Thanks Hoss! It's obvious what the problem(s) are when you lay it all out
that way.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> 1) The "terms" Query Parser (TermsQParser) has nothing to do with the
> "TermsComponent" (the first is for quering m
1) The "terms" Query Parser (TermsQParser) has nothing to do with the
"TermsComponent" (the first is for quering many distinct terms, the
later is for requesting info about low level terms in your index)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+
=>'ruby',
'rows'=>['1',
'1000']}},
And it responds with an error message
'error'=>{
'msg'=>'Unknown query parser \'terms\'',
'code'=>400}}
The terms component is defined in solrconfig.xml:
true
termsComponent
And the Standard Response Handler is defined:
explicit lucene
In case its useful, we have
4.9
Why would we be getting the "Unknown query parser \'terms\'" error?
Thanks,
Tricia
> too (in your case, it should be shards.qt=/terms)
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Federico Méndez >wrote:
>
> > Anyone knows if the TermsComponent supports distributed search trough a
> > SolrCloud installation? I have a SolrCloud installation that works
Hi Federico, it should work. Make sure you set the "shards.qt" parameter
too (in your case, it should be shards.qt=/terms)
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Federico Méndez wrote:
> Anyone knows if the TermsComponent supports distributed search trough a
> SolrCloud instal
Anyone knows if the TermsComponent supports distributed search trough a
SolrCloud installation? I have a SolrCloud installation that works OK for
regular searches but TermsComponent is returning empty results when using:
[collectionName]/terms?terms.fl=collector_name&terms.prefix=jo, the req
Hi,
I need a small clarification on how forwarding to the non-(/select) handler
works.
When I define a distinct handler /terms with TermsComponent inside (or
/suggest with the SpellCheckComponent defined for suggester), the
distributed call never works. The reason is simple - the request always
Hi
Im working on autocompelte functionality in solr. can u suggest me the
required configurations in schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for doing
autocomplete in solr ??
thanks in advance,
Anil
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-TermsComponent-space-in
Yes, per-doc. I mentioned TermsComponent but meant TermVectorComponent,
where we get back all the terms in the doc. Just wondering if there was a
way to only get back the terms that matched the query.
Thanks EE,
-Jay
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Jay:
>
>
is
> here? If so, I vaguely remember it being possible to do something
> with highlighting, just counting the tags returned after highlighting.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
>> I have a situation where I want to show the term counts as
ck
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> I have a situation where I want to show the term counts as is done in the
> TermsComponent, but *only* for terms that are *matched* in a query, so I
> get something returned like this (pseudo code):
>
> q=title:(golf swing)
>
I have a situation where I want to show the term counts as is done in the
TermsComponent, but *only* for terms that are *matched* in a query, so I
get something returned like this (pseudo code):
q=title:(golf swing)
title: golf legends show how to improve your golf swing on the golf course
I'd use the suggester:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Suggester
The suggester can give a collation. The TermsComponent can't do that.
The suggester builds on top of the spellchecking infrastructure, so
should be easy to use if you're familiar with that.
Martijn
On 10 September 201
Which is preferable? using TermsComponent or Facets for autosuggest?
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent states that TermsComponent
> will
> : return frequencies from deleted documents too.
> :
> : Is there
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent states that TermsComponent will
: return frequencies from deleted documents too.
:
: Is there anyway to omit the deleted documents to get the frequencies.
not really -- until a deleted document is expunged from segment merging,
they are still
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent states that TermsComponent will
return frequencies from deleted documents too.
Is there anyway to omit the deleted documents to get the frequencies.
I know there is a facets which can be used. Is it recommended to use facets
for autosuggest feature
I have a snapshot of trunk from some time ago, I'll check the latest
code thanks for the reply
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
>> I took a quick look at TermsComponent and noticed that it works with
&g
On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I took a quick look at TermsComponent and noticed that it works with
> distributed queries but it doesn't seem to work with distrib=true.
> Am I missing something, have there been any updates to this to get
> this to work with
I took a quick look at TermsComponent and noticed that it works with
distributed queries but it doesn't seem to work with distrib=true.
Am I missing something, have there been any updates to this to get
this to work with SolrCloud?
t;
> Don't you think?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Termscomponent-sort-question-tp2980683p2988872.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
ucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Termscomponent-sort-question-tp2980683p2988872.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi antonio,
Can you sort yourself on client side?
Are you trying to sort the terms with the same count in reverse order of
their lengths?
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, antonio wrote:
> Hi, i use solr 3.1.
> I implemented my autocomplete with TermsComponent. I'm finding, if ther
Help me please...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Termscomponent-sort-question-tp2980683p2986185.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
No one has an idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Termscomponent-sort-question-tp2980683p2983776.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, i use solr 3.1.
I implemented my autocomplete with TermsComponent. I'm finding, if there is,
a way to sort my finding terms by score.
Example, i there are two terms: "Rome" and "Near Rome", that have the same
count (that is 1), i would that "Rome" will be b
ol.java:583)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:44
7)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
That is all i get. Let me know if i use the wrong parameter or what.
Thanks.
cy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-
10 wrote:
> I tried it. It just does not work. the debug component only works when
> query component is there, and it is just showing debugging information for
> query result, not term match result.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
I tried it. It just does not work. the debug component only works when
query component is there, and it is just showing debugging information for
query result, not term match result.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-debug-if-termsComponent-is-used
: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 6:57:49 PM
> Subject: How to debug if termsComponent is used
>
> Hi, I defined a searchHanlder just for the sake of autosuggest, using
> TermsComponent.
>
>class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.Ter
Hi, I defined a searchHanlder just for the sake of autosuggest, using
TermsComponent.
explicit
terms
debug
This configuration might not even make sense, to configure "terms" and
"debug" component together. Is "debug
Hi!
plz tell me how can we filter the termcomponent handler result
on the basis of user query .Also explain me how interesting terms are
shown in morelikethis for ml on the basis of user query.
Thanks!
Isha
You need to remove EdgeNGramFilterFactory from your analyzer chain.
--- On Thu, 3/3/11, shrinath.m wrote:
> From: shrinath.m
> Subject: Re: Solr TermsComponent: space in term
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011, 1:41 PM
>
> Mar
strict it to only those words present in the documents and not
something like "compliance w" ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-TermsComponent-space-in-term-tp1898889p2624547.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.ShingleFilterFactory
On Thursday 03 March 2011 12:15:07 shrinath.m wrote:
> iorixxx wrote:
> > TermsComponent operates on indexed terms. One way to achieve multi-word
> > suggestions is to use ShingleFilterFactor
iorixxx wrote:
>
> TermsComponent operates on indexed terms. One way to achieve multi-word
> suggestions is to use ShingleFilterFactory at index time.
>
Thank you @iorixxx.
Could you point me where I can find a good docs on how to do this ?
--
View this message in context:
h
> Is there no way to achieve what the Op
> had to say ?
>
TermsComponent operates on indexed terms. One way to achieve multi-word
suggestions is to use ShingleFilterFactory at index time.
why was this thread left unanswered ? Is there no way to achieve what the Op
had to say ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-TermsComponent-space-in-term-tp1898889p2624203.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> from head, but also tried on
> > 1.4.1.
>
>
> The instructions i posted works with 1.4.1. You need to
> import TermDocs in TermsComponent.java :
>
> import org.apache.lucene.index.TermDocs;
Ravish, did you get it working? Can you give us feedback?
> I've compiled current source from head, but also tried on
> 1.4.1.
The instructions i posted works with 1.4.1. You need to import TermDocs in
TermsComponent.java :
import org.apache.lucene.index.TermDocs;
Yes, you are right. Ignore the query (document:*), it wont matter if i have
it for termscomponent i guess.
I've compiled current source from head, but also tried on 1.4.1.
Any idea how to go about finding a solution to this?
Thanks,
Ravish
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Ahmet Arslan
> I want to produce frequency analysis of all tokens inside
> my solr Index from
> a specific (content) field.
>
> When I use TermsComponent or FacetCounts, what I get is how
> many records or
> documents each term appears in (which again confuses me as
> to what the
>
Hi Guys,
I need a bit of help.
I want to produce frequency analysis of all tokens inside my solr Index from
a specific (content) field.
When I use TermsComponent or FacetCounts, what I get is how many records or
documents each term appears in (which again confuses me as to what the
difference
ll
> in
> > the index until an optimize. I'd advise starting with a clean slate for
> > your
> > experiments each time. The cheap way to do this is stop your server and
> > delete /data/index. Delete the index directory too, not just
> the
> > contents. So
'd advise starting with a clean slate for
> your
> experiments each time. The cheap way to do this is stop your server and
> delete /data/index. Delete the index directory too, not just the
> contents. So it's possible your TermsComponent is returning data from
> previous
&
ments each time. The cheap way to do this is stop your server and
delete /data/index. Delete the index directory too, not just the
contents. So it's possible your TermsComponent is returning data from
previous
attempts, because I sure don't see how the concatenated terms would be
in this ind
Dear Erick,
Thank you for your answer, here is my fieldtype definition. I took the
standard one because I don't need a better one for this field
Now my field :
But I have a doubt now... Do I really put a space between words or is it
just a coma... If I only put a coma then th
Nope, this isn't what I'd expect. There are a couple of possibilities:
1> check out what WordDelimiterFilterFactory is doing, although
if you're really sending spaces that's probably not it.
2> Let's see the and definitions for the field
in question. type="text" doesn't say anything abo
Dear Solr users,
I am currently using SolR and TermsComponents to make an auto suggest for my
website.
I have a field called p_field indexed and stored with type="text" in the
schema xml. Nothing out of the usual.
I feed to Solr a set of words separated by a coma and a space such as (for
two docu
> Does anyone know how to apply some analyzers over a prefix
> query?
Lucene has an special QueryParser for this.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/api/contrib-misc/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/analyzing/AnalyzingQueryParser.html
Someone provided a patch to use it in solr. It was an attachmen
I don't believe you can. If you just need query-time transformation,
can't you just do it in your client app? If you need index-time
transformation... well, you can do that, but it's up to your schema.xml
and will of course apply to the field as a whole, not just for
termsco
Hi everyone
Does anyone know how to apply some analyzers over a prefix query?
What I'm looking for is a way to build an autosuggest using the
termsComponent that could be able to remove the accents from the
query's prefix.
For example, I have the term "analisis" in the index an
10, Parsa Ghaffari wrote:
>
> > From: Parsa Ghaffari
> > Subject: Re: Solr TermsComponent: space in term
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 5:06 PM
> > Hi Ahmet,
> >
> > This is the fieldType for "name":
>
--- On Sun, 11/14/10, Parsa Ghaffari wrote:
> From: Parsa Ghaffari
> Subject: Re: Solr TermsComponent: space in term
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 5:06 PM
> Hi Ahmet,
>
> This is the fieldType for "name":
table?
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I'm using Solr 1.4.1 and I'm willing to use TermsComponent
> > for AutoComplete.
> > The problem is, I can't get it to match strings with spaces
> > in them. So to
> > say,
> I'm using Solr 1.4.1 and I'm willing to use TermsComponent
> for AutoComplete.
> The problem is, I can't get it to match strings with spaces
> in them. So to
> say,
>
> terms.fl=name&terms.lower=david&terms.prefix=david&terms.lower.incl=fa
> terms.fl=name&terms.lower=david%20&terms.prefix=david%20&terms.lower.incl=false&indent=true&wt=json
>
> it doesn't match all strings starting with "david ". Is it
> meant to be that
> way?
This is about fielyType of name field. What is it? If it does have
ShingleFilterFactory in it, then this
Hi folks,
I'm using Solr 1.4.1 and I'm willing to use TermsComponent for AutoComplete.
The problem is, I can't get it to match strings with spaces in them. So to
say,
terms.fl=name&terms.lower=david&terms.prefix=david&terms.lower.incl=false&indent=true&wt=json
Hi,
I have a solr index, which for simplicity is just a list of names, and a
list of associations. (either a multivalue field e.g. {A1, A2, A3, A6}
or a string concatenation list e.g. "A1 A2 A3 A6")
I want to be able to provide autocomplete but with a specific
association. E.g. Names beginn
: Subject: How to use TermsComponent when I need a filter
: In-Reply-To: <8ffbbf6788bd5842b5a7274ef0f6837e01c3d...@msex85.morningstar.com>
: References: <8ffbbf6788bd5842b5a7274ef0f6837e01c3d...@msex85.morningstar.com>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijackin
Hi,
I have a solr index, which for simplicity is just a list of names, and a
list of associations. (either a multivalue field e.g. {A1, A2, A3, A6}
or a string concatenation list e.g. "A1 A2 A3 A6")
I want to be able to provide autocomplete but with a specific
association. E.g. Names beginning
n context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/TermsComponent-AutoComplete-Multiple-Term-Suggestions-Inclusive-Search-tp916530p916769.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Saïd,
I think your problem is the field's type: String. You have to use a
TextField and apply tokenizers that will find "subcategory" if you put
in "cat". (Not sure which filter does that, though. I wouldn't think
that the PorterStemmer cuts off prefix syllables of that kind?)
If, however, you
Hi,
I'm using the Terms Component to se up the autocomplete feature based on a
String field. Here are the params I'm using:
terms=true&terms.fl=type&terms.lower=cat&terms.prefix=cat&terms.lower.incl=false
With the above params, I've been able to get suggestions for terms that start
with the sp
Hello again Nabble :D
TermsComponent works fine so far, but how can i get the same result for the
typing:
"harry pot" -> "harry potter" AND
"potter harr" -> "harry potter"
i try ReversedWildcardFilterFactory, but i dont want the revers
: so when ich search for "nik" termsCom suggest me "nikon". thats correctly
: whar i want.
: but when i type "nikon on" i want that solr suggest me "nikon one" ,
try using copyField to index an untokenized version of your field, so that
"nikon one" is a single term, then "nikon on" as a pr
gt;>
>>> i play with solr but i didn`t find the perfect solution for me.
>>>
>>> my goal is a search like the amazonsearch from the iPhoneApp. ;)
>>>
>>> it is possible to use the TermsComponent like the SpellComponent ? So,
>>> that
&
e/SOLR-1316
>
>
> On Mar 21, 2010, at 2:34 PM, stocki wrote:
>
>>
>> hello.
>>
>> i play with solr but i didn`t find the perfect solution for me.
>>
>> my goal is a search like the amazonsearch from the iPhoneApp. ;)
>>
>> it
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316
On Mar 21, 2010, at 2:34 PM, stocki wrote:
>
> hello.
>
> i play with solr but i didn`t find the perfect solution for me.
>
> my goal is a search like the amazonsearch from the iPhoneApp. ;)
>
> it is possible t
hello.
i play with solr but i didn`t find the perfect solution for me.
my goal is a search like the amazonsearch from the iPhoneApp. ;)
it is possible to use the TermsComponent like the SpellComponent ? So, that
works termsComp with more than one single Term ?!
i got these 3 docs with the
You can use the spelling dictionary feature for auto-complete. This is
actually more useful than facet.prefix because normal people are not
perfect spellers. (It would be even more useful based on phonemes, but
I haven't figured out how to do that yet.)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Erik Hatche
On 20.01.2010, at 15:50, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 19.01.2010, at 22:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
I also want to match multiple fields at once.
>>>
>>> Can you give an example?
>>
>>
>> I enter "Kreuz" but this could either be part of a persons name or of a
>> street name, whic
On 19.01.2010, at 22:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>> I also want to match multiple fields at once.
>>
>> Can you give an example?
>
>
> I enter "Kreuz" but this could either be part of a persons name or of a
> street name, which are separate fields in my index mainly because they
> analyzed
I find the DismaxRequestHandler perfect for matching multiple fields, matching
phrases in other/subset of fields, weighting the different matches. It's
powerful and fast.
You can define several DismaxRequestHandlers if you want to offer different
kinds of "search areas" to the user (e.g. search
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
a search "quality" meter. As in indicate the total number of
matches (doesnt
need to be accurate, just a ballpark figure especially if there are
a lot of
matches)
As in, you want each suggestion include the number of documents it
would
You may be able to use faceting for this.
Use facet.method=enum - it will be more efficient for this specific use.
The main problem is that you can't specify a start term for faceting
though (you can only use numeric offset / limit into the list).
To do more will require either adding some terms
On 19.01.2010, at 21:55, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
>
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Lukas Kahwe Smith
>
>> I want to use TermsComponent for both auto complete suggestions but also
>> showing
>
> Is TermsComponent really th
Hi Lukas,
- Original Message
> From: Lukas Kahwe Smith
> I want to use TermsComponent for both auto complete suggestions but also
> showing
Is TermsComponent really that good for AutoComplete?
Have a look at http://www.sematext.com/demo/ac/index.html - doesn't use T
I have a field that has millions of values, and I need to get "the
next X values" in alpha order. The terms component works fabulously
for this.
Here is a cooked up example of the terms
a
b
f
q
r
rr
rrr
y
z
zzz
So if I ask for the 3 terms after "r", I get "rr", "rrr" and "y".
But now I'd
Hi,
I want to use TermsComponent for both auto complete suggestions but also
showing a search "quality" meter. As in indicate the total number of matches
(doesnt need to be accurate, just a ballpark figure especially if there are a
lot of matches). I also want to match multiple fiel
Thanks for pointing that out. The TermsComponent prefix query is running
much faster than the facet prefix query. I guess there is yet another
reason to optimize the index.
Bill
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Bill Au wrote:
>
>> Should the re
Bill Au wrote:
Should the results of the TermsComponent change after documents have been
removed from the index? I am thinking about using the prefix of
TermsComponent to implement auto-suggest. But I noticed that the prefix
counts in TermsComponent don't change after documents have
ay
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:43 PM, R. Tan wrote:
>
> > Nice. In comparison, how do you do it with faceting?
> >
> > > "Two other approaches are to use either the TermsComponent (new in Solr
> > > 1.4) or faceting.&q
"Two other approaches are to use either the TermsComponent (new in Solr
> > 1.4) or faceting."
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jay Hill wrote:
>
> > Have a look at a blog I posted on how to use EdgeNGrams to build an
> > auto-suggest tool:
>
Nice. In comparison, how do you do it with faceting?
> "Two other approaches are to use either the TermsComponent (new in Solr
> 1.4) or faceting."
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jay Hill wrote:
> Have a look at a blog I posted on how to use EdgeNGrams to build an
4:40 AM, R. Tan wrote:
> Hello,
> What's the best way to get auto-suggested terms/keywords that is filtered
> by
> one or more fields? TermsComponent should have been the solution but
> filters
> are not supported.
>
> Thanks,
> Rihaed
>
Hello,
What's the best way to get auto-suggested terms/keywords that is filtered by
one or more fields? TermsComponent should have been the solution but filters
are not supported.
Thanks,
Rihaed
Thanks for the pointer. Definitely appreciate the help.
Todd
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jay Hill wrote:
> If you need an alternative to using the TermsComponent for auto-suggest,
> have a look at this blog on using EdgeNGrams instead of the TermsComponent.
>
If you need an alternative to using the TermsComponent for auto-suggest,
have a look at this blog on using EdgeNGrams instead of the TermsComponent.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed
le to the top of the sort.
The result is that a search for a name shows a first and last name without
the whitespace.
One thing I've noticed is that since TermsComponent is working on a single
Term, there doesn't seem to be a way to query against a phrase. The same
example as above appl
, at 11:06 AM, Todd Benge wrote:
It's set as Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
How are you tokenizing/analyzing the field you are accessing?
On Sep 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Todd Benge wrote:
Hi Rekha,
Here's teh link t
It's set as Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> How are you tokenizing/analyzing the field you are accessing?
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Todd Benge wrote:
>
> Hi Rekha,
>>
>> Here&#x
How are you tokenizing/analyzing the field you are accessing?
On Sep 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Todd Benge wrote:
Hi Rekha,
Here's teh link to the TermsComponent info:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
and another link Matt Weber did on autocompletion:
http://www.mattweber.org/20
Hi Rekha,
Here's teh link to the TermsComponent info:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
and another link Matt Weber did on autocompletion:
http://www.mattweber.org/2009/05/02/solr-autosuggest-with-termscomponent-and-jquery/
We had to upgrade to the latest nightly to ge
t; On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Todd Benge wrote:
> >> I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
> >> autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that
> terms
> >> that have whitespace in them when indexed are absent the whi
e for autocompletion, please share wih me..
Regards
Rekha
tbenge wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
> autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that terms
> that have whitespace in them when indexed are abs
Thanks - I'll give it a try
On 9/5/09, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Todd Benge wrote:
>> I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
>> autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that terms
>> that ha
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Todd Benge wrote:
> I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
> autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that terms
> that have whitespace in them when indexed are absent the whitespace when
> retur
Hi Todd,
I have not tried this yet.
But try setting the terms.raw parameter to true.
Maybe that will include the whitespace that is missing from the response.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Todd Benge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of b
Hi,
I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that terms
that have whitespace in them when indexed are absent the whitespace when
returned from the TermsComponent.
Any ideas on why that may be happening? Am
: I've copied TermsComponent and TermsParams from trunk into my own package
: and Eclipse isn't reporting any build errors
...
: SEVERE: java.lang.ClassCastException:
: com.titanpublishing.solr.TermsComponent cannot be cast to
: org.apache.solr.util.plugin.NamedListInitial
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
