James Purser
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:06 +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:22:52PM +1000, Grant Parnell wrote: > > Ashley Maher organised a CodeFest and had an installfest. Unfortunately > > the Installfest didn't get the numbers for success at UOW but the point is > > he tried! > > Just

[SLUG] Re: 2006-2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Matt Palmer
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:22:52PM +1000, Grant Parnell wrote: > Ashley Maher organised a CodeFest and had an installfest. Unfortunately > the Installfest didn't get the numbers for success at UOW but the point is > he tried! Just to clarify here -- there have been three installfests at UoW that

[SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Matt Palmer
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:55:19PM +1000, Philip Greggs wrote: > >SLUG server being offline for a few extended outages due to > >hardware issues which thankfully have now been sorted recently > >by removing hardware from the equation - ie it's now on a > >virtual server. > > I check SLUG web site

Re: [SLUG] debian vs FC threads

2006-04-05 Thread Del
re-inventing the wheel. further, one asks another flame-bait question - are there actually really savy redhat users? on this list? Yes. Me. (I think I'm the last one who hasn't been scared off -- I certainly know other experienced Red Hat users and systems admins who won't have anything to d