ultimate goal is to only index one directory and to serve it to
my Drupal site. Is there a way to run solr as a service so that it
restarts on boot? Can you please point me to how to do this?
--
James A. Rome
https://jamesrome.net
n: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
--
James A. Rome
https://jamesrome.net
for the
query result cache.
We already have a custom implementation in which we check our redis cache for
queries before they are sent to our aggregators which runs at 30% hit rate.
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
On 17/06/2020, 16:21, "Michael Gibney" wrote:
To expand a bit on
"true" regardless of
whether indexed is true or false?
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
On 17/06/2020, 14:02, "Michael Gibney" wrote:
facet.method=enum works by executing a query (against indexed values)
for each indexed value in a given field (which, for indexed=false, i
arts of the index to be read. In this case,
probably just facet on all the fields you care about. I'd add sorting too
if you sort on different fields.
The *:* query without facets or sorting does virtually nothing due to some
special handling...
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 10:4
got to query 4, as I
thought this would replicate the actions of the newSeacher.
Unfortunately we can't use the autowarm count that is available as part of the
filterCache/filterCache due to the custom deployment mechanism we use to update
our index.
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
On 16/06/202
s by using a rolling deployment
in Kubernetes.
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
On 12/06/2020, 18:58, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
I question whether fiterCache has anything to do with it, I suspect what’s
really happening is that first time you’re reading the relevant bits from disk
in
We've run the performance test after changing the fields to be of the type
string. We're seeing improved performance, especially after the first time the
query has run. The first run is taking around 1-2 seconds rather than 6-8
seconds and when the filter cache is present, the response time is a
hange the field type to a string, as our queries are always
looking for a specific value (and not intervals/ranges) and rerun our load test.
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
On 11/06/2020, 14:49, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
There’s a lot of confusion about using points-based fields
he underlying Google
Cloud Virtual Machine in our load test environment has 6 vCPUs, 32G RAM and
100GB SSD.
Would anyone be able to point me in a direction to either improve the
performance or understand the current performance is expected?
Kind Regards,
James Bodkin
I usually do a combination of grepping for ERROR in solr logs and checking
journalctl to see if an external program may have killed the process.
Cheers,
/
* James Austin Greene
* www.jamesaustingreene.com
* 336-lol-nerd
Check the log for for an OOM crash. Fatal exceptions will be in the main
solr log and out of memory errors will be in their own -oom log.
I've encountered quite a few solr crashes and usually it's when there's a
threshold of concurrent users and/or indexing happening.
On Thu, May 14, 2020, 9:2
I've been trying to get the _nest_path_ queries working with no success.
Does anyone have a link to an example of the configurations needed to get
this to work?
I'm using DIH to index my data and the child entities are getting indexed
(i can query them directly). But using the [child] ChildDocTran
Hello, I'm new to the group here so please excuse me if I do not have the
etiquette down yet.
Is it possible to have multiple entities (customer configurable, up to 40
atm) in a DIH configuration to be imported at once? Right now I have
multiple root entities in my configuration but they get inde
sam. 2 mai 2020 à 00:37, Phill Campbell
a écrit :
> Unless someone knows something concrete, I am going to move forward and
> assume that it is Google Chrome.
> Thank you Sylvain.
>
> > On May 1, 2020, at 3:42 PM, Sylvain James <mailto:sylvain.ja...@gmail.com>> wrote:
&
Hi Phil,
I encountered something similar recently, and after switched to Firefox,
all urls were fine.
May be a encoding side effect.
It seems to me that a new solr ui is in development. May be this issue will
be fixed for the release of this ui.
Sylvain
Le ven. 1 mai 2020 à 22:52, Phill Campbel
Hi Reinaldo,
Involved fields should be indexed for better performance ?
Sylvain
Le sam. 18 avr. 2020 à 18:46, Odysci a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We are seeing significant performance degradation on single queries that
> use fq with multiple values as in:
>
> fq=field1_name:(V1 V2 V3 ...)
>
> If we u
en it works, so we were thinking that we had the scope
of the parser correct.
If you could provide some guidance it'd be most appreciated.,
Kind regards,
James Smith
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain information that
is confidential and privileged. It is inte
Instead of dataConfig=data-config.xml, use config=data-config.xml .
From: sami
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 3:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Index database with SolrJ using xml file directly throws an error
Hi James,
Thanks for your reply. I am not absolotuely sure I
The parameter "dataConfig" should hold an actual xml document to override the
data-config.xml file you store in zookeeper (cloud) or the configuration
directory (standalone). Typically you do not use this parameter. Instead,
specify the "config" parameter with the filename (eg. data-config.xml
There is another thing to consider as well ...
When a node goes off line and then back on, unless Zookeeper has been
configured properly the ensemble may have trouble responding to the
cluster.
Jim Keeney
President, FitterWeb
E: nextves...@gmail.com
M: 703-568-5887
*FitterWeb Consulting*
*Are y
tion with "spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" to produce
did-you-mean-style suggestions when a query returns only a few hits and at
least some of the terms were in the index (but may be misspelled nevertheless).
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: neel choudhur
revented us
from validating the Config API (unless we had something configured wrong).
Moving on to SOLR_OPTS to see if that will work but it is undesirable since
the admin UI will display the settings (some of them sensitive).
JiM
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:24 AM James Strassburg
wrote:
>
toscaling actions such as ComputePlanAction to add custom
> core properties to any add replica or move replica command. That is
> probably worth another Jira as well.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:54 PM James Strassburg
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We're cr
Hello,
We're creating a SolrCloud in AWS and attempting to use autoscaling to add
replicas during nodeAdded/nodeLost. This was working fine for us until we
started creating collections specifying core properties (e.g.
/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&property.synonyms_datasource=REDACTED).
It
e "spellcheck.q" and it might work. You also
probably want smaller values for spellcheck.count and
spellcheck.maxCollationTries, maybe 10-20 for these.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
From: agorriz [mailto:agor...@tacitknowledge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 8:38 AM
To: so
em in
your case might be that you have separate sections in your
configuration. This might be causing only the last Search Component named
"spellcheck" to be active. I believe you need to have just one:
direct
...
index
...
wordbreak
...
James Dyer
Ing
We have a case on our dev server which uses the cloud example setup where
our two nodes are out of synch. One has records that the other does not.
We found the error:
c:organizations s:shard1 r:core_node1 x:organizations_shard1_replica0]
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor
udnev" wrote:
Will
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/transforming-and-indexing-custom-json.html
work
for you?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:17 PM, kasinger, james <
james.kasin...@nordstrom.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Has anyone had succes
t;,
"ColorFamily":"Red,Purple",
"SwatchImageUrl":"2/_102067602.jpg"
},
{
"Name": "CHARCOAL",
}
]
}
James
need anything else or if I should take my request over
to ZooKeeper.
Thanks.
Jim K.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:19 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/27/2018 10:57 AM, James Keeney wrote:
> > *1 - ZK ensemble not accepting return of node*
> > Currently, when a ZK node in the en
I'm setting up a solr cluster in AWS cloud and I need help with the
configuration of ZooKeeper. The cluster has 3 ZK nodes and 3 Solr nodes
There are two behaviors that are of concern:
*1 - ZK ensemble not accepting return of node*
Currently, when a ZK node in the ensemble goes down the ensemble
the phrase query. A document that says
*Foo* term1 term2 term3 term4 term5 term6 term7 term8 term9 *bar*
will not (because the search terms are within a group of 11 terms).
Note: If any search term is a MUST-NOT term, the phrase slop query will
never match.
"
Anybody willing to review and change to documentation?
Thanks,
James
Hello folks,
To start, we have a sharded solr cloud configuration running solr version 5.1.0
. During shard to shard communication there is a problem state where queries
are sent to a replica, and on that replica the storage is inaccessible. The
node is healthy so it’s still taking requests w
On my Solr 6.6 server I'd like to use BlendedTermQuery.
https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_6_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/BlendedTe
rmQuery.html
I know it is a Lucene class. Is there a Solr API available to access it? If
not, maybe some workaround?
Thanks!
Steps to reproduce:
Use Solr in SolrCloud mode.
Create collection with implicit routing and router.field set to some field,
e.g. "routerfield".
Index very small document. Stop time -> X
Index very large document. Stop time -> Y
Apply update to large document. Note that update command has at least
esters are not intended to automatically do another search if
> that's what you're asking.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:49 AM, James Keeney
> wrote:
> > I've setup the suggester and want to act on the full document when user
> > select
I've setup the suggester and want to act on the full document when user
selects one of the suggestions.
Ideally it would be nice to be able to tell the suggester to return more
than just the field that the suggestion index is built from.
If that can't be done, then should I do the following:
enstag, 17. Oktober 2017 12:43
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Howto verify that update is "in-place"
James,
@Amrit: Are you saying that the _version_ field should not change when
> performing an atomic update operation?
It should change. a new version will be allotted to
_version_ field should not change when
performing an atomic update operation?
Thanks
James
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Amrit Sarkar [mailto:sarkaramr...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 11:35
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Howto verify that update is &qu
ield which is not a
DocValue, the log output is very similar. Can I increase verbosity? Will it
tell me more about the type of update then?
Thank you!
James
.org/solr/guide/6_6/setting-up-an-external-zookeeper-ensemble.html#SettingUpanExternalZooKeeperEnsemble-PointSolrattheinstance
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:01 PM, James Keeney
> wrote:
>
> > I have a staging and a production solr cluster. I'd like to have them use
> >
I have a staging and a production solr cluster. I'd like to have them use
the same zookeeper cluster. It seems like it is possible if I can set a
different directory for the second cluster. I've looked through the
documentation though and I can't quite figure out where to set that up. As
a result m
mind you but possible.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Teague James wrote:
> Hello everyone! I'm still stuck on this issue and could really use
> some help. I have a Solr 6.0.0 instance that is storing documents
> peppered with text like "1a", "2e",
pha-numeric two character value, such a n0, b1, 1z, etc.:
...
Where "8667" is the document ID of the record that had the hit, but no
highlight. Other searches, "ms" for example, return:
...
MS
Why does highlighting fail for "1a" type searches? Any help is appreciated!
Thanks!
-Teague James
MS
Why does highlighting fail for "1a" type searches? Any help is appreciated!
Thanks!
-Teague James
its abilities? Even in this case,
it'd be nice if it failed more gracefully than this.
Could you provide the query parameters you are sending and also how you have
spellcheck configured?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:cl
rwise every combination will get reported
as returning results.
I hope this and other comments you've gotten helps demystify spellcheck
configuration. I do agree it is fairly complicated and frustrating to get it
just right.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From:
For NOT NULL, I had some success using:
WHERE field_name <> '' (greater or less than empty quotes)
Best regards,
Gethin.
From: Joel Bernstein
Sent: 05 January 2017 20:12:19
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Regarding /sql -- WHERE <> IS NULL and IS
Hello,
Thanks for reading this, but it has been resolved. I honestly don't know
what was happening, but restarting my shell and running the exact same
commands today instead of yesterday seems to have fixed it.
Best,
James
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:07 PM, James Muerle wrote:
> Hello,
the moment. If you need any additional information, I'd
be glad to provide it.
Thanks for reading!
James
Hi - Thanks for the reply, I'll give that a try.
-Original Message-
From: jimtronic [mailto:jimtro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 6.0 Highlighting Not Working
Perhaps you need to wrap your inner "" and "" tags in t
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
c
) be accomplished following the
approach outlined here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Mohan, Sowmya [mailto:sowmya.mo...@icf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:07 AM
To: solr-user
Can someone please help me troubleshoot my Solr 6.0 highlighting issue? I
have a production Solr 4.9.0 unit configured to highlight responses and it
has worked for a long time now without issues. I have recently been testing
Solr 6.0 and have been unable to get highlighting to work. I used my 4.9
c
interface, which was just simpler than copying and pasting that
hairy-looking, multiline command into a terminal. If you used the films
example as the basis for a tutorial and wrote it up in pretty HTML, you
could include screenshots, etc. That would make it completely painless.
James
restimated in a tutorial.
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I apologize if this is a really stupid question. I followed all
>
> It's not a stupid question, the tutorial is completley broken -- and for
> that matter, in my opinion, the data_driv
they can't imagine approaching from a blank slate.
Thanks for the suggestions. Had to chuckle, though: one of your links (
quora.com) is the one that I started with. Step 1: "Download Solr, actually
do the tutorial ..."
Best wishes,
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:41 PM, John Bic
leas" (note capital "M").
That appears to be the issue. Searching for name:Foundation indeed returns
the expected result. I will now go find some better entry point to SOLR
than the tutorial, which has wasted enough of my time for one day. Any
suggestions would be welcome.
James
On
ot; type rather than one of the text based fieldTypes.
> "string" types are not tokenized, thus a field with
> "My dog has fleas" will fail to find "My". It'll even not match
> "my dog has fleas" (note capital "M").
>
> The admin UI
don't really have anything to go on for
troubleshooting besides asking dumb questions.
James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:24 AM, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> Please share the exact query syntax?
>
> Are you using a collection you built or one of the examples?
>
> On Fri, Sep
at this point. I
tried blowing it all away and restarting from scratch with no luck. Where
should I be looking for problems here? I am running this on a MacBook, OS X
10.9, latest JDK (1.8).
James
--
*James Pritchett*
Leader, Process Redesign and Analysis
llChecking-Thespellcheck.maxCollationTriesParameter
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: SRINI SOLR [mailto:srini.s...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE
Hi all - please help me he
isplay/solr/Spell+Checking for more
information.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: kaveh minooie [mailto:ka...@plutoz.com]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 8:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: using spell check on phrases
Hi everyone
I am using solr 6 a
Hi
I think you'll need to do some unzipping of your zip files using an unzip
application before you post to Solr. If you do this via a OS level batch script
you can apply logic there to deal with nested zips. Then post your unzipped
files to Solr via Curl.
James
-Original Me
d
be appreciated. If this is a "feature" of the application, it'd be nice to see
that in the documentation.
Thanks Shawn!
-Teague
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 4:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Su
Hello,
I am trying to install Solr 6.0.0 and have been successful with the default
installation, following the instructions provided on the Apache Solr
website. However, I do not want Solr running on port 8983, I want it to run
on port 80. I started a new Ubuntu 14.04 VM, installed open JDK 8, the
e a weightField as a combination of the 3
boosting fields?
Is this possible, or am I best off indexing with Ngrams like this:
http://www.andornot.com/blog/post/Advanced-autocomplete-with-Solr-Ngrams-and-Twitters-typeaheadjs.aspx
Thoughts most welcome.
Thanks
James
Correction: Item 1 is not an absolute requirement; we can use Apache or Tomcat
if that makes things any easier.
-Original Message-
From: Gregoric, James [mailto:james.grego...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr M2M
Dear Solr Community,
We would like to provide an in-house group of users access to our Solr database
in a way that meets the following specifications:
1. Use the Jetty web service that Solr 6.0 installs by default.
2. Provide an M2M (machine-to-machine) interface, so a user can setu
complete?).
Thanks,
James
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:39, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>
> What exacting are you merge policy settings in solrconfig? They control
> when the background merges will be performed. Sometimes they do need to be
> tweaked.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> O
monitor what’s happening with the background
merges.
Thanks,
James
See the old docs at
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#Configuration
In particular, you need this line in solrconfig.xml:
./spellchecker
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Solanki [mailto:nitinml...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22
But if you really need more than 2 edits, I think IndexBasedSpellChecker
supports it.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:29 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: How get around solr&#
Ryan,
The json response format changed for Solr 5.0. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3029 . Is the single-core solr
running a 4.x version with the cloud solr running 5.x ? If they are both on
the same major version, then we have a bug.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
ting on _that_ field. Try
> > adding "debug=query" to the URL and look at the "parsed_query" section
> > of the return and you'll see what field(s) is/are actually being
> > searched against.
> >
> > NOTE: The field you highlight on _must_ have st
Todd,
I have no idea if this will perform acceptable with so many multiple values. I
doubt the solr/patch code was really optimized for such a use case. In my
production environment, I have je-6.2.31.jar on the classpath. I don't think
I've tried it with other versions.
James D
.pdf"
with the same result no highlight in the respond as below:
"highlighting": { "pdf1": {} }
=(
Really... do not know what to do...
Thanks for your time, if you have any more suggestion where I could be missing
something... please let me know.
Hi Evert,
I recently needed help with phrase highlighting and was pointed to the
FastVectorHighlighter which worked out great. I just made a change to the
configuration to add generateWordParts="0" and generateNumberParts="0" so that
searches for things like "1a" would get highlighted correctly
I am trying to build an edismax search handler that will allow a fuzzy search,
using the "query fields" property (qf).
I have two instances of SOLR 4.8.1, one of which has edismax "qf" configured
with no fuzzy search
...
ns_name^3.0 i_topic^3.0 i_object_type^3.0
...
And the other with a fuzzy
Brian,
Be sure to have...
transformer="RegexTransformer"
...in your tag. It’s the RegexTransformer class that looks for
"splitBy".
See https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#RegexTransformer for more
information.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Origin
roduces it. At
the very least, we should handle these problems better than throwing SIOOB like
this.
Long term, there is probably a better design we could come up with for how
terms are identified within queries and how collations are generated.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Me
Thanks everyone who replied! The FastVectorHighlighter did the trick. Here
is how I configured it:
In solrconfig.xml:
In the requestHandler I added:
on
text
true
100
In schema.xml:
I modified the text field:
I restarted Solr, re-indexed the documents and tested. All phrases are
correctly highli
the phrase
correct. It is the method of highlighting (I'm trying to get one set of tags
per phrase) and the occasional breaking of a single phrase into 2 hits.
Given that setup, what do you recommend? I'm not sure I understand the approach
you're describing. I appreciate the help!
tiguous=true ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Teague James
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
>> here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
Hello everyone,
I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
Solr 4.9
solrconfig.xml (partial snip)
xml
explicit
10
Hi everyone!
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to URL encode URLs that I'm
importing from SQL using the DIH? The importer pulls in something like
"http://www.downloadsite.com/document that is being downloaded.doc" and then
the Tika parser can't download the document because it ends up trying
r (4.6) with newer solr. I think there might have been an api
change or something that prevented the uncommitted caching code from working
with newer versions, but I honestly forget. This is probably a viable solution
if you don't want to write any code, but it might take some trial and err
implement partial updates with DIH.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Todd Long [mailto:lon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DIH Caching with Delta Import
It appears that DIH entity caching (e.g
isn't the most elegant solution but it
gets around the fact that DIH is single-threaded.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: nabil Kouici [mailto:koui...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:58 AM
To: Solr-user
Subject: DIH parallel processing
Hi All,
I
he query string you are trying.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Mark Fenbers [mailto:mark.fenb...@noaa.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:38 PM
To: Solr User Group
Subject: File-based Spelling
Greetings!
I'm attempting to use a file-based spell checker.
y well-documented on the old solr wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Arnon Yogev [mailto:arn...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Spell
Mark! For what it's worth - up
vote. Thanks!
Cheers!
-Teague James
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 6:12 PM, Koji Sekiguchi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think I saw similar requirement recently in mailing list. The feature
> sounds reasonable to me.
>
> > If not, how
ed at
and possibly we can come up with a way to handle these cases.
A way to work around these bugs is to strip your query down to raw terms,
separated by spaces, and use "spellcheck.q" with the raw terms only.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From:
boost the term frequency).
Keep in mind that while this will work fine for regular word-by-word spell
suggestions, collations are not going to work well with these approaches.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: Max Chadwick [mailto:mpchadw...@gmail.com]
Sent
to write a transformer to get what you want.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: coolmals [mailto:coolm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 12:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: exclude folder in dataimport handler.
I am importing files from my file
Talha,
Can you try putting your queried keyword in "spellcheck.q" ?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
-Original Message-
From: talha [mailto:talh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 10:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr spell check not s
elp with more information from you?
Can you provide a few document examples that have Bangla text, then the full
query request with a misspelled Bangla word (from the document examples you
provide), then the full spellcheck response, and the total # of documents
returned ?
James Dyer
Ingra
be to add "spellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%" or
"spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=100%", so when testing collations against the
index, it will require all the terms to match something. See
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collateParam.XX for
more informati
(), calling super(), then post-filtering out your stop
words from the response. You'll want to request a few more terms so you're
more likely to get results even if a term or two get filtered out. You can
specify your custom spell checker in solrconfig.xml.
James Dyer
Ingram Con
1 - 100 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
