There are corrosion types that ABF won't do a thing for, so it's out.
Black pipe with N2 is prolly a better one to try for, but I think you're about 
a decade earlier than you'll see it in code.
This side of the business is in its infancy.
Personally, I think the concept has great merit (yes, I've talked to JD at 
length on the topic) but if you want something that will pass muster quickly, 
It's galvanized.
To cure it from looking to expensive, price SS304 or better, 316 and from that 
perspective, it looks cheap and EZ to install.

George L.  Church, Jr., CET  
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
g...@rowesprinkler.com



-----Original Message-----
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Justin Reid
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: small orifice head on dry pipe

 Whoops, you are right. I should look in the code before shooting from the hip. 
 "Corrosion Resistant" (3.8.1.2) versus "Corrosion Retardant"(3.8.1.3). With 
the ABF coating obviously being the latter.
So... technically galvanized pipe falls under the definition of "Corrosion 
Retardant"???... but it is included in the options of the quoted code section 
so it applies.

So it looks like the cost effective options are limited.    Interesting
topic though. I might have interpreted it the same...that a Nitrogen filled 
system would place it in the corrosion resistant category.

Justin Reid


On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Roland Huggins
<rhugg...@firesprinkler.org>wrote:

> I think applying ABF pipe to that allowance is a step too far.  ABF is 
> a microbial coating to address MIC.  I haven't heard anyone 
> identifying it as a basic corrosion inhibitor.  Also it has a finite life 
> span.
>
> Roland
>
>
> On Oct 31, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Justin Reid wrote:
>
> Matt,
>>
>> I believe a product such as Allied's ABF coated pipe would meet the 
>> intent as corrosion resistant therefore being an alternative to 
>> galvanized. Since galvanized pipe is starting to fall out of favor, 
>> this will probably be used more often to satisfy that particular code 
>> section.
>>
>>
>> Justin Reid
>>
>
>  ______________________________**_________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.**org <Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org>
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.**org/mailman/listinfo/**sprinklerforum<
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111031/920c25ed/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to