Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Thomas Helzle
Poor guy that Joe Alter person. I still have the dongle for the initial Shave and a Haircut for Lightwave on the shelf. It never really worked properly and when Softimage bought into it, he showed all the Lightwave users who did the endless beta-testing of his broken code the highly raised middle

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Dan Yargici
Wow, he comes across as such an arsehole! I didn't realize he sued Disney for technology relating to Tangled also! http://patentexaminer.org/2011/10/disney-sued-for-infringing-virtual-hair-raising-patent/ The Westlake Village resident claims Disney “reverse engineered” his technology, tweaking

Re: This is a growing problem in the VFX industry.

2012-04-29 Thread John Richard Sanchez
I am so glad they are going cage free! http://2dayinanimation.com/news/big-studios-promise-to-start-making-films-with-cage-free-animators/ On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Fabian Schnuer Gohde list@schnuer.comwrote: By all accounts there would be many women along the European cost lines at

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread peter_b
Somehow I dont think Disney could have managed Rapunzels hair with 14 points per guide hair, nor the crappy collisions© But try and explain that to a copyright attorney. I wonder how: long till he sues Softimage for ICE strands? From: Dan Yargici Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 4:14 PM To:

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Juhani Karlsson
Ok, never knew he was that lame. 2012/4/29 pete...@skynet.be Somehow I dont think Disney could have managed Rapunzels hair with 14 points per guide hair, nor the crappy collisions© But try and explain that to a copyright attorney. I wonder how: long till he sues Softimage for ICE

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Eric Lampi
Sounds like he's within his rights to protect his property, and you're not going to beat a corporation like Disney by being Mr. Nice-guy. I think it's important to protect the small developer who's taken it to the point where they have a tool that people will pay for. Thiago, Helge, Holger, Eric

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Steven Caron
he is certainly with in his rights to do so, but then one could argue the issues we have today with patents. joe's patent is actually causing other small developers grief. yeti by peregrine labs has chosen not to sell its product in the US. there are other plugins, ornatrix and hairfarm which are

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Dan Yargici
OK, I appreciate that, I was careful to say he comes across as an asshole, not that he is. I'm still undecided really. Still though... “It’s a giant corporation that’s made a lot of money with my ideas and is now going to put me out of business, essentially,” ...sounds pretty trite if you ask

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Raffaele Fragapane
Actually, and sadly, it will. When you consider the average customer, who definitely doesn't follow the CGI news as much as we might, nor would care about this if he did, and how few products there are for this specific problem (for maya it's shave, and yeti, and that's about it), every license of

Re: Nodes galore II (not ICE)

2012-04-29 Thread Luc-Eric Rousseau
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ed Manning etmth...@gmail.com wrote: Now I'm no lawyer (do we have any on the list? would that be a good thing or not?) but I'm pretty sure that once he'd reached a settlement with Disney, he *obligated* himself, under the hurtful and dated system (how right