: There you go. clear as mud!
: As I see it, we either call a new community poll -- nothing in the rules says
: we can't. or vote on:
FWIW: My opinion hasn't really changed since i said...
>> committers should cast their votes as they feel appropriate to best
>> serve the interests of the co
I added some more math to the script I used to generate the results
page... and what do you know: no official winner by any of the
methods! (assuming my math is correct)
check:
http://people.apache.org/~ryan/solr-logo-results.html
for a variety of attempts.
The problem with the STV method
On 10-Dec-08, at 12:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Sure thing.
I take it that there are no objections? If so, I'll call a vote by
the end
of the week.
+1
I just wish we had used this method with the community vote.
I guess as a committer I should try and figure out what order the
community
On Dec 10, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 8-Dec-08, at 10:47 AM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 7-Dec-08, at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote
(i.e.,
S
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8-Dec-08, at 10:47 AM, Mike Klaas wrote:
>
>> On 7-Dec-08, at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> : I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote (i.e.,
>>> STV).
>>>
>>> Ah... yeah, that seems like
On 8-Dec-08, at 10:47 AM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 7-Dec-08, at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote
(i.e., STV).
Ah... yeah, that seems like it would be a more fair way to deal with
things then my suggestion, and it doesn't violate
On 7-Dec-08, at 7:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote
(i.e., STV).
Ah... yeah, that seems like it would be a more fair way to deal with
things then my suggestion, and it doesn't violate the spirt of the
rules as original outlined (it
: I would personally prefer more of an "elimination"-style vote (i.e., STV).
Ah... yeah, that seems like it would be a more fair way to deal with
things then my suggestion, and it doesn't violate the spirt of the
rules as original outlined (it's still a vote of ranked preferences). Are
you vo
On 4-Dec-08, at 2:33 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Being the likely two candidates for winning. My guess is that
: narrowing to the two most popular options first would make #2 the
: winner, while voting on the top 10 (w/o any strategy for winning)
: would make #1 the winner.
limiting to only
: Hoss may lay down the rules on us, but if he doesn't (or if hes in a good mood
For the record: i'm (almost) always i na good mood -- it's just hard to
tell because i spell like an angry unibomber wanna-be and i have a moral
objection to using emoticons so my email based sarcasim is very, very
: right, but what should be the role of committers voting in the second round?
: Is it:
:
: 1. Rank the entries the committers like best
: or
: 2. Rank the entries the committers think best represent the community
: preferences.
:
: My understanding of the purpose of the second round is to inter
: Being the likely two candidates for winning. My guess is that
: narrowing to the two most popular options first would make #2 the
: winner, while voting on the top 10 (w/o any strategy for winning)
: would make #1 the winner.
limiting to only voting for the top 2 seems unrepresentative since m
: All apache_solr_c_red.jpg flavoured logos have a total score of 94.
: That should be taken into account IMHO and we should reduce the number
: of choices for these ones.
To re-iterate a comment I made in SOLR-84 that "wouldn't be fair to the
people who have been submitting ideas and then retra
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The methodology will very likely determine the outcome here, with
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr
On Dec 4, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: 1. Have solr committers vote to accept:
:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
The process as outlined on the wiki was that the commiters should
have a
ranked prefrence vote, after conside
The methodology will very likely determine the outcome here, with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
Being the likely two candidates for winning. My guess is that
narr
: 1. Have solr committers vote to accept:
:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
The process as outlined on the wiki was that the commiters should have a
ranked prefrence vote, after considering the point totals from the first
vote. (with the ad
+1 on the runoff vote.
Ryan McKinley wrote:
We have discussed with the apache PRC (public relations
committee), and
they agree that the top choice in the logo contest should be
disqualified
for its similarity to the solaris logo.
Given the rules agreed upon in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Lo
gt;
>> We have discussed with the apache PRC (public relations committee), and
>> they agree that the top choice in the logo contest should be disqualified
>> for its similarity to the solaris logo.
>>
>> Given the rules agreed upon in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Logo
Hoss may lay down the rules on us, but if he doesn't (or if hes in a
good mood today), +1 on the runoff vote.
Ryan McKinley wrote:
We have discussed with the apache PRC (public relations committee),
and they agree that the top choice in the logo contest should be
disqualified fo
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I see two options:
1. Have solr committers vote to accept:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
2. Have a 'runoff' poll with the top contenders:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder
> I see two options:
> 1. Have solr committers vote to accept:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
> 2. Have a 'runoff' poll with the top contenders:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
> https:
We have discussed with the apache PRC (public relations committee),
and they agree that the top choice in the logo contest should be
disqualified for its similarity to the solaris logo.
Given the rules agreed upon in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
LogoContest, the next step is for Solr
23 matches
Mail list logo
