Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-06-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Max Vlasov wrote: > Don't know what is difference between "stock" 3.8.4.3 from the site > and the newly compiled one... > The official deliveries of 32-bit DLLs are normally cross-compiled on Linux using MinGW 4.5.2. But the most recent

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-06-03 Thread Max Vlasov
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> > > This time I build the 32-bit DLL using mingw instead of MSVC. (MSVC was > still used for the 64-bit DLL.) So perhaps it will work correctly on

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-06-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-05-29 15:52 GMT+02:00 Len Chisholm : > I see that the 64-bit MSVC DLL has the correct version resources, which show > in the tool-tip when you hover over the DLL in an Explorer window or look at > the file properties. > I think that I also got the version info

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-29 Thread Len Chisholm
Hi all, It was posted earlier that : This time I build the 32-bit DLL using mingw instead of MSVC. (MSVC was still used for the 64-bit DLL.) So perhaps it will work correctly on WinXP. Please let me know one way or the other. Thanks. I see that the 64-bit MSVC DLL has the correct version

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-29 Thread Edward Lau
oung <war...@etr-usa.com> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Sent: Wed, May 28, 2014 11:38 am Subject: Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta On 5/28/2014 12:26, Warren Young wrote: > On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isa

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-29 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, jose isaias cabrera > wrote: > > > > > 3. Is there a spot anywhere that has clear steps on creating the Sqlite3 > > DLL? > > > >

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-29 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, jose isaias cabrera < > cabr...@wrc.xerox.com > > wrote: > > > > > Just noticed something... It may be nothing, but the MinGW built DLL has > > a size of 645KB while the MSVC built one has

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-29 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:55 AM, RSmith wrote: > > On 2014/05/28 20:26, Warren Young wrote: > >> On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isaias cabrera wrote: >> >>> >>> I would rather have the speed >>> then the size. >>> >> >> > Rather speed than size is an Engineering decision which is

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread RSmith
On 2014/05/28 20:26, Warren Young wrote: On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isaias cabrera wrote: I would rather have the speed then the size. Rather speed than size is an Engineering decision which is easy on a desktop/server system (such as most Windows/OSX/*nix implementations) but it may well

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Scott Robison
On May 28, 2014 12:36 PM, "Drago, William @ MWG - NARDAEAST" > Don't modern compilers consider what effects the speed optimizations will have on the pipeline and the cache and optimize accordingly? I think they might try to in a broad way, but we live in a world with multiple models of CPUs from

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread jose isaias cabrera
"Richard Hipp" wrote... On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, jose isaias cabrera wrote: 3. Is there a spot anywhere that has clear steps on creating the Sqlite3 DLL? http://www.sqlite.org/draft/howtocompile.html#dll The "draft" page above will be promoted to the

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, jose isaias cabrera wrote: > > 3. Is there a spot anywhere that has clear steps on creating the Sqlite3 > DLL? > http://www.sqlite.org/draft/howtocompile.html#dll The "draft" page above will be promoted to the official website at the next

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Warren Young
On 5/28/2014 12:35, Drago, William @ MWG - NARDAEAST wrote: Bigger code gets kicked out of the processor cache faster, so the processor has to go back to main memory more often. Don't modern compilers consider what effects the speed optimizations will have on the pipeline and the cache and

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Warren Young
On 5/28/2014 12:26, Warren Young wrote: On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isaias cabrera wrote: I would rather have the speed then the size. in today's L1/L2/L3 world, size *is* speed. Also, there is a pretty hard limit on how much micro code optimizations can help a DBMS. It's a fundamentally

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Drago, William @ MWG - NARDAEAST
> -Original Message- > From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users- > boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Warren Young > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:26 PM > To: General Discussion of SQLite Database > Subject: Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQ

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isaias cabrera wrote: > >> >> I would rather have the speed >> then the size. >> > > Many years ago, I read an article written by a Microsoft employee where > they said they built Windows' own

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Warren Young
On 5/28/2014 11:20, jose isaias cabrera wrote: I would rather have the speed then the size. Many years ago, I read an article written by a Microsoft employee where they said they built Windows' own binaries optimized for size rather than speed, since in today's L1/L2/L3 world, size *is*

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread jose isaias cabrera
"Richard Hipp" wrote... On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, jose isaias cabrera

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, jose isaias cabrera wrote: > > Just noticed something... It may be nothing, but the MinGW built DLL has > a size of 645KB while the MSVC built one has a size of 962KB. Just under > 33% bigger. I hope there is nothing missing on the

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-28 Thread jose isaias cabrera
"Richard Hipp" wrote... On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, jose isaias cabrera < cabr...@wrc.xerox.com> wrote: H... I am running the original DLL created for 3.8.4.3 on the WinXP and it works fine, so it was not a

Re: [sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-27 Thread jose isaias cabrera
"Richard Hipp" wrote... On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, jose isaias cabrera < cabr...@wrc.xerox.com> wrote: H... I am running the original DLL created for 3.8.4.3 on the WinXP and it works fine, so it was not a

[sqlite] New DLLs and sources. Was: SQLite version 3.8.5 beta

2014-05-27 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, jose isaias cabrera < > cabr...@wrc.xerox.com> wrote: > >> H... I am running the original DLL created for 3.8.4.3 on the WinXP >> and >> it works fine, so it was not a change as far as