On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, "Morgan Storey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a DSL-502T that I am just running as the router too
I have avoided D-Link hardware for about five years now. My experiences back
then included failure-prone products, long telephone tech support queues (4
hours plus, I kid y
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:43:56PM +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
> I call shenanigans!
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 16:22 +1100, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> > Don't stop there!
> >
> > You probably mean bits not b(ytes) and mebi not mega,
> > so it's
> > 108 Mibit/s
>
> 1) It's mibi not mebi.
I don'
Glen Turner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 17:43 +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
Pete, who measures his traffic in gross nybbles to reduce confusion.
Is that 4-bit IBM nybbles or 6-bit DEC nybbles?
6-bit DEC nybbles? never.
cheers
rickw
--
___
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 17:43 +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
> Pete, who measures his traffic in gross nybbles to reduce confusion.
Is that 4-bit IBM nybbles or 6-bit DEC nybbles?
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/
I call shenanigans!
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 16:22 +1100, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> Don't stop there!
>
> You probably mean bits not b(ytes) and mebi not mega,
> so it's
> 108 Mibit/s
1) It's mibi not mebi.
2) The same standard that defines mibi- as a prefix (IEEE 1541 [1])
specifies that b is
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 09:42 +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:11 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Can anybody recommend an ADSL modem that does up to an including
> > ADSL2+, is Linux friendly and easy to set up in bridging or half
> > bridging mode? It would also be nice i
Don't stop there!
You probably mean bits not b(ytes) and mebi not mega,
so it's
108 Mibit/s
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_rate_units
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:50:54PM +1100, xorprime wrote:
> Oh well, make it Mb/s then ;-)
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Peter Miller <[EMAIL
Oh well, make it Mb/s then ;-)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:52 +1100, xorprime wrote:
> > 108mb wifi
>
>
> Wow, 0.108 bits per second, isn't that a bit slow? I thought only
> military submarines used that? Perhaps you meant
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:52 +1100, xorprime wrote:
> 108mb wifi
Wow, 0.108 bits per second, isn't that a bit slow? I thought only
military submarines used that? Perhaps you meant 108Mb/s.
Regards
Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/\/\*http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/
PGP public key I
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:52:21AM +1100, xorprime ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Try TP-Link ADSL 2+ Modem
> http://www.tp-link.com/products/product_des.asp?id=111
>
> It's cheap but you need to use an atheros superG cards on the client side to
> use the proprietary 108mb wifi but it's compatible w
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 08:43:44AM +1100, Morgan Storey ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I have a DSL-502T that I am just running as the router too, it is only about
> 6 months old, it works fine with all the linux clients in my place too. It
> isn't doing dhcp or DNS though as these are handled elsew
Try TP-Link ADSL 2+ Modem
http://www.tp-link.com/products/product_des.asp?id=111
It's cheap but you need to use an atheros superG cards on the client side to
use the proprietary 108mb wifi but it's compatible with B and G and works
like a charm in firefox and has bridging
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at
I have a DSL-502T that I am just running as the router too, it is only about
6 months old, it works fine with all the linux clients in my place too. It
isn't doing dhcp or DNS though as these are handled elsewhere.
AFAIK the DSL-502T is running linux. I have had some issues with the latest
firmwar
Hey hey.
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:11 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Can anybody recommend an ADSL modem that does up to an including
> ADSL2+, is Linux friendly and easy to set up in bridging or half
> bridging mode? It would also be nice if the adminstrative functions
> were still accessible
On 28/02/2008, Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been banging my head against my adsl modem and I wondering if it
> might not just be easier/cheaper to replace it with something better.
> Can anybody recommend an ADSL modem that does up to an including
> ADSL2+, is Linux fri
Hi all,
I've been banging my head against my adsl modem and I wondering if it
might not just be easier/cheaper to replace it with something better.
Can anybody recommend an ADSL modem that does up to an including
ADSL2+, is Linux friendly and easy to set up in bridging or half
bridging mode? It w
Excerpts from Erik de Castro Lopo's message of Thu Feb 28 00:13:17 +1100 2008:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up my adsl modem in half bridge mode and its
> almost working. The problem is that when it comes up it doesn't
> set the default route. I have successfully set it manually, but
> I can't
Is this the Linksys AM300?
I found it a big buggy in this mode. Not sure what the problem is, but
it doesn't work every time for some reason. Make sure you have the
latest firmware.
We have given up on half-bridge mode with many of these modems.
dave
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm t
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up my adsl modem in half bridge mode and its
almost working. The problem is that when it comes up it doesn't
set the default route. I have successfully set it manually, but
I can't figure out how to make if automatic.
Anyone have any clues?
Cheers,
Erik
--
Hi
recent discussion was about /etc/hosts to have the name for a local machine
rather than the complexity of DNS views.
[IE a local machine reffering to a www page 'virtual-hosted' to a local
machine gets the modem setup page, not the intended page]
If you do not use views then EVERY machine has
This one time, at band camp, DaZZa wrote:
>OK, so who, in your opinion, for which I will not hold you responsible if
>I'm silly enough to listen to {:-)}, *is* a good place to do on-line orb
>lookups?
We use the following list. Use spamcop at your own discretion, we have
had to disable it for var
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > OK, so who, in your opinion, for which I will not hold you responsible if
> > I'm silly enough to listen to {:-)}, *is* a good place to do on-line orb
> > lookups?
>
> Ah, now that's much harder. Your decision should be driven by your users
> requiremen
> OK, so who, in your opinion, for which I will not hold you responsible if
> I'm silly enough to listen to {:-)}, *is* a good place to do on-line orb
> lookups?
Ah, now that's much harder. Your decision should be driven by your users
requirements and policies more than anything else. Go to open
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > > Unfortunately, so are SORBS.
> > Care to elaborate?
> > If sorbs are that bad, I'll stop using them if someone can give me a
> > balanced argument as to WHY they're bad.
>
> First off, their methods and policies for adding and keeping IP addresses
> (
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:35:05 +1100 (EST)
DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Care to elaborate?
>
> If sorbs are that bad, I'll stop using them if someone can give me a
> balanced argument as to WHY they're bad.
OK, here is a bounce that I got:
Connected to 208.137.128.6 but sender was reject
> > Unfortunately, so are SORBS.
>
> Care to elaborate?
>
> If sorbs are that bad, I'll stop using them if someone can give me a
> balanced argument as to WHY they're bad.
First off, their methods and policies for adding and keeping IP addresses
(but usually whole blocks) are pretty shonky. Bo
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > Telstra currently have a number of their mail servers listed
> > in the SORBS database:
> > https://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup
> > Telstra are beyond clueless and I advise anyone to stay well away
> > from them.
>
> Unfortunately, so are
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Telstra currently have a number of their mail servers listed
> in the SORBS database:
>
> https://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup
And not just the cable ones either - a good percentage of their mail
servers that permanently connected busi
Kanwar,
I'm with telstra, they provided me with an "Alcatel Speed Touch Pro", which I used windows and their supplied cd to setup.
Then told linux it had a new gateway.
5 min including rebooting.
I also have here the "Netcom nb1300" and the "Billion bipac-714 ge v2.0"
I'd recommend the billion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:21 am, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Telstra currently have a number of their mail servers listed
> > in the SORBS database:
> >
> > https://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup
> >
> > Telstra are beyond clueless and I advise a
> Telstra currently have a number of their mail servers listed
> in the SORBS database:
>
> https://www.dnsbl.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup
> Telstra are beyond clueless and I advise anyone to stay well away
> from them.
Unfortunately, so are SORBS.
- Jeff
--
GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, N
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:23:32 +1100 (EST)
Kanwar Plaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the modem that ISPs provide by default as
> part of their promos?
Different ISPs provide different modems.
> For instance, i am about to
> install ADSL broadband from Telstra ...
My experiences with B
> What about the modem that ISPs provide by default as
> part of their promos? For instance, i am about to
> install ADSL broadband from Telstra ... does anyone
> know what modem they provide? Then I can get cracking
> at researching if/how it works with Linux.
>
Alcatel don't they?
--
SLUG -
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] ADSL modem recommendations?
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:13:13 +1100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Chris Deigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> quote("Erik de Castro Lopo");
> >I'm about to move from cable broadband to ADSL and
> the
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 08:56:23 +1100
Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI all,
>
> I'm about to move from cable broadband to ADSL and the ISP I
> have chosen allows me to choose my own modem instead of the
> one the supply (Netcomm NB1300). I've heard of some problems
> with the NB130
Chris Deigan wrote:
quote("Erik de Castro Lopo");
I'm about to move from cable broadband to ADSL and the ISP I
have chosen allows me to choose my own modem instead of the
one the supply (Netcomm NB1300). I've heard of some problems
with the NB1300 so I'm looking at alternatives.
Anyone have any re
> I have a D-Link DSL-300+ which works fairly well (besides bad
> internal security which is easily fixed with iptables)
>
> I've also heard good things about Billion (which are on the
> cheaper side)
I have a Billion and I must say it works great, as compared to the last
2 modems I had in the
quote("Erik de Castro Lopo");
>I'm about to move from cable broadband to ADSL and the ISP I
>have chosen allows me to choose my own modem instead of the
>one the supply (Netcomm NB1300). I've heard of some problems
>with the NB1300 so I'm looking at alternatives.
>
>Anyone have any recommendations?
Dlink 504/604 firewall, 4 port hub, NAT, DHCP + more
Depending on wireless or not.
Just plug the cables in and off you go.
Has web/telnet/serial connections for
setup if needed and config.
I have been using mine for about 8mths with no
problems.
If I have one complaint it has a noisy transfor
HI all,
I'm about to move from cable broadband to ADSL and the ISP I
have chosen allows me to choose my own modem instead of the
one the supply (Netcomm NB1300). I've heard of some problems
with the NB1300 so I'm looking at alternatives.
Anyone have any recommendations?
TIA,
Erik
--
+--
Richard Hayes wrote:
>
> Dear List,
>
> Has anyone had any experiences with the Netcomm NB3300 modem router or
> Billion 643 or other equivalents.
Yes, NB3300
Very nice and easy to set up. Does a while pile of stuff, but has one
major flaw.
It is web configurable only and the web config only w
Morning!
My D-Link DSL-500 has blown up. The phone line registers, but the ethernet
side of it has gone AWOL.
I'm looking to find a second hand ADSL modem today. Any ideas, or offers?
Thanks,
Nick
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/li
Dear List,
Has anyone had any experiences with the Netcomm NB3300 modem router or
Billion 643 or other equivalents.
Thanks in advance.
Richard Hayes
Nada Marketing - Australia & UK
2/713 Pacific Hwy Gordon Australia 2072
Ph +(61-2) 9418 4545 Fax +(61-2) 9418 4348 Mob +(61) 0414 618 425
ww
Alexander Samad wrote:
>
> I am a swiftel user, haven't had a problem as of yet, apart from the mtu
> problem but thats life.
That was caused by Telstra changing the MTU.
As have all (but 1) problems I'v had with Swiftel adsl in the last two
months.
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at
let me read the question again
netcomm 1300, bridging and router and 1/2 bridge for the lazy, not a
problem with it either, got it from swiftel.
I don;t work for either company
2c
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:25:51AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> I am a swiftel user, haven't had a problem as of
I am a swiftel user, haven't had a problem as of yet, apart from the mtu
problem but thats life.
Cheap and reliable
my 2c
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:08:20PM +1000, Jon Biddell wrote:
> -=> I'm shortly to move house, and I'll be able to gain
> -=> access to ADSL (once
> -=> I get Telstra to l
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:06:58PM -0700, Bill wrote:
> I won't be going with BigPond, but will select an ISP with more reasonable
> download limits.
Internode works well to me. http://adsl.internode.on.net/.
> Any recemmendations/experiences with ADSL modems will be appreciated.
I use a D-lin
Hi,
I'm shortly to move house, and I'll be able to gain access to ADSL (once
I get Telstra to lay the 'phone cables - 7 + weeks to date), so I'm
interested in info re suitable recommended modems.
I won't be going with BigPond, but will select an ISP with more reasonable
download limits.
Any
-=> I'm shortly to move house, and I'll be able to gain
-=> access to ADSL (once
-=> I get Telstra to lay the 'phone cables - 7 + weeks to date), so I'm
-=> interested in info re suitable recommended modems.
Gee, 7 weeks It's taken me 4.5 YEARS so far...:-(
-=>
-=> I won't be going with
Alexander Samad wrote:
>
> let me read the question again
>
> netcomm 1300, bridging and router and 1/2 bridge for the lazy, not a
> problem with it either, got it from swiftel.
Netcomm NB3300 ADSL modem router, again from Swiftel. It actually comes
direct from Swiftel. PS if you go Swiftel, get
I have a billion ASSL Modem,
www.ausadsl.info
It's a firewall, USB, Ethernet and the cheapest I beleive
still .. not if that doesn't sell you, well ..
I have had no problems with it and found out the other
day by poking around that
you can replace it's web based admin via the built in FTP
serv
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 12:06, Bill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm shortly to move house, and I'll be able to gain access to ADSL (once
> I get Telstra to lay the 'phone cables - 7 + weeks to date), so I'm
> interested in info re suitable recommended modems.
I'd suggest checking the archives for the SLUG
Bill wrote:
> I'm shortly to move house, and I'll be able to gain access to ADSL (once
>I get Telstra to lay the 'phone cables - 7 + weeks to date), so I'm
>interested in info re suitable recommended modems.
>
>I won't be going with BigPond, but will select an ISP with more reasonable
>download
Quoting Holroyd Engineering Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm thinking of getting adsl. Would like to know whether there is an
> internal
> adsl modem that linux supports.
>
> Ta
*nods*
www.traverse.com.au sell PCI internal adsl modems.
Thanks
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://sl
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:30:01 +1000
"Holroyd Engineering Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking of getting adsl. Would like to know whether there is an internal
> adsl modem that linux supports.
I use an external which plugs into a nic
Kevin
--
Please avoid sending me Word or Power
I'm thinking of getting adsl. Would like to know whether there is an internal
adsl modem that linux supports.
Ta
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
I've found the Alcatel Speed Touch ADSL modems, and the Cisco (800
series, IIRC) to be fairly reliable.
The main area where I find you should really spend some money is on the
router at your end of the connection: either a good Linux machine
running IPRoute 2, or proper Intel / Cisco gear. Netge
Brad, Edwin,
Thankyou both for your emphatic replies. You seem to both be in
agreement about the internal D-Link and Edwin has doubts about the
Dynalink as well.
So, what external device would I get?
The D-Link DSL-300 ADSL Ethernet Modem (approx $300) is one possibility
which seems common
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 19:46, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>
You forgot the trailing slash. You'll never validate as strict XML that
way :P
Mike
>
> > I have a D-link DSL-300 as my gateway on a RH7.3 box serving lan and
> > wlan:). It works flawlessley. I'm connected to Internode who are very
>
> Wh
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> > I have a D-link DSL-300 as my gateway on a RH7.3 box serving lan and
> > wlan:). It works flawlessley. I'm connected to Internode who are very
>
> Which is an external DSL modem, and IMHE seem to work fine... it's just the
> internal ones (like
> I have a D-link DSL-300 as my gateway on a RH7.3 box serving lan and
> wlan:). It works flawlessley. I'm connected to Internode who are very
Which is an external DSL modem, and IMHE seem to work fine... it's just the
internal ones (like winmodems) that one needs to really watch for?
J.
--
I have a D-link DSL-300 as my gateway on a RH7.3 box serving lan and
wlan:). It works flawlessley. I'm connected to Internode who are very
good from a service perspective. They are also bringing out some new
plans that may incorporate speed shaping or similar so you don't get a
000's dollar bi
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:34:58AM +1000, Brad Thomson wrote:
> I'd also be interested in hearing from anyone who's gotten one of these
> cards working in a stable manner.
>
Unless you are planning to use them under windows I would have to say
don't touch them. We used to use them on our servers
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 02:30, Brendan Dacre wrote:
> Gentlepeople,
>
> For one reason or another I have decided rather ahead of my planned
> schedule to go broadband (probably iiNet, comments...).
>
> I was planning to get a D-Link DSL-100D PCI internal ADSL modem which I
> can pick up for abou
o Julienne
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Brendan Dacre
> Sent: Sunday, 22 September 2002 2:30 AM
> To: Sydney Linux Users Group
> Subject: [SLUG] ADSL modem
>
>
> Gentlepeople,
>
> For one reaso
Gentlepeople,
For one reason or another I have decided rather ahead of my planned
schedule to go broadband (probably iiNet, comments...).
I was planning to get a D-Link DSL-100D PCI internal ADSL modem which I
can pick up for about $170.
Is this a good choice and does it work with linux and m
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:49:51AM +1000, Edwin Humphries wrote:
> We're building a system which serves, amongst other things, as an ADSL router.
>
> For cost and simplicity reasons, we want to use an internal ADSL modem; both the
>internal ADSL
> modems available to us (Dynalink and D-Link) u
We're building a system which serves, amongst other things, as an ADSL router.
For cost and simplicity reasons, we want to use an internal ADSL modem; both the
internal ADSL
modems available to us (Dynalink and D-Link) use, as far as we can tell, a Rockwell
chipset. The
only drivers availabl
http://telstra.com/ServiceStatus/Recent.asp make this your default homepage
for a while, allthough it seems to slowly be improving.
> Hi,
>
> The good point about the Cisco is that you can start the ppp connection on
> the router itself (pppoA client), you can use as well NAT and firewalling
> i
Hi,
The good point about the Cisco is that you can start the ppp connection on
the router itself (pppoA client), you can use as well NAT and firewalling
image (which give you as well a good value firewall and access to real
Tech support trough the cisco TAC which is pretty good). This is the adde
Unbiased view -
It all depends on what you want to pay. The Cisco 827 is a nice little router, is
simple to setup, has a stack of features and will work stand-alone, but if you want to
keep costs down then run a Linux box with PPPoE to a ADSL modem.
Your carrier will probably give you the op
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:27:55AM +1000, Michael Sztachanski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi guys,
[snip]
> So to cut a long story short my client paid $600 for the modem as
> apposed to $1500 for the router. I couldn't see the point of the router
> if my linux boxes do it all for anyway!!!
Hi guys,
Have a number of clients running via D-Link ADSL modems (PPPoe) and
Telstra Equipment at exchange, there has been a few outages but only in
early morning so that hasn't affected anyone, apart from that the links
have been running smoothly.
I initally went with Telsta as the sites all
Hi there Jobst,
I've got a customer with that option (router). North Sydney with
connect.com.
I agree it's a waste of money, but I will say, their ADSL link has been
down twice in four months.
I put it down to the fact that connect have their own equipment and
aren't using Telstra's.
I use
74 matches
Mail list logo
