Re: How to update dataImportHandler config in solr version 5.3

Are you 100% sure it is using solrcloud and that the config is not simply on the disk? On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:11 AM Lewin Joy (TMNA) wrote: > > ll PROTECTED 関係者外秘 > Hi, > > We have an old collection running on a very old solr version. 5.3 > Now, we have a need to update the

How to update dataImportHandler config in solr version 5.3

ll PROTECTED 関係者外秘 Hi, We have an old collection running on a very old solr version. 5.3 Now, we have a need to update the url string inside db-data-config.xml for the DataImportHandler. Now, I see that this version does not support downconfig and upconfig as good as in current versions. I was

Re: FW: SOLR version 8 bug???

Hi Phil, The error you mention “The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.” isn't being generated by Solr but by Drupal. We can't tell from the error text you're providing what the Drupal Solr plugin is actually sending to Solr as a query I'm afraid: if you could fig

FW: SOLR version 8 bug???

I just updated to SOLR 8.5.0 on one of our test servers and I continue to get the same issue/bug I described below. Below my description of the problem I have also included the log message detail from Drupal. This is the third time I have submitted this item. For the time being we will contin

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

en Walker wrote: > >> > >> Hello Erick, > >> > >> Thanks for your reply! > >> > >> You mean that, we should follow below steps right? > >> Here is the data directory path : > >> solr/solr-8.2.0/server/solr/product/item_c

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

ry path : >> solr/solr-8.2.0/server/solr/product/item_core/data >> >> STEPS :- >> 1. Stop old solr-8.2.0 server >> 2. Copy data directory (from old solr version to new solr version) >> copy solr/solr-8.2.1/server/solr/product/item_core/data to >> solr/solr-

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

ld follow below steps right? > Here is the data directory path : > solr/solr-8.2.0/server/solr/product/item_core/data > > STEPS :- > 1. Stop old solr-8.2.0 server > 2. Copy data directory (from old solr version to new solr version) > copy solr/solr-8.2.1/server/solr/product/item_

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Hello Erick, Thanks for your reply! You mean that, we should follow below steps right? Here is the data directory path : solr/solr-8.2.0/server/solr/product/item_core/data STEPS :- 1. Stop old solr-8.2.0 server 2. Copy data directory (from old solr version to new solr version) copy solr/solr

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

k how it works. >> >> Then as already said. You can simply install another version of Solr if you >> are within a Solr major version 8.x in Linux is simply a symbolic link >> pointing from one Solr version to the other. In this way you can easily >> switch back

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

mply install another version of Solr if you > are within a Solr major version 8.x in Linux is simply a symbolic link > pointing from one Solr version to the other. In this way you can easily > switch back as well. > > Finally, check your memory consumption. Normally heap is sign

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

.x in Linux is simply a symbolic link pointing from one Solr version to the other. In this way you can easily switch back as well. Finally, check your memory consumption. Normally heap is significant smaller then the total available memory as the non-heap memory is used by Solr for caching. If

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

alker wrote: > > We are upgrading solr version from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 > > version but we have faced out of memory error while importing data and > > then we have extended memory in our server and then again start > > importing process but it has work too slowy for 8G

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

On 12/23/2019 9:58 PM, Ken Walker wrote: We are upgrading solr version from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 version but we have faced out of memory error while importing data and then we have extended memory in our server and then again start importing process but it has work too slowy for 8GB

Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Hello, We are using solr version 8.2.0 in our production server. We are upgrading solr version from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 version but we have faced out of memory error while importing data and then we have extended memory in our server and then again start importing process but it has

Re: Minimum Tomcat version that supports latest Solr version

On 10/15/2019 12:42 AM, vikas shinde wrote: Dear Solr team, Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version 8.2.0? Also provide details about previous Solr versions & their compatible Tomcat versions. Dominique is correct. We do not officially support running u

Re: Minimum Tomcat version that supports latest Solr version

Hi, Solr is not tested with Tomcat since version 4. Why not using the embedded Jetty server ? Regards Dominique Le mar. 15 oct. 2019 à 10:44, vikas shinde a écrit : > Dear Solr team, > > Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version > 8.2.0? >

Minimum Tomcat version that supports latest Solr version

Dear Solr team, Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version 8.2.0? Also provide details about previous Solr versions & their compatible Tomcat versions. Thanks & Regards. Vikas Shinde.

RE: SOLR version 8.1 compatibility with OS OEL 7

Hi Support, Can I please follow up on the below? Kind Regards, Susnigdha. From: Abburi, Susnigdha Sent: Wednesday, 9 October 2019 1:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Komatineni, D. ; Koh, Joshua Subject: SOLR version 8.1 compatibility with OS OEL 7 Hi Support, We are looking at

Re: SOLR version 8.1 compatibility with OS OEL 7

. > Am 09.10.2019 um 14:12 schrieb Abburi, Susnigdha > : > > Hi Support, > > We are looking at upgrading the SOLR from version 7.2 to version 8.1. Could > we please check if SOLR version 8.1 is compatible with Oracle Enterprise > Linux 7. > > Thank you!

SOLR version 8.1 compatibility with OS OEL 7

Hi Support, We are looking at upgrading the SOLR from version 7.2 to version 8.1. Could we please check if SOLR version 8.1 is compatible with Oracle Enterprise Linux 7. Thank you! Kind Regards, Susnigdha. This message is for the designated recipient only

Re: How to have Suggester to return part of the content instead of the entire content in Solr version 7.6.0?

What would you recommend to use for the search field autocomplete functionality? Considering I have the whole pdf content, and the user can start searching for any term from the pdf. -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: How to have Suggester to return part of the content instead of the entire content in Solr version 7.6.0?

your expectations about what OOB suggester is good for. Best, Erick > On Jun 19, 2019, at 11:58 AM, ppunet wrote: > > Here is my problem statement and I would really appreciate for your feedback. > > Solr version 7.6.0 > > 1. There are 1000's of pdf's with la

How to have Suggester to return part of the content instead of the entire content in Solr version 7.6.0?

Here is my problem statement and I would really appreciate for your feedback. Solr version 7.6.0 1. There are 1000's of pdf's with large amount of content are indexed to Solr. 2. Using AnalyzingInfixSuggester for the suggestions. Q. As the SuggeterComponent provides the 'entire

Re: Different Parsed query for solr cloud and master slave with same solr version

On 4/23/2019 2:04 AM, Anant Bhargatiya wrote: We are migrating from solr 5.5 master slave to solr 8.0 cloud deployment. for exactly same index and config, we are getting different results. We'll need to see the configs you are working with as well as the raw and parsed queries from both. Eve

Different Parsed query for solr cloud and master slave with same solr version

edismax queries are being generated for same search term. In our setup IDF and TF is set to 1 by overriding similarity class. [ also did not make any difference in our observation] our main concern is, why edismax is generating different queries in master slave and cloud even if solr version is same

is Solr version 6.6.2 supported by SolrCloud on AWS EC2

Hi, I am reviewing the ref guide for Solr 7.2 for SolrCloud on AWS EC2. href="https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/aws-solrcloud-tutorial.html";>solr guide 7.2 The ask is to implement solr cloud on AWS for the Sitecore 9.0 application, which only supports solr 6.6.2 Questions:- (I) Does So

Is system-load based auto-scaling supported in latest Solr version

Hi, there >From Solr 7.x doc I know auto-scaling is triggered by number of replicas, just want to know if I can achieve auto-scaling based on system-load dynamically? Appreciate your reply. Thanks, Xiaoming

Re: At which solr version was "Managed-schema" set as default?

On 2/23/2018 10:40 AM, BlackIce wrote: > My idea was, in order to avoid confusion, which has been arising when > people start to modify schema.xml,... is to set Solr back into > "schema-mode" by having the user issue a command like SED or AWK in order > to add the corresponding command line into so

Re: At which solr version was "Managed-schema" set as default?

Thank you, at the current Nutch documentation for Nutch 14 which is build against Solr 6.6.x, it states to delete the "managed-schema.xml" and provide the Nutch specific schema.xml and THEN create the core. This works, it creates the core with all nutch specific fields, but solr then automaticall

Re: At which solr version was "Managed-schema" set as default?

On 2/23/2018 6:23 AM, BlackIce wrote: I'm reworking some documentation for the Nutch project, and for the sake of correctness and completness could someone tell me at which version did Solr switch over to the "managed-Schema" by default? It was version 5.5. In the versions before that, the pri

At which solr version was "Managed-schema" set as default?

hi, I'm reworking some documentation for the Nutch project, and for the sake of correctness and completness could someone tell me at which version did Solr switch over to the "managed-Schema" by default? Thank you very much! RRK

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

Thanks Shawn! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/11/2017 9:36 AM, Gunalan V wrote: > > In our project we are planning to use SOLR and I'm new to it. So, what is > > the latest stable version we can use and that is supported by Apache? > > As of four days ago, the latest

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

Thanks Alessandro! On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Alessandro Hoss wrote: > Solr 6.6.1 was already released on September 7: > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/lucene/solr/6.6.1 > Release notes: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_6_1/changes/Changes.html > > Guess you should give it a try.

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

On 9/11/2017 9:36 AM, Gunalan V wrote: > In our project we are planning to use SOLR and I'm new to it. So, what is > the latest stable version we can use and that is supported by Apache? As of four days ago, the latest release is 6.6.1.  This is a point release, intended to fix known bugs in the 6

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

Solr 6.6.1 was already released on September 7: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/lucene/solr/6.6.1 Release notes: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_6_1/changes/Changes.html Guess you should give it a try. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:15 PM Gunalan V wrote: > Thank You! > > I believe 6.6 should

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

Thank You! I believe 6.6 should have fixed all the previous version issues. But in 6.6 is there any major issues noticed? if so I will go with 6.5.1 else will proceed with 6.6. Kindly confirm! GVK On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > We have been running 6.5.1 in pro

Re: Latest stable SOLR version

We have been running 6.5.1 in production since May. I would not run anything before that. The new metrics code caused performance problems. That was fixed in 6.5.0. There was a memory leak talking to Zookeeper. That was fixed in 6.5.1. Solr 6.6.1 should be released very soon. wunder Walter Und

Latest stable SOLR version

Hello, In our project we are planning to use SOLR and I'm new to it. So, what is the latest stable version we can use and that is supported by Apache? Kindly let me know your suggestions because we started with installing SOLR 6.2 but heard that there are many issues and need to be upgraded to 6.

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

Atita: Thanks for that update. I've opened SOLR-11188 to track this, please add any details to that JIRA that you can, in particular what bit of code you've identified as the problem. Also, do you have any document you can share that would cause this? I'm wondering if it's sensitive to the partic

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

Hi All , Just thought of giving quick update on this. So we were able to *knock down this issue by using jvisualvm* which comes with java . So , we enabled monitoring through jmx and the CPU profiling showed (as attached in one of my previous emails) *Highlighting taking maximum processing.* Myst

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

On 7/27/2017 1:30 AM, Atita Arora wrote: > What OS is Solr running on? I'm only asking because some additional > information I'm after has different gathering methods depending on OS. > Other questions: > > /*OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.141-b16) for linux-amd64 JRE > (1.8.0_141-b16), built on Jul

RE: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

o: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3 > > Hi Shawn , > > Thank you for the pointers , here is the information : > > > What OS is Solr running on?  Im only asking because some additional > information Im after has d

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

Hi Shawn , Thank you for the pointers , here is the information : What OS is Solr running on? I'm only asking because some additional information I'm after has different gathering methods depending on OS. Other questions: *OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.141-b16) for linux-amd64 JRE (1.8.0_141-b1

Re: High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

On 7/26/2017 1:49 AM, Atita Arora wrote: > We did our functional and load testing on these boxes , however when we > released it to production along with the same application (using SolrJ to > query Solr) , we ran into severe CPU issues. > Just to add we're on Master - Slave where master has index

High CPU utilization on Upgrading to Solr Version 6.3

Hi , We upgrade our production Solr to version 6.3 from Version 4.3.2 about a week ago. We had our Dev / QA / staging on the same version (6.3) before finally releasing the application leveraging Solr 6.3. We did our functional and load testing on these boxes , however when we released it to prod

Re: CDCR support with solr version 4.10.3

We like to know that the Cross Data Center Replication > (CDCR)<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62687462> > support with the solr version 4.10.3 > > We are planning to use the document > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/p

CDCR support with solr version 4.10.3

Hi Solr Team, We are using apache solr 4.10.3 version along with CDH 5.4.8. We like to know that the Cross Data Center Replication (CDCR)<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62687462> support with the solr version

Suggestions order is changed after SOLR version upgrade to 6.4.0

blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } I have upgraded SOLR version from 5.1.0 to 6.4.0. I noticed with new version suggestions order is changed little bit.  Uchit

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

I finished to write FacetConverter, but I have a question: How do I config facet.threads parameter in Json Facet Api? I didn't find right syntax in the Confluence page. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regre

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

ike this: *q=*:*&json.facet={ A_B : {type:terms, field:A, facet:{type:terms, field:B} } }* but I get error: wrong aggr_B field. I didn't find right syntax in the Confluence page. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-

Re: SOLR version upgrade 5.1.0 to 6.4.0

On 2/7/2017 6:47 AM, Uchit Patel wrote: > I want detailed step by step guidance for SOLR version upgrade from > 5.1.0 to 6.4.0 for Windows and Linux both. On Windows, and on any other OS where the installer wasn't used, there are no explicit install instructions, so there are no expli

SOLR version upgrade 5.1.0 to 6.4.0

Hi, I want detailed step by step guidance for SOLR version upgrade from 5.1.0 to 6.4.0 for Windows and Linux both. Thanks. Regards, Uchit PatelSr. GIS AnalystWaste Management Inc.

SOLR version upgrade from 5.1.0 to 6.4.0 documentation

Hi, I want detailed step by step guidance for SOLR version upgrade from 5.1.0 to 6.4.0 for Windows and Linux both. Thanks. Regards, Uchit PatelSr. GIS AnalystWaste Management Inc.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

s will be there. Related the converter, i don't think there's anything out there. You will need to define the json facets as json. Cheers -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4318252.html

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4318241.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

ample, I checked permissions before each query with my own component). -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4318240.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4318189.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

I noticed if I don't write list of components in request handler it works fine, but if I add something like query facet Facets don't work... How can you explian it? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

Tom, I already tried this syntax (and many another different syntax). It still doesn't work. Are you sure that no need to change facet name in request handler to something else? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfo

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:49 AM, SOLR4189 wrote: > But I can't run Json Facet API. I checked on SOLR-5.4.1. > If I write: > localhost:9001/solr/Test1_shard1_replica1/myHandler/q=*:*&rows=5&fl=*&wt=json&facet=true&facet.field=someField > It works fine. But if I write: > localhost:9001/solr/Test1_sh

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

q=*:*&rows=5&fl=*&wt=json&json.facet={field:someField} It doesn't work. Are you sure that it is built-in? If it is built-in, why I can't find explanation about it in reference guid? Thank you for your help. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

quest/SimpleFacets.java:578 : selectFacetMethod -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4317815.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

re using 5.4.1 , > were't you?) > Furthermore, I would recommend to check if your field is/isn't > multi-valued > ( that could affect as well) > It is weird you don't get any benefit from docValues though... > > Cheers Quoted from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

After failining SOLR-5.4.1, we checked SOLR-5.5.2 also. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4317804.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

't get any benefit from docValues though... Cheers -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4317781.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

n: if Json Facet Api is good enough and if exists some converter from old facet api to new facet api? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4317716.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

Which kind of field are you faceting on ? Cardinality ? Field Type ? Doc Valued ? Which facet algorithm are you using ? Which facet parameters ? Cheers -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4317513.html

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

; In the case you facet method is enum ( Term Enumeration), the issue has >> been >> transparently solved ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176 ) >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://luc

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

fc/fcs approaches with high cardinality > fields. > > In the case you facet method is enum ( Term Enumeration), the issue has > been > transparently solved ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176 ) > > Cheers > > > > -- > View this message in conte

Re: Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

), the issue has been transparently solved ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176 ) Cheers -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrade-SOLR-version-facets-perfomance-regression-tp4315027p4315512.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at

Upgrade SOLR version - facets perfomance regression

Before few months we upgraded our SOLR in production from 4.10.1 to 5.4.1. And at once we noticed perfomance regressions. After searchings in internet we found SOLR-8096 issue <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096> . So we had to downgrade SOLR version to 4.10.1. We want to be

答复: full garbage collection about upgraded the solr version to 5.3.0

; 主题: full garbage collection about upgraded the solr version to 5.3.0 HI Recently, I upgraded the solr version in our server, from 4.7.2 to 5.3 .0 . Through the pressure test, I found that full garbage collection is becoming very frequent in the 5.3 version. I notic

full garbage collection about upgraded the solr version to 5.3.0

HI Recently, I upgraded the solr version in our server, from 4.7.2 to 5.3 .0 . Through the pressure test, I found that full garbage collection is becoming very frequent in the 5.3 version. I noticed that in BooleanScorer. < init >, TermWeight scorer with frequent

Re: Does any solr version use lucene concurrent flush

Yes. Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Aaron Beach wrote: > -- > Aaron Beach > Senior Data Scientist > w: +1-303-625-7043 > > SendGrid -- Email Delivery. Simplified

Re: Does any solr version use lucene concurrent flush

On 11/25/2014 2:37 PM, Aaron Beach wrote: I'm fairly clueless when it comes to how Lucene internals work or how Solr uses those internals ... but I remember hearing a LOT about concurrent flushing in the leadup to the Lucene/Solr 4.0 release, and what a performance boost it was for indexing speed.

Does any solr version use lucene concurrent flush

-- Aaron Beach Senior Data Scientist w: +1-303-625-7043 SendGrid -- Email Delivery. Simplified.

Re: Fast question about replication between solr version

On 9/18/2014 1:15 AM, mizayah wrote: > I cant't find anywhere inofrmation about replication between solr version. > Is it possible replicate between example solr 4.2 and 4.10 without any > problems? > > What i need is to upgrade version and don't wona re-index all fro

Fast question about replication between solr version

I cant't find anywhere inofrmation about replication between solr version. Is it possible replicate between example solr 4.2 and 4.10 without any problems? What i need is to upgrade version and don't wona re-index all from beginning. -- View this message in context: http://lucene

Solr [version 3.6.1] filter query issue

ΜΕΣΗΜΕΡΙ” or “ΜΕΡΑ” OR “ΜΕΣΗΜΕΡΙ”? Any help would be greatly appreciated. I hope not to bore you with my writing. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-version-3-6-1-filter-query-issue-tp4109989.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Which patch for which solr version

> > > > there are some patches listed. I currently can't really figure out, for > which solr version this patch is valid, since the issue listed there is > still open and should be fixed for version 4.6. > > > > I'm wondering if this patch can be applied on a 4.5.1 version of solr > > > > Best, > > Ramo > >

Which patch for which solr version

Hi, on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3583 there are some patches listed. I currently can't really figure out, for which solr version this patch is valid, since the issue listed there is still open and should be fixed for version 4.6. I'm wondering if this pa

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

As much as possible, use new configs. Take fieldType definitions from your 4.x example dir, don't use the old ones. e.g. if you use the old date field type, it won't be usable in various ways (e.g. in the MS() function). Upayavira On Thu, Jun 27, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Sandeep Gupta wrote: > Thanks a

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

Thanks again Shawn for your comments. I am little worried about the multi threading of web application which uses servlets. I also found one of your explanation (please confirm the same whether its your comment only) in http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Memory-problems-with-HttpSolrServer-td4060

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

I have done this - upgraded a 1.4 index to 3.x then on to 4.x. It worked, but... New field types have been introduced over time that facilitate new functionality. To continue to use an upgraded index, you need to continue using the old field types, and thus loose some of the coolness of newer vers

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

On 6/26/2013 11:25 PM, Sandeep Gupta wrote: > To have singleton design pattern for SolrServer object creation, > I found that there are so many ways described in > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern > So which is the best one, out of 5 examples mentioned in above url, for web > applicat

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

Thanks Shawn. To have singleton design pattern for SolrServer object creation, I found that there are so many ways described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern So which is the best one, out of 5 examples mentioned in above url, for web application in general practice. I am sure lots

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

On 6/25/2013 11:52 PM, Sandeep Gupta wrote: > Also in application development side, > as I said that I am going to use HTTPSolrServer API and I found that we > shouldn't create this object multiple times > (as per the wiki document http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#HttpSolrServer) > So I am plannin

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

think I > did that once and it worked. > > Regards, > André > > > Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

think I > did that once and it worked. > > Regards, > André > > > Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr

AW: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

ng from scratch before moving on to 4.x - I think I did that once and it worked. Regards, André Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 19:37 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Need Help in migrating Solr ver

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

bq: I'm not sure if Solr 4.3 will be able to read Solr 1.4 indexes Solr/Lucene explicitly try to read _one_ major revision backwards. Solr 3.x should be able to read 1.4 indexes. Solr 4.x should be able to read Solr 3.x. No attempt is made to allow Solr 4.x to read Solr 1.4 indexes, so I wouldn't

Re: Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

You must carefully go through the upgrade instructions starting from 1.4 upto 4.3. In particular the instructions for 1.4 to 3.1 and from 3.1 to 4.0 should be given special attention. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sandeep Gupta wrote: > Hello All, > > We are planning to migrate solr 1.4 to So

Need Help in migrating Solr version 1.4 to 4.3

Hello All, We are planning to migrate solr 1.4 to Solr 4.3 version. And I am seeking some help in this side. Considering Schema file change: By default there are lots of changes if I compare original Solr 1.4 schema file to Sol 4.3 schema file. And that is the reason we are not copying paste of s

Re: solr version error

This is a duplicate of another topic "strange solr version error ( http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/strange-solr-version-error-td4070636.html)". Please ignore or delete it. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jenny Huang < sunearthmoonwaterf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > &g

Re: strange solr version error

a table in database, > and > > encountered the solr version error: "java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid > > version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format". To > > figure out what went wrong, I stripped the program to bare bone and le

Re: strange solr version error

On 6/14/2013 4:26 PM, Jenny Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I need to use solrj to do a full data import from a table in database, and > encountered the solr version error: "java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid > version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin'

solr version error

Hi, I need to use solrj to do a full data import from a table in database, and encountered the solr version error: "java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format". To figure out what went wrong, I stripped the program

strange solr version error

Hi, I need to use solrj to do a full data import from a table in database, and encountered the solr version error: "java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format". To figure out what went wrong, I stripped the program

Re: POLL: Which Solr version are you on?

Hi Hoss, Yup. My plan for dealing with that is to post this on LinkedIn next week there, I *assume* slightly less on-the-bleeding-edge crowd hangs out. Maybe you have some other ideas, too? Thanks! Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:12 PM, C

Re: POLL: Which Solr version are you on?

: I think the subject is self explanatory and the results will be very : interesting to see! one caveat to keep in mind is that the results will most likely be biased in favor of people actively participating in the broader community (ie: on the mailing list, or following people realted to solr

  1   2   >