Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Fitch
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:12:56PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > yes that's all fine (and I agree it is unusual on optus' part!) > > It's *NOT* unusual on Optus' part - perhaps you're used to my common > sarcasm, but this is exactly what Optus *should* be doing. Good on them. Now > they can get th

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-11 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I can set Sender: in .muttrc but that's not how the > email appears when it comes back and I can't set From (no colon) > at all (they're the 2 I'm talking about). You're answering stuff before reading the rest of the email, aren't you? :) > > Because spiral is not a recognised host, OptusNet

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Fitch
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:34:23PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > Okay, I'll answer all these bits separately... > > > ok thanks, folder-hook is the one, but... > > I've had to stop postfix setting the From/Sender header (was set > > in the canonical file) but mutt doesn't seem to set those fields. >

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Jeff Waugh
> And for some reason, my reply-to address broke in that last mail; good > ol' finagles law. Haha. Willow. That's one of my machine's names. (I think we've been through this before.) Only, now it's a Windows machine. It too is poopie. Anyway, yes, I was going to mention that it's easier in exi

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jamie Wilkinson said: >Exim reads this file, and mangles outgoing mail accordingly, so all my >messages which would have gone out as jaq@willow go out as you would >expect them to. And for some reason, my reply-to address broke in that last mail; good ol' finagles law

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said: >If you do that, all of your mail will be sent out with the envelope set to >your isp's hostname, and with postfix, it means that everything will be >rewritten thus. Think... root@spiral -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not good. Thinking laterally; exim has an /

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Jeff Waugh
Okay, I'll answer all these bits separately... > ok thanks, folder-hook is the one, but... > I've had to stop postfix setting the From/Sender header (was set > in the canonical file) but mutt doesn't seem to set those fields. Indeed it does. :) > My .muttrc has (ignoring the folder-hook bit f

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Fitch
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 05:52:00PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > while there's a spate of mutt questions... > > how can I set a different outgoing email address for > > different mailing lists? > > folder-hook or send-hook as appropriate. ok thanks, folder-hook is the one, but... I've had to s

Re: [SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-09 Thread Jeff Waugh
> while there's a spate of mutt questions... > how can I set a different outgoing email address for > different mailing lists? folder-hook or send-hook as appropriate. - Jeff -- It makes perfect sense. If you're a narcissistic arsehole spawned from a curdl

[SLUG] different from address for different lists?

2001-05-09 Thread Dave Fitch
while there's a spate of mutt questions... how can I set a different outgoing email address for different mailing lists? I use mutt and have each list in a different mail file. Mutt supposedly sets my "From:" address and other headers (like Reply-To: etc) but postfix writes a "From" header (set i