Re: faceted search field sorting

If you don't want the facets sorted by decreasing count (the default), you can specify facet.sort=index to get "index order" ((lexicographic by indexed term) -Yonik http://heliosearch.com -- making solr shine On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:08 PM, MC wrote: > Hello, > Here is a public API that uses f

Re: Faceted search on SOLR

Thanks for help, Alexandre. It worked as you described. I have other question. Suppose I have product catalogue that has many sub categories, each one has different group of fields. When a user search the catalogue, we should show corresponding facet fields on left based on result set. That means

Re: Faceted search on SOLR

Facets work on the tokenized content of the field. You must be using text_en or similar type. Switch the facet field to use String. If you are using eDisMax and want to be able to search it for substrings (e.g. if somebody searches for Intel), use copyField to create two fields, one for searching,

RE: Faceted search question (Tokenizing)

What do you want the results to be, persons? And the facets should be interests or subinterests? Why are there two layers of interests anyway? Can there my many subinterests under one interest? Is one of those two a name of the interest which would look nice as a facet? Anyway, have you rea

Re: Faceted search question (Tokenizing)

Here is another simpler example of what I am trying to achieve: Multi-Valued Field 1: Data 1 Data 2 Data 3 Data 4 Multi-Valued Field 2: Data 11 Data 12 Data 13 Data 14 Multi-Valued Field 3: Data 21 Data 22 Data 23 Data 24 How can I specify that Data 1,Data 11 and data 21 are all related? And i

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

Hi, Sorry for the top-quote: On a mobile. A discussion on the evils of patents aside, shirley library catalogues are prior art. I remember such systems giving lists of matches by category, if maybe not counts. Will look at the patent applications, but sheesh, what a waste of time and resources.

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

patent rights only last 17 years then it is public domain. On 08/17/2011 11:05 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: I have no plan to look at the patents, but there is some serious prior art in faceted search. First, faceted classification for libraries was invented by S. R. Ranganathan in 1933. Comput

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

I have no plan to look at the patents, but there is some serious prior art in faceted search. First, faceted classification for libraries was invented by S. R. Ranganathan in 1933. Computer search for libraries dates from the 1960's, probably. Combining the two is obvious, even back then. wunde

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:51 AM, LaMaze Johnson wrote: > > Paul Libbrecht-4 wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > I believe, precisely, the objective of such a thread is to be helped by > > knowledgeable techies into being able to do what you say. > > > > If Johnson gave only 3 lines of details, such as

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

Paul Libbrecht-4 wrote: > > Robert, > > I believe, precisely, the objective of such a thread is to be helped by > knowledgeable techies into being able to do what you say. > > If Johnson gave only 3 lines of details, such as claimed patent URLs or > dates, we might easily be able to tell him th

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit

Le 17 août 2011 à 13:01, Robert Muir a écrit : >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...] >> >> Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK? >> After all, this is of concern to us all. >

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Tomas Zerolo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...] > > Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK? > > After all, this is of concern to us all. >

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...] Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK? After all, this is of concern to us all. Regards -- tomás

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

While I agree with Grant we shouldn't engage on a legal discussion, it may be worth that this thread shares a few dates of when faceted search was used "in the old times"... paul Le 16 août 2011 à 22:02, LaMaze Johnson a écrit : > > Grant Ingersoll-2 wrote: >> >> I know you mean well and ar

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

Grant Ingersoll-2 wrote: > > I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next, but such > a discussion is really beyond the scope of this mailing list. Most of us > aren't lawyers (I wonder if anyone here is?) and if we were, we wouldn't > likely speculate in public on something t

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next, but such a discussion is really beyond the scope of this mailing list. Most of us aren't lawyers (I wonder if anyone here is?) and if we were, we wouldn't likely speculate in public on something that can only be decided in the cou

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

Gora Mohanty-3 wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:03 AM, LaMaze Johnson > wrote: > [...] >> Just thought I would make others aware of this.  I'd appreciate any >> insight >> others might have regarding the issue. > [...] > > If you will permit me a moment of levity, from th

Re: Faceted Search Patent Lawsuit - Please Read

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:03 AM, LaMaze Johnson wrote: [...] > Just thought I would make others aware of this.  I'd appreciate any insight > others might have regarding the issue. [...] If you will permit me a moment of levity, from the perspective of someone in India, I would say, move to a non

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

Another thing you can try is trunk. This specific case has been improved by an order of magnitude recenty. The case that has been sped up is initial population of the filterCache, or when the filterCache can't hold all of the unique values, or when faceting is configured to not use the filterCache

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

I am sorry for raising up this thread after 6 months. But we have still problems with faceted search on full-text fields. We try to get most frequent words in a text field that is created in 1 hour. The faceted search takes too much time even the matching number of documents (created_at within 1

Re: faceted search with job title

retrieved based on the job board. What do you think? You can store the XPath expressions in a text file as strings, and load/compile them as needed. From: "Nagelberg, Kallin" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM Subject: RE: faceted search

Re: faceted search with job title

only a string which can be stored in a text file > or > db, and retrieved based on the job board. What do you think? > > > > > > From: "Nagelberg, Kallin" > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > Sent: Wed, July 2

Re: faceted search with job title

To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM Subject: RE: faceted search with job title Yeah you should definitely just setup a custom parser for each site.. should be easy to extract title using groovy's xml parsing along with tagsoup for sloppy ht

Re: faceted search with job title

r dom code.  But is regex pattern flexible enough for all job boards? Thanks. From: "Nagelberg, Kallin" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM Subject: RE: faceted search with job title Yeah you should defin

RE: faceted search with job title

ge here :P -Kallin Nagelberg -Original Message- From: Savannah Beckett [mailto:savannah_becket...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:20 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: dave.sea...@magicalia.com Subject: Re: faceted search with job title mmm...there must be better way.

Re: faceted search with job title

42:55 AM Subject: RE: faceted search with job title You'd probably need to do some post processing on the pages and set up rules for each website to grab that specific bit of data. You could load the html into an xml parser, then use xpath to grab content from a particular tag with a cl

RE: faceted search with job title

You'd probably need to do some post processing on the pages and set up rules for each website to grab that specific bit of data. You could load the html into an xml parser, then use xpath to grab content from a particular tag with a class or id, based on the particular website -Original M

Re: Faceted search outofmemory

There is memory used for each facet. All of the facets are loaded for any facet query. Your best shot is to limit the number of facets. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:42 AM, olivier sallou wrote: > I have given 6G to Tomcat. Using facet.method=enum and facet.limit seems to > fix the issue with a few

Re: Faceted search outofmemory

I have given 6G to Tomcat. Using facet.method=enum and facet.limit seems to fix the issue with a few tests, but I do know that it is not a "final" solution. Will work under certain configurations. Real "issue" is to be able to know what is the required RAM for an index... 2010/6/29 Nagelberg, Kal

RE: Faceted search outofmemory

How much memory have you given the solr jvm? Many servlet containers have small amount by default. -Kal -Original Message- From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Faceted search outofmemory Hi,

Re: Re: Faceted search outofmemory

ttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.limit > > -Original message- > From: olivier sallou > Sent: Tue 29-06-2010 20:11 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; > Subject: Re: Faceted search outofmemory > > How do make paging over facets? > > 2010/6/29 A

RE: Re: Faceted search outofmemory

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.limit   -Original message- From: olivier sallou Sent: Tue 29-06-2010 20:11 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Subject: Re: Faceted search outofmemory How do make paging over facets? 2010/6/29 Ankit Bhatnagar > > Did you

Re: Faceted search outofmemory

How do make paging over facets? 2010/6/29 Ankit Bhatnagar > > Did you trying paging them? > > > -Original Message- > From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Faceted search outofmemory > > H

RE: Faceted search outofmemory

Did you trying paging them? -Original Message- From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Faceted search outofmemory Hi, I try to make a faceted search on a very large index (around 200GB with 200

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

case? > If not, is there any other way to mitigate the cache re-building problem of > facet search? > > --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> From: Yonik Seeley >> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

core strategy still work in this case? If not, is there any other way to mitigate the cache re-building problem of facet search? --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote: > From: Yonik Seeley > Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger > To: solr-user@lucene.apa

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

Ok, I will have a look at distributed search, multi-core solr solution. Thank you Yonik, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Furkan Kuru wrote: > > We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in > every > > minute. > > >

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

Using the Zoie/Bobo combination gives you realtime faceting. (Lucene based) http://sna-projects.com/zoie/ http://sna-projects.com/bobo/ wiki write-up: http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/BOBO/Realtime+Faceting+with+Zoie We can take this over to the zoie/bobo mailing list if you have questio

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Furkan Kuru wrote: > We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in every > minute. > > We commit for every 100 documents received. > > The facet search is executed every 5 mins. OK, that's the problem - pretty much every facet search is reb

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in every minute. We commit for every 100 documents received. The facet search is executed every 5 mins. Here is the stats result after facet search with normal facet.method=fc (it took 95 seconds) *name: * fieldValueCache *cl

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Furkan Kuru wrote: > facet.limit = default value 100 > facet.minCount is 1 > > The document count that matches the query is 8-10K in average. I did not > calculate the terms (maybe using using facet.limit=-1 and facet.minCount=1) > > My index entirely fits into memo

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

eturning the facet > counts of all 1M of facet terms, or did you limit the number of facet terms > returned to a small number? > > Also did your entire index fit within RAM? > > > --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Furkan Kuru wrote: > > > From: Furkan Kuru > > Subject: Re: F

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

all 1M of facet terms, or did you limit the number of facet terms returned to a small number? Also did your entire index fit within RAM? --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Furkan Kuru wrote: > From: Furkan Kuru > Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger > To: solr-user@lucene.a

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

The documents full-text fields are 140 chars length (tweets). Actually I had looked at those parameters and thought no change was neccessary because the terms per document would be few and the unique term count was nearly 1 M. I don't know exactly but average term count per document text can be 10

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Andy wrote: > Yonik, > > Just curious why does using enum improve the facet performance. > > Furkan was faceting on a text field with each word being a facet value. I'd > imagine that'd mean there's a large number of facet values. According to the > documentation

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

FacetParameters#facet.method) facet.method=fc is faster when a field has many unique terms. So how come enum, not fc, is faster in this case? Also why use filterCache less? Thanks Andy --- On Fri, 6/4/10, Furkan Kuru wrote: > From: Furkan Kuru > Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as i

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

I am using 1.4 version. I have tried your suggestion, it takes around 25-30 seconds now. Thank you, On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Faceting on a full-text field is hard. > What version of Solr are you using? > > If it's 1.4 or later, try setting > facet.method=enum > >

Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger

Faceting on a full-text field is hard. What version of Solr are you using? If it's 1.4 or later, try setting facet.method=enum And to use the filterCache less, try facet.enum.cache.minDf=100 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Furkan Kuru wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: Faceted search not working? (RESOLVED)

Ah, the issue was explicitly specifying components... query I don't remember changing this during default install, commenting this out enabled faceted search component. Thanks all for the help. Ilya On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Sascha Szott wrote: > Hi, > > please note, that the Face

Re: Faceted search not working?

Sascha thanks for the response, here is the output... 0 0 xml title:* title Baseball game Soccer game Football game On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Sascha Szott wrote: > Hi Ilya, > > Ilya Sterin

Re: Faceted search not working?

Hi, please note, that the FacetComponent is one of the six search components that are automatically associated with solr.SearchHandler (this holds also for the QueryComponent). Another note: By using name="components" all default components will be replaced by the components you explicitly m

Re: Faceted search not working?

Is the FacetComponent loaded at all? query facet On 2010-05-25, at 3:32 AM, Sascha Szott wrote: > Hi Birger, > > Birger Lie wrote: >> I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to "on" and "off" :) > You can use true and on interchangeably. > > -Sascha > >> >> >> -birg

Re: Faceted search not working?

Hi Birger, Birger Lie wrote: I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to "on" and "off" :) You can use true and on interchangeably. -Sascha -birger -Original Message- From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com] Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Fa

RE: Faceted search not working?

Hi, try http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=YOUR-QUERY&facet=true&facet.field=title I don't think the bolean fields is mapped to "on" and "off" :) -birger -Original Message- From: Ilya Sterin [mailto:ster...@gmail.com] Sent: 24. mai 2010 23:11 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject

Re: Faceted search not working?

it's probably because your query isn't matching anything. try q=title: [* TO *], or maybe even simply *:* if you are trying to match all documents. Erik On May 24, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Ilya Sterin wrote: I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set doesn't retu

Re: Faceted search not working?

Hi Ilya, Ilya Sterin wrote: I'm trying to perform a faceted search without any luck. Result set doesn't return any facet information... http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=title:*&facet=on&facet.field=title I'm getting the result set, but no face information present? Is there something else

Re: Faceted search in 2 indexes

Hi, Even I am looking for a solution for this. case: Index1: has the meta data and the contents of the files (basically read only for the end users) Index2: will have the tags attached to the search results that user may get out of index1 (so read/write). so next time when user searches it again

Re: Faceted search in 2 indexes

: I have 2 indexes with some similar fields and some distinct fields. I need : to make a faceted search that returns the union of the same search in these : 2 indexes. : : How can I make it? Assuming you don't need facets or sorting on the fields that are distinct between the two indexes (which

Re: Faceted Search on Dynamic Fields?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > Faceting, as of now, can only be done of definitive field names. To further clarify, the fields you can facet on can include those defined by dynamic fields. You just must specify the exact field name when you facet. Did you reall

Re: Faceted Search on Dynamic Fields?

Faceting, as of now, can only be done of definitive field names. Faceting on field names matching wildcards (dynamic field being one such scenario) is yet to be supported. There are lot of open issues, aiming to achieve this. Find a similar discussion here - http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/d

Re: Faceted Search on Dynamic Fields?

Also, here is the field definition in the schema -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-on-Dynamic-Fields--tp25612887p25612936.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: faceted search cache and optimisations

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Nicolae Mihalache wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using faceted search (perhaps in a dumb way) to collect some statistics > for my index. I have documents in various languages, one of the field is > "language" and I simply want to see how many documents I have for each > lan

Re: Faceted Search

if you are querying using a http request you can add these two parameters: facet=true facet.field=field_for_faceting and optionally this one to set the max number of facets: facet.limit=facet_limit I don't know if it's what you need... On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Sajith Weerakoon wrote:

Re: faceted search returning multiple values for same field

Shantanu, It sounds like all you have to do is switch to a field type that doesn't tokenize your mfg field. Try field type "string". You'll need to reindex once you make this change. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: "Deo,

Re: faceted search returning multiple values for same field

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Deo, Shantanu wrote: > > I have tried playing around with defining the fieldtype using the > following analyzers: > positionIncrementGap="100" > > > > > > words="manufacturer.txt"/> > > > > > Any ideas if its possible to get the same facets a

RE: Faceted Search!

: generating XML feed file and feeding to the Solr server. However, I was : also looking into implementing having sub-categories within the : categories if that make sense. For example, in the shopper.com we have : the categories of by price, manufactures and so on and with in them,they : are su

RE: Faceted Search!

e -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Faceted Search! : define the sub-categories. let's say from the above example, the : category "price" has different sub-cate

RE: Faceted Search!

Niraj: What environment are you using? SQL Server/.NET/Windows? or something else? -Mike -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Faceted Search! : define the sub-categories

Re: Faceted Search!

: define the sub-categories. let's say from the above example, the : category "price" has different sub-categories like "less than 100" : ,"100-200"? I'm guessing, we explicit define this in XML feed file, but : I could be very wrong. In any case, can you please give me the short : example achi

Re: Faceted Search!

Hi Chris, thank you for the reply. I was reading other posting regarding faceted search and seems like they are using the filtering capability of Lucene for that. If that the case, can we have control over the "label" of categories? For example: in shopper.com when we search for camera gi

Re: Faceted Search!

: Thanks Chris for replying my question. So I'm thinking about using a : CMS and when somebody publishes a page in CMS, I would generated this : well structure XML file and feed that xml to Solr to generate the index : on those data. Then, I can simply do faceted search using the correct : Lucene

Re: Faceted Search!

Thanks Chris for replying my question. So I'm thinking about using a CMS and when somebody publishes a page in CMS, I would generated this well structure XML file and feed that xml to Solr to generate the index on those data. Then, I can simply do faceted search using the correct Lucene query f

Re: Faceted Search!

: search for documents. I'm planning to use Nutch to crawl that website : and use Solr to cluster my search results. I tried integrating Nutch : with Solr following FooFactory.com's blog ..but I could not follow : few of the steps as I'm very new to both of them. If anyone of you have : imp

Re: Faceted search glitch???

: It sure could, but I was just trying to stretch my imagination as far : as possible. filter.term also seems to me like only a marginal : improvement over lucene syntax. the only reason i suggested filter.term at all was because it eliminates hte need to worry baout quoting/escaping when dealin

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On 2/10/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : As for future expansion, some possibilities are: filter.op/filter.q.op : (set operator of filter query parser, which is currently OR regardless I'm not sure why/how thta would ever make sense... you'd be much better off using seperate fil

Re: Faceted search glitch???

: > > filter.query : > > filter.term : > > filter. : I like self-documenting parameter names, but if there is concern about : verbosity, how 'bout: : : fq : fq.term no it's cool ... filter.query and filter.term are definitely better. : As for future expansion, some possibilities are: filter.op/f

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mike Klaas wrote: > Might I suggest: > > filter.query > filter.term > filter. I like it. While Hoss has a point, though descriptive names do make a lot of sense too. It has been a bit confusing to explain facet.que

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mike Klaas wrote: Might I suggest: filter.query filter.term filter. I like it. While Hoss has a point, though descriptive names do make a lot of sense too. It has been a bit confusing to explain facet.query and fq as two different things. However, is there a

Re: Faceted search glitch???

: filter.query : filter.term : filter. there's a whole lot of Unicode letters availble thta could fill in the f_ blank, how much more expansion do we really need? :) I suppose filter.term is a wise choice, and adding filter.query as an alias makes sense too ... i'm just a big fan of short param

Re: Faceted search glitch???

Might I suggest: filter.query filter.term filter. -Mike On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ft and fq work for me! Erik On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> : The simplest form would be a term quer

Re: Faceted search glitch???

ft and fq work for me! Erik On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping whatsoever: : : Something like: : fq=High School I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping whatsoever: : : Something like: : fq=High School I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param proliferation, and there's definitely going to be a need for some kind of markup in the fu

Re: Faceted search glitch???

: The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping whatsoever: : : Something like: : fq=High School I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param proliferation, and there's definitely going to be a need for some kind of markup in the future to denote which query syntax to use for different

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On 2/9/07, Gunther, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:"High School". Also do you want to use the filter query param instead fq=education_facet:"High School" Hopefully having the cl

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On 2/9/07, Gunther, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:"High School". Also do you want to use the filter query param instead fq=education_facet:"High School" Hopefully having the client escape simple term filters won't be necessary

Re: Faceted search glitch???

Awesome, thanks that works. From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Faceted search glitch??? Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:28:05 -0500 On 2/9/07, Peter McPeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: O

RE: Faceted search glitch???

Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:"High School". Also do you want to use the filter query param instead fq=education_facet:"High School" -Andrew -Original Message- From: Peter McPeterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:22 PM To:

Re: Faceted search glitch???

On 2/9/07, Peter McPeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Solr, I'm indexing a facet field which contains different values on each record (of course) but it doesn't seem to be working the way I had expected. For instance: When looking for: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=sales&facet=true&fa

Re: Faceted search problem

On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Peter McPeterson wrote: Hi all, I'm trying this solr ruby DSL called Flare/solrb and I don't really know how the faceted search works because I cant add whatever fields I want to to the index. This is currently not working: conn = Solr::Connection.new('http://l

Re: Faceted search/browse

On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Giri wrote: Do you have any simple tutorial that explains how to enable the faceted search in solr? I wouold appreciate if you point me to some resource. The wiki is the best source of information on Solr. For facets, look here:

Re: Faceted search/browse

Hi Yonik, Thanks for the information and suggestion. Do you have any simple tutorial that explains how to enable the faceted search in solr? I wouold appreciate if you point me to some resource. Thanks much On 12/28/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/27/06, Giri <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Faceted search/browse

On 12/27/06, Giri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am currently exploring the possibility of using faceted browsing using Solr, and got few questions. I am currently indexing some fields that has more than one value per record or e.g., a field name called metaKeyword, and the value for this contains