[suggest] Stack of cpan2rpm Perl modules for submission

2007-10-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I've got a whole stack of roughly 50 CPAN modules, assembled for RHEL 4 for some projects and for RHEL 5 for projects like Musicbrainz, at a contract job I'm doing. I'd love to get these into RPMforge so that this worksite can avoid having to deal with their own repositories. Is the cpan2rpm g

Re: [suggest] Stack of cpan2rpm Perl modules for submission

2007-10-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Dag Wieers wrote: On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I've got a whole stack of roughly 50 CPAN modules, assembled for RHEL 4 for some projects and for RHEL 5 for projects like Musicbrainz, at a contract job I'm doing. I

Re: [suggest] Stack of cpan2rpm Perl modules for submission

2007-10-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Dag Wieers wrote: Ok, I finished doing all of them and am generating metadata right now. I'll push them to the mirrors tommorow. But are you sure this is work-related ? perl-Games-EverQuest-LogLineParser :) Also, some of the RPM packages did not build and eg. the Bundles I simply skipp

Re: [suggest] Stack of cpan2rpm Perl modules for submission

2007-10-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Dag Wieers wrote: Ok, unfortunately, I think I got your whole mail wrong. I though the SRPMs at that link were the ones you requested to have. Not so, I guess :/ So I packaged another 45 perl modules for fun :) Can you send me a list of all the modules you would like to see packaged in RPMforge

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 28, Issue 11

2007-10-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send suggest mailing list submissions to suggest@lists.rpmforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PR

Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 28, Issue 11

2007-10-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Dag Wieers wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: No can do. libotr is no problem, but EL5 does not have pidgin and EL4 and EL3 do not have glib2 >= 2.6. So pidgin-otr fails to build for all of the distributions. I don't suppose the pidgin from sourceforge.net

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 28, Issue 12

2007-10-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
What are the chances of getting the Nagios::Plugin module from CPAN into the repository? I'd like to use it for the nagios-of-plugins from http://www.openfusion.com.au/labs/dist/nagios-of-plugins-0.8.3.tar.gz, which builds nicely with "rpmbuild -ta nagios-of-plugions-0.8.3.tar.gz", and would also

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 28, Issue 13

2007-10-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
naming that .spec file to be .spec.in. Nico Kadel-GArcia On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:31:14 +0100 > From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 29, Issue 3

2007-11-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:55:11 +0100 (CET) From: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [suggest] perl module additions in repo To: Michael Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "suggest lists.rpmforge.net" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 29, Issue 15

2007-11-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Would it be possible to add "mkrdns" to your wonderful repository? It's an old and quite stable too, and very useful for doing reverse DNS generation from a existing DNS infrastructure. http://www.mkrdns.org/ftp/mkrdns_v3/ The SRPM's could use modificaton to be "noarch" instead of architect

[suggest] Can you publish or republish the HylaFAX+ software?

2007-12-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
While mgetty, built into RHEL, is OK, I prefer HylaFAX for various reasons. I'd love to get HylaFAX or the latest HylaFAX+ fork, which seems to be better supported, into RPMforge. This latest fork and release are at http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/. Any chance of getting them into your reposito

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 37, Issue 1

2008-07-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
ommend it for Dag's wonderful repository, because replacing such a central system component is begging for pain. But I went through this a lot last year, when working with Musicbrainz, and I'm going through it right now with Lilac and its necessary

[suggest] Composing an RPM for PHP propel and PHP zhing, can anyone help me out?

2008-07-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'm trying to work with Lilac, the new version of the 'Fruity' Nagios configuration tool. Unfortunately, I'm not a PHP expert, and it relies on the PHP 'propel' package. That package is normally installed online, with ' I'm unclear on what parts of the installation I need to do: just dump it in

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 37, Issue 17

2008-07-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 3 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:13:52 +1100 From: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [suggest] awstats 6.8 RPM To: "suggest lists.rpmforge.net" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Dag, I noticed the ne

[suggest] Please update HylaFAX

2008-07-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
HylaFAX+ has had a recent update, to version 5.2.6, at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=148904&package_id=164873. Can our faithful repository maintainers update this? ___ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rp

[suggest] Please package mnogosearch

2008-07-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
There is a useful web search engine called Mnogosearch: I was involved in early Linux testing with it, years ago, and would like to have RPM's available for RHEL/Fedora. The source repository is at www.mnogosearch.org: there are RPM's discoverable at rpmbone.net, and I'm happy to test and submit t

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12

2008-08-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:56:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ignacio Bustamante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [suggest] Problems with spamassassin 3.2.5-1.el5.rf To: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, suggest@lists.rpmforge.net Mes

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 38, Issue 13

2008-08-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Michael wrote: Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:57:17 +1100 > From: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12 > To: Nico Kadel-Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, suggest@lists.rpmforge.net > Message-I

[suggest] Would OpenSSH 5 and nagioe 3 updates be reasonable for older RHEL releases?

2008-08-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'm working with some tools for Kerberos single-sign-on that would benefit from OpenSSH 5.x features in RHEL 5, and am wondering how our faithful leader here feels about publishing updated versons of such core components. Would an 'openssh5' named RPM be reasonable for RHEL, built from the Fedo

[suggest] What's going on wth Fedora 9? I'd like to update my Subversion

2008-09-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
testing out a Nagios 3 .spec file, called 'nagis3.spec' to rename it to reflect the major release change, but I'm testing it on Fedora 9 for various reasons and want to be assured that it will work well there for RPMforge. Nico Kadel-Garcia __

[suggest] Update cvs2svn to match 2.0.1 from Fedora 9

2008-09-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good afternoon: The SRPM from Fedora 9 updates, for cvs2svn-2.1.1, compiles well on RHEL 5 and works well there when recompiled. Would it be feasible to get this into the RPMforge packages? Or should I try to get it into EPEL? ___ suggest mailing list su

Re: [suggest] What's going on wth Fedora 9? I'd like to update my Subversion

2008-09-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Dag Wieers wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Hi, folks. What's going on, if anything, to add Fedora 9 to the RPMforge targets? I'd like to update my Subversioin to be compatible with my RPMforge supplied Subversion-1.5.2, but I'm tripping over the h

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10

2008-09-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:20:02 -0400 From: Peter Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module To: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; char

[suggest] Fedora 10 is out, what shall we do about it?

2008-11-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Hi, folks. Fedora 10 just hit the servers. Dag, what can we do to support providing Fedora 9 and 10 build environments and updates from your very helpful site? ___ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listi

Re: [suggest] Fedora 10 is out, what shall we do about it?

2008-11-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Michael Mansour wrote: Hi Dag, On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Fedora 10 just hit the servers. Dag, what can we do to support providing Fedora 9 and 10 build environments and updates from your very helpful site? Good question. Relevant answers to the following

[suggest] I see the new Nagios 3.0.x in place, it is *not* a painless upgrade

2008-12-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I see the Nagios 3.0.x in place, it's a nice and helpful upgrade to Nagios. But, it is absolutely *NOT* a drop-in replacement for Nagios 2.x. The layout of hte configuration files is considerably different, and the old standard configuration files are not quite compatible with it. In particular

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7

2008-12-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote: Send suggest mailing list submissions to suggest@lists.rpmforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11

2008-12-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:52:27 +1100 > From: "Michael Mansour" > Subject: Re: [suggest] rkhunter 1.3.2 update? > To: Dag Wieers > Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net > Message-ID: <20081220034542.m81...@npgx.com.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > > > But the E

[suggest] nrpe specific user suggested for nagios-nrpe package

2008-12-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
spec files and patches as necessary by next week. (I'm in the midst of moving right now, and cleaning up old notes from my last consulting work.) Nico Kadel-Garcia ___ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net ht

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 46, Issue 4

2009-04-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote: Send suggest mailing list submissions to suggest@lists.rpmforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 46, Issue 8

2009-04-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote: Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:56:58 -0400 From: Jason Subject: [suggest] Unable to find a specific package. To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net Message-ID: <2a8b31640904180656r61960e5emc2f076f99e189...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="is

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 47, Issue 1

2009-05-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote: -- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 16:09:45 -0400 From: Matthew Saltzman Subject: [suggest] subversion tools not built To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net Message-ID: <1241294985.4964.310.

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.x compilation issues

2009-05-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
There is an unfortunate dependency for Subversion 1.6.x on a very recent sqlite3, and a workaround built into Subversion where it simply uses a local copy of the sqlite3.c source file from sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz. Rather than including the full tarball, I think it makes more sense to sim

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 is out, I'm working on .spec file

2009-05-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'd *just* gotten subversion 1.6.1 working, and now 1.6.2 popped out today. (Sigh.) One question I'm finding for compiling on RHEL 5/CentOS 5 is how to handle the SQLite version 3.x dependency. It requires a more recent version than RHEL 4 and 5 provide, but leaves in a hook to put in the sql

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 .spec and patch files

2009-05-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Attached files are for subversion 1.6.2 compilation. The other patches already exist in the 1.5.6 subversion in RPMforge, although I can attach them as well if desired. I'd love to get some testing by other people, especially Fedora users. subversion-1.6.2-pie.patch Description: Binary data sub

Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 .spec and patch files

2009-05-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> Attached files are for subversion 1.6.2 compilation. The other patches >> already exist in the 1.5.6 subversion in RPMforge, although I can >> attach them as well if desired. I&#x

Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 .spec and patch files

2009-05-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Greg Bailey wrote: Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: That SRPM reports: # rpm -U subversion-1.6.1-4.fc11.src.rpm warning: subversion-1.6.1-4.fc11.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY, key ID d22e77f2 warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9

2009-05-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
From: Christoph Maser Subject: Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 .spec and patch files Eh? These patches are from fedora cvs. I was just about to use them. Fedora 10 has subversion 1.5, Fedora 11 (wich will be released in just a few days). Why would fedora users use the subversion from rpmforge? W

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 fo r RPMforge comments.

2009-05-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
t/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Dienstag, den 12.05.2009, 13:12 +0200 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: Fedora users might have excellent reasons to stay away from Fedora 11 until after it's released, and since Fedora 7 through 10 are still active, they might appreciate an updated subvers

[suggest] Please add perl-Term-ReadLine-Perl, .spec attached

2009-05-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Can we add the Term-ReadLinie-Perl module? I've got people using it, and I'd much prefer to have it in RPMforge than locally maintained. The spec file is attached, which I built using cpan2rpm. I did disable the 'make test', because this particular silly program demands console access to type thing

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 47, Issue 17

2009-05-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
From: Dag Wieers On Sat, 23 May 2009, Jason wrote: Searching though rpmforge, I notice in the packages list a driver labeled nvidia-x11-drv-173.08-1.beta.el5. I am wondering how up to date this package is, and if any security patches were applied, as the currently available driver from niv

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 47, Issue 24

2009-05-31 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:00 AM, wrote: > Send suggest mailing list submissions to >        sugg...@lists.rpmforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >        http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'hel

[suggest] perl-DateTime numbering issue with "0.4305" release

2009-06-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
RPM version tracking is confused by numbers like '0.4305', and the "mock" utility for CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 doesn't properly detect perl-DateTime-0.4305 them as being more recent than 0.42. This is particularly confusing since Dave Rolsky, being a CPAN sort of guy, keeps changing his numbering sche

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 48, Issue 15

2009-06-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:35:59 +0200 > From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] perl-DateTime numbering issue with "0.4305" >        release > I worked on a perl module with the same version number problem last > week. I solved that by appending zeros. eg cpan version 0.38, rpmforge > ve

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 48, Issue 16

2009-06-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Pavel Kankovsky > Subject: Re: [suggest] perl-DateTime (was: Re: suggest Digest, Vol 48, >        Issue   15) > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> And if, for example, RPMforge has a perl-DateTime-0.5000 (since that >> module is up to 0.5

[suggest] New IO-Compress-2.020 tarball and confusion with IO::Compress::Base

2009-06-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
There is a new "IO-Compress-2.020' tarball over at CPAN. It includes what used to be in IO-Compress-Base-2.015, and subsumes it. It also has some new dependencies, on Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020 or later, and Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020 or later. Can we get these added to our helpful RPMforge repository?

[suggest] Update subversion-1.6.3, please?

2009-06-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
The published patches and .spec file for Subversion 1.6.2 work fine for the new Subversion 1.6.3 release, with the release number updated. May I ask politely for an update of that package? Getting it working for RHEL 4 or older is work I've had trouble with: It requires a local compilation of a mo

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 3

2009-07-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:47:23 +0200 > From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not >        RPMforge        package > To: "suggest@lists.rpmforge.net" > Message-ID: <1246567643.2540.15.ca...@l3f8946.financial.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7

2009-07-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> 1) I'll managed to compile 1.6.3 against the included python 2.3 on my >> out-of-the-box CentOS 4.7 (with a couple of patches :-) ) >> >> 2) I can't compile subversion 1.6.3 with the system-included neon. I can >> however compile it using

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 9

2009-07-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: > Subject: Re: [suggest] subversion 1.6.3 for EL4 > To be honest, I do not like all these "hacks" with locally build > replacements. Subversion is a bear this way: the new feature sets are not well-modularized, and if you want the software, it *cannot* be easily reverse-engineered to av

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 12

2009-07-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] collectd dependancies > Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb > anthony.caet...@sanlam.co.za: >> >> Hi >> >> I wish to start using collectd on my servers.  I am testing the >> install, but for some reason it wants to install xmms, libogg

[suggest] Does anyone have RPM structure for Java utilities published as .jar files for jmxterm RPM?

2009-07-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'm looking at the jmxterm utility, from http://wiki.cyclopsgroup.org/jmxterm, which some acquaintances like. It's published as .jar files, and I've not worked out the fun of compiling it from the source files since there is no obvious 'build.xml' or 'Makefile' structure. Does anyone have .spec fi

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 24

2009-07-31 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:40:39 +0200 > From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] Request: Required Perl Packages for Bugzilla >        3.4 > To: "suggest@lists.rpmforge.net" > > Am Freitag, den 17.07.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Max Kanat-Alexander: >>       Bugzilla 3.4 will be coming out s

[suggest] perl-DateTime-Format-DBI module, please?

2009-08-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I've got some folks using the DateTime::Format::DBI module from CPAN. Can we get that into the RPMforge repository? I've attached a working .spec file for RHEL 4 and RHEL 5, and am happy to provide my .spec files for other required components. perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.spec Description: Binary d

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-08-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Chris > Subject: Re: [suggest] Updates for sarg and nut > On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:55:29 +0800 > Richard Chapman wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am running Centos 5.3 x86_64. I have installed "sarg" from rpmforge >> and "nut" from the epel repository. >> I have some problems with both of these pack

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 50, Issue 12

2009-08-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:37:26 +0800 > From: Richard Chapman > Subject: [suggest] nut rpmforge and epel > To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net > Message-ID: <4a88c266.6060...@aardvark.com.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > I note that there is a fairl

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 52, Issue 10

2009-10-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Steve Huff wrote: >> $ sudo echo 'exclude = perl-DBD-mysql' >> /etc/yum.conf >> >> that will fix your problem quite well without requiring us to break >> with our naming convention :) > > i must be on crack.  I don't think i've run into this one previousl

[suggest] subversion 1.6.6 is out

2009-10-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Subversion 1.6.6 is out: I've tested the existing RPMforge .spec file with the new tarball on CentOS 5, and didn't need any changes except updating the version. Can our faithful maintainers update that package? And for such modest updates, would you prefer that we send a new .spec file, or simply r

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 53, Issue 1

2009-11-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] cfengine 3.0 ? > > Am Montag, den 02.11.2009, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Bjarne Saltbaek: >> And here is a diff against >> http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/cfengine/cfengine3.spec : > > > Thanks, will apply check it... Careful: When I tried personal

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 53, Issue 2

2009-11-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Christoph Maser > Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 53, Issue 1 >> Careful: When I tried personally updating to cfengine 3.x last summer, >> I found the format different enough to be incompatible with my >> existing CFengine layout. And since CFengine is used to edit system

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 54, Issue 1

2009-12-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > From: Victor > Subject: [suggest] OpenSSH 4.9 (or later?) > > Just wondering what the thought is with having OpenSSH 4.9 or later included > as available download on RPM (or even on the official CentOS repo's... but > don't think i can request that here

[suggest] Update 'proj' to 4.7.0?

2009-12-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I've just done a test build of proj-4.7.0 with a modified .spec file from RPMforge. It's attached: can we get that package updated, along with its incorporated proj-datumgrid updated to version 1.5? Nico Kadel-Garcia proj.spec Description: B

[suggest] Update clearsilver to 0.10.5

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good morning: I've got a client using clearsilver: I'd like to update RPMforge's version to 0.10.5 from the existing 0.10.3, to get it under RPM deployment. I've attached the updated .spec file and patches, from EPEL, but I'm afraid it will take them a log longer to update. clearsilver.spec Des

[suggest] Create postfixadmin RPM

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
2 hooks as unneeded for RedHat OS's, updated to version 2.3, and threw out the Perl module requirements (which postfixadmin 2.3 does not use, it does it all in PHP). Can we get this in as well? Again, I'm submitting it because a client uses it. Nico Kade

Re: [suggest] Update clearsilver to 0.10.5

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:00 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> I've got a client using clearsilver: I'd like to update RPMforge's >> version to 0.10.5 from the existing 0.10.3, to get it under R

Re: [suggest] Update 'proj' to 4.7.0?

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2009, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Yury V. Zaytsev: > On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 19:52 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > I've just done a test build of proj-4.7.0 with a modified .spec file > > from RPMforge. It's attached: can we get that package up

Re: [suggest] Create postfixadmin RPM

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
ng time on it. > 2) Lacking version numbers in changelog will trigger rpmlint warnings > > Sorry, I don't have time to clean up this mess. Hopefully you can do > this, or maybe someone else have time to thoroughly review and fix / > commit this SPEC. > > -- > Sincerely y

Re: [suggest] Update clearsilver to 0.10.5

2009-12-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 05:54 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: >> > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:00 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> >> >>

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 55, Issue 6

2010-01-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On 2010-01-05 08:35 , Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 03:21 +, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: >> >>> The attached patch replaces a sqlite hard coded version >>> number by the sqlite_version macro. >> >> Thanks!!! Makes sense. Committed. > > Thanks for committing the patch (it's no

Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 55, Issue 6

2010-01-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 14:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> Did the requirements for Subversion get updated, or are you merely >> pointing to the latest releases? If the requirements didn't update in >

[suggest] Can we add mnogosearch?

2010-01-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
There's an old Web search tool called "mnogosearch", rather powerful, rather flexible, better than most I've encountered. I've attached a .spec file, and the source is at the "Source0:" site listed in the .spec file. Can we get this added to RPMforge?

Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 55, Issue 6

2010-01-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 15:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> I'm just concerned that we might be forcing unnecessary upgrades. If >> Subversion is *compatible* with the older releases, and the feature >> c

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 55, Issue 10

2010-01-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Ingvar Hagelund > Another small matter about the rrdtool specfile that had to be changed > before it worked in mock: It's very seldom (probably never) it's > possible to run rpm from within a mock changeroot. So the following does > not work: > > Requires: perl >= %(rpm -q --qf '%%{epoch}

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 55, Issue 15

2010-01-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Greg Bailey > Subject: [suggest] tweak - an efficient hex editor > I've built an RPM of "tweak", an "efficient hex editor" written by Simon > Tatham, of "putty" fame... > > It's a great, lightweight hex editor.  I'm attaching an old spec file I > used a long time ago as a reference--some

[suggest] Putting .i386 packages in x86_64 repository for Subversion

2010-02-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Would it be possible to put copies of the subversion.i386 and subversion-devel.i386 packages in the x86_64 repositories? The issue is that, with "yum", if you say "yum install subversion" on RHEL 4 and 5, it detects the built-in RHEL version of the ancient 1.4.2 , i386 version of these packages and

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 56, Issue 4

2010-02-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 14:04 +0100 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: >> Would it be possible to put copies of the subversion.i386 and >> subversion-devel.i386 packages in the x86_64 repositories? The issue >> is that, with "yum", if you say "yum install subver

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.9 .spec file

2010-02-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Subversion 1.6.9 has been out for a while now, and running on my local RHEL 5 i386 and x86_64 boxes. It seems stable: I'm attaching a .spec file for it. Can we encourage an update, to remain consistent with the published TortoiseSVN for Windows client and the latest releases for other OS's? subve

Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.9 .spec file

2010-02-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 16:09 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Subversion 1.6.9 has been out for a while now, and running on my local >> RHEL 5 i386 and x86_64 boxes. It seems stable: I'm attaching a .spec >> fil

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 56, Issue 11

2010-02-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev" > Subject: Re: [suggest] ganglia and libconfuse > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 18:49 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: > >> I attempted to build the latest version on CentOS4.8, but the latest >> ganglia also requires apr-1, and CentOS4 has apr-0, so I'm guessing that >> the latest ga

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 3

2010-03-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Victor > > I'd like to see rpmforge look to update OpenSSH to 4.8p1 or later. > Reason is this version (from what I can determine) has the built-in ability > to Jail users to their home directory if you enabled SSH (IE: SFTP). > > But in the versions available in centos / rpm / epel they

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 5

2010-03-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev" > Subject: Re: [suggest] OpenSSH 4.8p1 or above. > To: Victor > FYI, > > OpenSSH 5.4p1 for CentOS 5 RPMs > > are available here: > > http://centos.alt.ru/?p=373 > > Apologies for the page being in Russian. I don't see your SRPM. But I don't read Russian. Installing su

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 6

2010-03-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev" > Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 5 > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 07:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> I don't see your SRPM. But I don't read Russian. > > These packages are not mine and I am in

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 15

2010-03-29 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: "J. Allen Crider" > I would very much like to see RPMs for RHEL for Eclipse and jEdit > plug-ins added.  In the case of Eclipse, I am most interested in Python, > C++, and UML related plug-ins, although others may be useful as well. This is tricky to do. JPackage seems to be the leading

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.11 is out, .spec file attached

2010-04-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good morning: Subversion 1.6.11 came out recently. (They skipped right over 1.6.10.) I've attached a new .spec file. It does have a new dependency for RHEL 5, on the 'gcc-c++' package: I've not tried it on other releases. The changes for 1.6.11 are below: User-visible changes: * fix for repos

Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.11 is out, .spec file attached

2010-04-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Hi! > > Why couldn't you attach a diff against svn at > > http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/subversion/subversion.spec > > ? > > Would save us a diff and merge. > > Thanks! I'm happy to do so in the future. Historically, I prefer send

[suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good morning! lftp has an update published to version 4.0.8 with some minor bugfixes. I just tested the existing 4.0.7 spec file from RPMforge, updated to the 4.0.8 release, and it works fine. Should I send a .spec file with the one line change and a forged updated '%changelog', or can I ask you

Re: [suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 06:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> Should I send a .spec file with the one line change  and a forged >>>  updated '%cha

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 13

2010-06-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:45:13 +0200 > From: "Yury V. Zaytsev" > Subject: Re: QRe: [suggest] please update libdvbpsi > To: arnebjarn...@hotmail.com > Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net > Message-ID: <1276508713.7686.35.ca...@mypride> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi! > > On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 22:0

[suggest] trac-0.12 requires python-sqlite2 or python-sqlite >= 2.0

2010-07-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
The latest Trac software release, trac-0.12, is very nice. But it requires a more recent version of the python-sqlite utilities to use sqlite databases. This is found in the python-sqlite2 packages from RPMforge and even from EPEL: can we get a 'Requires:" line added for that? _

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 61, Issue 5

2010-07-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> From: Dave B > Subject: [suggest] broken "mrtg" package for RHEL4 > One of my 64-bit RHEL4 machines, last night, ended up with: > > mrtg-2.16.4-1.el4.rf > > Two problems... > > 1. this overrides the Redhat included package mrtg-2.10.15-2a Not really surprisingly. That MRTG is *ancient*. If you

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 61, Issue 5

2010-07-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> From: Dave B >> Subject: [suggest] broken "mrtg" package for RHEL4 >> 2. the package is missing MRTG_lib.pm: >> >> Can't locate MRTG_lib.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/../lib/mrtg2

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10

2010-07-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > Send suggest mailing list submissions to >        sugg...@lists.rpmforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >        http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'he

Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.11 is out, .spec file attached

2010-07-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Hi! > > FYI, regularly updated packages are available here: > > http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/ > > I guess we have to check out what can be taken from there... Good morning, Yuri. I had cons

[suggest] rssh version 2.3.3 released, please update

2010-08-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
rssh is up to version 2.3.3 at Sourceforge. There is a bug in its Makefile.am and Makefile.in that tries to do a 'chmod' on a target without "DESTDIR" in front of it, that breaks non-root compilation. The updates in the new release are modes: I've attached a .diff file for the .spec file: can we g

Re: [suggest] rssh version 2.3.3 released, please update

2010-08-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 13:39 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> rssh is up to version 2.3.3 at Sourceforge. There is a bug in its >> Makefile.am and Makefile.in that tries to do a 'chmod' on a target >> without

[suggest] How to introduce git hosted projects to RPMforge?

2010-10-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'm doing some work with "neatx", at http://code.google.com/p/neatx// The source code is published via Subversion at http://neatx.googlecode.com/svn/trunk//neatx/. Now, I've sent them .spec file updates to allow complete installations but they don't currently publish tarballs, only Subversion acces

[suggest] Subversion 1.6.13 update released with HTTP/HTTPS security patch

2010-10-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
There's a recent security update for Subversion HTTP and HTTPS servers, due to a flaw in the mod_dav_svn modu The announcement and the security notice are at http://subversion.apache.org/. (I'm very glad that Subversion is now hosted there: it lends additional open source credit to it.) I've just

[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 64, Issue 2

2010-10-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:55:23 +0200 > From: "Yury V. Zaytsev" > Subject: Re: [suggest] How to introduce git hosted projects to RPMforge? > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:34 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> Does RPMforge have a setup that can build from Sub

[suggest] Subversion just updated to 1.6.15, update of SRPM simply requires version number and new tarball

2010-11-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Subversion has just been released with version 1.6.15. The release announcement is at http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-11/0475.shtml. The change list at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.6.15/CHANGES shows some interesting but mostly minor bug fix changes. Can we plan an update

[suggest] git-1.7.3-1.rf.src.rpm does not compile on RHEL 5, %filer_from_requires not set

2010-12-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I'm taking a look at updating git for some clients, but note that the git at RPMforge is 1.7.3. That's cool: the latest release is 1.7.3.2, but that's plenty recent. But when I recompile the src.rpm, I get the following message: error: lin 48: Unknown tag: %filter_from_requires /^perl(packed-

  1   2   >