On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:17:30 +0600, Alexander Litvinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Solution is to learn a monogram, bigram and trigram character model
for the ham you recieve. Mix the statistics together (to account for
partial information) and that'll be very good at detecting gibberish
Hi,
I want to whitelist the SA mailinglist. Is this the right way to do it:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
Thanks in advance
/ Martin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:13:52PM +1030, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a number of hosts spamming us using the mailing to a wrong address
which doesn't exist but crafting the reply to address as someone else so
they receive a bounce message and open it and it's spam.
I've tried
On 27 Nov 2003 01:13:04 -0600, Scott A Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to spamassassin-devel and spamassassin-talk:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:17:30 +0600, Alexander Litvinov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Solution is to learn a monogram, bigram and trigram character model
for the ham you
: From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mailinglist-letter marked as spam every time
:
:
: At 01:52 PM 11/18/03 +0100, Martin Lyberg wrote:
: Can i whitelist the subject in some way, because it seems
: like this is the
: only thing that is common in every letter.
: From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mailinglist-letter marked as spam every time
:
:
: KP == Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: * 3.3 MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT Message-Id was added by a relay
:
: KP Perhaps you could have the originator fix the subject
: From: Pat Masterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mailinglist-letter marked as spam every time
:
:
: Martin - I use whitelist_from_rcvd on the few servers that my mailing
: lists come from, including the spamassassin list. Works
: perectly.. -pat
Hi Pat,
How can i do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 10:12:27 PM, I wrote:
LG Attached is a custom rule file. It has been working rather well and
LG I will be increasing the score from 0.5 to 1.0. The cf file also
has
LG some rules looking for words obfuscated by pipes.
On 27 Nov 2003 10:06:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 27 Nov 2003 01:13:04 -0600, Scott A Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to spamassassin-devel and spamassassin-talk:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:17:30 +0600, Alexander Litvinov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Solution is to learn a
Hello Rob,
I would like to have the worked example since Jason McCormick has suggested
a different approach (check the post).
His suggestion is well enough for my basic requirement.
However, I am looking for a better way.
Best Regards
Patrick Tsang
- Original Message -
From: Rob
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Martin Lyberg wrote:
Hi,
I want to whitelist the SA mailinglist. Is this the right way to do it:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
Thanks in advance
/ Martin
Almost,
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
will work PROVIDED
Hello,
I have just upgraded one of our mailhubs from SA 2.44 (I think) up to
version 2.60. I tested this on my own (linux) PC beforehand to see what
was required, and had no problems.
The mailhub is a Sun Solaris 9 ultra 10 with perl 5.8.0. Generally no
problems with the new version except that
I've found it helpful to use the following rule, which tends not to have too
many false negatives actually:
# Take off points for possible mailing lists
header FNET_MAILING_LISTSubject =~ /\[*\]/i
score FNET_MAILING_LIST -5.0
describe FNET_MAILING_LIST Possibly part of a
I am running Spamassassin 2.60-1 (the RPM package from the Spamassassin home
site) with the local.cf and default user.prefs files on a Mandrake 9.2
system.
Pyzor and Razor checking was enabled by simply downloading and installing the
Pyzor and Razor RPM packages from the Mandrake and Mandrake
Nichols, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attended a seminar yesterday about spam. One of the idea that was
pitched as being in a product was training the inbound spam detecting
on the patterns of outbound mail.
They talked about their filters looking at outbound mail, building
patterns
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Sascha Huedepohl wrote:
So i wonder if it is possible to delete some token from the bayes
Database.
Not from SA itself. You'd have to manipulate the DB externally. Note:
this is not recommended unless you understand the DB internal format.
--
Hi!
We are using SA 2.6nb1 and Razor 2.22.
I registered my username as stated and I entered the line use_razor2 in my
local.cf .
Do the 2 points below mean it's working?
Thanks
Frank
In my /root/.razor directory
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel25 Nov 27 06:55 identity@ -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a problem where SA is not rewriting the subject line. Any ideas on what I'm
missing ?
LOCAL.CF
required_hits 5.0
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag This could be SPAM*
dns_available no
LOG
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:26:29 %z:1742: scanloop:
# Take off points for possible mailing lists
header FNET_MAILING_LISTSubject =~ /\[*\]/i
Well, this effectively hits anytime there is a closing bracket, nothing
else is taken into consideration. Any occurence, even 0, of [, followed
by ].
There is just a . missing (or similar
I have a 2.6 SA installation that has recently started to take off process wise.
SA starts and then runs normally for 5 to 10 minutes then the processes start to pile
up. I get 10 to 15 spamd processes spawning
and they soon consume all the system resources and eventually hangs the machine.
On 27 Nov 2003, John Horne wrote:
The mailhub is a Sun Solaris 9 ultra 10 with perl 5.8.0. Generally no
problems with the new version except that I just cannot seem to get the
usual SA logging to occur which states how long it took to spam check
the message, etc. I have set the syslog.conf
Frank DeChellis wrote:
Hi!
We are using SA 2.6nb1 and Razor 2.22.
I registered my username as stated and I entered the line use_razor2 in my
local.cf .
Do the 2 points below mean it's working?
Yup, looks like it's working.
The output does report you don't have a
Make sure RBL is disabled.
skip_rbl_checks 1
also, execute spamd (you are using spamd, right?) using the -m flag and
make sure that number is high enough. I use -m25 and handle about 50k
messages/week with no problem.
Also, memory is critical on a system. If you are below 256mb, it
I tried skipping the rbl already with no luck.
Here is my current ps output with half of my rules disabled:
[firewall:/etc/mail/spamassassin] admin# ps -aux | grep spam
mta 4640 41.7 20.9 174920 164612 ?? R11:14AM 15:50.12 /usr/bin/spamd -u
mta -d -r /var/run/spamd.pid
mta
Step 1:
Install onto server net-snmp.
Step 2:
Somewhere else (or on the same server if you want) install MRTG or similar
product.
Step 3:
Configure SNMP daemon to report all sorts of nifty stuff; cpu, free memory,
free swap, file-system utilization, network load, number of processes
running
so I'm guessing that spamhaus is a thing which you can plug into
spamassassin and mark as spam incoming? or how would I completely block
those IP addresses with firewall or some kind of deny rules that's what
we need around here. complete and utter shutdown... :)thanks for the
I believe I've set things correctly, but SA doesn't seem to be
autolearning:
An example header:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,
DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
Hi Shayne,
Way ahead of you:
http://mrtg.orourke.ca/firewall/cpu.html
The yearly graph will show you when I first installed SA back in September. The realy
ugly flatline's are since Tuesday. These
were the periods today where I was hiding in the server room to avoind the endless
the server
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'grep bayes /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf`:
The filename is /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. And don't forget to
restart spamd/amavisd-ne after any change there.
Just a typo, and I definitely restarted spamd.
Thanks,
Greg
--
Greg
does some one what to earn some money helping me
to start and configure and make work the spamassassin software ???
because i laready instaled , and can;t find the problem
if some one are interested and want more details please let me know
max
- Original Message -
From: Vee Persaud
I am running 2.60 also. I think I have the same issue. I do not use the .qmail-user
script as you
but use the qmail-scanner-queue.pl method.
For debuggin purposes, in a shell I run:
/usr/bin/spamd --username=popuser -D
--virtual-config-dir=/var/qmail/mailnames/%d/%l/configs -a
in my syslog
At Thu Nov 27 22:06:18 2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
Hi Shayne,
Way ahead of you:
http://mrtg.orourke.ca/firewall/cpu.html
The yearly graph will show you when I first installed SA back in
September. The realy ugly flatline's are since Tuesday. These were
the periods today where I was
crap. stupid outhouse sent before i was ready. sorry, ignore last message.
---
Hi All,
I've figured out how to use DNSBL with sendmail and am very pleased, apart
from being burnt by this page (ie i use www.orbz.org as a blacklist and our
mail server suddenly became very
Hi, I ran the following
sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
and got
.
Learned from 0 message(s) (37
message(s) examined).
Did this work? Seems like it didnt..
FYI. This spam_new dir is an MH folder of spam that doesnt get
Hi All,
I've figured out how to use DNSBL with sendmail and am very pleased, apart
from being burnt by this page (ie i use www.orbz.org as a blacklist and our
mail server suddenly became very obscene)...
my question is, i read in the archives that if you have too many of these
DNS lookups then
I have a smtp gateway running sendmail 8.12.10. How
do I setup a site-wide filter and still retain the ability to select which users
are sent through spamassassin? Also, if I can pose two questions in the same
message, how do I (and only I) add spam/ham to the site-wide bayes filter (99.9%
At 03:49 PM 11/27/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
Ø sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
and got
.
Learned from 0 message(s) (37 message(s) examined).
Did this work? Seems like it didnt..
Yep, that means that SA has already learned all 37 messages
At 01:48 PM 11/27/03 -0800, Greg Webster wrote:
An example header:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,
DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
Thanks, is amavisd-new linked from the Spamassassin homepage?
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Alain Fauconnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Site-wide opt-op
On Thu, Nov 27,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 08:19:04PM -0400, Tim Johnson wrote:
I have a smtp gateway running sendmail 8.12.10. How do I setup a
site-wide filter and still retain the ability to select which users
are sent through spamassassin? Also, if I can pose two questions in
the same message, how
Hello S.,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:49:46 PM, you wrote:
SMCB * sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
SMCB and got
SMCB .
SMCB Learned from 0 message(s) (37 message(s) examined).
SMCB Did this work? Seems like it didn't..
It looks to me like
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:23:36PM -0400, Tim Johnson wrote:
Thanks, is amavisd-new linked from the Spamassassin homepage?
Probably, but just in case:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Greets,
_Alain_
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Hi there, does any one knows any software like spamassassin ?
but I need it to run on Windows enviroment
Regards and thanks in advance
===
Efren Pedroza Huerta
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
On 11/28/03 9:19 AM, "Tim Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(B
(B I have a smtp gateway running sendmail 8.12.10. How do I setup a site-wide
(B filter and still retain the ability to select which users are sent through
(B spamassassin? Also, if I can pose two questions in the same message, how
44 matches
Mail list logo
