I was actually able to accomplish (althought not pretty) what I wanted using
a regex transformer.
blargy wrote:
>
> How can I manually specify a static multiple value field in the
> DataImportHandler?
>
> I finally figured out the answer of how to statically define a value from
> t
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 3:57 AM, blargy wrote:
>
> How can I manually specify a static multiple value field in the
> DataImportHandler?
>
> I finally figured out the answer of how to statically define a value from
> this FAQ: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq which basically
> stat
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Barnett, Jeffrey
wrote:
> Can I use both for a single index?
>
> Here is my Solrconfig.xml:
> class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent">
>
> default
> spellingShingle
> 0.75
> ./spellShingle
> textSpellShingle
>
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Suram wrote:
>
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> >
> > Did you commit your changes?
> >
> > Erick
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Suram wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Can set my index fields for auto Suggestion, sometime the newly index
> >> field
> >> not found for auto
Or, (as Joe Calderon said in the apparent sibling thread) you can just type
"ant clean dist" if you want to verifiably blow away the old jars and
replace them with the new jars/war to deploy.
-Trey
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Trey wrote:
> Hmm... sorry for the bad link... looks like someh
Hmm... sorry for the bad link... looks like somehow I inserted a bogus
letter: "artiicles" instead of "articles" in the url.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse
At any rate, are you using Ant to compile? Literally all you have to do is
run the com
do `ant clean dist` within the solr source and use the resulting war
file, though in the future you might think about extending the built in
parser and creating a parser plugin rather than modifying the actual sources
see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#QParserPlugin for more info
--jo
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Did you commit your changes?
>
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Suram wrote:
>
>>
>> Can set my index fields for auto Suggestion, sometime the newly index
>> field
>> not found for auto suggestion and index search
>> --
>> View this message in context:
Hi,
I had made some changes to solrqueryparser.java using Eclipse and I am able
to do a leading wildcard search using Jetty plugin (downloaded this plugin
for eclipse).. Now I am not sure how I can package this code and redploy it.
Can someone help me out please?
Thanks,
B
--
View this message
Ill have about 5m documents indexed (ranging in size) with an expected amount
of searches to be between 750k and 1m per day.
Ill be using a master/slave setup with an unknown number of slaves. What
hardware requirements would you recommend/suggest?
Thoughts?
--
View this message in context:
I messed with a perfectly good 1.3 setup and installed Solr 1.4 in the hope of
seeing better faceting performance. Nothing in the release notes or migrating
section scared me off.I stuck with it a little too long and now due to the
costs of rebuilding the time delta on the index I am commit
Thank you both for your responses.
However, I am not familiar enough with Solr and even not with Lucene. So, at
the moment, I have no real idea of what payloads are (I can't even translate
this word...).
The manual says something about "metadata" - but there is nothing said about
what metadata t
Hi Grant,
Thanks for the feedback. In reading the Wiki, it recommended that you
copy everything from example/solr/libs directory into a /libs directory
in your instance. I went into my example/solr directory and only see two
directories - "bin" and "conf". There is no "libs" directory. Where el
How can I manually specify a static multiple value field in the
DataImportHandler?
I finally figured out the answer of how to statically define a value from
this FAQ: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq which basically
states to use the TemplateTransformer.
My question is what do I
I contributed a little reward to whoever can complete this task too
http://nextsprocket.com/tasks/solr-1337-spans-and-payloads-query-support-asf-jira
Feel free to contribute to the reward if you need this done too!
Tommy Chheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Twitter @tommychheng
http
On Mar 12, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Steve Reichgut wrote:
> Now that I have configured my Solr instance for standard indexing, I wanted
> to start indexing PDF's, MS Doc's, etc. When I tried to test it with a simple
> PDF file, I got the following error:
>
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: la
OK, you need https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1337 and it's related
item: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1485
Unfortunately, not implemented yet.
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:36 PM, MitchK wrote:
>
> Thanks for your response, Grant!
>
> Imagine you are searching for "foo".
> "f
Hi All,
The DataImportHandler is the most fantastic thing that has recently
come to Solr. Thank you.
I'm noticing that when I use variables in nested entities that
square brackets are wrapped around the variable value when they are
used. For example ${x.url} used in the "tika" entity
Can I use both for a single index?
Here is my Solrconfig.xml:
default
spellingShingle
0.75
./spellShingle
textSpellShingle
true
basicSpell
spelling
0.75
./spellchecker
textSpell
true
What happens is th
Now that I have configured my Solr instance for standard indexing, I
wanted to start indexing PDF's, MS Doc's, etc. When I tried to test it
with a simple PDF file, I got the following error:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: lazy loading error
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrExc
Hi -
The best way is probably to add more ram. :-)
That error apparently results from running out of perm gen space, and with
512m, you may not have much perm gen space.
Options for increasing this can be found
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/vmoptions.jsp
But, if you don't have
Thanks for your response, Grant!
Imagine you are searching for "foo".
"foor" occurs in doc1 three times. It is the 5th, the 20th, and the 50th
term in the document.
I want to get these positions.
Of course, if I am searching for "foo bar" and "bar" occurs at the 4th and
the 21th position, I also
Im still having a problem with this... for example I would assume this would
index the value Item into the field called type
However I receive this error when starting up Solr: Caused by:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Field must
have a co
What TermPositions do you want? On a per doc basis or just in general for the
index? I think the TermsComponent could add the latter. The former is only
possible via TermVectors.
-Grant
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:46 PM, MitchK wrote:
>
> Hello community,
>
> is it possible to get TermPosition
Hello,
I've searched the list for this kind of error but never find one that is
similar to my case:
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM warning:
Exception java.lang.OutOfMemoryError occurred dispatching signal
SIGTERM to handler- the VM may need to be forcibly terminated
I use the latest st
Sounds like you're pretty well on your way then. This is pretty typical
of multi-threaded situations... Threads 1-n wait around on I/O and
increasing the number of threads increases throughput without
changing (much) the individual response time.
Threads n+1 - p don't change throughput much, but i
Hello community,
is it possible to get TermPositions without a TermVector? If yes, how can I
do so?
If such a feature is not yet implemented in Solr, it would be interesting
how to do so with Lucene.
I don't want to use a TermVector, because I have read somewhere that Lucene
stores the TermPosit
> I feel like the default option is a little hacky plus I'll
> probably be
> sharing my schema.xml for multiple cores using dynamic
> field types.
>
> I can't believe there isnt an easy way to specify this. So
> my only options
> is something like this?
Also you can generate this static value fro
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:23 AM, wicketnewuser wrote:
>
> Hi I'm getting geo_distance as str eventhough I'm define the field as
> tdouble. my search looks like
> /solr/select?&qt=geo&lat=xx.xx&long=yy.yy&q=*&radius=10
> Is there anyway i can get is as
> double instead of str
I'm not sure about this
Hi,
Thanks for your responses. It actually feels good to be able to locate where
the bottlenecks are.
I've created two sets of data - in the first one I'm measuring the time took
purely on Solr's end, and in the other one I'm including network latency
(just for reference). The data that I'm posti
I'm sorry. You sent this to the correct one. I made a mistake in my mail
client.
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#solr-dev:
>
> Your question is better suited for the solr-u...@lucene mailing list ...
> not the solr-...@lu
I feel like the default option is a little hacky plus I'll probably be
sharing my schema.xml for multiple cores using dynamic field types.
I can't believe there isnt an easy way to specify this. So my only options
is something like this?
What if I don't need a templa
On 03/12/10 17:51, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>>
>> try using Parenthesis with queries that contain more than
>> one term. &fq=label:(Aces+of+London)
>> Otherwise
>> jumps
>> in.
>
> defaultSearchField stuff is correct but I just realized that you need to use
> quotes in your case. Because query p
>
> try using Parenthesis with queries that contain more than
> one term. &fq=label:(Aces+of+London)
> Otherwise
> jumps
> in.
defaultSearchField stuff is correct but I just realized that you need to use
quotes in your case. Because query parser splits on white-spaces.
&fq=label:"Aces of Lo
Hi,
I am just curious to know how this class works and how this can be
implemented in right way.
I got the details from JIRA as below
This patch is an implementation of the "reversed tokens" strategy for
efficient leading wildcards queries.
ReversedWildcardsTokenFilter reverses tokens and retu
Haven't tried this myself but try adding a default value and don't
specify it during the import.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
On 3/12/10 7:56 AM, blargy wrote:
Forgive me but I'm slightly retarded... I grew up underneath some power lines
;)
I've read through that wiki but I still c
> I have some fields that are only used for faceting, so
> they're only
> queried by facet results. No modification is needed, no
> lowercase,
> nothing. So the KeywordTokenizerFactory seems to be perfect
> for them.
You can use plain string type definition (comes in schema.xml) for that purpose.
Hi,
I have some fields that are only used for faceting, so they're only
queried by facet results. No modification is needed, no lowercase,
nothing. So the KeywordTokenizerFactory seems to be perfect for them.
Alas, when the value contains spaces, I'm still getting too many
results. I have a field
Hi Erick,
On 03/12/10 17:09, Erick Erickson wrote:
> << of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
> working fine without problems.>>>
>
> Field or fieldType?
...one of my fields with a fieldtype that does not have any analyzer
defined at all, ... ;-)
>
> << So, it must
> Forgive me but I'm slightly retarded... I grew up
> underneath some power lines
> ;)
>
> I've read through that wiki but I still can't find what I'm
> looking for. I
> just want to give one of the DIH entities/fields a static
> value (ie it
> doesnt come from a database column). How can I config
<<>>
Field or fieldType?
<< So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers. >>
Truth to tell, I don't know off the top of my head
what happens if you define no analyzer for a fieldType.
I think it would be bad practice anyway, *I* want to *know*
what indexing and a
Forgive me but I'm slightly retarded... I grew up underneath some power lines
;)
I've read through that wiki but I still can't find what I'm looking for. I
just want to give one of the DIH entities/fields a static value (ie it
doesnt come from a database column). How can I configure this?
FYI th
Hi,
From http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#solr-dev:
Your question is better suited for the solr-u...@lucene mailing list ...
not the solr-...@lucene list. solr-dev is for discussing development of
the internals of the Solr application ... it is *not* the appropriate
place to ask questions abou
any one with localsolr expirence?
wicketnewuser wrote:
>
> Hi I'm getting geo_distance as str eventhough I'm define the field as
> tdouble. my search looks like
> /solr/select?&qt=geo&lat=xx.xx&long=yy.yy&q=*&radius=10
> Is there anyway i can get is as
> double instead of str
>
--
View this m
Hi Erick,
thank you very much for your help. What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems. So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers. I don't understand why it
shouldn't be po
Does SolrCloud's notion of a "collection", which appears to use cores,
override normal multi-core usage for building an offline index and
quickly swapping it into production? Some of the features in SolrCloud
look useful, if it's still possible to exert manual control over cores
and shards. A
Hey !
I use boost on my documents and Solr takes my boosts in consideration ! But
now, i would like to get the "boost" of each documents but there are not
present in my XML result ... why ?
What i have in my XML result:
1
What i want in my XML result :
1
Thanks for your help !
--
View this me
Hi everybody,
I would need a little help understanding what seems to be a rather erratic
behavior in Solr Highlighting.
In my query I want the field "text" to be summarized, and want a maximum of 300
characters and 3 snippets.
I have therefore set fragsize=100 and snippets=3.
But there seems to b
Did you commit your changes?
Erick
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Suram wrote:
>
> Can set my index fields for auto Suggestion, sometime the newly index field
> not found for auto suggestion and index search
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/AutoSuggest-tp27874542p2
You've probably already looked at this, but here goes anyway. The
first question probably should have been "what are you measuring"?
I've been fooled before by looking at, say, average response time
and extrapolating. You're getting 20 qps if your response time is
1 second, but you have 20 threads
> Hi All
>
> Im not sure where i'm going wrong but highlighting does not
> seem to work for me.
>
> I have indexed around 5000 PDF documents which went well.
>
> Running normal queries against the attr_content works
> well.
>
> When adding any hl code it does not seem to make a bit of
> differe
Hi Lee,
What issues are you having mate? The highlighted fragments appear in a
different section to the response, toward the bottom (can't remember the
element names without referring to the docs). The stored fields returned are
not replaced with the highlighted fragments.
Cheers
Dave
-O
Well, what would you have SOLR do that makes sense if you
don't define a query analyzer? Very very strange things
happen if you use different analyzers for indexing
and querying. At least defaulting that way has a *chance* of
giving expected results...
Why not use, say, KeywordTokenizerFactory if
You'll find many discussions of this topic if you search
the mail archive for "near real time".
Erick
2010/3/12 Kranti™ K K Parisa
> Hi,
>
> What are the Best Practices for Runtime Index Updates? Means we have index
> and user may add some data like tags, notes..etc to each solr document.
>
Data Import Handler, see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
Erick
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> What is DIH? I feel like I'm saying, "Duh . . .", sorry.
>
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
> Signature Warning
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we
Can set my index fields for auto Suggestion, sometime the newly index field
not found for auto suggestion and index search
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/AutoSuggest-tp27874542p27874542.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello folks,
I have two questions regarding dataimport handler. Using mysql
datasource with mysql java connector.
1. Full import works fine
http://example.com:8983/solr/dataimport?command=full-import
delta-import as well
Question is how can I figure out if there are errors when running
delta
Hi,
I want to implement a suggestion/autocomplete dropdown on my searchbox - can
anyone help with:
1) Is the TermComponent the advised way for autocomplete?
2) How can I ensure that the returned terms are complete, valid and English
words?
Any help much appareciated.
Thanks for replying Yonik. I did actually restart the jetty after changing
schema and before re-indexing.
But i realized that it was to do with 'omitNorms' field attribute, i had
titles with length 3 and 4 with similar length normalization score (0.5),
which I was, wrongly, expecting to be diffe
Ah I see.
Thanks very much Jay for your explanation, it really helped a lot.
I guess I have to deal with this in some other way, since I am working with
short titles and I really want short titles to appear at top. Can you
suggest anything to bring titles with length 3 to appear before titles wi
okay now its better ;9
thx =)
gwk-4 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Try replacing KeywordTokenizerFactory with a WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
> so it'll create separate terms per word. After a reindex it should work.
>
> Regards,
>
> gwk
>
> On 3/11/2010 4:33 PM, stocki wrote:
>> hey,
>>
>> okay i show
Can anyone help ??
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Lee Smith
> Date: 11 March 2010 17:25:59 GMT
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Highlighting Results
> Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi All
>
> Im not sure where i'm going wrong but highlighting does not seem to work for
I've allocated 4GB to Solr, so the rest of the 4GB is free for the OS disk
caching.
I think that at any point of time, there can be a maximum of concurrent requests, which happens to make sense btw (does it?).
As I increase the number of threads, the load average shown by top goes up
to as high
Hi all,
I have a field with some kind of category tree as a string. The format
is like this:
"prefix>first>second#prefix>otherfirst>othersecond"
So, the document is categorized in two categories, separated by '#', and
all categories start with the same prefix which I don't want to use.
F
64 matches
Mail list logo
