Hello,
I need to create two date facets displaying counts of a particular fields
values.
With normal facets, this can be done with facet.query, but this parameter is
not available to facet.date .
Is this possbile? I'd really prefer to avoid performing two queries.
Thanks
William
--
View this me
Hi Wong,
I'm using Default server (Jetty with port 8983)
Girish solution already solve my problem
thanks for your response Wong :)
On 7/22/2010 11:57 AM, K Wong wrote:
Check: /var/lib/tomcat5.5/conf/Catalina/localhost/
Are you using Tomcat on a custom port (the default tomcat port is
8080)? Che
why using default="0" its optional remove that from field definition
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/set-field-with-value-0-to-the-end-tp980580p986115.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Check: /var/lib/tomcat5.5/conf/Catalina/localhost/
Are you using Tomcat on a custom port (the default tomcat port is
8080)? Check your ports ($ sudo netstat -nlp)
Maybe try searching the file system for the solr.xml file?
$ sudo find / -name solr.xml
Hope this helps.
K
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 a
wowww...amazing Girish !
the solution that you gave is very simple but 100% answering my problem
thanks a lot Girish !
On 7/22/2010 11:43 AM, Girish Pandit wrote:
it seems like you are using Default server (Jetty with port 8983),
also it looks like you are trying to run it with command "java -ja
it seems like you are using Default server (Jetty with port 8983), also
it looks like you are trying to run it with command "java -jar
start.jar" if so then under same directory there is another directory
called "webapps" go in there, rename "solr.war" to "search.war" bounce
server and you shou
firstly, I really appreciate your respond to my question Ken
I'm using Tomcat on Linux Debian
I can't find the solr.xml in \program
files\apache...\Tomcat\conf\catalina\localhost
there are only 2 files in localhost folder:
host-manager.xml and manager.xml
any solutions?
On 7/22/2010 10:41 AM
Your environment may be different, but this is how I did it. (Apache Tomcat
on Windows 2008)
go to \program files\apache...\Tomcat\conf\catalina\localhost
rename solr.xml to search.xml
recycle Tomcat service
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-change-the-
I think what Siva mean is that when there are docs with the same url,
leave the doc whose score is large.
This is the right solution.
But itshows a problem of distrubted search without common idf. A doc
will get different score in different shard.
2010/7/22 MitchK :
>
> It already was sorted by sco
Hi everyone,
I really need your help
this is the default address that I got from the solr:
http://172.16.17.126:8983/solr/
the question is how to change that path to be:
http://172.16.17.126:8983/search/
Please I really need your help
thanks a lot before
Java regex might be different from all other regex, so writing a test
program and experimenting is the only way. Once you decide that this
expression really is what you want, and that it does not achieve what
you expect, you might have found a bug in highlighting.
Lucene/Solr highlighting has alwa
You have to store the termvectors when you index, and then retrieve
them when you do a query. Highlighting does exactly this; the easy way
to do this is to ask for highlighting and search for the highlighted
words, and count them.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Peter Spam wrote:
> If I search f
Fields or documents? It will return all of the fields that are 'stored'.
The default number of documents to return is 10. Returning all of the
documents is very slow, so you have to request that with the rows=
parameter.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that not
Hi,
I am attempting to cluster a query. It kinda works, but where my
(regular) query returns 500 results the cluster only shows 1-10 hits for
each cluster (5 clusters). Never more than 10 docs and I know its not
right. What could be happening here? It should be showing dozens of
documents per clus
You could grab your xpath rules from a db too. This is what I did for a price
scrapping app I did a while ago. New sites were added with a set of rules using
a web ui You could certainly use regex of course, but IMO that's more complex
than writing a simple xpath. Using JavaScript or some dom t
Still not working ... any ideas?
-Pete
On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Peter Spam wrote:
> Any other thoughts, Chris? I've been messing with this a bit, and can't seem
> to get (?m)^.*$ to do what I want.
>
> 1) I don't care how many characters it returns, I'd like entire lines all the
> time
If I search for "foo", I get back a list of documents. Any way to get a
per-document hit count? Thanks!
-Pete
I might have misunderstood, but I think I cant do string literals in
function queries, right?
myfield:"something"^3.0
I tried it anyway using solr 1.4, doesnt seem to work.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> function queries match all documents
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/
Hi,
It seems that not all field are returned from query response when i use DISMAX?
Only first 10??
Any idea?
Here is my solrconfig:
dismax
explicit
*
0.01
text^0.5 content^1.1 title^1.5
text^0.2 content^1.1 title^1.5
And I will have to recompile the dom or sax code each time I add a job board
for
crawling. Regex patten is only a string which can be stored in a text file or
db, and retrieved based on the job board. What do you think?
From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
To: "solr-
I don't see how it can be done without writing sax or dom code for each job
board, it is non-maintainable if there are a lot of new job boards being
crawled. Maybe I should use regex match? Then I just need to substitute the
regex pattern for each job board without writing any new sax or dom c
>From the mailing list archive, Koji wrote:
> 1. Provide another field for highlighting and use copyField to copy plainText
> to the highlighting field.
and Lance wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg35548.html
> If you want to highlight field X, doing the
> termO
function queries match all documents
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Using_FunctionQuery
-Original message-
From: Justin Lolofie
Sent: Wed 21-07-2010 20:24
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: boosting particular field values
I'm using dismax request handler, solr 1.4
I'm using dismax request handler, solr 1.4.
I would like to boost the weight of certain fields according to their
values... this appears to work:
bq=category:electronics^5.5
However, I think this boosting only affects sorting the results that
have already matched? So if I only get 10 rows back,
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply. I could not find in the log files any mention to
that. By the way I only have _MM_DD.request.log files in my directory.
Do I have to enable any specific log or level to catch those errors?
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Simple
Yeah you should definitely just setup a custom parser for each site.. should be
easy to extract title using groovy's xml parsing along with tagsoup for sloppy
html. If you can't find the pattern for each site leading to the job title how
can you expect solr to? Humans have the advantage here :P
Thank you three for your feedback!
Chantal, unfortuntately kenf is right. Facetting won't work in this special
case.
> parallel calls.
>
Yes, this will be the solution. However, this would lead to a second
HTTP-request and I hoped to be able to avoid it.
Chantal Ackermann wrote:
>
> Sure S
It already was sorted by score.
The problem here is the following:
Shard_A and shard_B contain doc_X and doc_X.
If you are querying for something, doc_X could have a score of 1.0 at
shard_A and a score of 12.0 at shard_B.
You can never be sure which doc Solr sees first. In the bad case, Solr see
mmm...there must be better way...each job board has different format. If there
are constantly new job boards being crawled, I don't think I can manually look
for specific sequence of tags that leads to job title. Most of them don't even
have class or id. There is no guarantee that the job tit
How about sorting over the score? Would that be possible?
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Li Li wrote:
> in QueryComponent.mergeIds. It will remove document which has
> duplicated uniqueKey with others. In current implementation, it use
> the first encountered.
> String prevShard = uniqueD
Some further information --
I tried indexing a batch of PDFs with the client and Solr CELL, setting
the credentials in the httpclient. For some reason after successfully
indexing several hundred files I start getting a "SolrException:
Unauthorized" and an info message (for every subsequent file):
You'd probably need to do some post processing on the pages and set up rules
for each website to grab that specific bit of data. You could load the html
into an xml parser, then use xpath to grab content from a particular tag with a
class or id, based on the particular website
-Original M
Hi,
I am currently using nutch to crawl some job pages from job boards. They are
in my solr index now. I want to do faceted search with the job titles. How?
The job titles can be in any locations of the page, e.g. title, header,
content... If I use indexfilter in Nutch to search the cont
That just gives a count of documents by type. The use-case, I believe, is to
return from a search, 10 documents of type 'short' and 1 document of type
'extensive'.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p984539.html
Sure SOLR supports this: use facets on the field "type":
add to your regular query:
facet.query=true&facet.field=type
see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 15:48 +0200, kenf_nc wrote:
> parallel calls. simultaneously query for type:short rows=10 and
> typ
parallel calls. simultaneously query for type:short rows=10 and
type:extensive rows=1 and merge your results. This would also let you
separate your short docs from your extensive docs into different solr
instances if you wished...depending on your document architecture this could
speed up one o
Hi Peter
We are using the packaged Ubuntu Server (10.04 LTS) versions of Tomcat6 and
Solr1.4 and running a single instance of Solr with multiple cores.
Regards
Andrew
On 20 July 2010 19:47, Peter Karich wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> the whole tomcat shouldn't fail on restart if only one core fails.
I am trying to export some config options common to all cores into single
file,
which would be included using xinclude. The only problem is how to include
childrens of given node.
common_solrconfig.xml looks like that:
now all of the following attemps have failed:
http://www.w3.org/20
I Think Solr does not provide any thing like that U want.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p983938.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
What resource are you using for LocalSolr?
Using the SpatialTierQParser, you can choose between km or mile:
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
Or, if you are using the LocalSolrQueryComponent
(http://www.gissearch.com/localsolr), and you can't choose
I don't know much about the code.
Maybe you can tell me to what file you are referring?
However, from the comments one can see, that the problem is known but one
decided to let it happen, because of System requirements in the Java
version.
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://luce
yes. This will make user think our search engine has some bug.
from the comments of the codes, it needs more things to do
if (prevShard != null) {
// For now, just always use the first encountered since we
can't currently
// remove the previous one added to the pri
Oh,... I just see, there is no direct question ;-).
How can I specify the number of returned documents in the desired way
*within* one request?
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p983773.html
Sent from
Ah, okay. I understand your problem. Why should doc x be at position 1 when
searching for the first time, and when I search for the 2nd time it occurs
at position 8 - right?
I am not sure, but I think you can't prevent this without custom coding or
making a document's occurence unique.
Kind rega
Hello community,
I got a situation, where I know that some types of documents contain very
extensive information and other types are giving more general information.
Since I don't know whether a user searches for general or extensive
information (and I don't want to ask him when he uses the defau
Integer field can be empty also, I think u have set required=true if that
remove required=true,
and u can live field without data at the time of indexing.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/set-field-with-value-0-to-the-end-tp980580p983728.html
Sent from the Solr
But users will think there is something wrong with it when he/she
search the same query but got different result.
2010/7/21 MitchK :
>
> Li Li,
>
> this is the intended behaviour, not a bug.
> Otherwise you could get back the same record in a response for several
> times, which may not be intended
Li Li,
this is the intended behaviour, not a bug.
Otherwise you could get back the same record in a response for several
times, which may not be intended by the user.
Kind regards,
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/a-bug-of-solr-distributed-search-tp98
Hi James,
triggering an optimize (on the salve) helped us to shrink the disc usage
of the slaves.
But I think, the slaves will clean them up automatically on the next
replication (if you don't mind the double-size-index)
Regards,
Peter.
>
> Hi Peter,
> Thanks your reponse. I will check the
> ht
Hi Peter,
Thanks your reponse. I will check the
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication first.
I mean the slave node did not delete the old index and finally cause the disk
usage to large for the slave node.
I am thinking to manually force the slave node to refresh the index.
Regards,
Jam
Hi!
> Any there any known issues may cause the index sync between the
> master/slave abnormal?
What do you mean here? Corrupt indices? Please, describe your problems
in more detail.
> And is there any API to call to force sync the index between the
> master and slave, or force to delete the old
in QueryComponent.mergeIds. It will remove document which has
duplicated uniqueKey with others. In current implementation, it use
the first encountered.
String prevShard = uniqueDoc.put(id, srsp.getShard());
if (prevShard != null) {
// duplicate detected
52 matches
Mail list logo
