Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sebastien
Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 3:56 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Maurice, did you see the CAD
: Luc-Eric Rousseau [luceri...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 April 2014 08:04 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
it's interesting blog but I don't think that guy is saying anything that
would suggest Softimage is doing any better... (if you read the bit about
rigging having
: 01 April 2014 08:04 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
it's interesting blog but I don't think that guy is saying anything that
would suggest Softimage is doing any better... (if you read the bit about
rigging having not evolved)...
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014
This guy has a point.
MB
Den 31. marts 2014 kl. 16:17 skrev Saeed Kalhor ndman...@gmail.com:
When in a production environment, I don't care how the tool works under
the hood, I just want to get into the driver's seat, strap in, and hit the
gas . Barry Zundel
This is what Autodesk
... Red this very quickly, because it upsets me every 4 words.
Frankly, the guy who is way too smart or to arty for those complex 3d
software, should just buy a pen...
Remember me some Texas Lightwave/NT communication from back in the day.
Le 01/04/2014 11:40, Morten Bartholdy a écrit :
I think he is quite right in his assertion, what was hurting you Olivier ?
On 1 April 2014 16:29, olivier jeannel olivier.jean...@noos.fr wrote:
... Red this very quickly, because it upsets me every 4 words.
Frankly, the guy who is way too smart or to arty for those complex 3d
software,
Well from my experience, you can't ignore what's under the hood and get
into blablabla...
That would be a little too easy.
We're technical artist, some are more techy, some are more arty. But
nobody jumps into the driver seat.
Le 01/04/2014 18:39, Sebastien Sterling a écrit :
I think he
...And obviously he never drove a Ferrari.
Le 01/04/2014 18:55, olivier jeannel a écrit :
Well from my experience, you can't ignore what's under the hood and
get into blablabla...
That would be a little too easy.
We're technical artist, some are more techy, some are more arty. But
nobody
. It enabled
both he novice and the professional to do amazing things out the box.
From: Sebastien Sterling [sebastien.sterl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 April 2014 06:39 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
I think he is quite right in his assertion, what was hurting you
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: A Good Read!
I think he is quite right in his assertion, what was hurting you Olivier ?
On 1 April 2014 16:29, olivier jeannel olivier.jean...@noos.fr
mailto:olivier.jean...@noos.fr wrote:
... Red this very quickly, because it upsets me every 4
it's interesting blog but I don't think that guy is saying anything that
would suggest Softimage is doing any better... (if you read the bit about
rigging having not evolved)...
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Angus Davidson angus.david...@wits.ac.zawrote:
I think the original author does
I think the author point was that a lot of 3D programs doesn't give
usability enough attention as they should.
I totally agree with the ZBrush thing. It is a wonderful tool but the UI
and usability in general could be better. I remember It took me a while to
understand what are tools and scenes.
both he novice and the professional to do amazing things out the
box.
*From:* Sebastien Sterling [sebastien.sterl...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 01 April 2014 06:39 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: A Good Read!
I think he is quite right in his assertion, what was hurting
...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 01 April 2014 06:39 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: A Good Read!
I think he is quite right in his assertion, what was hurting you
Olivier ?
On 1 April 2014 16:29, olivier jeannel olivier.jean
Rousseau [luceri...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 April 2014 08:04 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
it's interesting blog but I don't think that guy is saying anything that would
suggest Softimage is doing any better... (if you read the bit about rigging
having not evolved
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Here is a better race related analogy
You are a race car driver, you've spent a career diligently homing your skills
and natural talent, you know instinctively how to calculate angles, torque,
speed, drifting, terrain, weather, pressure
you can read other
Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sebastien Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:25 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Here is a better race related analogy
: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sebastien Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:25 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Here is a better race related analogy
You are a race
Is that AD internal assumptions or have you ever approached your customers with
the idea of a bug/usability fix upgrade? Honestly?
Andy
On Apr 01, 2014, at 21:39, Maurice Patel maurice.pa...@autodesk.com wrote:
While everyone will argue that stability and usability are important they
don't
They did it for SI 2013, and apparently to some extent for max this year,
and people kicked up shit cause those releases where feature light, and
they where quite right to do so.
The thing is Fixing bugs and workflow are things that should really be
addressed incrementally, not just left to build
Hey Seb and Andy, am fairly certain that Maurice here in this instance
is not representing Autodesk and the really large IMO he started with
means quite clearly 'in my opinion' :) I get what you are saying,
but had enough AD bashing for now, 'fish in a barrel'... this thread
was just getting
Hey Marcel, Sebastien and Rob,
it was sincere question, I didn’t intend to offend.
I guess it comes down to customer relation and communication, both of which
have been talk about enough already.
That sentence I replied to just triggered a button.
Sorry,
Andy
On Apr 01, 2014, at 22:51, Rob
Sorry for lashing out of control.
On 1 April 2014 21:51, Rob Chapman tekano@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Seb and Andy, am fairly certain that Maurice here in this instance
is not representing Autodesk and the really large IMO he started with
means quite clearly 'in my opinion' :) I get what
Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:25 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.commailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Here is a better race related analogy
You are a race car driver, you've spent a career diligently homing your skills
and natural talent, you know
: Tél: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sebastien Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 3:56 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Maurice, did you see the CAD Junky Zen slim UI
Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sebastien
Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 3:56 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: A Good Read!
Maurice, did you see the CAD
This is good too:
http://barryzundel.blogspot.de/2013/10/workflow-workflow-workflow-its-all.html
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Saeed Kalhor ndman...@gmail.com wrote:
*When in a production environment, I don't care how the tool works under
the hood, I just want to get into the driver's
27 matches
Mail list logo
