Hi Mikhail,
> it's just how org.apache.lucene.search.CachingWrapperFilter works. The
> first out-of-the box stuff which I've found.
Thanks for your explanation and snippets - I thought this was configurable.
Regards,
Em
Am 15.02.2012 06:16, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Em wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> > it will use per segment bitset at contrast to Solr's fq which caches for
> > top level reader.
> Could you explain why this bitset would be per-segment based, please?
I don't see a reason why this *have* to be so.
>
it's just how or
hi
at present we use carrot2 for clustering and doing analysis on customer
feedback data. Since its in memory and search time we are having issues with
performance and cluster size.
I was reading about generating clusters using mahout from solr index data.
But can we feed segmentation generated
All of the nodes now show as being Active. When starting the replicas
I did receive the following message though. Not sure if this is
expected or not.
INFO: Attempting to replicate from
http://JamiesMac.local:8501/solr/slice2_shard2/
Feb 14, 2012 10:53:34 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException
Doing so now, will let you know if I continue to see the same issues
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Doh - looks like I was just seeing a test issue. Do you mind updating and
> trying the latest rev? At the least there should be some better logging
> around the recovery.
>
I have roughly read the codes of 4.0 trunk. maybe it's feasible.
SegmentMerger.add(IndexReader) will add to be merged Readers
merge() will call
mergeTerms(segmentWriteState);
mergePerDoc(segmentWriteState);
mergeTerms() will construct fields from IndexReaders
for(int
rea
This has not been ported back to the 3.X line yet - mostly because it involved
some rather large and invasive changes that I wanted to bake on trunk for some
time first.
Even still, the back port is not trivial, so I don't know that it's something
I'd personally be able to get to in the short t
Ah, OK, I misread your post apparently. And yes, what you suggest
would result in some efficiencies, but at present I don't think there's any
syntax that allows one to combine filter queries as you suggest. There
was some discussion about it in the JIRA I referenced, but no action that
I could see.
Hi All,
Is there a way to soft commit in the current released version of solr 3.5?
Regards,
Dipti Srivastava
This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender and remove it from your system.
Is there the possibility of perform 'exact search' in a payload field?
I'have to index text with auxiliary info for each word. In particular at
each word is associated the bounding box containing it in the original pdf
page (it is used for highligthing the search terms in the pdf). I used the
payl
done something along these lines:
https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/rcarepo/wiki/InspireAutoSuggest#Autosuggestautocompletefunctionality
but you would need MontySolr for that - https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr
roman
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Octavian Covalschi
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> H
Hm... I used it for some basic group by feature, but haven't thought of it
for autocomplete. I'll give it a shot.
Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> facetting?
>
> paul
>
>
> Le 14 févr. 2012 à 23:10, Octavian Covalschi a écrit :
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Has anyone
I was thinking if I make a wrapper class that aggregates another IndexReader
and filter out terms I don't want anymore it might work. And then pass that
wrapper into SegmentMerger. I think if I filter out terms on
GetFieldNames(...) and Terms(...) it might work.
Something like:
HashSet igno
facetting?
paul
Le 14 févr. 2012 à 23:10, Octavian Covalschi a écrit :
> Hey guys,
>
> Has anyone done any kind of "smart" autocomplete? Let's say we have a web
> store, and we'd like to autocomplete user's searches. So if I'll type in
> "jacket" next word that will be suggested should be some
agreeing with wunder - I don't know the application, but I think almost
always, a set of linear approximations over a few ranges would be ok (and
you could increase the number of ranges until it was), and will be faster.
And if you need just one equation, a sigmoid function will do the trick,
such
Doh - looks like I was just seeing a test issue. Do you mind updating and
trying the latest rev? At the least there should be some better logging around
the recovery.
I'll keep working on tests in the meantime.
- Mark
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Sounds good, if I pull
Hi Erick,
> Whoa!
>
> fq=id(1 OR 2)
> is not the same thing at all as
> fq=id:1&fq=id:2
Ahm, who said they would be the same? :)
I mean, you are completely right in what you are saying but it seems to
me that we are talking about two different things.
I was talking about caching each filter-crite
BTW, you're not the first person who would like this capability, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1223
But the fact that this JIRA was originally opened in in June of 2009
and hasn't been implemented yet indicates that it's not super-high
priority.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012
Whoa!
fq=id(1 OR 2)
is not the same thing at all as
fq=id:1&fq=id:2
Assuming that any document had one and only one ID, the second clause
would return exactly 0 documents, each and every time.
Multiple fq clauses are essentially set intersections. So the first query is the
set of all documents
Sounds good, if I pull the latest from trunk and rerun will that be
useful or were you able to duplicate my issue now?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Okay Jamie, I think I have a handle on this. It looks like an issue with what
> config files are being used by cores create
Okay Jamie, I think I have a handle on this. It looks like an issue with what
config files are being used by cores created with the admin core handler - I
think it's just picking up default config and not the correct config for the
collection. This means they end up using config that has no Upda
Perhaps this is some kind of vufind specific issue?
The server (/example) bundled with solr unpacks the war in
/example/work and not /tmp
-Yonik
lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bernhardt, Russell (CIV)
wrote:
> A software package we use recently upgraded to Solr 3.5 (from 1
In practice, I expect a linear piecewise function (with sharp corners) would be
indistinguishable from the smoothed function. It is also much easier to read,
test, and debug. It might even be faster.
Try the sharp corners one first.
wunder
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> In
Hi Mark,
did you already had a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery ?
Regards,
Em
Am 14.02.2012 20:09, schrieb Mark:
> Or better yet an example in solr would be best :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 2/14/12 11:05 AM, Mark wrote:
>> Would you mind throwing out an example of these types of fun
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for kicking in some brainstorming-code!
The given thread is almost a year old and I was working with Solr in my
freetime to see where it fails to behave/perform as I expect/wish.
I found out that if you got a lot of different access-patterns for a
filter-query, you might end up
Or better yet an example in solr would be best :)
Thanks!
On 2/14/12 11:05 AM, Mark wrote:
Would you mind throwing out an example of these types of functions.
Looking at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probit) its seems
like the Probit function is very similar to what I want.
Thanks
Would you mind throwing out an example of these types of functions.
Looking at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probit) its seems
like the Probit function is very similar to what I want.
Thanks
On 2/14/12 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
In general this kind of function is very easy to con
In general this kind of function is very easy to construct using sums of basic
sigmoidal functions. The logistic and probit functions are commonly used for
this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:05, Mark wrote:
> Thanks I'll have a look at this. I should have mentioned that the act
Hi Em,
I briefly read the thread. Are you talking about combing of cached clauses
of BooleanQuery, instead of evaluating whole BQ as a filter?
I found something like that in API (but only in API)
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/search/ExtendedQuery.html#setCacheSep(boolean)
Am
Nope, I don't have a custom /tmp mount in fstab, I just have a basic CentOS 6
install for development and testing...
Full everyone read/write permissions are in place on /tmp too.
> Is /tmp a separate file system? There are problems with people
> mounting /tmp with 'noexec' as a security precau
On 14 February 2012 23:35, Mark wrote:
> Thanks I'll have a look at this. I should have mentioned that the actual
> values on the graph aren't important rather I was showing an example of how
> the function should behave.
[...]
>> either y = (100/(e^((x -50)/75)^2)) + 50
[...]
In general, the ex
bq: Is the Filter Cache used for the OR'ed fq?
The filter cache is actually pretty simple conceptually. It's
just a map where the key is the fq and the value is the set
of documents that satisfy that fq (we'll skip the implementation
here, just think of it as the list of all the docs that the fq
Thanks I'll have a look at this. I should have mentioned that the actual
values on the graph aren't important rather I was showing an example of
how the function should behave.
On 2/13/12 6:25 PM, Kent Fitch wrote:
Hi, assuming you have x and want to generate y, then maybe
- if x < 50, y = 15
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:17 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how efficent is such an query:
>
> q=some text
> fq=id:(1 OR 2 OR 3...)
>
> Should I better use q:some text AND id:(1 OR 2 OR 3...)?
>
1. These two opts have the different scoring.
2. if you hit same fq=id:(1 OR 2 OR 3...) many times you have a b
Thanks Mark, not a huge rush, just me trying to get to use the latest
stuff on our project.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Sorry, have not gotten it yet, but will be back trying later today - monday,
> tuesday tend to be slow for me (meetings and crap).
>
> - Mark
>
> On
No hard plans around that that at the moment, but when I free up some time I
plan on looking at the JIRA issue I pointed to. Looks like a lot of the work
may already be done.
- mark
On Feb 12, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Thanks Mark. Is there any plan to make all the Solr search h
Sorry, have not gotten it yet, but will be back trying later today - monday,
tuesday tend to be slow for me (meetings and crap).
- Mark
On Feb 14, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Has there been any success in replicating this? I'm wondering if it
> could be something with my setup tha
Koji Sekiguchi wrote
>
> Uh, what you tried was that you changed the field between q and hl.q,
> that I've not expected use case when I proposed hl.q.
>
> Do you think that hl.text meats your needs?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1926?focusedCommentId=12871234&page=com.atlassian
Hi Bráulio,
I don't know about HunspellStemFilterFactory especially but concerning
accents:
There are several accent filter that will remove accents from your
tokens. If the Hunspell filter factory requires the accents, then simply
add the accent filters after Hunspell in your index and query fil
(12/02/14 22:25), O. Klein wrote:
I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it
analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work?
Nothing special on hl.q. If you use hl.q, the value of it will be used for
highlighting rather than the value of q. There
Can we get this back ported to 3x?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:45 AM, Matthias Käppler wrote:
> hey thanks all for the suggestions, didn't have time to look into them
> yet as we're feature-sprinting for MWC, but will report back with some
> feedback over the next weeks (w
Does someone have an example of using unmap in 3.5 and chunksize?
I am using Solr 3.5.
I noticed in solrconfig.xml:
I don't see this parameter taking.. When I set
-Dsolr.directoryFactory=solr.MMapDirectoryFactory
How do I see the setting in the log or in stats.jsp ? I cannot find a place
t
It's not as compact as binary format, but would just using something
like JSON help enough? This is really simple, just specify
&wt=json (there's a method to set this on the server, at least in Java).
Otherwise, you might get a more knowledgeable response on the
C# java list, I'm frankly clueless.
I did find a solution, but the output is horrible. Why does explain look so
badly?
6.351252 = (MATCH) boost(*:*,query(specialties_ids: #1;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;
,def=0.0)), product of:
1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:
1.0 = queryNorm
6.351252 = query(specialties_ids: #1;#
Has there been any success in replicating this? I'm wondering if it
could be something with my setup that is causing the issue...
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Yes, I have the following layout on the FS
>
> ./bootstrap.sh
> ./example (standard example directory from di
Hello all,
I'm evaluating the HunspellStemFilterFactory I found it works with a
pt_PT dictionary.
For example, if I search for 'fóruns' it stems it to 'fórum' and then find
'fórum' references.
But if I search for 'foruns' (without accent),
then HunspellStemFilterFactory cannot stem
word, as it d
Hello all,
I'm experimenting with NGramFilterFactory and EgdeNGramFilterFactory.
Both of them shows a match in my solr admin analysis, but when I query
'foruns'
doesn't find any 'forum'.
analysis
http://bhakta.casadomato.org:8982/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?nt=type&name=text&verbose=on&highlight=on&v
O. Klein wrote
>
>
> O. Klein wrote
>>
>> Hmm, now the synonyms aren't highlighted anymore.
>>
>> OK back to basic (im using trunk and FVH).
>>
>> What is the way to go about if I want to search on a field without
>> stopwords, but still want to highlight the stopwords? (and still
>> highligh
Hi!
On 14.02.2012 13:09, PeterKerk wrote:
I want to sort my results on the facetnames (not by their number of results).
From the example you gave, I'd assume you don't want to sort by facet
names but by facet values.
Simply add facet.sort=index to your request; see
http://wiki.apache.org/so
Try this when you start SOLR
java -javaagent:/NEWRELICPATH/newrelic.jar -jar start.jar
Normally you will see your SOLR installation on your newrelic dashboard in 2
minutes.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-monitor-solr-in-newrelic-tp3739567p3743488.ht
I want to sort my results on the facetnames (not by their number of results).
So now I have this (ordered by number of results):
Instelling voor auditief gehandicapten (16)
Audiologisch centrum (13)
Huisartsenpraktijk (13)
Instelling voor lichamelijk gehandicapten (13)
Ambulancezorg (12)
Beroepsor
only one field element?
There should be two or?
One for each language.
paul
Le 14 févr. 2012 à 07:34, bing a écrit :
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I want to do multilingual search in single-core solr. That requires to
> define language specific tokenizers in scheme.xml. Say for example, I have
> two toke
hey thanks all for the suggestions, didn't have time to look into them
yet as we're feature-sprinting for MWC, but will report back with some
feedback over the next weeks (we will have a few more performance
sprints in March)
Best,
Matthias
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
>
O. Klein wrote
>
> Hmm, now the synonyms aren't highlighted anymore.
>
> OK back to basic (im using trunk and FVH).
>
> What is the way to go about if I want to search on a field without
> stopwords, but still want to highlight the stopwords? (and still highlight
> synonyms and stemmed words)?
54 matches
Mail list logo
