Re: Solr regex documenation

2016-02-28 Thread Anil
HI , i am using [a-z]+works. i could not see networks in the solr results. is it regex working properly in solr ? Please clarify. Regards, Anil On 27 February 2016 at 20:52, Anil wrote: > Thanks Jack. > > On 27 February 2016 at 20:41, Jack Krupansky

Re: docValues error

2016-02-28 Thread shamik
David, this is tad weird. I've seen this error if you turn on docvalues for an existing field. You can running an "optimize" on your index and see if it helps. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/docValues-error-tp4260408p4260455.html Sent from the Solr - User

Too many close [count:-1]

2016-02-28 Thread Vipul G
[08:04:49] ERROR 0-thread-7 o.a.s.c.SolrCore <> Too many close [count:-1] on org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore@2720dd. Please report this exception to solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re: Query time de-boost

2016-02-28 Thread shamik
I tried the function query route, but getting a weird exception. *bf=if(termfreq(ContentGroup,'Developer Doc'),-20,0)* throws an exception *org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Missing end quote for string at pos 29 str='if(termfreq(ContentGroup,'Developer'* . Does it only accept single word or

Indicator of collapsed results in CollapsingQParserPlugin

2016-02-28 Thread Wil -
Hi, One use case I have is to return a collapse results, but provide a link for users to get the non-collapsed results. I don't want to display a link the result set returned has no collapsed result. Is there a way to tell whether the results returned are collapsed on a per-page basis and

Re: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread Walter Underwood
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 2:40 PM, > wrote: > > But Disney Land and Disney World are actually really good examples of places > where the magic stuff is suitable, ... As a former Disney employee, those are properly

Re: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread Jack Krupansky
So, all this hard work that people have put into Solr to make it more like a Disney theme park is just... wasted... on you? Sigh. Okay, I guess we can't please everyone. -- Jack Krupansky On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, wrote: > I have no problem with

RE: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread jimi.hullegard
I have no problem with automatic. It is "automagicall" stuff that I find a bit hard to like. Ie things that are automatic, but doesn't explain how and why they are automatic. But Disney Land and Disney World are actually really good examples of places where the magic stuff is suitable, ie in

docValues error

2016-02-28 Thread David Santamauro
I'm porting a 4.8 schema to 5.3 and I came across this new error when I tried to group.field=f1: unexpected docvalues type SORTED_SET for field 'f1' (expected=SORTED). Use UninvertingReader or index with docvalues. f1 is defined as positionIncrementGap="100">

Re: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread Jack Krupansky
Yes, it absolutely is automagic - just look at those examples in the Confluence ref guide. No special request handler is needed - just the normal default handler. Just the defType and qf parameters are needed - as shown in the wiki examples. It really is that simple! All you have to supply is the

RE: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread jimi.hullegard
I'm sorry, but I am still confused. I'm expecting to see some tag somewhere. Why doesn't the documentation nor the example solrconfig.xml contain such a tag? If the edismax requestHandler is defined automatically, the documentation should explain that. Also, there should still exist some xml

Re: ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread Jack Krupansky
Consult the Confluence wiki for more recent doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser You can specify all the parameters on your query request as in the examples, or by placing the parameters in the "defaults" section for your request handler in

Re: Query time de-boost

2016-02-28 Thread Jack Krupansky
Thanks for clarifying - that you are referring to the bq parameter which is in fact additive to the underlying score within the original query, while in the main query, or using the bf and boost and qf and pf parameters the boosting is multiplicative rather than "additive". IOW, only in the bq

Re: Query time de-boost

2016-02-28 Thread Emir Arnautovic
Hi Jack, I think we are talking about different things: I agree that boost is multiplicative, and boost values less than zero will reduce score, but if you use such boost value in bq, it will still bust documents that are matching it. Simplest example is with ids. If you query: q=id:a OR

ExtendedDisMax configuration nowhere to be found

2016-02-28 Thread jimi.hullegard
Hi, I want to setup ExtendedDisMax in our solr 4.6 server, but I can't seem to find any example configuration for this. Ie the configuration needed in solrconfig.xml. In the wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax it simply says: "Extended DisMax is already configured in the

Re: Exception SolrServerException: No live SolrServers available to handle this request:

2016-02-28 Thread Elaine Cario
You may be bumping into this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7951. Can you try a simple query (no grouping) and see if Solr responds? On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mugeesh Husain wrote: > Yes, all of the shards in a live state. I guess may be there will