Question - your from doens't match your to in the final example - right?
Good idea - as a general purpose tool such a concept could help condense
patterns very efficiently. If you shared your source some other people might
have improvements to make though (not me - I'm a reg ex whimp ;-)
Can
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:47:07 -0800, Mitch (WebCob) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question - your from doens't match your to in the final example - right?
Yes. I thought that pasting in a 300 line exerpt would be
counterproductive.
Scott
---
The
Read it and weep. :(
Next question, how was it sent? The Received headers look relatively
legit, so was this sent from a trojaned AOL user?
I have *got* to implement that fuzzy matching algorithm.
Scott
---BeginMessage---
pronounce,
How Vigras works. And you can better understand, what
Tanen wrote:
Hello,
Im searching a solution, to send back, mails, who havent been detect
as spam, on the mail server, for put it on a mail box, or folder, for
use the sa-learn command, and give to SpamAssassin more values to catch
spams.
How to put mails who have been downloaded on the
On Monday 19 January 2004 23:06, David A. Carter wrote:
Before turning off Habeas (or even worse, giving it a positive score),
please take time to read this thread, particularly Bob Proulx's response.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/38623
I'd read that thread
I as well have gotten alot and want to set it to 0 and exlude it from bayes.
So just to confirm i enter the below in my local.cf file. Non have made it
thought because of things like big evil however might as well make it 0 till
they work out how to stop it.
thanks
score HABEAS-SWE 0
I am having some trouble with Subject header rules to my local.cf file -
they don't seem to be getting read by spamassassin.
Example:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
score SUBJECT_VICODIN 4.0
(I took this example from Chris' site
Nice stuff - have you got any benchmarks to prove it's all worthwhile?
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott
Is there an easy way to get a total of the spam/ham in the bayes db?
I've noticed the total come up in the log when running SA in debug mode,
and one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic numbers,
but is there really nothing easier, no sa-learn commands?
TIA
Adrian
in case you have SA 2.6x
then just type sa-learn --dump magic
Adrian Simmons wrote:
Is there an easy way to get a total of the spam/ham in the bayes db?
I've noticed the total come up in the log when running SA in debug mode,
and one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic
Scott A Crosby wrote:
Read it and weep. :(
Next question, how was it sent? The Received headers look relatively
legit, so was this sent from a trojaned AOL user?
I have *got* to implement that fuzzy matching algorithm.
Scott
[.. spam ..]
I also get them even with 2.61. I have added a
Hello, i was an happy user of Spamassassin untill some days ago
spamassassin started to eat all my memory opening the bayes database.
I was using spamassassin 2.55 with procmail calling it directly with
the -P switch, not using spamd and spamc.
My database is about 40 Mb and i have 256 Mb of ram
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Scott A Crosby wrote:
Read it and weep. :(
This looks very similar to the one I posted about yesterday. See this mbox:
http://www.westnet.com/~chris/Spam0118
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
The fact that Habeas are very litigious when it comes to protecting
their haiku doesn't alter the fact that is it intrinsically a very
abusable system. We're not talking about some trusted cryptographic
algorithm spoofed in an email header, the mark is a series of
easy-to-forge text which any
This answer does NOT really relate to bayes!
But nevertheless to a typical 'out of memory'.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:43:30PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
I have also tryed to upgrade to sa 2.62 and convert the old db format to
the new one but sa fill all my memory, and conseguently is
and noticed that the tagging configuration is specified twice, once in
amavisd.conf, and again in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. There
doesn't seem to be any reason as to why one setting is specified in one
place, and and not the other. What is the point of specifying settings
in the local.cf,
Hello Bob,
Sunday, January 18, 2004, 5:59:29 PM, you wrote:
BA Based on SPAM-L posts from admins at Outblaze (Suresh) and rambler.ru, I
BA conjured up a few simple rules to detect forgeries from these domains:
BA header RAA_FORGED_FROM_OUTBLAZE Received =~ /\.mr\.outblaze\.com/
BA
Hi There,
I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
is installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
version, but had errors when starting spamd or spamassassin so i downloaded
the latest version 2.70 and installed that, but still get
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:28:00 +0200 Marc Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
is installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
version, but had errors when starting spamd or spamassassin
Hi,
My header checks (RBL) only seem to be firing off when there is a forged
HELO with the message, otherwise the checks come back as success for 1
of 1queries. This is a new installation of ver 2.61. We are running a
site wide config with no individual user prefs.
Debug looks like:
Hi all,
The spamd options specify the following (amongst other things):
-v, --vpopmail
Enable vpopmail config. If specified with with -u
set to the vpopmail user,
this allows spamd to lookup/create user_prefs in the vpopmail user's
own
maildir. This option is useful for vpopmail
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range. Nothing
more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing dynamic, but
then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by mailservers and then it
actually made sense. It
At 12:27 PM 1/20/04 +, Adrian Simmons wrote:
Is there an easy way to get a total of the spam/ham in the bayes db? I've
noticed the total come up in the log when running SA in debug mode, and
one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic numbers, but
is there really nothing
At 09:13 AM 1/20/04 -0500, David Roback wrote:
debug: DNS MX records found: 0
snip
Shouldn't I be seeing more than 1 query for all messages?
Hmm.. looks like your DNS is flaking out.. I'm pretty sure you should
always have at least one MX success from the DNS_AVAILABLE test...
What happens
Are you sure you want that rule to be case sensitive, lower-case only?
try
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/i
(note the added i at the end)
At 11:48 AM 1/20/04 +, David Logan wrote:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
At 11:49 AM 1/20/04 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
Hello folks!
I wanted to update my bigevil list but when I did a locate on them I got this:
/var/amavis/.spamassassin/bigevil.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf
Now I really forgot where the correct location is. Both files are identical.
I know
With SA 2.61 (Redhat 9; SA called from MailScanner) we often got a huge,
and apparently orphaned, file called bayes_toks.new. Having upgraded to
2.62, this behaviour has been replaced by occurences of multiple files
called bayes_toks.expire$$ (where $$ seems to be a process number).
When I check
At 09:54 PM 1/19/04 -0500, Barry Jaspan wrote:
The OPT_HEADER (in 2.5x and 2.6x) rule does not make much sense to me:
header __OPT_HEADER_SUBJALL =~
/^(?:Resent-)?Subject:.*opt.?(in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/im
header __OPT_HEADER_ALL ALL =~
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom
I just started using the FVGT rules and got this FP.
Do I understand this right, the rule below penalizes (scores high) anyone
with a .us domain?
Many schools across the country use the .k12.ss.us format where ss is
their state two letter identifier.
thanks
SCott
2.4 FVGT_u_BZ_TLD
I am trying to install 2.62 and razor 2 is giving the error below. CPAN
won't install without force it says. I dont want to force anything.
I have the newest razor and it is patched.
t/razor2..FAILED test 1
Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay
Thanks.
--
Michael H. Collins
Forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please include me in your reply as I am not yet subscribed.
Cheers,
Ron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Forwarded Message-
From: Ron Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: spamassassin and evolution
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:05:55 +1100
here is a
Hi There,
I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail is
installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest version,
but had errors when starting spamd or spamassassin so i downloaded the latest
version 2.70 and installed that, but still get
Title: Message
Hi, I am noticing a
disturbing trend within the past month. I'm noticing mails coming thru without
any of the normal Spam headers, such as:
X-Spam-Checker-Version:X-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Status:
These mails
inevitably are *never* caught as spam. I can't even check what score they
At 08:49 AM 1/20/04 -0600, Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:
I just started using the FVGT rules and got this FP.
Do I understand this right, the rule below penalizes (scores high) anyone
with a .us domain?
Yes, but it only penalizes them when used in a web-page link. Your From:
address, etc won't
-Original Message-
From: Scott Williams , Area4 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Schools Slapped? FVGT
I just started using the FVGT rules and got this FP.
Do I understand this right, the rule below
Hi!
I am using SA with exiscan-acl (probably should post to some exiscan mailing
list) and I am subscribed here. I keep getting messages from thhis group, which
trigger de MIME syntax error check of exiscan-acl:
2004-01-20 16:10:05 1AixW1-0002fD-8I demime acl condition: uuencoded line length
is
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 07:53, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Scott A Crosby wrote:
Read it and weep. :(
This looks very similar to the one I posted about yesterday. See this mbox:
http://www.westnet.com/~chris/Spam0118
I would try the antidrug.cf at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
here is a mystery...
Both my wife and I use spamassassin from within evolution by piping
emails to spamc -c and checking for the return value to classify as
spam or not, as written up by others.
When running evolution and spamassassin on my
-Original Message-
From: Paul Barbeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] 7245 Habeas and counting
I as well have gotten alot and want to set it to 0 and exlude
it from bayes. So just to confirm i enter
Does this not boil down to the globally effective legal footprint for
Habeas?
That is if you are a spammer and originate from outside this footprint you
won't have any problems abusing the mark.
My 0.02 English pence worth.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
How can I change the text that is included in tagged
messages, that includes the servername and also includes my
email address?
So for example, it currently states:
Spam detection software, running on the system server2,
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The
original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 05:06, Marc Morgan wrote:
Hi There,
I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
is
installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
version,
but had errors when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 07:45, Alan Munday wrote:
Does this not boil down to the globally effective legal footprint for
Habeas?
That is if you are a spammer and originate from outside this footprint you
won't have any problems abusing the
http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam.txt
It also slipped right by Mailscanner on another host, but I'm surprised
that it scored 0.0 on my SA setup (backhair, weeds, everything in
rules_du_jour)
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon
At 10:50 AM 1/20/2004, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Hi,
How can I change the text that is included in tagged
messages, that includes the servername and also includes my
email address?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
see the report and clear_report_template options.
(note: don't edit 10_misc.cf..
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:13 AM 1/20/04 -0500, David Roback wrote:
debug: DNS MX records found: 0
snip
Shouldn't I be seeing more than 1 query for all messages?
Hmm.. looks like your DNS is flaking out.. I'm pretty sure you should
always have at least one MX success from the DNS_AVAILABLE
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Brad Koehn wrote:
I'm sure the something like URI::URL could be used to get the host of
the URLs, and that could in turn be fed to a whois server (although how
one chooses between ARIN, APNIC, and the like I'm not yet sure).
I recently wrote a script to automate spam
FYI:
I checked my SPAM Rejection log, and found two occurrences this morning
where a spammer put the Hebeas headers in the email, but it was classified
as SPAM anyway (scores of 30+ each).
This appears to confirm that spammers are trying to use this as their path
into our email box.
I think I
Title: Message
Was... Missing Spam
Headers? Why?
Thanks for the
advice. I've got the spamd log analyzers bookmarked.
However, upon
further inspection, this is the reason why these mails are coming thru without
being processed. I'm getting a lot of these log entries. The below is for just
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam.txt
It also slipped right by Mailscanner on another host, but I'm surprised
that it scored 0.0 on my SA setup (backhair, weeds, everything in
rules_du_jour)
---
The SF.Net email is
Hi,
just a quick question: How do I enable localized rule descriptions?
There's a lot of german rule descriptions in the stock SA distribution,
but they're not used on my (german) mail server setup. Do I miss a point?
--ck
---
The SF.Net
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ron Gilbert wrote:
I have two questions:
1) Where do i put new rules, or changes to scores. I have heard several
different things, and I'm sure there are reason for each, but i can't figure
it out. As far as i ca tell, there is (RH9):
They have different purposes.
Hello all,
I want to use Bayesian Rules on all incoming mails for all users on our
server, however am not entirely sure how to do it as the 100+ mail
accounts we have are not in use by an homogenous group...
As I understand it, using SA-learn needs both good and bad e-mails to
work properly, and
Changes:
-now catches some gapped-and-obfuscated v-words.
on a test-list of 100 v-word spellings v 0.2 caught 37 of them. v 0.3
catches 65. more improvements in the works.
(thanks for the list Gary)
comments at top have a link to where the file comes from
The ruleset is located at:
Hello all,
I want to use Bayesian Rules on all incoming mails for all users on our
server, however am not entirely sure how to do it as the 100+ mail
accounts we have are not in use by an homogenous group...
As I understand it, using SA-learn needs both good and bad e-mails to
work properly, and
Morning Ralf.
Matt has a problem that I think is specifically caused because his server is
Nated. He had to add the private network to his trusted networks list.
I don't have that problem, and Theo acknowleges that there is a bug that
should be fixed in 2.70.
I haven't heard a definite schedule
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam.txt
That's really odd, here it tripped a DATE_IN_PAST rule. Here's the report:
Content analysis details: (12.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
When I initially installed Spamassassin, it would alter the spam's
subject line if I choosed to receive the spam. My message subjects
would look something like this:
Subject: **SPAM** fwd: something something something
Subject: **SPAM** Re: something else something else
...etc.
Jonathan
Worth changing the X-MailScanner header stuff to be
X-%org-name%-Mailscanner in the MailScanner.conf. This was introduced at
MS 4.24 (I think) as one of the virus's at the time was putting this in
the header to stop MS hosts virus scanning the email!
The other headers in there look
I'd be interested in seeing that scriptcan you be persuaded to share
with the class? g
-JR
snip
I recently wrote a script to automate spam complaints to the contact
address(es) of the previous hop before my mail servers, using both a
Whois lookup by IP address (see Net-Whois-IP-0.35 Perl
How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred
of these rules, and I'm wondering if that will cause a problem. I'm
guessing I will have between 300 and 600 rules. Is anyone else running
this many URI rules? And does it cause any big performance issues?
The rules won't
I've been tagging a lot of mdpillsource.com spam. They don't hit bigevil
because there is no URI in the text format. However the spam hits a ton of
other rules. One thing I noticed is this spammer must be using trojaned
machines. THe last one came in from:
dhcp-v53-89.cudenver.edu
snip
How can I change the text that is included in tagged
messages, that includes the servername and also includes my
email address?
If you got a Windows box, Michael Bell (Guinevere), has created a usefull
win32 app called SAConf , for configuring your SpamAssassin systems.
This seems like one of those questions that probably resurfaces
regularly, and for which the answer is probably buried somewhere
obvious, but nonetheless, I have been unable to find out how to easily
limit Spamassassin's testing and filtering to mail delivered to local
addresses. I don't
If you want your server to be in german, tell it.
export LANG=de
note: this may affect other programs on the system that are language-smart
as well.
At 12:01 PM 1/20/2004, Christopher Kunz wrote:
just a quick question: How do I enable localized rule descriptions?
There's a lot of german rule
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.]
1.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence between 51 and 100
[cf: 100]
1.0 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2
At 12:14 PM 1/20/2004, Kenneth Andresen wrote:
Will SA-learn filter all mails for everybody using the same rules, or
how can it work with different rule set for each user/mail account?
by default bayes databases and rulesets are specific to the user that
executes SA (note: that's execution, which
At 12:24 PM 1/20/2004, Pat Traynor wrote:
Spamassassin a couple of times, and I have to suspect that a new version
changed things. Is this something that I can configure somewhere?
start off with spamassassin --lint
I suspect you've got some old and invalid things like defang_mime that are
sounds like you're making your own version of bigevil.cf.
Chris S found that memory usage was greatly reduced by using regex combos
to reduce the number of rules.
At 12:31 PM 1/20/2004, Dan Kennedy wrote:
How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred
of these rules,
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:39 PM -0500 Ben Hanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like one of those questions that probably resurfaces
regularly, and for which the answer is probably buried somewhere obvious,
but nonetheless, I have been unable to find out how to easily limit
There is still ( I believe ) a couple of problems were it capitalizes the word BAYES_
on a couple of lines and I believe he is away on vacation for another week ..
although I still see activity in the support forums from him otherwise it is a
good tool for those of us on a win32
On Tue, 19 Jan 2004, JRiley wrote:
I'd be interested in seeing that scriptcan you be persuaded to
share with the class? g
Of course. In an effort to avoid bothering others on the list who may
not be interested, I've placed it at
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~syl/packages/spambounce.pl
if export LANG=de doesnt work try
export [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
ralf
Christopher Kunz wrote:
Hi,
just a quick question: How do I enable localized rule descriptions?
There's a lot of german rule descriptions in the stock SA distribution,
but they're not used on my (german) mail server
(followup to my own message ...)
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Sylvain Robitaille wrote:
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~syl/packages/spambounce.pl
Sorry! I'd forgotten about the redirection from there to my home web
server. I've now made sure the script is available via the above URL
...
Anyone who
I've talked to a few people running Alt-N Mdaemon, and I'd like to run it
at home... It appears it uses SpamAssassin (version 2.55 according to the
headers). And while I like it that it's integrated, I'd rather have more
control over it. Does anyone know if it's possible to configure the SA in
At 09:31 AM 1/20/2004, Dan Kennedy wrote:
The rules won't have any wildcards, just basically a big blacklist of
URLs found in SPAM.
You might want to look into Chris Santerre's BigEvil ruleset before you
reinvent the wheel:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
Kelson
Just posted 2.60L.
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 18:01, Brad Koehn wrote:
I've been thinking about a new rule, either for Bayes or for more
normal processing, and I'd like the group's opinion. It has to do with
URLs in the message.
My original thought came to me when running SpamCop on a bunch of
messages. Taking
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Ben Hanson wrote:
I have been unable to find out how to easily
limit Spamassassin's testing and filtering to mail delivered to local
addresses.
If you use the howto on spamassassin with virus filtering from advosys.ca,
that is what you get. I did the same thing, and
Just curious, if there is a script (be it perl or
otherwise), that anyone has written, that will perform an automated
'download' of the different SARE (or other) SA rulesets?
I wouldn't think this would too difficult to do,
and have a scheduled restart of the MTA calling SA to implement it.
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 14:41, David Logan wrote:
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
Example:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
Hi,
I just installed SpamAssassin-2.6.1 under FreeBSD-4.9.
Installation was from the FreeBSD ports collection.
I have not configured anything yet. I just opened INSTALL
and USAGE and went through the steps listed there. It
appears that, because I've installed SpamAssassin from
ports, everything
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Petersen
Sent: Sat 1/17/2004 9:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ann: Rules De Jour: An automated way to keep upwith
the latest rulesets
Yes, check the archives for an email from me (bigevil update) or Chris Peterson (all
updates -ge, cp, weeds, etc).
These were topics last week and last month
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of JRiley
Sent: Tue 1/20/2004 10:52 AM
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/rules_du_jour
I save
WY to many emails :)
--Chris
-Original Message-From: JRiley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:52
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[SAtalk] Automated ruleset download
Just curious, if there is a
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:12, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam.txt
It also slipped right by Mailscanner on another host, but I'm surprised
that it scored 0.0 on my SA setup (backhair, weeds, everything in
rules_du_jour)
FWIW, here's what it scored on my system:
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:52, JRiley wrote:
Just curious, if there is a script (be it perl or otherwise), that
anyone has written, that will perform an automated 'download' of the
different SARE (or other) SA rulesets?
I wouldn't think this would too difficult to do, and have a scheduled
+[ To [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20.Jan.2004 16:09):
|
[snipped]
| In case it's useful I have run the same example, now adding
| -D to collect more debug info. I am attaching the output.
Sorry, forgot to attach the file. It is attached to this
message.
|
+]
--
F e r n a n
Thanks for all the replies.. I checked the archive, (like i should have
before posting, i know i know..)..
-JR
www.spamfighter.org
snip
RulesDeJour handles updating the add-on rulesets:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/RulesDeJour
There's no good way to auto-update the main ruleset.. upgrading
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:12, Evan Platt wrote:
I've talked to a few people running Alt-N Mdaemon, and I'd like to run it
at home... It appears it uses SpamAssassin (version 2.55 according to the
headers). And while I like it that it's integrated, I'd rather have more
control over it. Does
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:35:28PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
Actually, it works quite well. Some people get more spam than ham to
specific To addrs, so those become spam signs -- but once a ham arrives
at those addrs, the ham signs outweigh the To spam-sign and redeem
the mail.
In theory, I
At 01:52 PM 1/20/2004, JRiley wrote:
Just curious, if there is a script (be it perl or otherwise), that anyone
has written, that will perform an automated 'download' of the different
SARE (or other) SA rulesets?
I wouldn't think this would too difficult to do, and have a scheduled
restart of
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0600, Terry Shows wrote:
FYI:
I checked my SPAM Rejection log, and found two occurrences this
morning where a spammer put the Hebeas headers in the email, but it
was classified as SPAM anyway (scores of 30+ each).
This appears to confirm that spammers
I moderate a mailing list that's hosted off of a third-party server to
which I don't have direct access (beyond the simplistic web-interface of
the list-management software). The list is (and must be) open to mail
from non-members, and thus collects huge amounts of spam.
My plan for fixing this
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
John A. Hengstler wrote:
I have noticed this as well.
I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server
is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and
the pull in just fine. But
I have had SpamAssassin running with my Qmail for about a week now, and have
yet to see any mail come through marked with *SPAM* -- even after
I set the level to 3! It appears to be running, but doesn't seem to be
doing anything, and I'm still getting dozens of spams in my personal mailbox
I have had SpamAssassin running with my Qmail for about a week now, and
have
yet to see any mail come through marked with *SPAM* -- even
after
I set the level to 3! It appears to be running, but doesn't seem to be
doing anything, and I'm still getting dozens of spams in my personal
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:02 PM -0800 Webmaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had SpamAssassin running with my Qmail for about a week now, and
have yet to see any mail come through marked with *SPAM* --
even after I set the level to 3! It appears to be running, but doesn't
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
