On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
I don't see the usefulness of sending my own mac address. But
sending the mac address of my default gateway, then yes, I find that
very useful. That's how a lot of "location aware"-tools for the Mac
work for example.
It's just another source
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I was chatting with Joe Hildebrand about XEP-0255 and he mentioned
that
it would be good to add a reference type for an Ethernet address,
such as:
00.31.55.f9.1d.de
ethernet
It seems that we'd need this because y
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Helge Timenes wrote:
> The reference type "rfid" has been actually been foreseen since v0.1. This
> is also not covered by any examples and I have made no assumptions as to how
> the ID of a RFID reference should be composed as I don't really know much
> about it :
On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Actually, I meant the local ethernet (MAC) address of your active
network connection(s). There are network elements that keep
track of the ethernet addresses they hav
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Actually, I meant the local ethernet (MAC) address of your active
network connection(s). There are network elements that keep track
of the ethernet addresses they have seen, and can glean location
information from that c
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Helge Timenes wrote:
Actually, I meant the local ethernet (MAC) address of your active
network connection(s). There are network elements that keep track
of the ethernet addresses they have seen, and can glean location
information from that connectivity informat
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Uhm.. is that meaningful? Usually for location queries external
references are more useful than your address (e.g. your MAC moves with
your notebook, so what is the purpose of doing a query with it?)
I meant your local
Fabio Forno wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I meant your locally-assigned IPv4 or IPv6 address, not your MAC
address. My bad.
Penitenziagite! :D Yep, now I get the point and it makes sense
Sorry for being a bit late responding to this. The referenc
On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Uhm.. is that meaningful? Usually for location queries external
references are more useful than your address (e.g. your MAC moves
with
your notebook, so what is the purpose of doing a query with it?)
I meant your locally-assigned IPv4 or
>>> It seems that we'd need this because your ethernet address might be
>>> different from your wifi address even in the same location (e.g., where
>>> I am right now my ethernet address is 00:23:32:d4:28:ea whereas my wifi
>>> address is 00:23:6c:88:d4:1d).
>>>
>>
>> Uhm.. is that meaningful? Usua
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> I meant your locally-assigned IPv4 or IPv6 address, not your MAC
> address. My bad.
Penitenziagite! :D Yep, now I get the point and it makes sense
>> Besides that there is one more reference we are starting using: RFID
>> addresses, w
Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I was chatting with Joe Hildebrand about XEP-0255 and he mentioned that
>
> [...]
>> It seems that we'd need this because your ethernet address might be
>> different from your wifi address even in the same location (
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I was chatting with Joe Hildebrand about XEP-0255 and he mentioned that
[...]
> It seems that we'd need this because your ethernet address might be
> different from your wifi address even in the same location (e.g., where
> I am right now
On Mar 02, 2009, at 20:23, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I was chatting with Joe Hildebrand about XEP-0255 and he mentioned
that
it would be good to add a reference type for an Ethernet address,
such as:
It seems that we'd need this because your ethernet address might be
different from your wifi
I was chatting with Joe Hildebrand about XEP-0255 and he mentioned that
it would be good to add a reference type for an Ethernet address, such as:
00.31.55.f9.1d.de
ethernet
It seems that we'd need this because your ethernet address might be
different from your wifi
009 12:29 PM
To: 'XMPP Standards'
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Helge Timenes
Sent: 02/13/2009 1:24 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Locatio
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Helge Timenes
Sent: 02/13/2009 1:24 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
Just a heads up notice:
As suggested by Stephen Pendleton I plan to add ip
AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
Just a heads up notice:
As suggested by Stephen Pendleton I plan to add ip-address to the type
of "beacons" that can be submitted in a location query. The
justification being that in most cases an IP address can be ass
Just a heads up notice:
As suggested by Stephen Pendleton I plan to add ip-address to the type
of "beacons" that can be submitted in a location query. The
justification being that in most cases an IP address can be associated
with a particular country, region and city. Some items of concern in
ge Timenes
Sent: 02/04/2009 11:25 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
I'm still thinking about this one. Granted ip address is useful in
determining location, and adding a new beacon type is a painless update. But
i feel it is a bit silly to call it a '
mpp.org] On
Behalf Of Helge Timenes
Sent: 02/03/2009 6:55 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
Thanks. Will fix ;-)
Regards,
Helge Timenes
-original message-
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
From: Daniel Willmann
Date: 03/02/2009 11:24
Hi,
I ju
ubject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
Thanks. Will fix ;-)
Regards,
Helge Timenes
-original message-
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
From: Daniel Willmann
Date: 03/02/2009 11:24
Hi,
I just noticed an inconsistency between the query tags at
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep
Thanks. Will fix ;-)
Regards,
Helge Timenes
-original message-
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255: Location Query
From: Daniel Willmann
Date: 03/02/2009 11:24
Hi,
I just noticed an inconsistency between the query tags at
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html#examples and the format
Hi,
I just noticed an inconsistency between the query tags at
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html#examples and the format
specification at http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html#format.
Example 1 uses tags named latitude and longitude, but the format
specifies them as lat and lon. Since XE
I'm on board with that too. So IP would be:
208.99.11.22
ip
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Tennant
Sent: 01/27/2009 9:20 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP
Helge Timenes wrote:
> That is a good idea. And also brings up an already asked question. Would it
> be better to de-generalize the element into explicit , ,
> , and as suggested, elements?
>
> Pros/cons anyone?
We will soon have WiMAX and then LTE-type cell-ids and... So let's not
paint our
That is a good idea. And also brings up an already asked question. Would it be
better to de-generalize the element into explicit , ,
, and as suggested, elements?
Pros/cons anyone?
-original message-
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query)
From: "Stephen Pendleton"
D
What about adding another optional element to the query to allow the lookup
of location information based on IP address?:
127.88.22.22
Sometimes IP address is "good enough" for applications.
Thanks
Helge Timenes wrote, On 12/12/2008 04:52 PM:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:15:30 -0500, Stephen Pendleton
wrote:
- Is Example 7 allowed in XMPP/pubsub? It looks like the component is
publishing to the entities node. I suppose there is nothing wrong with
that, I just haven't seen it before.
I was wo
Helge Timenes wrote, On 11/26/2008 10:43 PM:
Some comments to the XEP-0255 / "Location Query" draft
(http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html):
1) Beacon signal strength seems to have been forgotten in the draft specification. This is a mistake and I will correct it.
2) In the development pr
such that our server
(ejabberd) allows it to post on behalf of users (@Simon: correct me if I'm
wrong or unclear on this)
Helge
>> To: standards@xmpp.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:43:45 +0100> From:
> he...@buddycloud.com> Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query)
wrong with that, I
just haven't seen it before.
> To: standards@xmpp.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:43:45 +0100> From:
> he...@buddycloud.com> Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query)> > >
> Some comments to the XEP-0255 / "Location Query" draft
&
Some comments to the XEP-0255 / "Location Query" draft
(http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html):
1) Beacon signal strength seems to have been forgotten in the draft
specification. This is a mistake and I will correct it.
2) In the development project from which XEP-0255 was born (Buddycloud
33 matches
Mail list logo
