--On Friday, January 23, 2004 12:01 PM +0200 Extech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Can anyone please direct me to a How to... Document on installing
spamassassin with sendmail.
Two approaches, depending on whether sendmail is on a gateway. You can run
SA from your delivery agent, such as procmail, j
Hi All,
I have a (hopefully) unique problem where it appears that a small percentage
of the email coming in are not being assigned a score. In fact, the headers
look messed up.
I've been running SpamAssassin for a 150 user company for some time now with
great results. The system runs on:
Qmail-
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:14, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:12:06 -0600 Wagner One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 1/22/2004 1:15 PM, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> >
> > > Note: I think this my hacked-up version of sa-stats.pl at
> > > http://www.cynistar.net/~apthorpe/code/sa-
So I inherited sysadmining our Spam Assassin install that runs as an
external filter to our Communigate Pro server (using CGPSA).
I've managed (thanks mostly to this list) to figure out how to train Bayes
(and am trying to feed it at least 5% ham to spam each time i feed it), and
how to insta
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 13:56, Webmaster wrote:
>
> Hmmm, when I look at the Qmail configuration in Webmin I see no
> reference (nor a place for it) to spamc. I don't even see a reference to
> spamassassin. When I look at the qmail action in the bootup process, this
> is the entire script:
>
Hello,
I hope someone can help me out with my problem.
I am currently setting up the latest version of SA, for my users that are in a ldap
database. The users in ldap do not have shell accounts, they are mail only user. For
users to SA, do they need to have a shell account? Something other th
I'm receiving some spam through my spamassassin with
X-Spam-Status: hits=? required=?
Whats the cause of this, does any one know?
Best regards,
Owen Franssen
Technical Services Manager
WASP (a division of Insight Web Marketing Ltd.)
+353 64 54094
--
At 10:19 AM 1/23/2004, Mark Squire wrote:
Hi all,
I have been training SA manually for a couple of weeks now. I estimate
a good 2000 emails for both Spam and Ham have been learned by it.
Coupla questions though . . . I want to put it into auto-learn mode
because I have only trained it on a few of
Most likely network tests are all timing out on him. Run spamd -D and it
will tell you if and which ones are timing out.
Martin Hepworth wrote:
I get about 4 seconds per message on a Celeron 600 512MB ram with about
8000 messages a day and 80% is spam!
runing pyzor, spamcop, xbl.spamhaus.org a
> Something tells me that most of that time is likely due a couple of
network
> tests that are timing out for _every_ email.
>
>
> ie: he might have DCC installed, but not allow the UDP packets past the
> firewall, which would add 10 seconds to every email (by default, more if
he
> upped the timeo
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:01:38PM +0200, Extech wrote:
> Hi There
>
> Can anyone please direct me to a How to... Document on installing spamassassin with
> sendmail.
If you don't want all the attachment scanning and just want the SA
checks, spamass-milter has been working for years with our ins
Hi all,
I have been training SA manually for a couple of weeks now. I estimate
a good 2000 emails for both Spam and Ham have been learned by it.
Coupla questions though . . . I want to put it into auto-learn mode
because I have only trained it on a few of our employees emails, and not
people from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Bret Miller" writes:
>> While I haven't done what you are looking for, I'd be
>> most interested in any info you get off-list. I am getting
>> ready to embark on this same process for a customer and would
>> love to have the dirty insight be
I get about 4 seconds per message on a Celeron 600 512MB ram with about
8000 messages a day and 80% is spam!
runing pyzor, spamcop, xbl.spamhaus.org and bayes, + backhair etc rules
Running with MailScanner and MailWatch on same box.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
> Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942
> Number of spams : 91592 ( 45.58%)
> Number of clean messages:109350 ( 54.42%)
> Average message analysis time : 69.27 seconds
> Average spam analysis time :
Humm
This command works every time from command line, but not passed as a param
from SA_RESTART.
"postfix stop ; sleep 15 ; /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart ; postfix start"
It runs the postfix stop and then quits. Any idea why? I can create a sed
that patches the rules_du_jour each time pu
At 09:39 AM 1/23/04 -0500, John Fleming wrote:
Where is the auto_learn parameter - which file? tnx
You can specify that value in ANY of the config files that SA parses. So
there's no one specific file it belongs in.
If you want to change the value on a site-wide basis, put it in
/etc/mail/spama
I'll never complain about my old PII-400 taking 8.5 seconds to process a
message through spamd again.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Kinghorn
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:32 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAt
how do you turn _off_ AWL ?
also, where would one put sitewide whitelists ? (assuming
/etc/mail/spamassassin as default directory)
thanks in advanced
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Devel
Why does it take your SA 69 seconds to process an email? Our systems
take about 3 seconds, using network tests and bayes with
Postfix/amavisd-new.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Kinghorn
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:32
At 04:40 PM 1/23/04 +0200, snowchyld wrote:
how do you turn _off_ AWL ?
Depends on version, but in 2.6x it is "use_auto_whitelist 0" in your config
also, where would one put sitewide whitelists ? (assuming
/etc/mail/spamassassin as default directory)
Any *.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
-
Where is the auto_learn parameter - which file? tnx
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www
At 01:16 AM 1/23/04 -0600, David B Funk wrote:
Trim off the Bayes poison and relearn it as spam. The payload
contains several unique misspellings that would be good Bayes
signatures.
Why trim off the bayes poison? Doing so just poisoning your bayes database
in a different way.
http://www.mail-arc
At 07:08 AM 1/23/04 -0600, Who Knows wrote:
I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add any
rules for them yet because all the ones I have been receiving seem to also
contain a list of words that can only be there to spoil baysian tracking.
Is there anyway to avoid add
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Who Knows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Martinez wrote:
> > I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number.
>
> I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add
> any rules for them yet because all the ones I have been recei
In your message regarding Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.63, Backhair, Chickenpox
and UUencoded .pdf file dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:00:25 +, Mike
Bostock said that ...
>MB- In your message regarding [SAtalk] SA 2.63, Backhair, Chickenpox and
>MB- UUencoded .pdf file dated Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:07:17 +, M
Anthony Martinez wrote:
I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. Hotmail
always puts the dotted quad in the header.
I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add
any rules for them yet because all the ones I have been receiving seem
to also co
I am looking at changing the size of mail i scan for spam/virus. Right now
i am using 64k and it is doing a good job catching stuff however some make
it through and i was thinking of raising it to 128k. Do anyone have a good
number to use and the larger number will increase my scans and possible
Another option is MailScanner - www.mailscanner.info
combines virus and spam checking along with sendmail/exim/postfix and
qmail has just been done (we are awaiting the patches/docs).
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
*
In your message regarding [SAtalk] SA 2.63, Backhair, Chickenpox and
UUencoded .pdf file dated Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:07:17 +, Mike
Bostock said that ...
>MB- Received false negative due to its attachment.
I posted a correction to this from home but it doesn't seem to have
appeared on the list.
I was trying to run salearn on a directory of spam email with the
following command:
sa-learn --spam --showdots cur/*
and I got the following erro:
Can't locate object method "init_learner" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin" at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/CmdLearn.
On Friday 23 January 2004 10:16, Ralf Vitasek wrote:
> you probalby don't really want to run it with sendmail but with
> procmail. which is the easiest and fastest way.
>
> but if you really want to then i suggest running sendmail with "amavisd
> new" (www.amavis.org) which has virus scanning and/o
hi
I`m using spamassassin with bayes filtering. Everthing works very well.
I implementated it 1 month ago. So I activated autolearning for the
bayesdatabase.
But the 2 mailgateways have different priorities, so my databases differ a
lot.
Is it possible to synchronize them ?
Thank you for your hel
To all the contributors of SPAMASSASSIN, exiscan & sa-exim...
Thank you all
here are some stats for the last 4 weeks
This is for 4 domains.
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942
Number of spams : 91592 ( 45.58%)
Number of clean messages
you probalby don't really want to run it with sendmail but with
procmail. which is the easiest and fastest way.
but if you really want to then i suggest running sendmail with "amavisd
new" (www.amavis.org) which has virus scanning and/or attachment
blocking as well.
have a look at this howto:
> |-Original Message-
> |From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 15:03
> |To: SpamAssassin
> |Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How to stop this kind of stuff?
Real easy, this is a predictable spamhaus, "Empire Towers"
Go check the records on this outfit at http
Hi There
Can anyone please direct me to a How to... Document on installing spamassassin with
sendmail.
Regards
Extech
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
On 22 Jan 2004 Ross Vandegrift ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My boss recently suggessted we try to whitelist all outgoing
> recipients of emails. This should reduce the number of false positives
> we're seeing - after all, if I send out an email, I almost certainly
> would like to read the re
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to be able to take an email message that may contain MIME and HTML
> and to strip it down to basically nothing but text. (I know that
> SpamAssassin already does this in large part so that it can analyze the
> message properly.) So I'm not actu
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Below are the headers & I have attached the mail.
>
> These are getting worse.
>
> To top it off, SA learned it as HAM.
>
> If anyone knows of any rules that could work on these mails, It would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks All.
> Regards
> Tom
Title: Message
Below are the headers & I have attached the
mail.
These are getting worse.
To top it off, SA learned it as
HAM.
If anyone knows of any rules that could work on these
mails, It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks All.
Regards
Tom
PS: I am using SA 2.62.
Rece
41 matches
Mail list logo
