-6335 fax
> g...@rowesprinkler.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Justin Reid
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:17 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Grise
To: "'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org'"
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:52 PM
Subject: RE: small orifice head on dry pipe
I am not familiar with N2. Where can I get more info?
I spoke with and Allied rep who confirmed that ABF did not render a pipe
'corrosion r
forum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:52 PM
To: 'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org'
Subject: RE: small orifice head on dry pipe
I am not familiar with N2. Where can I get more info?
I
George Church
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:47 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: small orifice head on dry pipe
There are corrosion types that ABF won't do a thing for, so it's out.
Black pipe with N2 is prolly a better one to try for, but I think you're about
y, October 31, 2011 3:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: small orifice head on dry pipe
Whoops, you are right. I should look in the code before shooting from the hip.
"Corrosion Resistant" (3.8.1.2) versus "Corrosion Retardant"(3.8.1.3). With
the ABF coating obviou
Whoops, you are right. I should look in the code before shooting from the
hip. "Corrosion Resistant" (3.8.1.2) versus "Corrosion
Retardant"(3.8.1.3). With the ABF coating obviously being the latter.
So... technically galvanized pipe falls under the definition of "Corrosion
Retardant"???... but it
I think applying ABF pipe to that allowance is a step too far. ABF is
a microbial coating to address MIC. I haven't heard anyone
identifying it as a basic corrosion inhibitor. Also it has a finite
life span.
Roland
On Oct 31, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Justin Reid wrote:
Matt,
I believe a pro
Matt,
I believe a product such as Allied's ABF coated pipe would meet the intent
as corrosion resistant therefore being an alternative to galvanized. Since
galvanized pipe is starting to fall out of favor, this will probably be
used more often to satisfy that particular code section.
Justin Reid
: small orifice head on dry pipe
You can take Mr. Denhardt's words as a very authoritative statement. His
fellow NFPA 13 Committee Members have nicknamed him "Nitro-man". So if it
deals with Nitrogen, he speaks with much force (and often).
It should be recognized that the abov
: jdenha...@stricklandfire.com
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: small orifice head on dry pipe
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:37:59 +
>
> No, nitrogen would not meet this requirement in my opinion.
>
> John August Denhardt, P.E., FSFPE
> Strickland Fire Pro
live without them?
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:56 PM
To: 'sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org'
Subject: small orifice head on dry pipe
I
In the 2007/2010 edition of NFPA 13, section 8.3.4.3 allows k 4.2 sprinkler
heads to be used on dry systems where the piping is corrosion resistant or
internally galvanized.
Are there any options that people are aware of for corrosion resistance besides
internally galvanized? (Copper being too
12 matches
Mail list logo