Hello Robert. Unstemmed terms have slightly higher IDF so they gain more
weight, but stemmed tokens usually have slightly higher TF, so differences are
marginal at best, especially when using standard TFIDFSimilarity. However, by
setting a payload for stemmed terms, you can recognize them at sea
Hello Baruch!
You are not pointing to a directory of segments, not a specific segment.
You must either point to a directory with the -dir option:
bin/nutch solrindex http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/ crawl/crawldb
-linkdb crawl/linkdb -dir crawl/segments/
Or point to a segment:
bin/nutch solrin
Hello - This patch may be more straightforward
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4018
-Original message-
> From:Ahmed Adel
> Sent: Wednesday 4th March 2015 19:39
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Log numfound, qtime, ...
>
> Hi, I believe a better approach than
Hello - facetting will be the same and distributed more like this is also
possible since 5.0, and there is a working patch for 4.10.3. Regular search
will work as well since 5.0 because of distributed IDF, which you need to
enable manually. Behaviour will not be the same if you rely on average d
Well, the only work-around we found to actually work properly is to override
the problem causing tokenizer implementations on by one. Regarding the
WordDelimiterFilter, the quickest fix is enabling keepOriginal, if you don't
want the original to stick around, the filter implementation must be mo
Hello - i stumbled upon an issue i've never seen earlier, a shard with all
nodes up and running but no leader. This is on 4.10.4. One of the two nodes
emits the following error log entry:
2015-03-08 05:25:49,095 WARN [solr.cloud.ElectionContext] - [Thread-136] - :
cancelElection did not find el
Ok, so what's next? Do you intend to open issues and send the links over here
so interested persons can follow them? Clearly some would like to see features
to merge. Let's see what the PMC thinks about it :)
Cheers,
M.
-Original message-
> From:Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Monday 9th March
gt; state when introducing a new token than to clear it!
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Well, the o
Thanks for sharing Toke!
Reliability should not be a problem for a Solr cloud environment. A corrupted
index cannot be loaded due to exceptions so the core should not enter an active
state. However, what would happen if parts of the data become corrupted but can
still be processed by the codec
Jan - we don't really need any security for our products, nor for most clients.
However, one client does deal with very sensitive data so we proposed to
encrypt the transfer of data and the data on disk through a Lucene Directory.
It won't fill all gaps but it would adhere to such a client's gui
---
> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 12 March 2015 at 18:39, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > Thanks for sharing Toke!
> >
> > Reliability should not be a problem for a Solr cloud environment. A
>
t; > SOLR-7216 JSON Request API
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> > P.s. Oh, the power of GMail filters :-)
> >
> > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> > http://www.solr-start.com/
> >
> >
> > On 9 Ma
Hello - setting (e)dismax' tie breaker to 0 or much low than default would
`solve` this for now.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Mihran Shahinian
> Sent: Monday 16th March 2015 16:29
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Relevancy : Keyword stuffing
>
> Hi all,
> I have a use
Hello - Chris' suggestion is indeed a good one but it can be tricky to properly
configure the parameters. Regarding position information, you can override
dismax to have it use SpanFirstQuery. It allows for setting strict boundaries
from the front of the document to a given position. You can als
Anshum, Jack - don't any of you have a cluster at hand to get some real results
on this? After testing the actual functionality for a quite some time while the
final patch was in development, we have not had the change to work on
performance tests. We are still on Solr 4.10 and have to port lots
Hello Majisha,
Nutch' Solr indexing plugin has support for stripping non-utf8 character
codepoints from the input, but it does so only on the content field if i
remember correctly.
However, that stripping method was not built with the invalid middle byte
exception in mind, and i have not seen
Hi - trying to extract entities for facets or whatever using IDF is bad at
best. MLT works well because of scoring, not for entity extraction, because it
doesnt extract entities. The OpenNLP Lucene filters do what you need, but it
depends on the model you built. The freely available maxent model
Hello, you can either process the logs, or make a simple SearchComponent
implementation that reads SolrQueryRequest.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Nitin Solanki
> Sent: Tuesday 24th March 2015 11:38
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Read or Capture Solr Logs
>
> Hello
Logs
>
> Hi Markus,
> Can you please help me. How to do that?
> Using both "Process the logs"
> or "make a simple SearchComponent implementation that reads
> SolrQueryRequest."
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrot
Hello Chris - i don't know that token filter you mention but i would like to
recommend Lucene's HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter. It works reasonably well
if you provide the hyphenation rules and a dictionary. It has some flaws such
as decompounding to irrelevant subwords, overlapping subwords
Hi - what do you see if you monitor memory over time? You should see a typical
saw tooth.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Tom Evans
> Sent: Tuesday 21st April 2015 12:22
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Confusing SOLR 5 memory usage
>
> Hi all
>
> I have two SOLR 5 serve
Hi - i've created a small Maven project with just a custom Lucene 4.3 codec. It
is a basic MyCodec extends FilterCodec implementation, disabling compression. I
have added the FQCN to the
src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec. I have
checked the jar itself to see if
Hi we have a multiValued spatial RPT field. Each document has 0 or more
coordinate pairs attached to it. I derived the coordinate pairs from the
spatial facetting heatmap and i have the count that comes with it, to do so i
had to translate the heatmap grid to a list of coordinate pairs with the
Hello - you can use HMMChineseTokenizerFactory instead.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/5_2_0/analyzers-smartcn/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/HMMChineseTokenizerFactory.html
-Original message-
> From:Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> Sent: Thursday 25th June 2015 11:02
> To: solr-user@lucene.apac
订从速，读者可登陆www.wbsub.com.sg，或拨打客服专线6319
> 1800订购。 \n
> 此外，一年一度的晚报保健美容展，将在本月23日和24日，在新达新加坡会展中心401、402展厅举行。
> \n
> 现场将开设《联合晚报》订阅展摊，读者当场订阅晚报，除了可获得丰厚的赠品，还有机会参与“"],
> "author":["Edwin"]}}}
>
>
> Is there any suitable filter factory to solve this issu
":["chinese3"],
> "content":[")组成的我国女队在今天的东运会保龄球女子三人赛中，
> 以六局3963总瓶分夺冠，为新加坡赢得本届赛会第三枚金牌。队友陈诗桦（Jazreel)、梁蕙芬和陈诗静以3707总瓶分获得亚军，季军归菲律宾女队。（联合早报记者：郭嘉惠)
> \n "],
> "author":["Edwin"]},
> "chinese4":{
> &
Hello - why not just use synonyms or StemmerOverrideFilter?
Markus
-Original message-
> From:hossmaa
> Sent: Monday 29th June 2015 14:08
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Correcting text at index time
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I'm wondering if it's possible in Solr to correct t
Apologies for the bump, but there should be someone with a clever idea? :)
Cheers,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Wednesday 24th June 2015 11:20
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Attaching payload on spatial RPT?
>
> Hi we have a multiValued spatial RPT field. Each do
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageDetection
-Original message-
> From:Alessandro Benedetti
> Sent: Thursday 2nd July 2015 11:06
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: language identification during solrj indexing
>
> SolrJ is simply a java client to access Solr REST API.
> >
> > >
> > > "highlighting":{
> > >
> > > "chinese1":{
> > >
> > > "text":["1月份的制造业产值同比仅增长0 \n \n 新加坡 我国1月份的制造业产值同比仅增长0.9％。
> > > 虽然制造业结束连续两个月的萎缩，但比经济师普遍预估的增长3.3％疲软得多。这也意味着，我国今年第一季度的经济很可能让
s ourselves before we can use it in 5.x?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> On 6 July 2015 at 18:44, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
> > Yes, analyzers slightly changed since 5.x.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5388
> >
> > -Original message-
>
Hello - you can either use a similarity that does not use query normalization,
or you can just ignore it, it is relative anyway. Also, consider using boost
parameter instead of bf, it is multiplicative where bf is just additive, which
offers less control. You may also want to reduce time resolut
Well yes, a simple empty commit won't do the trick, the searcher is not going
to reload on recent versions. Reloading the core will.
-Original message-
> From:Bernd Fehling
> Sent: Wednesday 15th July 2015 13:42
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: To the experts: howto for
See SOLR-5783.
-Original message-
> From:Alessandro Benedetti
> Sent: Wednesday 15th July 2015 14:48
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: To the experts: howto force opening a new searcher?
>
> 2015-07-15 12:44 GMT+01:00 Markus Jelsma :
>
> &g
Hello - i need to run a thread on a single instance of a cloud so need to find
out if current node is the overseer. I know we can already programmatically
find out if this replica is the leader of a shard via isLeader(). I have looked
everywhere but i cannot find an isOverseer. I did find the el
Hi, thats a known issue and unrelated:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9120
M.
-Original message-
> From:Stephen Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday 17th May 2016 23:10
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Aleksey Mezhva ;
> Hans Zhou
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud replicas consistently out of
Hello - that sounds odd indeed. Did you check query and indexing analysis?
M.
-Original message-
> From:Dmitry Kan
> Sent: Thursday 19th May 2016 9:36
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: puzzling StemmerOverrideFilterFactory
>
> Hello!
>
> Puzzling case: there is a diction
t; Hi,
>
> Yes, I have checked the analysis page and there everything is logical,
> stemming is done as expected. So by analysis page the search should not
> return anything.
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Hello - that sounds odd i
Hello - try the KStem filter. It is better suited for english and doesn't show
this behaviour.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Mark Vega
> Sent: Thursday 19th May 2016 19:55
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Stemming nouns ending in 'y'
>
> I am using Apache Nutch v1.10
Hello - did you find this manual page? It explains how HTML can be uploaded.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Solr+Cell+using+Apache+Tika
Markus
-Original message-
> From:scott.chu
> Sent: Tuesday 24th May 2016 7:48
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re:
Hi - with some crazy casting to a NamedList and List you can
finally get a SimpleOrderedMap that contains a bucket you can read. It's a bit
tedious but it works fine.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Bram Van Dam
> Sent: Wednesday 25th May 2016 16:48
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
Hi,
We have a bunch of tests extending AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase on 6.0 and our
builds sometimes fail with the following message:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Could not load collection from ZK:
collection1
at io.
Caused by: org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$SessionExpiredEx
Also, tests sometimes fail with:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No registered leader was found after
waiting for 1ms , collection: collection1 slice: shard1
Despite having waitForThingsToLevelOut(45);
If anyone has a suggestion for this as well, it would be much appreciated :)
Markus
Hello,
I ran accros an awkward situation where is collect all ~7.000.000 distinct
values for a field via facetting. To keep things optimized and reduce memory
consumption i don't do setFacetLimit(-1) but a reasonable limit of 10.000 or
100.000.
To my surprise, Solr just stops or crashes. So, i
I'll have a look at it!
Thanks guys!
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Toke Eskildsen
> Sent: Thursday 2nd June 2016 15:49
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Small setFacetLimit() terminates Solr
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 09:26 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > My guess wou
Hi,
Just now i indexed ~15k doc to a newly made core and shema, running 6.0 local
this time. It was just regular indexing, nothing fancy and very small
documents. Then the following popped up in the logs:
2496200 WARN (qtp97730845-17) [ x:documents]
o.a.s.u.p.AtomicUpdateDocumentMerger Unkn
Hello Joseph,
Your datanodes are in a bad state, you probably overwhelmed it when indexing.
Check your max open files on those nodes. Usual default of 1024 is way too low.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Joseph Obernberger
> Sent: Monday 20th June 2016 19:36
> To: solr-user@lucene
Hello,
I recommend using the langdetect language detector, it supports many more
languages and has much higher precission than Tika's detector.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Sent: Wednesday 22nd June 2016 12:32
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Automatic Lan
Mads, some distributions require different steps for increasing max_open_files.
Check how it works vor CentOS specifically.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Mads Tomasgård Bjørgan
> Sent: Thursday 30th June 2016 10:52
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr node crashes wh
over 4000 files without closing them
> properly? Is it for example possible to adjust autoCommit-settings I
> solrconfig.xml for forcing Solr to close the files?
>
> Any help is appreciated :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openinde
Hello - we use GZipped output streams too for buffering large sets of
SolrInputDocument's to disk before indexing. Works fine and SolrInputDocument
is very easily compressed as well.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Sebastian Riemer
> Sent: Thursday 30th June 2016 13:56
> To: solr-
Hello - just as mentioned in the thread:
> Add to your solrconfig:
>
>
>
> features
>
>
>
>
And point your update handler config to this html-strip-features update
processor chain.
M.
-Original message-
> From:Kalpana
> Sent: Wednesday 13th
Hello - this is the 101 documentation on indexing:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Indexing+and+Basic+Data+Operations
..and this describes stuff on indexing stuff with POST etc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Index+Handlers
..and things that
Hello - Multiple slashes beyond the URL scheme should be normalized, but some
crazy CMS' or their doubtful modules actually rely on it! It's madness.
M.
-Original message-
> From:Jamal, Sarfaraz
> Sent: Thursday 14th July 2016 21:39
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: S
Hello - all our production environments as deployed as a cloud, even when just
a single Solr instance is used. We did this for the purpose having a single
method of deployment / provisioning and just because we have the option to add
replica's with ease if we need to.
We never use embedded Zook
Depending on your settings, Nutch does this as well. It is even possible to set
up different inc/decremental values per mime-type.
The algorithms are pluggable and overridable at any point of interest. You can
go all the way.
-Original message-
> From:Walter Underwood
> Sent: Wednes
No, just run it continously, always! By default everything is refetched (if
possible) every 30 days. Just read the descriptions for adaptive schedule and
its javadoc. It is simple to use, but sometimes hard to predict its outcome,
just because you never know what changes, at whatever time.
You
Hello - your similarity should rely on numDoc instead, it solves the problem. I
believe it is already fixed in trunk, but i am not sure.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Upayavira
> Sent: Thursday 4th August 2016 13:59
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Out of sync deletions c
Hi - I get this compile error when upgrading a Maven project to Solr 6.2.0 and
i cannot find a reference in CHANGES.txt.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Markus
cannot override coord(int,int) in
org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.PerFieldSimilarityWrapper
Oh forget it, i missed it completely!
LUCENE-7395, SOLR-9315: Fix PerFieldSimilarityWrapper to also delegate query
norm and coordination factor using a default similarity added as ctor param.
(Uwe Schindler, Sascha Markus)
Sorry
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Wedne
Hi,
I've read up on the streaming expressions on the cwiki. The update decorator is
ideal for quick imports from various sources such as jdbc, and combined with
daemon it can be used for periodic delta imports too, which is very nice. But
besides the update function, i would also expect a delet
Hello - we've just spotted the weirdest issue on Solr 6.1.
We have a Solr index full of logs, new items are added every few minutes. We
also have an application that shows charts based on what's in the index, Banana
style.
Yesterday we saw facets for a specific field were missing. Today we chec
; different definition for your field. Optimize would have to resolve
> this somehow, perhaps that process made the magic happen?
>
> NOTE: I'm not conversant with the internals of merge, so this may be
> totally bogus..
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2
n that query?
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Hello - we've just spotted the weirdest issue on Solr 6.1.
> >
> > We have a Solr index full of logs, new items are added every few minutes.
> > We also have an application tha
Yes, definately SpanFirstQuery! But i didn't know you can invoke it via
XMLQueryParser, thank Mikhail for that!
There is a tiny drawback to SpanFirst, there is no gradient boosting depending
on distance from the beginning.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent:
Hi,
I just spotted something weird, again. A regular search popped up a weird
candidate for first result, so i've reproduced it on our production system.
Digging deeper, it appears that the fl parameter has something to do with it.
Not the order of results but the scores / explain in the debug
ps the "get fields" phase because it already has all the right
> information.
>
> You can force the single pass for the first request as well by adding
> distrib.singlePass=true as a request parameter. It might be interesting to
> get that output as well and compare it w
the normal two phase search? Please open a jira issue. This
> warrants more investigation.
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Shalin, that does the trick indeed!
> >
> > Also noted that the manual is incorrect, setting it to a blank or false
Yes, you can use HTTP POST with SolrJ for queries.
SolrRequest request = new QueryRequest((SolrParams)query,
SolrRequest.METHOD.POST);
QueryResponse response = new QueryResponse(client.request(request), client);
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_2_1/solr-solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrReq
Did someone miss https://pdfbox.apache.org/ ? It can write PDF documents, is
ASF and has a ton of examples to learn from.
M.
-Original message-
> From:John Bickerstaff
> Sent: Monday 17th October 2016 22:05
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PDF writer
>
> It's not fun
In case you're not up for Doug or Jan's anwers; we have relied on HTTP proxies
(nginx) to solve the problem of restriction for over 6 years. Very easy if
visibility is your only problem. Of course, the update handlers are hidden (we
perform indexing for clients with crawlers) so we don't expose
ase that client's key is fairly static, yes? It doesn't change at
> any time, but tends to live on the data more or less permanently?
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > In case you're not up for Doug or Jan's anwers; w
ManifoldCF can do this really flexible, with Filenet or Sharepoint, or both, i
don't remember that well. This means a variety of users can have changing
privileges at any time. The backend determines visibility, ManifoldCF just
asks how visible it should be.
This also means you need those back
Indeed, we have similar processes running of which one generates a 'related
query collection' which just contains a (normalized) query and its related
queries. I would not know how this is even possible without continuously
processing query and click logs.
M.
-Original message-
> Fr
Does it work if you comment out any of the two local param queries? I'd doubt
passing two sets of local params ever worked at all without wrapping one in the
other.
-Original message-
> From:Gintautas Sulskus
> Sent: Monday 31st October 2016 21:19
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> S
Hi - i need to process a batch of documents on update but i cannot seem to find
a point where i can hook in and process a list of SolrInputDocuments, not in
UpdateProcessor nor in UpdateHandler.
For now i let it go and implemented it on a per-document basis, it is fast, but
i'd prefer batches.
t; Sent: Thursday 3rd November 2016 18:57
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: UpdateProcessor as a batch
>
> Markus:
>
> How are you indexing? SolrJ has a client.add(List)
> form, and post.jar lets you add as many documents as you want in a
> batch
>
> Best,
> Eri
ly no
> batching at that level that I know of. I'm pretty sure that even
> indexing batches of 1,000 documents from, say, SolrJ go through this
> method.
>
> I don't think there's much to be gained by any batching at this level,
> it pretty immediately tells Luce
e they're removed from the
> > >> incoming batch and passed on, but I admit I have no
> > >> clue where to do that. Possibly in an update chain? If
> > >> so, you'd need to be careful to only augment when
> > >> they'd reached their final s
Yes, index the employee and item names instead of only their ID's. And if you
can't for some reason, i'd implement a DocTransformer instead of a
ResponseWriter.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:mganeshs
> Sent: Friday 16th June 2017 16:19
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi,
Moving over to docValues as stored field i got this:
o.a.s.s.IndexSchema uniqueKey is not stored - distributed search and
MoreLikeThis will not work
But distributed and MLT still work.
Is the warning actually obsolete these days?
Regards,
Markus
To add on Erick,
First thing that comes to mind, you also have a huge heap, do you really need
it to be that large, if not absolutely necessary, reduce it. If you need it
because of FieldCache, consider DocValues instead and reduce the heap again.
Use tools like VisualVM to see what the CPU is
Solr hasn't got built in support for NER, but you can try its UIMA integration
with external third-party suppliers:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration
-Original message-
> From:FOTACHE CHRISTIAN
> Sent: Thursday 22nd June 2017 19:03
> To: Solr-user
> S
Hello, see inline.
-Original message-
> From:ken edward
> Sent: Friday 23rd June 2017 21:07
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Questions about typical/simple clustered Solr software and hardware
> architecture
>
> Hello,
>
> I am brand new to Solr, and trying to ramp up qui
Sure:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser
-Original message-
> From:Michael Craven
> Sent: Friday 23rd June 2017 22:06
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Proximity searches with a wildcard
>
> I apologize in
Hi,
We have a proces checking presence of many documents in a collection, just a
simple client.getById(id). It sometimes begins throwing lots of these
exceptions in a row:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Connection pool shut down
Then, as su
t; Sent: Tuesday 27th June 2017 23:02
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SolrJ 6.6.0 Connection pool shutdown
>
> On 6/27/2017 6:50 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > We have a proces checking presence of many documents in a collection, just
> > a simple client.g
firewall). Yes, that's using the hammer to swat a fly :-)
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> On 29 June 2017 at 08:21, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Everything is 6.6
Try mergeFactor of 10 (default) which should be fine in most cases. If you got
an extreme case, either create more shards and consider better hardware (SSD's)
-Original message-
> From:Antonio De Miguel
> Sent: Wednesday 5th July 2017 16:48
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: R
Hi - There is no out-of-the-box integration of OpenNLP in Lucene at this
moment, but there is an ancient patch if you are adventurous.
Regards,
LUCENE-2899
-Original message-
> From:meenu
> Sent: Thursday 6th July 2017 16:26
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: OpenNLP and
Hello,
This morning i spotted our QTime suddenly go up. This has been going on for a
few hours by now and coincides with a serious increase in heap consumption. No
node ran out of memory so far but either that is going to happen soon, or the
nodes become unusable in another manner.
I restarted
w much total cache
> consumption may go based on your current solrconfig.xml settings. Also 2
> shards and 3 replca's are on 6 such machines i assume.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thi
>
> What changed in the system?
>
> Has there been a code change, increased QPS or different types of queries
> being run?
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
&g
ixes made in Solr
> 6.6 with PayloadScoreQuery in this regard. See LUCENE-7808 and LUCENE-7481
>
> Erik
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 2017, at 7:01 AM, Markus Jelsma
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This morning i spotted our QTime suddenly go up.
t; Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
> >
> >
> > On 29 June 2017 at 08:21, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Everything is 6.6.0. I could include a stac
with stack trace
>
> Do you see any errors etc. in solr.log during this time?
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > The problem was never resolved but Shawn asked for the stack trace, here
> > it is:
> >
nt/connections happening concurrently.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Susheel,
> >
> > No, nothing at all. I've check all six nodes, they are clean.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Markus
> &g
Hello,
Another peculiarity here, our six node (2 shards / 3 replica's) cluster is
going crazy after a good part of the day has passed. It starts eating CPU for
no good reason and its latency goes up. Grafana graphs show the problem really
well
After restarting 2/6 nodes, there is also quite a
> On July 19, 2017 5:35:32 AM EDT, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Another peculiarity here, our six node (2 shards / 3 replica's) cluster
> >is going crazy after a good part of the day has passed. It starts
> >eating CPU for no good reason a
hey start to sync shards due to some reason?
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Another peculiarity here, our six node (2 shards / 3 replica's) cluster is
> > going crazy after a good part of the day has passed
101 - 200 of 1583 matches
Mail list logo
