You can create a copy field and copy to it from all the fields you want to
retrieve the suggestions from and then use that field with the suggester.
On Thu 13 Apr, 2017, 23:21 OTH, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've followed the steps here to set up auto-suggest:
> https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/solr-s
i found from StackOverflow that we have to use escaping of single quote and
to use double quote around the JSON string.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43387719/error-when-adding-user-for-solr-basic-authentication/43387895#43387895
curl --user user:password http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/auth
Hi ,
Would like to know Solr 4.10 supports distributed pivot faceting in non-solr
cloud mode.
According to the below JIRA , it looks like it is fixed in 4.10. But we use
solr in non cloud mode.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894
Thank you,
Raji
Hi Mahmoud
Beware of using a proxy. Your web application will get attacked, and you should
only forward the parameters that are needed for your app features. But you
thought of that already.
Cheers -- Rick
On April 12, 2017 11:39:57 PM EDT, Mahmoud Almokadem
wrote:
>Thanks Rick,
>
>I already r
After reading everyone's post, my thoughts are sometimes things are better
achieved with smoke and mirrors.
I achieved something similar by measuring my scores with no keyword hits. I
wrote simple jquery script to do a CSS strike through on the returned
message if the score was poor, + I returned
Why are you adding these update processors (esp. the
AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor) after DistributedUpdateProcessor? Try
adding them before DUP, and it has a better chance to work.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Pratik Thaker <
pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facin
bq: he searches he wants to know what keywords were not found in results.
We need to distinguish between words not found in the returned
documents and words not found at all. The solutions above tell you
about documents returned. If the keyword was found in a document not
returned (say the 11th d
Hi - That is not going to be that easy out-of-the-box. In regular setups the
output you find in debugging mode contains stemmed versions of the original
input text.
At best you use KeepWordsFilterFactory to get unstemmed terms, but those tokens
would, in usual cases, also have passed through fi
Thanks for your input guys. I will look into it.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:07 PM, simon wrote:
> Regardless of the business case (which would be good to know) you might
> want to try something along the lines of
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25038080/how-can-i-
> tell-solr-to-return-the-h
Regardless of the business case (which would be good to know) you might
want to try something along the lines of
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25038080/how-can-i-tell-solr-to-return-the-hit-search-terms-per-document
- basically generate pseudo-fields using the exists() function query which
wil
Another ugly solution would be to use the debugQuery=true option, then
analyze the reults in explain, if the word isnt in the explain, then you
strike it out.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi - There is no such feature out-of-the-box in Solr. But you probably
> could mo
Thanks, but i am not going to be brave this time :)
I have tried reclaimDeletesWeight on an ordinary index some time ago and it was
very aggresive with slightly higher values than default. I think setting this
weight in this situation would be analogous to a forceMerge every time, which
makes s
Hi - There is no such feature out-of-the-box in Solr. But you probably could
modify a highlighter implementation to return this information, the highlighter
is the component that comes closest to that feature.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Nilesh Kamani
> Sent: Thursday
Here is the example.
https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#safe=off&q=solr+spring+trump
You will see this under search results. Missing: trump
I am not asking for visual representation of such feature.
Is there anyway solr is returning such info in response ?
Are you asking visual representation or an actual feature. Because if
all your keywords/clauses are optional (default SHOULD) then Solr
automatically tries to match maximum number of them and then less and
less. So, if all words do not match, it will return results that match
less number of words.
Pasted images are generally stripped out, you'll have to provide an
external link.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Nilesh Kamani
wrote:
> Something like this. Does SOLR have such feature ?
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nilesh Kamani
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
Something like this. Does SOLR have such feature ?
[image: Inline image 1]
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nilesh Kamani
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> When we search google, sometimes google returns results with mention of
> keywords not found (mentioned as strike-through)
>
> Does Solr provide such
Hello
So, from what I've picked up so far:
FST only matches from the beginning of the input, but can handle spelling
errors and do stemming.
AnalyzingInfix can't handle spelling errors or stemming but can match from
the middle of the string.
(Is there anyway to achieve both of the functionalities a
Hello,
I've followed the steps here to set up auto-suggest:
https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/
So basically I configured the auto-suggester in solrconfig.xml, where I
told it which field in my index needs to be used for auto-suggestion.
The problem is:
When the user searches in th
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the insights into the memory requirements. Looks like cursor
approach is going to require a lot of memory for millions of documents.
If I run a query that returns only 500K documents still keeping 100K docs
per page, I don't see long GC pauses. So it is not really the number o
Hello All,
When we search google, sometimes google returns results with mention of
keywords not found (mentioned as strike-through)
Does Solr provide such feature ?
Thanks,
Nilesh Kamani
The boundary scanner supports sentence as per:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Highlighting
So, the word in context should - if I remember correctly - give you
the sentence that word is in even if the field has longer text.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Reso
If you don't care about sentence boundaries, but just want a window around
target terms and you want concordance functionality (sort before, after, etc),
you might check out LUCENE-5317, which is available as a standalone jar on my
github site [1] and is available through maven central.
Using a
Thanks Alex. Yes, I am using TIKA. So, to some extent it preserves the text
flow.
There is something interesting in your reply, "Or you could try using
highlighter to return only
the sentence. ".
I didnt understand that bit. How do we use Highlighter to return the
sentence?
To make sure, I want
BM25 came out of work on probabilistic engines, but using BM25 in Solr doesn’t
automatically make it probabilistic.
I read a paper once that showed the two models are not that different, maybe by
Karen Sparck-Jones.
Still, even with a probabilistic model, relevance cutoffs don’t work. It is
st
With great difficulty. PDF does not usually preserve the text flow, it
uses instead absolute positioning for text fragments. Extraction will
try to approximate the right thing, but it is an approximation. And if
you have two columns, it is harder again. Some documents may have
accessibility layer,
I had the chance to make some investigation code side,
and I basically confirm what Erick hypothesized and what Diego Ceccarelli
mentioned in this other thread [1].
Grouping happens with a 2 collector phases strategy :
1) first phase retrieve and sort the groups
2) second phase retrieve the top d
If you want to be brave
Through a clever bit of reflection, the parameters that
TieredMergePolicy uses to decide what segments to reclaim are settable
in solrconfig.xml (undocumented, so use at your own risk). You could
try bumping
reclaimDeletesWeight
in your TieredMergePolicy configuration
bq: Why is it possible then to alter replicationFactor via
MODIFYCOLLECTION in the collections API
Because MODIFYCOLLECTION just changes properties in the collection
definition generically and replicationFactor just happens to be one.
IOW there's no overarching reason.
It would be extra work to d
bq: FST-based vs AnalyzingInfix
They are two totally different things. FST-based suggesters are very
fast and compact. But they only match from the beginning of the input.
AnalyzingInfix creates a "sidecar" index that's searched like a normal
index and the _field_ is returned. Thus analyzinginfi
If i am search for word "growth" in a PDF, i want to output all the sentences
with the word "growth" in it.
How can that be done?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/keyword-in-content-for-PDF-document-tp4329754.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
Apologies, I meant "keyword-in-context".
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/keyword-in-content-for-PDF-document-tp4329754p4329756.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The security.json which I'm using is the default one that is available from
the Solr Documentation https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
solr/Basic+Authentication+Plugin.
{
"authentication":{
"blockUnknown": true,
"class":"solr.BasicAuthPlugin",
"credentials":{"solr":"IV0EHq1OnNrj6
Thanks, that's very helpful!
The third link especially is quite helpful.
Is there any recommendation regarding using FST-based vs AnalyzingInfix
suggesters?
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi,
> I think you got an old post. I would have a look at the built-in fe
On 4/13/2017 4:37 AM, Uchit Patel wrote:
> I have recently moved my cores from SOLR 5.1.0 to 6.4.0. I am using windows
> environment. I have large data in cores. I have total 6 cores with total data
> 142 GB. All cores are migrated perfectly but one is giving error:
>
> SolrCore Initialization F
On 4/13/2017 3:22 AM, Johannes Knaus wrote:
> Ok. Thank you for your quick reply. Though I still feel a little
> uneasy. Why is it possible then to alter replicationFactor via
> MODIFYCOLLECTION in the collections API? What would be the use case
> for this parameter at all then?
If you use a very
That looks good. can you share the security.json (commenting out
anything that's sensitive of course)
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> This is what I get when I run the code.
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error
> from server
Maybe not every entry got deleted and it was holding up the segment.
E.g. a child or parent record abandoned. If, for example, the parent
record has a date field and the child does not, then deleting with a
date-based query may trigger this. I think there was a bug about
abandoned child or somethin
Hi,
I have recently moved my cores from SOLR 5.1.0 to 6.4.0. I am using windows
environment. I have large data in cores. I have total 6 cores with total data
142 GB. All cores are migrated perfectly but one is giving error:
SolrCore Initialization Failures
- core_name:
org.apache.solr.c
I have forced a merge yesterday and went back to one segment.
One indexer program reindexes (most or all) every 20 minutes orso. There is
nothing custom at that particular point. There is no autoCommit, the indexer
program is responsible for a hard commit, it is the single source of reindexed
d
Ok. Thank you for your quick reply.
Though I still feel a little uneasy. Why is it possible then to alter
replicationFactor via MODIFYCOLLECTION in the collections API? What would be
the use case for this parameter at all then?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:eric
Hi Koji,
strictly talking about TF-IDF ( and BM25 which is an evolution of that
approach) I would say it is a weighting function/numerical statistic that
can be used for ranking functions and is based on probabilistic concepts (
such as IDF) but it is not a probabilistic function[1].
Indeed a BM25
Hi:
I have a question about edismax and dismax.
I'm using SOLR 6.3.0. Both types of query statements are the same, but the
results is differ.
Now there is such a document:
pj_title:word1 word2 word3
1. edismax
q=word1 word2&qf=pj_title&pf=pj_title&defType=edi
Hi,
With solr streaming expressions is there a way to parallel merge a number
of solr streams. Or a way to apply the parallel function to something like
this?
merge(
search(collection1, ...),
search(collection2, ...),
...
on="id asc")
)
Cheers,
Damien.
Hi,
When I try to add the user for the Solr Basic Authentication using the
following method in curl
curl --user user:password http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/authentication
-H 'Content-type:application/json' -d '{
"set-user": {"tom" : "TomIsCool" ,
"harry":"HarrysSecret"}}'
I g
45 matches
Mail list logo
