hi michael,
i have finished my xs port to an alpha state.
you are now able to make a new $obj and initialize the transport layer (SSL
might even work, but only if the shared object file is not called
libsslspamc, because my Makefile.PL links -lspamc), and check() a mail in a
$string.
after that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
>
>> Hmm. Well, the idea is:
>>
>> 1. if the unusual headers (X-Envelope-From, Envelope-Sender, X-Sender)
>> are present and trustworthy, use them
>> 2. fall back to the R
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 15:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review] fix misspelling in new 3.0 API, code, and documentation
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:06:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> how's about ad
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3586
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 15:13 ---
The patch won't help in MacOS X. We should document somewhere what functionality
will not work in MacOS X with a reference to perl bug -- perl#24122 and the
discus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 15:10 ---
Subject: Re: [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:39:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As for having the make test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> Hmm. Well, the idea is:
>
> 1. if the unusual headers (X-Envelope-From, Envelope-Sender, X-Sender)
> are present and trustworthy, use them
> 2. fall back to the RFC-2822 std, Return-Path, which is pretty much
> always present
Okay, I l
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: [review] fix misspelling in new 3.0 API, code, and documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>since this does change a public A
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3586
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl setuid fails, breaking |[review] perl setuid fails,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3586
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=2139)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2139&action=view)
suggested patch
Ok, this patch does the kluge where we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:39 ---
Theo said:
> There are times you'd want to compile in support,
> and run the main tests, but not run the SSL test(s).
What would those circumstances be? This is a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=2138)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2138&action=view)
the patch
via the rtc policy, the patch needs to be att
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|fix misspelling in new 3.0 |[review] fix misspelling in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:10 ---
just to correct myself, I didn't previously notice at the bottom of get() that
an undef value is changed to '' before being returned. so either patch is fine,
alt
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:05 ---
Subject: Re: fix misspelling in new 3.0 API, code, and documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|using envelope_sender_header|[review] using
|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2136 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 14:00 ---
d'oh. you're right, the "ok" section is expecting the header value, not the
header name.
however, this patch will fail if the header doesn't exist. get() will r
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:15:12PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> +1 for the change, I agree that it needs a vote, but I don't agree
> that we need to spend a lot of time debating that it needs a vote and
> reverting the code that will probably get enough +1s anyway.
>
> So, let's just vote and be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 13:30 ---
Subject: Re: fix misspelling in new 3.0 API, code, and documentation
+1
Michael
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee f
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.0.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3614
Summary: fix misspelling in new 3.0 API, code, and documentation
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:41 PM
> Daniel Quinlan writes:
> > Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > FYI: I reverted the change. r22977.
> >
> > I would have reverted the change if asked and I was anticipating a
> > vote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FYI: I reverted the change. r22977.
>
> I would have reverted the change if asked and I was anticipating a vote
> rather than being reverted. I don't think we need to rever
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FYI: I reverted the change. r22977.
I would have reverted the change if asked and I was anticipating a vote
rather than being reverted. I don't think we need to revert changes on
procedural grounds.
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 12:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:04:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh, and reading over the com
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:10:05PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Note: I'm not against the idea of making the change, I'm against this
> > being considered "trivial" and committed without comment by the rest of
> > the dev team.
>
> Well, reason
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note: I'm not against the idea of making the change, I'm against this
> being considered "trivial" and committed without comment by the rest of
> the dev team.
Well, reason enough.
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> 1. Shouldn't we have Return-Path: higher up on the list of envelope
>sender headers that are checked in get_envelope_from() ?
Hmm. Well, the idea is:
1. if the unusual headers (X-Envelope-From, Envelope-Sender, X-S
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:54:23AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> (I also agree it's a reasonable change, but we need to vote on it.)
FYI: I reverted the change. r22977.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Programming isn't so much a profession as it is an obsessive-compulsive
disorder."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:33:20AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: quinlan
> > Date: Fri Jul 16 01:33:20 2004
> > New Revision: 22962
> >
> > -sub get_mbox_seperator {
> > +sub get_mbox_separator {
> >return
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:28:02AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> Sorry, it seemed trivial and non-controversial because it's a new API in
> 3.0, avoids confusion, lock-in after 3.0 final, and, well, misspelling a
> function name would be embarrassing.
All good reasons, but it's still an API change a
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ummm. Why exactly was this set of changes committed? It may seem
> trivial, but it's an API change since you're renaming functions.
Sorry, it seemed trivial and non-controversial because it's a new API in
3.0, avoids confusion, lock-in after 3.0 fin
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:19:54PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
> (let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
> wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
Yeah, people interested in code ch
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3613
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:33:20AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: quinlan
> Date: Fri Jul 16 01:33:20 2004
> New Revision: 22962
>
> -sub get_mbox_seperator {
> +sub get_mbox_separator {
>return $_[0]->{mbox_sep};
> }
Ummm. Why exactly was this set of changes committed? It may s
1. Shouldn't we have Return-Path: higher up on the list of envelope
sender headers that are checked in get_envelope_from() ? I think the
heuristic could probably use some work, perhaps look at the top
Received: line to determine a priority order for headers.
2. ROUND_THE_WORLD - is this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.0.0
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3613
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 11:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: spamassassin "Argument "BODY" isn't numeric in addition"
error
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:58:22AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Argu
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3613
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- You are receivi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3613
Summary: spamassassin "Argument "BODY" isn't numeric in addition"
error
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: Mac O
+1
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
(let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> I know this is a big deal in terms of "the wiki way" -- but how would
> people feel about switching this on for the SpamAssassin wiki, to curtail
> the spam?
+0.5 I'd strongly prefer some other method to eliminate wiki spam, but
this is acceptable in the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 09:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=2136)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2136&action=view)
proposed fix
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3612
Summary: using envelope_sender_header causes incorrect env sender
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
hi michael,
you all can find the code i talked about here:
http://ankh-morp.org/~vetinari/tmp/sa-client.txt
it is used as "SpamAssassin integration for qpsmtpd".
but the code should be useable for everything else.
i'm currently getting forward in porting libspamc to perl,
but things are quite tough
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 06:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=2135)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2135&action=view)
Caused spamd to run for 2.5hrs - but not when retried
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 06:43 ---
And re-processing the same message gave no problems (have attached).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 06:42 ---
We have had several crashes over the last three weeks or so. Just caught the
first one (during the day) - a small message, just a couple of kb, from a list
that we
On Friday 16 July 2004 06:19 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
> (let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
> wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
/me shrugs and says +1 (or better: --1 ;
ye guys,
what about that web-of-trust theory, google used in its new "community"
concept,
like: everyone is trusted, that got invited by someone already trusted.
but maybe thats overshot for what you guys want?
regards, johannes
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL P
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3573
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 04:04 ---
Can I have one more vote here? I reset the count after the last patch.
Oh, and reading over the comments, I'm not sure whether Theo has been satisfied
about inclu
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 00:37 ---
vaild code missing:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Cp1252
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watc
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 00:31 ---
valid ISO code with is missing:
Content-type: text/plain; charset=x-euc-jp
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bu
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 00:30 ---
there are some less hits I cant´t understand
out of one mail:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Dis
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 23:41 ---
another vaild code witch is missing:
windows-874
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assi
Hello Justin,
Thursday, July 15, 2004, 11:04:47 AM, you wrote:
JM> I know this is a big deal in terms of "the wiki way" -- but how
JM> would people feel about switching this on for the SpamAssassin
JM> wiki, to curtail the spam?
+1
Works well for the rules wiki at exit0.us
Bob Menschel
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 22:29 ---
seemed that in the list one vaild code is missing:
iso-8851-15
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
> (let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
> wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
+1.
- --j.
-BEGIN P
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 22:11 ---
you mean somethink like:
body SARE_ILL_CS Content-transfer =~ /ansi|unicode|437|8(?:5[/i
that would be helpfull.
--- You are receiving this mail becau
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
(let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
+1 -- or whatever number > 1 I am allowed to use :-)
-- sidney
Please vote on splitting out the wiki changes from the -cvs mailing list
(let's say a -wiki list will be created). The volume is too high for
wiki changes and I'd rather they were separate lists.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 20:57 ---
Subject: Re: [review] eval check_illegal_chars produces divide by zero error
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:52:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hehe, man i fee
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 20:52 ---
hehe, man i feel like an idiot. did anyone notice in the attachment i put
!$length($str) vs !length($str).
^
i see its (length($str) == 0) in r22957 at least :
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3608
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3595
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:42 ---
I may be being dumb here, but I thought Spamassassin 3 was capable of looking at
the message body after content-transfer-encodings had been dealt with?
It seems t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:27 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3608
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:27 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3595
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:25 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:25 ---
+1 it slows things down a slight bit, but not enough to worry about.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3608
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:09 ---
+1 can't believe we have to clean up after razor so much :(
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watch
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3595
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-15 19:08 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
74 matches
Mail list logo
