I have used this without issue. In the example solrconfig.xml replace
this line:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=${solr.directoryFactory:solr.StandardDirectoryFactory}/
with this one:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory class=solr.RAMDirectoryFactory/
Thanks,
Matt Weber
of trunk Solr (r1073990) and the example
solrconfig.xml. I am also using the example schema with the addition
of my ngram field.
Any ideas? I have tried this with other word's containing an
apostrophe and they all stop returning results after 4 characters.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
Think about this for a moment. When you use MoreLikeThis, the query
is a document. How do you highlight a document in another document?
wunder
On 4/29/09 9:21 PM, Matt Weber m...@mattweber.org wrote:
Any luck
There was a thread about this last week and verdict is currently you
can't highlight MoreLikeThis results.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On May 4, 2009, at 1:22 AM, jli...@gmail.com wrote:
My query returns a number of MoreLikeThis results for a given
document. I wonder if there is a way
schema.xml, add a
new string field, then use a copyfield to copy the value of title into
the new field and set terms.fl to the new field you just created after
reindexing.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On May 4, 2009, at 6:46 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know how work /autoSuggest.
I do have
a servlet you can write a rails
handler parsing the json output directly.
http://www.mattweber.org/2009/05/02/solr-autosuggest-with-termscomponent-and-jquery/
.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On May 4, 2009, at 9:39 AM, manisha_5 wrote:
Hi,
I am new to solr. I am using solr server to index the data
it's own index that contains documents of all types. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On May 5, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Chris Masters schrieb:
- flatten the searchable objects as much as I can - use a type field
to distinguish
I do not think this is possible. You will probably want to handle
this logic on your side during indexing. Index the document with the
fist price, then as that price expires, update the document with the
new price.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
://json.rubyforge.org/.
After you have your rails controller working you can hook it into your
FE with some javascript like I did in the example on my blog. Hope
this helps.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 7, 2009, at 7:37 AM, manisha_5 wrote
I actually wrote a plugin that integrates Solr with WordPress.
http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/21/solr-for-wordpress/
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/solr-for-wordpress/
https://launchpad.net/solr4wordpress
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 8
will be able to facet on this new field and sort the facet by
frequency (the default) to get the most popular words.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 12, 2009, at 7:33 AM, sachin78 wrote:
Does anybody have answer to this post.I have a similar
=textfield:copperfacet=truefacet.field=textfieldfacetfacet.limit=5
This will give you the top 5 words in the textfieldfacet.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 12, 2009, at 7:57 AM, sachin78 wrote:
Thanks Matt for your reply.
What do you mean by frequency
I also work with the FAST Enterprise Search engine and this is exactly
how their Security Access Module works. They actually use a modified
base-32 encoded value for indexing, but that is because they don't
have the luxury of untokenized/un-processed String fields like Solr.
Thanks,
Matt
access
each result.
Good luck.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 12, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
The only downside would be that you would have to update a document
anytime
a user was granted or denied access. You would have to query before
I think you will want to look at the Field Collapsing patch for this. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 14, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Chris Miller wrote:
Oh, one more question
3) Is there a way
1. The limit parameter takes a signed integer, so the max value is
2,147,483,647.
2. I don't think there is a defined limit which would mean you are
only limited to want your system can handle.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 20, 2009, at 11
Check the dataDir setting in solrconfig.xml.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On Jun 5, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Dean Pullen wrote:
I lied, it's actually saving data to:
/usr/local/jboss-portal-2.7.1.GA/bin/C:\home\jboss\solr\data
Which is a tad crazy! And I
,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Vijay_here wrote:
Hi,
I am using solr to inxdex some of the legal documents, where i need
the solr
search engine to return relevancy ranking score for each search
results. As
of now i am getting
Found my own answer, use the literal parameter. Should have dug
around before asking. Sorry.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On Jul 23, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Matt Weber wrote:
Is it possible to supply addition metadata along with the binary
file when
to optimize your index.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 13, 2009, at 6:21 PM, William Pierce wrote:
Folks:
Are there good rules of thumb for when to optimize? We have a large
index consisting of approx 7M documents and we currently have it set
to optimize once a day. But sometimes
Why don't you create a synonym for + that expands to your customers
product name that includes the plus? You can even have your FE do
this sort of replacement BEFORE submitting to Solr.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:42 AM, AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
Thanks Ahmet,
Thats excellent
Query for *:*
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I'm using Solr for seach and faceted browsing
Is it possible to have solr search for 'everything' , at least as
far as q is concerned ?
The request handlers I've found don't like it if I don't pass
Check out the field collapsing patch:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Peter Ledbrook wrote:
Hi,
I want to index both the contents of a document/file and metadata
associated
You might want to see how the stats component works with field
collapsing.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 30, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Uri Boness wrote:
Hi,
At the moment I think the most appropriate place to put it is in the
AbstractDocumentCollapser (in the getCollapseInfo method). Though
24 matches
Mail list logo