Re: Leading wildcard searches very slow

https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_6_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/analysis/ReversedWildcardFilterFactory.html ? On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:01 AM mosheB wrote: > > Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex > queries? > > > Thanks > > > > -- > Sent from:

Re: Leading wildcard searches very slow

Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex queries? Thanks -- Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Is this a bug? Wildcard with PatternReplaceFilterFactory

s [73] 4 5 1 word 1 2 false This is  what we were trying to achieve with the class="solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory" pattern="’" replacement="'"/> The problem is when using wildcard *Rod’s* we get no hits || |"responseHeader":{ &q

Re: Is this a bug? Wildcard with PatternReplaceFilterFactory

Why do you say “…that are now in the index as rod’s”? You have WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory, which breaks things up. When I put your field definition in the schema and use the analysis page, turns “rod’s” into the following 4 tokens: rod’s rods rod s And querying on field:”*Rod’s*” works

Is this a bug? Wildcard with PatternReplaceFilterFactory

Is this a bug? Wildcard with PatternReplaceFilterFactory Attempting to normalize left and right single and double quotes for searches ‘   Left single quotation mark    '    Single quote ’   Right single quotation mark   '    Single quote “   Left double quotation mark

Re: Performance comparison for wildcard searches

On 2/3/2020 12:06 PM, Rahul Goswami wrote: I am working with Solr 7.2.1 and had a question regarding the performance of wildcard searches. q=*:* vs q=id:* vs q=id:[* TO *] Can someone please rank them in the order of performance with the underlying reason? The only one of those

Performance comparison for wildcard searches

Hello, I am working with Solr 7.2.1 and had a question regarding the performance of wildcard searches. q=*:* vs q=id:* vs q=id:[* TO *] Can someone please rank them in the order of performance with the underlying reason? Thanks, Rahul

Use copyField with wildcard in source; how then to work out where a value came from?

I've got a collection for which the schema has a number of copyFields that have a wildcard in the source: The idea is that I have fields in each document that contain language-specific values in fields that have field names that end in a language tag, i.e., "skos_prefLab

Problems with TokenFilter, but only in wildcard queries

the remaining non-ascii symbols. However, it does cause odd behaviour in Wildcard Queries. e.g.: The query title:todesmä* matches todesmarsch, which it should not, because an ä is supposed to be replaced with an ae, however, it also matches todesmärchen, as it should. The query title:todesmär still matches

Problems with Wildcard Queries / Own Filter

Hello, I am having a bit of a problem with Wildcard queries and I don't know how to pin it down yet. I have a suspect, but I kind find an error in it, one of the filters in the respective search field. The problem is that when I do a wildcard query: title:todesmä* it does return a result

Re: wildcard search doesn't fetch results when field has whi

> Best, > Erick > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 10:33 ahemad.sh...@yahoo.com.INVALID > wrote: > >> Hi , >> I have field with white spaces and special characters on which indexing >> needs to be done to do wildcard querying. >> It works for most of the scnearios wi

Re: wildcard search doesn't fetch results when field has whi

t; needs to be done to do wildcard querying. > It works for most of the scnearios with wildcard search. > e.g. if my data is "ali.abc" and "abc_pqr" and "ali abc" and "ahemad ali" > then search with ali* gives this three results. > > But I

Re: wildcard search doesn't fetch results when field has white spaces and special charecters

Hi , > I have field with white spaces and special characters on which indexing > needs to be done to do wildcard querying. > It works for most of the scnearios with wildcard search. > e.g. if my data is "ali.abc" and "abc_pqr" and "ali abc" and "ahemad ali

wildcard search doesn't fetch results when field has white spaces and special charecters

Hi , I have field with white spaces and special characters on which indexing needs to be done to do wildcard querying. It works for most of the scnearios with wildcard search. e.g. if my data is "ali.abc" and "abc_pqr" and "ali abc" and "ahemad ali" then s

Re: Edismax leading wildcard search

> > Am 22.12.2017 um 11:57 schrieb Selvam Raman: > > > 1) how can i disable leading wildcard search > > > > Do it on the client side. Just don't allow leading asterisks or question > > marks in your query term. > > > > > 2) why leading wil

Re: Edismax leading wildcard search

an i disable leading wildcard search > > Do it on the client side. Just don't allow leading asterisks or question > marks in your query term. > > > 2) why leading wildcard search takes so much of time to give the > response. > > > > Because Lucene can't just look in the i

RE: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore Hi Chris, All I have is the .p12 and password so it has already gone through the CSR process. How do I import this file into the keystore? On the Windows side, does it need to reside in the Personal Store

RE: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

Hi Chris, Thanks for the assistance. It is from a real CA. I was sent the .p12 Wildcard certificate and I need to use that to HTTPS my Solr address. Kelly -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 12:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

ne.apache.org Subject: Re: Add Wildcard > Certificate to Java Keystore > > Kelly, > > On 8/13/18 11:55 AM, Kelly Rusk wrote: >> I have imported a Wildcard Certificate to my Java Keystore and it >> displays, but when I pull up Internet Explorer and browse to my >&g

RE: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 12:00 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore Kelly, On 8/13/18 11:55 AM, Kelly Rusk wrote: > I have imported a Wildcard Certificate to my Java Keystore and it > displays, but when I pull up Internet Explorer and

Re: Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

Kelly, On 8/13/18 11:55 AM, Kelly Rusk wrote: > I have imported a Wildcard Certificate to my Java Keystore and it > displays, but when I pull up Internet Explorer and browse to my Solr > site, it fails to load and presents TLS errors. What do you mean "it displays"? How

Add Wildcard Certificate to Java Keystore

Hi all, I have imported a Wildcard Certificate to my Java Keystore and it displays, but when I pull up Internet Explorer and browse to my Solr site, it fails to load and presents TLS errors. Has anyone run into this, what commands do you run to import a Public CA into Solr? Regards, Kelly

Re: question regarding wildcard-searches

; > positionIncrementGap="100"> > > > words="stopwords.txt" /> > > > > > > words="stopwords.txt" /> > synonyms="synonyms.txt&

RE: question regarding wildcard-searches

rching without wildcard also returns zero results... As I mentioned before: we are testing this all, so we are not really up to speed with the why-does-this-do-that, although I am trying to learn. Thanks for any other pointers you can provide. Greetings, Roel -Original Message- From:

Re: question regarding wildcard-searches

n in admin > console. What you can try is searching for phrase without wildcard > “EO.1954.53” or if you are using WordDelimiterTokenFilter in your analysis > chain, you can set preserveOriginal=“1” and reindex. > > Can you share how your text_general looks like. > > HTH, > E

Re: question regarding wildcard-searches

Hi Roel, As mentioned, _text_ field probably does not contain complete “EO.1954.53.1” but only its parts. You can verify that using snalysis screen in admin console. What you can try is searching for phrase without wildcard “EO.1954.53” or if you are using WordDelimiterTokenFilter in your

RE: question regarding wildcard-searches

[mailto:jagdisht.vas...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 16 maart 2018 12:41 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question regarding wildcard-searches Hi paesen, Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed as below Eo 1954 53 1 Dot is removed.try with wildcard -? Like EO.1954.53.?? If you have 2 digits only in last.. I have

Re: question regarding wildcard-searches

Hi paesen, Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed as below Eo 1954 53 1 Dot is removed.try with wildcard -? Like EO.1954.53.?? If you have 2 digits only in last.. I have not tried but you just check it. Hope it will solve your problem. Thanks, Jagdish On 16-Mar-2018 3:51 pm, "Paesen Roel"

question regarding wildcard-searches

Hi everybody, We are experimenting with solr, and I have a (I think) basic-level question: we have a multiple fields, all copied into a generic field so we can search everything at once. However we have a (for us) strange situation doing wildcard searches for the contents of one specific field

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

orking for wildcard query X07Z3BO14C confirmation# for 1/30 8:30 appt. oil change / tire rotation Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this m

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

X07Z3BO14C confirmation# for 1/30 8:30 appt. oil change / tire rotation Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

17/18 11:47 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query > > Hi, > > solr version 6.4.2 > > hl.method = unified, hl.bs.type=Word, this setting working fine for normal > queries but failed in wildc

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Selvam Raman <sel...@gmail.com> Date: 1/17/18 11:47 AM (GMT-05:00) To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query Hi, solr version

Re: Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Query Parser defType=edismax On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Selvam Raman <sel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > solr version 6.4.2 > > hl.method = unified, hl.bs.type=Word, this setting working fine for normal > queries but failed in wildcard queries.(tried o

Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Hi, solr version 6.4.2 hl.method = unified, hl.bs.type=Word, this setting working fine for normal queries but failed in wildcard queries.(tried other hl.bs.type parmeter and without hl.bs.type as well, highlighting not working for wildcard queries) hl.method = original, this is working fine

Re: Enable default wildcard search

ate UX and > > algorithms. > > You can start to explore different aspects of this field from > > https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/ > > You see NGamming just freak the heap out. So, you can band aid it with > > EdgeNGram (and it's what you probably want to ha

Re: Enable default wildcard search

Hi Rick! Yes, as soon as I get the required result I'll definitely publish it on GitHub. Dovecot default scheme doesn't suit me, when I use it the search works according to the full word, but I want to make it wildcard search. I don't have the solution. Hope the this group will help me. 2017-12

Re: Enable default wildcard search

gt; solrconfig.xml - https://pastebin.com/5HSswCcv >> >> But under these settings, the search works only on the full >coincidence, >> for instance, if I search for Chris it doesn't find Christmas. The >client >> does not support wildcard search. I would like to know how

Re: Enable default wildcard search

p out. So, you can band aid it with > EdgeNGram (and it's what you probably want to have) and add some heap to > your poor server. > Another approach, is to stop ngramming but try to really search by wildcard > with http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution/ > It should be something lik

Re: Enable default wildcard search

/ You see NGamming just freak the heap out. So, you can band aid it with EdgeNGram (and it's what you probably want to have) and add some heap to your poor server. Another approach, is to stop ngramming but try to really search by wildcard with http://yonik.com/solr-query-parameter-substitution

Re: Enable default wildcard search

pastebin.com/1XXWTs8V > solrconfig.xml - https://pastebin.com/5HSswCcv > > But under these settings, the search works only on the full coincidence, > for instance, if I search for Chris it doesn't find Christmas. The client > does not support wildcard search. I would like to know how to turn

Enable default wildcard search

search for Chris it doesn't find Christmas. The client does not support wildcard search. I would like to know how to turn on wildcard search for all queries. I tried to do that by adding the following line to schema.xml but when I added it, Solr 6.6.1 very often showed errors during

Re: Edismax leading wildcard search

Am 22.12.2017 um 11:57 schrieb Selvam Raman: > 1) how can i disable leading wildcard search Do it on the client side. Just don't allow leading asterisks or question marks in your query term. > 2) why leading wildcard search takes so much of time to give the response. > Because Luc

Edismax leading wildcard search

Hi, Solr version - 6.4 Parser - Edismax Leading wildcard search is allowed in edismax. 1) how can i disable leading wildcard search 2) why leading wildcard search takes so much of time to give the response. -- Selvam Raman "லஞ்சம் தவிர்த்து நெஞ்சம் நிமிர்த்து"

Re: Wildcard searches with special character gives zero result

Solr does not analyze queries with wildcards in it. So, with ch*p-seq, it will search for terms that start with ch and end with p-seq. Since your indexer has analyzed all tokens before, only chip and seq are in the index. See https://solr.pl/en/2010/12/20/wildcard-queries-and-how-solr-handles

Re: Wildcard searches with special character gives zero result

cted result, for this case one result. > > But when i am searching with wildcard it produce zero result. > 1) ch*p-seq > > > if i use escape character in '-' it creates two terms rather than single > term. > > -- > Selvam Raman > "லஞ்சம் தவிர்த்து நெஞ்சம் நிமிர்த்து" > -- Selvam Raman "லஞ்சம் தவிர்த்து நெஞ்சம் நிமிர்த்து"

Wildcard searches with special character gives zero result

Solr version - 6.4.0 "title_en":["Chip-seq"] When i fired query like below 1) chip-seq 2) chi* it is giving expected result, for this case one result. But when i am searching with wildcard it produce zero result. 1) ch*p-seq if i use escape character in '-' it creates t

Re: solr.TrieDoubleField deprecated with 7.1.0 but wildcard "*" search behaviour is different with solr.DoublePointField

AFAICT The behavior you're describing with Trie fields was never intentionally supported/documented? It appears that it only worked as a fluke side effect of how the default implementation of FieldType.getprefixQuery() was inherited by Trie fields *and* because "indexed=true" TrieFields use

solr.TrieDoubleField deprecated with 7.1.0 but wildcard "*" search behaviour is different with solr.DoublePointField

Hi, some question about the new DoublePointField which should be used instead of the TrieDoubleField in 7.1. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/field-types-included-with-solr.html If i am using the deprecated one its possible to get a match for a double field like this: test_d:* even in

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

e.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search At the very least the English possessive filter, which you have. Great! Depending on what your query log analysis finds -- perhaps users are pretty much only searching on nouns? -- you might consider EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory. I woul

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

e name "newing". -Original Message- From: Georgy Nevsky [mailto:gnevsky.cn...@thomasnet.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:31 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search I understand stemming reason. Thank you. What do you suggest to use for stemmin

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

r 30, 2017 8:25 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search The initial question wasn't about a phrasal search, but I largely agree that diff q parsers handle the analysis chain differently for multiterms. Yes, Porter is crazily aggressive. USE WITH CAUTION! As has been p

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

rk. Porter doesn't have rules for words ending in "pp", so it doesn't stem "shipp" to "ship". So, your wildcard query is looking for words that start with "shipp", and given that "shipping" was stemmed to "ship", it won't find it. It wou

Re: Solr Wildcard Search

As Rick raised the most important aspect here , that the phrase is broken into multiple terms ORed together , I believe if the use case requires to perform wildcard search on phrases , we would need to store the entire phrase as a single term in the index which probably is not happening right now

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

to Apache Solr 7.1.0. In the best we trust Georgy Nevsky -Original Message- From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:32 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Wildcard Search George, When you get those results it could be due to stemming.

Re: Solr Wildcard Search

George, When you get those results it could be due to stemming. Wildcard processing expands your term to multiple terms, OR'd together. It also takes you down a different analysis pathway, as many analysis components do not work with multiple terms. Look into the SolrAdmin console, and use

Solr Wildcard Search

Can somebody help me understand how Solr Wildcard Search is working? If I’m doing search for “ship*” term I’m getting in result many strings, like “Shipping Weight”, “Ship From”, “Shipping Calculator”, etc. But if I’m searching for “shipp*” I don’t get any result. In the best we trust Georgy

Re: Leading wildcard searches very slow

Hi Sundeep, The simplified explanation is that terms are indexed to be more prefix search friendly (and that is why Amrit suggested that you index term reversed if you want leading wildcard). If you use leading wildcard, there is no structure to limit terms that can be matched and engine has

Re: Leading wildcard searches very slow

ral indexed string fields which is not tokenized and does not > have docValues enabled. > > When we do leading wildcard searches on these fields they are running very > slow. We were thinking that since this field is indexed, such queries > should be running pretty quickly. We are usi

Leading wildcard searches very slow

Hi, We have several indexed string fields which is not tokenized and does not have docValues enabled. When we do leading wildcard searches on these fields they are running very slow. We were thinking that since this field is indexed, such queries should be running pretty quickly. We are using

Re: Is there a way to delete multiple documents using wildcard?

in case). From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 09/21/17 13:28:13To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Is there a way to delete multiple documents using wildcard? Hi, Delete by query should work - posting to /update *:* should delete all doc. HTH, Emir > On 21 Sep 2017, at 05

Re: Is there a way to delete multiple documents using wildcard?

Hi, Delete by query should work - posting to /update *:* should delete all doc. HTH, Emir > On 21 Sep 2017, at 05:25, balmydrizzle <balmydriz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Doesn't work, either. wildcard query can't be used in delete. At least for > old Solr 3.x > &

Re: Is there a way to delete multiple documents using wildcard?

Doesn't work, either. wildcard query can't be used in delete. At least for old Solr 3.x -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

tsCache? > But there is all the same score 1.0, so maybe not a solution? > > Bernd > >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Bernd Fehling < >> bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >> >>> Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*=json&

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

Bernd > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Bernd Fehling < > bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > >> Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*=json&... >> >> A couple of "shift + reload" (to bypass cache) in the browser and you &g

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

Since all scores are equal it just can not break this tie. Add id as a sort clause to make results deterministic. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*=json&... > >

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

i thought you said different results i.e. different count. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*=json&... > > A couple of "shift + reload" (to bypass cache) in t

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*=json&... A couple of "shift + reload" (to bypass cache) in the browser and you will see that the order of the result changes sometimes. Definately no updates/ingestion because it's currently a SolrCloud test system with onl

Re: SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

5 server) and a wildcard query > I get different results between the same query. > > I assume this is alltogether due to the distributed search and > the response time of each server and the constant score of 1.0 ??? > > Is there any config where I can set the shard order (shard_1..

SolrCloud wildcard query result order change

With SolrCloud 6.4.2 (5 shards on 5 server) and a wildcard query I get different results between the same query. I assume this is alltogether due to the distributed search and the response time of each server and the constant score of 1.0 ??? Is there any config where I can set the shard order

Re: Wildcard query difference

It's the same in both cases: enumerate all terms that start with "a" and collect them into (conceptually) a huge OR query and execute it. There's been some work lately to avoid the TooManyBooleanClauses exception, but it's still the case that every term starting with "a" has to be examined and

Wildcard query difference

I have a question in terms of how solr/lucene will lookup terms from postings list for the below two queries: 1. a* 2. a*gh My understanding is that for first, it will get all terms starting with 'a' and issue query on those terms. For second, it will again get all terms starting with 'a', then

Re: Proximity searches with a wildcard

Have you looked at ComplexPhraseQueryParser? It adds some expense of course. See SOLR-1604. Best, Erick On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Michael Craven wrote: > I apologize in advance if this is too off topic or basic. I am a web > developer on a Drupal site tasked with

RE: Proximity searches with a wildcard

Sure: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser -Original message- > From:Michael Craven <mcrav...@jhu.edu> > Sent: Friday 23rd June 2017 22:06 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Proximity search

Proximity searches with a wildcard

I apologize in advance if this is too off topic or basic. I am a web developer on a Drupal site tasked with trying to improve searching capabilities for our users. A product manager asked to me if proximity searches and wildcards worked on our search form. I did some testing and found that,

Re: ComplexPhrase WildCard Case Sensitivy problem

}} < filter class="solr.TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory"/> < filter class="solr.TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory"/> On 25 March 2017 at 21:15, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello > It sounds similar to > https://luc

Re: ComplexPhrase WildCard Case Sensitivy problem

"eoe:yasın*" but q={!complexphrase}eoe:"YASIN*" parsedquery: "ComplexPhraseQuery("YASIN*")", FWIW Erick On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello > It sounds similar to > https://lucidworks.com/201

Re: ComplexPhrase WildCard Case Sensitivy problem

Hello It sounds similar to https://lucidworks.com/2011/11/29/whats-with-lowercasing-wildcard-multiterm-queries-in-solr/ (yep, I see TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory there) What's your analyzer for this field? Does it work for plain wildcards queries? I'm asking because CPQP adds an oddity sometimes

ComplexPhrase WildCard Case Sensitivy problem

Hello, I have a problem with ComplexPhrase and TurkishLowerCaseFilterFactory. When I search like {!complexphrase}SContent_tinx:"6* YAŞINDA", {!complexphrase}SContent_tinx:"6* yaşında", results is correct. { "responseHeader":{ "zkConnected":true, "status":0, "QTime":104, "params":{

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Hi, how about q=code_text:bolt*=code_text:bolt Ahmet On Thursday, March 2, 2017 4:41 PM, Сергей Твердохлеб <selik...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Emir On 02.03.2017 14:41, Сергей Твердохлеб wrote: Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}. When I search for "bolt" I want to get both results, but somehow grouped, so I can de

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

erently to get different score for different matches: >> >> code_text_exact:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt >> >> If you want to use wildcards, you can use similar approach: >> >> code_text:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt* >> >> HTH, >> Emir >> >

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

ifferently to get different score for different matches: > > code_text_exact:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt > > If you want to use wildcards, you can use similar approach: > > code_text:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt* > > HTH, > Emir > > > On 02.03.2017 14:41, Сергей

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

: Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}. When I search for "bolt" I want to get both results, but somehow grouped, so I can determine either it was found with exa

Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}. When I search for "bolt" I want to get both results, but somehow grouped, so I can determine either it was found with exact or non-e

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

Hi, You could try this: drop wildcard stuff altogether: 1) Employ edgengramfilter at index time. 2) Use plain searches at query time. Ahmet On Friday, November 25, 2016 4:59 PM, Sandeep Khanzode <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: Hi All, Can someone please assist with this

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

something in the syntax.  SRK On Thursday, November 24, 2016 11:16 PM, Sandeep Khanzode <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: Hi All, Erick, Please suggest. Would like to use the ComplexPhraseQueryParser for searching text (with wildcard) that may contain special char

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

Hi All, Erick, Please suggest. Would like to use the ComplexPhraseQueryParser for searching text (with wildcard) that may contain special characters. For example ...John* should match John V. DoeJohn* should match Johnson SmithBruce-Willis* should match Bruce-WillisV.* should match John V. F

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

/Other+ Parsers#OtherParsers- ComplexPhraseQueryParser Best, Erick On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandeep Khanzode <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks, Erick. > > I am actually not trying to use the String field (prefer a TextField here). > But, in my comparisons wit

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

ueryParser > > Best, > Erick > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandeep Khanzode > <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Erick. > > > > I am actually not trying to use the String field (prefer a TextField > here). > > But, in my compari

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

rs#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser Best, Erick On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Sandeep Khanzode <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks, Erick. > > I am actually not trying to use the String field (prefer a TextField here). > But, in my comparisons with TextField, it

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

Thanks, Erick. I am actually not trying to use the String field (prefer a TextField here). But, in my comparisons with TextField, it seems that something like phrase matching with whitespace and wildcard (like, 'my do*' or say, 'my dog*', or say, 'my dog has*') can only be accomplished

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

if I have 'field:a\ b', then the > parsedQuery is field:a field:b. Which does not match as expected (matches > individually). > > Can you please provide an example that I can use in Solr Query dashboard? > That will be helpful. > > I have also seen that wildcard queries work irr

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

. Another (maybe unrelated) observation is if I have 'field:a\ b', then the parsedQuery is field:a field:b. Which does not match as expected (matches individually). Can you please provide an example that I can use in Solr Query dashboard? That will be helpful.  I have also seen that wildcard

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

You can escape the space with a backslash as 'a\ b*' Best, Erick On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Reth RM <reth.ik...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think you can do wildcard on StrField. For text field, if your > query is "category:(test m*)" the parsed query w

Re: Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

I don't think you can do wildcard on StrField. For text field, if your query is "category:(test m*)" the parsed query will be "category:test OR category:m*" You can add q.op=AND to make an AND between those terms. For phrase type wild card query

Wildcard searches with space in TextField/StrField

Hi, How does a search like abc* work in StrField. Since the entire thing is stored as a single token, is it a type of a trie structure that allows such wildcard matching?  How can searches with space like 'a b*' be executed for text fields (tokenized on whitespace)? If we specify this type

Re: StrField with Wildcard Search

Khanzode <sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi, Okay. So it seems that the wildcard searches will perform a (sort-of) dictionary search where they will inspect every (full keyword) token at search time, and do a match instead of a match on pre-created index-time tokens with TextField. H

Re: StrField with Wildcard Search

Hi, Okay. So it seems that the wildcard searches will perform a (sort-of) dictionary search where they will inspect every (full keyword) token at search time, and do a match instead of a match on pre-created index-time tokens with TextField. However, the wildcard/fuzzy functionality will still

Re: StrField with Wildcard Search

Hi, EdgeNGram and Wildcard may be used to achieve the same goal: prefix search or starts with search. Lets say, wildcard enumerates the whole inverted index, thus it may get slower for very large databases. With this one no index time manipulation is required. EdgeNGram does its magic

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >