[sqlalchemy] Re: DynamicMetaData question

2007-03-14 Thread Gaetan de Menten
I think its more confusing for the API to break backwards-compatibility every 5 or 6 releases. Also i think adding a whole new class DelayedMetaData, which is literally just to avoid passing a flag, well i wont say insane but its a little obsessive. Agreed here. Hey list, are you

[sqlalchemy] Re: DynamicMetaData question

2007-03-14 Thread Gaetan de Menten
On 3/14/07, JP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 13, 11:59 am, Gaetan de Menten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only discovered (or at least understood) this thread localness of DynamicMetaData, and honestly, I don't understand in what case it can be useful. It seems like the thread localness

[sqlalchemy] Re: DynamicMetaData question

2007-03-13 Thread Gaetan de Menten
I only discovered (or at least understood) this thread localness of DynamicMetaData, and honestly, I don't understand in what case it can be useful. It seems like the thread localness is limited to the engine connected to the metadata. So what I'd like to understand is when anyone wouldn't want

[sqlalchemy] Re: What should the future of SQLAlchemy Query look like ?

2007-03-10 Thread Gaetan de Menten
On 3/10/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well initial response to this post has been overwhelmingly low, but thats fine with me. After trying to tackle this today, I realized that I actually didnt want to add a brand new query object and go through a painful deprecation procedure

[sqlalchemy] SQLAlchemy and Elixir at FOSDEM 2007

2007-02-19 Thread Gaetan de Menten
Just to let everyone who might be interested know, I'll be giving a talk about SQLAlchemy and Elixir at the FOSDEM 2007. It'll be in the python devroom. -- Gaƫtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[sqlalchemy] Re: Activemapper and multiple Foreign Keys

2006-11-06 Thread Gaetan de Menten
On 11/6/06, percious [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I have reached the limit of what activemapper can do for me! Consider the following example: class Alarm(ActiveMapper): class mapping: __table__ = Alarm alarmID = column(Integer, primary_key=True)

[sqlalchemy] Re: TurboEntity announcement

2006-11-01 Thread Gaetan de Menten
Hello, Well, thank you for that. It's exactly what I needed. The funny thing here is that I've been working on developping approximately the same code for the past two or three weeks, with exactly the same syntax... And I was about to announce it in a few days (after cleaning it up and

[sqlalchemy] Re: TurboEntity announcement

2006-11-01 Thread Gaetan de Menten
I'll send you a copy as soon as the basics work. For now, the system is in place but only ManyToOne work. I wanted to also implement the 3 possible types of inheritance before publishing my code, but well, now the circumstances are different... I'd be very glad if we could mix both code bases.

<    1   2