-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
could please anyone point me to instructions how to install SpamAssassin on
IRIX 6.5, specifically the spamd and spamc.
Thanks
Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/gener
Title: RE: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + QmailScanner
Hello All;
I've been folowing this thread with intrest since I haven't had success getting SA working with Qmail on my system. However when I tried to add this code I broke qmail-scanner. Where does this go exactly pleas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Bart Schaefer on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:26:37AM -0700:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>
> > Yeah, "man spamassassin" and have a look at the -P argument.
>
> -P is implied with -t, so that's not the problem.
Oops, my mistake.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Carlos Kumbak
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + QmailScanner
>
>
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to use SpamAssassin 2.31 with m
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Yeah, "man spamassassin" and have a look at the -P argument.
-P is implied with -t, so that's not the problem.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thi
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Fi Mail wrote:
> While trying to test spamassassin installing, i always end up with a
> 'broken pipe' or no output at all.
This is a bug in the way SA tests for availability of DCC, and also in the
way it handles errors when writing to dccproc.
Either install DCC, or creat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Fi Mail on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:56:03PM +0100:
> ANy other ideas that i can test.
Yeah, "man spamassassin" and have a look at the -P argument.
- --
[!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31)
Spamassassin and broken pipe
While trying to test spamassassin installing, i always end up with a 'broken pipe'
or no output at all.
With the command
cat sample-nonspam.txt | spamassassin -Dt > nonspam.out
I get no output in nonspam.out.
with the command
spamassassin -Dt < sample-nonspam.txt
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:16, Carlos Kumbak wrote:
> Check out this:
> --
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by cadeado by uid X with
> qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassassin: 2.40. . Clear:SA:1(14.2/5.0):. Processed
> in 0.683329 secs); 14 Jul 2002 03:16:03 -
> X-Spam-Sta
Hello
I'm trying to use SpamAssassin 2.31 with my Mail Server, but seems
that something is wrong.
Some SpamAssassin features are not working. The worst problem of all
is that even when SA identifies a SPAM it doesn't add the
`*SPAM*` to the subject. Also... the spam_level_stars doesn't
w
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 19:08, Steve Wingate wrote:
> How can I set spamassasin to allow html mail? I seem to get the raw
> source instead. Believe it or not sometimes I actually like to see it.
After actually reading the previous posts, I hereby rescind my previous
question.
--
How can I set spamassasin to allow html mail? I seem to get the raw
source instead. Believe it or not sometimes I actually like to see it.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications
As for modifying SA, I have already done it, (at least initially). I
just want help to modify it to allow the parameters to be in a central
config file.
A rule that says this "**" and not "**" means that I
need one for everything in between? The stars are also in the header,
for
At 7/15/02 12:52 PM, Steven Stringham wrote:
>1) Does not "*" also work for a message with "*"? So,
>you need to make sure your rules run in order (GroupWise cannot
>guarantee this).
Really? Good lord. That's awful.
Does it allow you to specify a rule like 'header contains "
At 7/15/02 12:14 PM, Steven Stringham wrote:
>The idea here is to provide an easier way to create rules for the users
>own email system (whether it be GroupWise/Outlook, etc.). Creating a
>rule to put a message in a folder for ** SPAM - 10.2 ** is much harder
>than ** SPAM - Likely **. It also le
The idea here is to provide an easier way to create rules for the users
own email system (whether it be GroupWise/Outlook, etc.). Creating a
rule to put a message in a folder for ** SPAM - 10.2 ** is much harder
than ** SPAM - Likely **. It also lets me create that scale at my will
(geometric/loga
Hey all,
We're running spamassassin on a test system via milter and getting some
flaky results. The system is RedHat 7.2, sendmail is 8.12.5, spamassassin
is 2.01 and 2.30(we've tried both, both have the same problem). The
spamassassin install is default except:
# cat local.cf
defang_mim
At 08:44 7/12/2002 -0700 Steven Stringham wrote:
>I am looking to filter my entire domain's email through SpamAssassin.
>Sendmail + spamass-milter.
>
>I am however, concerned with letting valid emails through (we are a Law
>Firm). If I were to kill valid messages, there would be real problems.
>
>
> The solution: Change the way it reports on the subject line, and let it
> all through.
That's how I handle most of my stuff...
> In PerMsgStatus.pm (which is where the subject line is changed) I am
> adding two additional variables: _SPLV_ and _SPLG_.
> Spamlevel = hits/threshold (so hits of 1
This is a first step into implementing a solution.
This allows my users to quickly scan, and build rules to kill them or
put them into a folder for evaluation when they have time. We need to
make sure the rules work with our clients and legitimate emails before
we start killing emails at the gat
I am looking to filter my entire domain's email through SpamAssassin.
Sendmail + spamass-milter.
I am however, concerned with letting valid emails through (we are a Law
Firm). If I were to kill valid messages, there would be real problems.
The solution: Change the way it reports on the subject
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + aliases + exim
Chris,
> I've been trying to work out one things but seem to not have enough
> of a clue to get anywhere. I can br
Chris,
> I've been trying to work out one things but seem to not have enough
> of a clue to get anywhere. I can briefly describe this problem I am
> having as 'problem with filtering using user prefs when dealing with
> an aliased addresses ?'
Either you run SA after the alias has been resolved
Hi all,
I've been trying to work out one things but seem to not have enough of a clue to get
anywhere. I can briefly describe this problem I am having as 'problem with filtering
using user prefs when dealing with an aliased addresses ?'
Firstly, I use exim with the following to deliver
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:47PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
> share the script that's doing that?
;) I just posted a message about it (under the "high spam score"
thread...) It's just some perl I threw together.
--
Trey Keifer wrote:
> I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
> far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
> It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
>
> all_spam_to *@example.com
>
> users at example.com are s
> mysql> select COUNT(*) from reported where date > '2002-06-26
> 00:00:00' and rules like
> '%RAZOR_CHECK%';
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
--
michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> although I seem to recall some questions on the razor list about Razor
> matching anything, and I haven't seen many hits in the past few days,
> but I haven't had any time to investigate, myself :(
Well:
mysql> select COUNT(*) from
Theo Van Dinter said:
> Originally the statement was "Razor2 support is a big change, we
> should wait for 2.4", and now it's "2.4 will take a while, we should
> release 2.32." The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave
> 2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 supp
Hello,
I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
all_spam_to *@example.com
users at example.com are still getting their mail
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
> it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
> support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
> "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versi
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
"upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down
I'm sure we could live with that, too.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> >>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> >>be release ready?
> >
> >
> > Good
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
>>be release ready?
>
>
> Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
> release date yet. Hopefully
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> be release ready?
Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
release date yet. Hopefully soon. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagl
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> > that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
>
> Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
> S
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
SpamAssassin. (it's available via CVS...) Currently rel
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> > databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
>
> It should just work. What does "spamas
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
It should just work. What does "spamassassin -P -D< message" tell you?
Does it say Razor is
I've gone over my spamassassin.cf file, and the entries for razor appear
to be there. I have razor running.
Yet, SA does not appear to be checking against the razor database(s).
In the last batch of spam that SA tagged (at least it's doing its job,
there. ), one of the messages was confirmed
> Well, if you're autoreporting, I would agree. But we're agreeing that
> you shouldn't autoreport. What we're disagreeing about is whether you
> should report the spam after you verify that the message is in fact spam.
Ah... Somewhere along the way I took a turn into the weeds. Thanks
for wi
At 04:29 AM Friday, 7/5/2002, Mike Burger wrote -=>
> So, then, if I'm supposed to only use spamassassin -r to manually report
> spam, how in heaven's name do I use Razor, in conjunction with SA, to
> check for spam?
If you installed razor, SA will use it. Check the test results in a
messag
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 07:02:49PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Putting on a Razor centric user hat and personae: It is taking away
> choice since I expect those messages to be spam verified by a user and
> not be a false positive generated by a tool. If you are automatically
> reporting to razor a
> > But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
>
> You assume that people using SA or Razor do so by choice and/or are
> technically savvy enough to set them up.
By choice, yes. Your point about technically savvy is interesting
since I think both SA and Razor have simil
> So, then, if I'm supposed to only use spamassassin -r to manually report
> spam, how in heaven's name do I use Razor, in conjunction with SA, to
> check for spam?
If you have razor installed then spamassassin will automatically
detect that and use it. If it is not installed then it won't.
>Hans Vallden wrote:
>> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
>> Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
>> Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
>
>http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.html
Rod, Tony, Ian and all oth
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:11:04AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
You assume that people using SA or Razor do so by choice and/or are
technically savvy enough to set them up.
> not using SA when it is available to them but are using
> and it adds the message as spam for people who aren't
> fortunate enough to use SA but use Razor instead.
But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
not using SA when it is available to them but are using Razor it leads
me to believe that they do not want to use it. Th
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Tony L. Svanstrom write:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
>
> > I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
> > X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
> > even pay some mon
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
> X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
> even pay some money for specific instructions.
I'd be surprised if this wasn't enough
Hans Vallden wrote:
> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
> Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
> Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.html
Shall I presume the check is in the
Hello all!
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
--
--
Hans Vallden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> Currently I have sendmail-8.12.4 built and functional on the
> firewall, but I can't get it to both forward mail and send it through
> spamassassin. I've tried building spamass-milter, but the make always fails
> with "libmilte
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 10:40, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
> that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
> subnet on a priva
> -Original Message-
> From: McClung, Darren W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 July 2002 16:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin with Exchange
>
>
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sen
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
> that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
> subn
> I know people have accomplished this previously. Is there a general
> consensus as to what is the best way to configure such a setup?
>
>
Install qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, qmail-scanner, and spamassassin.
Add smtproutes to forward mail from your domain into your internal mail server. My
I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
subnet on a private IP address range. What I would like to accomplish is to
hav
> Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
> say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with
valid
> DNS and reverse DNS.
While it would be "nice" in the real world to do this, many email
servers can ALREADY reject mail that does not have a reverse DN
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>>>Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
>>>say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with valid
>>>DNS and reverse DNS.
>>
>>Sadly ISP's aren't as on-the-ball as you are. I've been trying for
>>months to get my I
Hi,
> > Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
> > say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with valid
> > DNS and reverse DNS.
> Sadly ISP's aren't as on-the-ball as you are. I've been trying for
> months to get my ISP to setup reverse DNS for s
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>>I believe the only check that for instance sendmail could do, is to
>>check if a lookup of the ip gives the hostname, and if the hostname
>>lookup doesnt give the IP, then it can block the message. But in
>>real life, there are so many situations where this is not the case
> "ON" == Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ON> I wonder how it happened actually. Only way would be that the machine
ON> with 216.139.180.4 connected to your mail server and started the
ON> dialog with HELO and your own mailserver name.
ON> Now I see no reason why in real life one
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> I wonder how it happened actually. Only way would be that the machine
> with 216.139.180.4 connected to your mail server and started the
> dialog with HELO and your own mailserver name.
I think that would actually give (for sendmail) the "apparently f
>I believe the only check that for instance sendmail could do, is to
>check if a lookup of the ip gives the hostname, and if the hostname
>lookup doesnt give the IP, then it can block the message. But in
>real life, there are so many situations where this is not the case,
>that blocking that scen
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> SA could do a reverse DNS check and mark this as very suspicious, but
> on another hand, if expansionpack.xtdnet.nl is an internal mail
> gateway only, why did it accept incoming message from 216.139.180.4,
expansionpack.xtdnet.nl is another ip number
Jm's autoreply told me to mail it here :)
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:14:05 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Paul Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SpamAssassin idea?
Hi,
I noticed that lately, spammers are using a trick to "hide" the p
Wash --
...and then Odhiambo Washington said...
%
% Hello Users,
Hello!
%
...
% 1. How do I model my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
%I do not want to mess up the subject line so much though I have to. I am
In addition to the instruction you've already seen to read the man page,
note t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Odhiambo Washington on Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:43:11PM +0300:
> 1. How do I model my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? I do not want
> to mess up the subject line so much though I have to. I am going to
> setup a list (opt-in) for users who want
Hello Users,
Pardon me for joining the list with a question ;-)
I do run Exim-3.36 on FreeBSD and would like to run SA globally.
I have downloaded the latest version and put in in /usr/local/etc/Spamassassin.
The only decisions that I find difficult to make (because this is an ISP) are
as follo
ivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:13:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r -w = mailloop?
> >>>>> "DF" == David Flanigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DF> I have several very old, and very sp
David B. Bitton wrote:
> if i'm using spamd/spamc, how can I use command switches from spamassassin,
> particularly -W?
You can't. Try PPerl (from CPAN) instead which does the same job, but
doesn't require two separate scripts.
Matt.
---
S
if i'm using spamd/spamc, how can I use command switches from spamassassin,
particularly -W?
--
David B. Bitton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.codenoevil.com
Code Made Fresh DailyT
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
> "DF" == David Flanigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DF> I have several very old, and very spam ridden e-mail addresses which I am
DF> trying to make spamtraps. I am running Sendmail and Procmail.
Why use procmail at all? Just delete the account associated with it
and make an alias, or f
SA Gurus:
I have several old e-mail addresses which receive only spam (and allot of
it). So I would like to turn them into SpamTraps.
Following the instructions in the spamassassin man page I tried the
following in aliases:
spamtrap: "|/usr/bin/spamassassin -r -w spamtrap"
The resu
SA gurus:
I have several very old, and very spam ridden e-mail addresses which I am
trying to make spamtraps. I am running Sendmail and Procmail.
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r -w noreply
--
Kind Regards,
David A. Flanigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.flanigan.net
--
Matthew Cline writes:
> I can't find '$&' in any of the Net::DNS version 1.14 files. Was it present
> before this version, or added after it? Maybe we could include a special
> version of Net:DNS without the $& to make SA faster.
As nearly as I can tell these are the perl modules on my syste
On Wednesday 19 June 2002 12:54 am, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> To use SpamAssassin in a production environment, we do a number of
> optimisations. We patched Net::DNS to remove the use of $& , which
> speeds up all SA regexp matches by orders of magnitude.
I can't find '$&' in any of the Net::DNS ve
http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/ >
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
-- Random epigram: (9/11)
"I'm sorry, but after reading this thread, I'm having a hard time
coming up wit
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Jim.George wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm new to the list and need some help please.
>
> I've been happily using Spamassassin for several months under
> Cygwin (Linux under Win2K), and previously under Linux itself. So with
> this confidence in the package I thought
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:26:23PM -0700, Jeff Campbell wrote:
> Are there any similar web hosts or ISPs currently using SpamAssassin in
> a production environment? Smaller but still significantly sized web
> hosts or ISPs? I personally would really like to see us provide this to
> our customer
Hi folks,
I'm new to the list and need some help please.
I've been happily using Spamassassin for several months under
Cygwin (Linux under Win2K), and previously under Linux itself. So with
this confidence in the package I thought I'd improve things by linking in
the database op
At 06/14/2002 11:26, Jeff Campbell wrote:
>Mainly, our worries fall into the realm of load.
>Are there any similar web hosts or ISPs currently using SpamAssassin in
>a production environment? Smaller but still significantly sized web
>hosts or ISPs?
We handle about 1/2 million incoming mail
Hello,
I'm looking into the feasibility of offering SpamAssassin support to the
customers of a mid sized web hosting operation (~15,000 customers). We
all use it internally - and there is little question as to its
effectiveness in dealing with the problem - but there is concern that
running i
16:29:22 +0200
IV> From: Ian Vännman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IV> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IV> Subject: [SAtalk] spamassassin on mac os x with CGP
IV>
IV> I'm attempting to install SpamAssassin using the instructions on
IV> www.communigatefaq.com. The instructions are for Redhat
I'm attempting to install SpamAssassin using the instructions on
www.communigatefaq.com. The instructions are for Redhat systems and I'm
running Mac OS X. So when I get to point 5 I get stuck:
Copy the spamd init.d startup script to /etc/init.d, make it executable, and
make it start when the syst
Is now available, for those that are using both ...
*Very* base functionality is in there right now, which is limited to just
changing the required_hits value, but that was just to get it into the
repository ... we've already got a load of changes that should be
committed later on tonight ...
W
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:43:34PM -0400, Hugo wrote:
| I couldn't find some decent documentation regarding the topology,hence some
| questions:
| - Should I install SpamAssassin on the same machine I run sendmail or it
| can be installed on the separate machine
How heavy is your load and how po
I couldn't find some decent documentation regarding the topology,hence some
questions:
- Should I install SpamAssassin on the same machine I run sendmail or it
can be installed on the separate machine
- Is it integrated with sendmail?
- What is the best topology?
_
> "MM" == Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> you can run amavisd-new without virus checking, just with
MM> SpamAssassin. Should be quite fast and easy to set up if you need
MM> site-wide central setup. Next version will make it easier to set
MM> it up with null virus checker, and
> I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
> machines. Currently I'm Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me
> to some good documentation on setting up SpamAssassin With Postfix?
Try:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
and in particular:
http://www.ijs.si/
once procmail is installed you only really need to uncomment one of the following
lines in main.cf:
$ grep procmail main.cf
#mailbox_command = /usr/local/bin/procmail
#mailbox_command = /some/where/procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
Paul
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:50:23AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
"Security" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
> machines. Currently I'm
> Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me to some good
> documentation on setting up SpamAssassin
> With Postfix? I've done some searches but c
> "s" == security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
s> I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
s> machines. Currently I'm
s> Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me to some good
s> documentation on setting up SpamAssassin
s> With Postfix? I've done some searc
Hi,
I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
machines. Currently I'm
Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me to some good
documentation on setting up SpamAssassin
With Postfix? I've done some searches but can't seem to find any decent
documentation.
If anyo
Probably would be a good idea to install the latest fink first -- that generally
solves all kinds of problems with OSX. After fink, try SA again.
C
Sarwat Khan wrote:
SK> > Looks like all your network tests are breaking. Did you
SK> > install a firewall or
SK> > something? 2.20 works fine fo
> Looks like all your network tests are breaking. Did you
> install a firewall or
> something? 2.20 works fine for me on 10.1.4, as does current CVS.
I just tried, through CPAN, 'install Mail::SpamAssassin' with
the firewall off and I got the same problems (spamd, spamd_port,
spamd_stop test
Looks like all your network tests are breaking. Did you install a firewall or
something? 2.20 works fine for me on 10.1.4, as does current CVS.
C
Fred Inklaar wrote:
FI> op 18-05-2002 22:35 schreef Sarwat Khan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
FI>
FI> > I haven't been unable to get 2.20 to install properl
For those few that care SAPP v1.2 is working and stable. The main new
feature is that it skips messages over a variable size (prevents timeouts)
AND a Readme to explain (badly) how to use it.
Get it here http://nickdafish.com/SAPP-Light.Zip
For those of you who don't know what it is... SAPP is a
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:51:48AM -0500, dman wrote:
> | the easiest to setup/manage with SpamAssassin as a relay box - Exim,
> | Postfix, Sendmail, Qmail, ...?
>
> Exim with Marc's sa-exim patch would be the easiest way to implement
> this. You would just configure exim as usual (for a rel
801 - 900 of 1033 matches
Mail list logo
