In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
I'll keep playing with this for now, because it's not fit to be checked in
yet and I've only built the core /src/share files. There's also more work to
do in conf
Steve Raeburn wrote:
In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
Super. You could use
xdocs/images/struts-blue.gif
which fits the background color, and feel free to delete the other logo's
under xdoc/ima
When I run the maven jar target, the upload tests fail
(MultipartTestSuite).
But, when I run the ant test.junit test, only the
TestActionConfigMatcher test fails.
Is it me, or do others share this experience?
If so, any ideas as to why this would be?
-Ted.
-
Hmmm...I just updated, uncommented those two lines, and ran "ant
test.junit" - all tests passed. Anyone else?
Don
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> When I run the maven jar target, the upload tests fail
> (MultipartTestSuite).
>
> But, when I run the ant test.junit test, only the
> TestA
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> When I run the maven jar target, the upload tests fail
> (MultipartTestSuite).
On a fresh copy ofwelleverything (maven 1.0-rc1, jakarta-struts,
etc, etc) I cannot do anything with maven.
The attempt to download validator SNAPSHOT fails. When I c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 27, 2003 9:36 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> Hmmm...I just updated, uncommented those two lines, and ran "ant
> test.junit" - all tests passed. Anyone else?
>
> Don
>
>
After copying my local Validator build to Maven's repo, I get the same as
you do - no tests to run.
Doing the Ant test.junit thing, I get the TestActionConfigMatcher failure,
but it looks like Steve has tracked that one down.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, James Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu
to rethink the test so it doesn't rely on the
> ordering. Or even just drop that section since it's really only testing
> findForwardConfigs(), not the matcher.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
rdering. Or even just drop that section since it's really only testing
> > findForwardConfigs(), not the matcher.
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
e Maven build remains HIGHLY experimental!!
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 28, 2003 12:05 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> After copying my local Validator build to Maven&#x
Me too!
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 28, 2003 12:56 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Maven test run
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Good point, than
Steve Raeburn wrote:
There were no tests found because the test section was commented out!
(and the example include pattern doesn't match our naming convention).
I've enabled the JUnit tests. Using Cactus with Maven is beyond me, for
now :-)
Mea culpa on the comment block. I did that to see if I co
n build if anyone
is interested.
Tim Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven test run
Steve Raeburn wrote:
> There were no tests found because the tes
because of incorrectly written tests.
Either way, I'll try to find some time to fix the maven build if anyone
is interested.
Tim Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re:
OK, the Maven build is looking good. Thanks ever so much, Tim!
Now the next question on this front is what to do about the various web
applications?
We had been rolling these into the binary distribution as WARS. The
default Maven dist target seems fine for core, but it may be hard to
extend t
Steve, would it be possible to merge what you started here with the
current Maven build?
-Ted.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
I'll keep playing with this for now, because
Sure, I'll have a go at it this evening. I'm not sure how far different
they are anyway.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 28, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
Anyone who wants to explore Maven, feel free to dive in :-)
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 28, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> Steve, would it be possibl
Great work, Steve. That's looking very good.
I guess the $64,000 question is whether we're up for using Maven for the
1.2.0 release.
It does looks like the pieces are coming together, and I wouldn't be
opposed to moving forward on that basis. I ran the Struts 1.2.0 JAR
against the bundled web
David
>
> Steve
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: November 28, 2003 3:10 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Maven test run
> >
> >
> > Steve, would it be possible to
David Graham wrote:
You're going to delete the old versions in /doc right? We certainly don't
want to maintain 2 versions of our docs. It would be good not to lose the
cvs history on all of these in the moves to xdocs so maybe we can just
move the files in the filesystem on cvs.apache.org instead
]
> Sent: November 29, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > You're going to delete the old versions in /doc right? We
> certainly don't
> > want to maintain 2 versions of our docs. It
larifying that.
David
> I'm not sure the end is in sight yet, but I'm now more confident now
> that the end is achievable with Maven :-)
>
> Steve
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: November 29, 2003
has an opinion about it.. please speak up.
Thanks,
Tim Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Maven test run
At the minute, I've just copied the docs ov
-
> From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 30, 2003 9:01 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Maven test run
>
>
> As a Struts user I would rather not wait for the mavenization
> to hold up
> the 1.2.0 release niether.
> As a M
it shakes out :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 30, 2003 9:01 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Maven test run
As a Struts user I would rather not wait for the mavenization
to hold up
the 1.2.0 release niether.
As a Maven user t
ite an Ant task :-)), it just needs some effort to do it.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: December 1, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> lol Steve,
> I wonder that my
ying to maintain xdocs yet. I hope we'll be able to translate
> the docs in place & maintain the history.
>
> I'm not sure the end is in sight yet, but I'm now more confident now
> that the end is achievable with Maven :-)
>
> Steve
>
>
> > -Original
s raise one question about Maven. If we
still have to write Ant tasks, is there enough benefit in switching to
Maven? We'll see how it shakes out :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 30, 2003 9:01 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
1. Generate the TLD files (& docs)
I just submitted a Bugzilla issue (#25147) with a partial solution to
this for Maven: it generates the TLD files with XSLT (but doesn't yet
copy them into the final JAR) I don't have time to finish it up right
On Nov 28, 2003, at 3:08 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
I've updated project.xml to reference the validator 1.1.1 jar. You need
to manually download it from http://www.apache.org/~rleland/ and place
it in your local repository.
Would it be a good idea to make an alternate JAR repository for Struts
so
Joe Germuska wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to make an alternate JAR repository for Struts
> so that this step can be automated without depending on the iBiblio
> managers? It's trivial to do in Maven -- in fact, now that I look, I
> see that it's configured in the "project.properties" file, but
Ted Husted wrote:
Ditto for any of our Commons JAR dependencies.
... that we are using for a release trigger, like Commons-Validator for
1.2.0
-T.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: December 3, 2003 6:33 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
>
>
> Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Would it be a good idea to make an alternate JAR
> repository for Struts
> > so that this step can be automated without depend
their own jars.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2003 6:33 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Maven test run
Joe Germuska wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to make an alternate JAR
repository for Struts
> so that this
s happy.
:-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Steve
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: December 3, 2003 6:33 AM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Maven test run
> >
> >
> > Joe Germuska w
; >to directly publish their own jars.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: December 3, 2003 6:33 AM
> >>To: Struts Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: Maven
Quoting Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Nov 28, 2003, at 3:08 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
>
> > I've updated project.xml to reference the validator 1.1.1 jar. You need
> > to manually download it from http://www.apache.org/~rleland/ and place
> > it in your local repository.
>
> Would it be
ably be a Maven plugin, since its something all the Jakarta projects
need to do.
-Ted.
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: Maven test run
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:55:44 -0500
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Or
Do you want the dependency jars included? (ie. commons, etc?)
Tim Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Maven test run]
And, for extra credit, if anyone
e I'm not much of a Maven maven myself.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: Re: Maven test run
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:55:44 -0500
> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL P
ent: Friday, November 28, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Maven test run]
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> And, for extra credit, if anyone were interested in trying it, a
> Mavenized version of Martin's very cool "release" target wou
On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
2. Run the Cactus tests
OK, since the TLDs are out of the way (Thanks Tim, Steve!), I got
started on this one this morning. I've gotten decently far along but
have to quit now. If anyone else is interested in working on this bit,
let me know so
Struts Developers List
> Subject: Cactus tests (Re: Maven test run)
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
> > 2. Run the Cactus tests
>
> OK, since the TLDs are out of the way (Thanks Tim, Steve!), I got
> started on this one this morning. I've gott
44 matches
Mail list logo
