To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking
.
All the benchmarks I have seen are at least few years old.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not super fresh, but more recent than the 2 links you sent:
http://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote:
This is quite an old discussion
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking in the code, I would think the inner loops, the
stuff that really burns
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
That resource is rather superficial. I wouldn't make big decision based on it.
Agree. It's also somewhat biased given the environment in which it
grew. ES advocates were all over stuff like that, but Solr advocates
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2014 3:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two
://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote
/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote:
This is quite an old discussion. Wanted to check
both with your
data and requirements. Benchmarks are all very well, but they don't
necessarily apply to your situation.
Cheers
Charlie
I am also doing a talk and a book on Solr vs. ElasticSearch, but I am
not really planning to address those issues either, only the feature
comparisons
way to choose is to try both with your
data and requirements. Benchmarks are all very well, but they don't
necessarily apply to your situation.
Cheers
Charlie
I am also doing a talk and a book on Solr vs. ElasticSearch, but I am
not really planning to address those issues either, only
for some clear and obvious benefit in terms of features, performance, and
scalability.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Salman Akram
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 1:35 AM
To: Solr Group
Subject: Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch
I did see that earlier. My main concern is search
performance
-solr-xapian-which-fits-for-which-usage
http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/
Regards,
Peter.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-vs-ElasticSearch-tp3009181p3200492.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
Not super fresh, but more recent than the 2 links you sent:
http://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Salman
years old.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not super fresh, but more recent than the 2 links you sent:
http://blog.sematext.com/2012/08/23/solr-vs-elasticsearch-part-1-overview/
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search
Maybe Charlie Hull can answer that:
https://twitter.com/FlaxSearch/status/494859596117602304 . He seems to
think that - at least in some cases - Solr is faster.
I am also doing a talk and a book on Solr vs. ElasticSearch, but I am
not really planning to address those issues either, only
, Shashi Kant sk...@sloan.mit.edu wrote:
Here is a very interesting comparison
http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: May-31-11 10:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr vs ElasticSearch
, May 31, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Shashi Kant sk...@sloan.mit.edu wrote:
Here is a very interesting comparison
http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: May-31-11 10:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Tarjei Huse tar...@scanmine.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 08:22 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Thanks Shashi, this is oddly coincidental with another issue being put
into Solr (SOLR-2193) to help solve some of the NRT issues, the timing
is impeccable.
Hmm, does anyone
Have a look:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2271600/elasticsearch-sphinx-lucene-solr-xapian-which-fits-for-which-usage
http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/
Regards,
Peter.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-vs
protocol to capitalize on this however... Hmm...
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Shashi Kant sk...@sloan.mit.edu wrote:
Here is a very interesting comparison
http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: May-31-11 10
Well, I recently chose it for a personal project and the deciding
thing for me was that it had nice integration to couchdb.
Thanks,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote
I've been hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me a
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:38 -0700, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
Nice email address. I personally have no idea, maybe ask Shay Banon
to post an answer? I think it's possible to make Solr more elastic,
eg, it's currently difficult to make it move cores between
I'm likely to try playing with moving cores between hosts soon. In
theory it shouldn't be hard. We'll see what the practice is like!
Right, in theory it's quite simple, in practice I've setup a master,
then a slave, then had to add replication to both, then call create
core, then replicate,
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:52 -0700, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm likely to try playing with moving cores between hosts soon. In
theory it shouldn't be hard. We'll see what the practice is like!
Right, in theory it's quite simple, in practice I've setup a master,
And some way to delete the core when it has been transferred.
Right, I manually added that to CoreAdminHandler. I opened an issue
to try to solve this problem: SOLR-2569
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:52 -0700, Jason Rutherglen
On 6/1/2011 10:52 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
nightmarish to setup. The problem is, it freezes each core into a
respective role, so if I wanted to then 'move' the slave, I can't
because it's still setup as a slave.
Don't know if this helps or not, but you CAN set up a core as both a
master
On 6/1/2011 11:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Probably the ReplicationHandler would need a 'one-off' replication
command...
It's got one already, if you mean a command you can issue to a slave to
tell it to pull replication right now. The thing is, you can only issue
this command if the core is
Jonathan,
This is all true, however it ends up being hacky (this is from
experience) and the core on the source needs to be deleted. Feel free
to post to the issue.
Jason
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
On 6/1/2011 10:52 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:47 -0400, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
wrote:
On 6/1/2011 11:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Probably the ReplicationHandler would need a 'one-off' replication
command...
It's got one already, if you mean a command you can issue to a slave to
tell it to pull
You _could_ configure it as a slave, if you plan to sometimes use it as
a slave. It can be configured as both a master and a slave. You can
configure it as a slave, but turn off automatic polling. And then issue
one-off replicate commands whenever you want.
But yeah, it gets messy, your use
I've been hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me
a rough overview on how these two technologies differ. What are the
strengths/weaknesses of each. Why would one choose one of the other?
Thanks
Mark,
Nice email address. I personally have no idea, maybe ask Shay Banon
to post an answer? I think it's possible to make Solr more elastic,
eg, it's currently difficult to make it move cores between servers
without a lot of manual labor.
Jason
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Mark
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr vs ElasticSearch
I've been hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me a
rough overview on how these two technologies differ. What are the
strengths/weaknesses of each. Why would one choose one of the other?
Thanks
Here is a very interesting comparison
http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: May-31-11 10:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr vs ElasticSearch
I've been hearing more and more about
sk...@sloan.mit.edu
Sender: shashi@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:01:51
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch
Here is a very interesting comparison
http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs
35 matches
Mail list logo
