I've got a whole stack of roughly 50 CPAN modules, assembled for RHEL 4
for some projects and for RHEL 5 for projects like Musicbrainz, at a
contract job I'm doing. I'd love to get these into RPMforge so that
this worksite can avoid having to deal with their own repositories. Is
the cpan2rpm g
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I've got a whole stack of roughly 50 CPAN modules, assembled for RHEL 4 for
some projects and for RHEL 5 for projects like Musicbrainz, at a contract job
I'm doing. I
Dag Wieers wrote:
Ok, I finished doing all of them and am generating metadata right now.
I'll push them to the mirrors tommorow. But are you sure this is
work-related ?
perl-Games-EverQuest-LogLineParser
:)
Also, some of the RPM packages did not build and eg. the Bundles I simply
skipp
Dag Wieers wrote:
Ok, unfortunately, I think I got your whole mail wrong. I though the SRPMs
at that link were the ones you requested to have. Not so, I guess :/
So I packaged another 45 perl modules for fun :)
Can you send me a list of all the modules you would like to see packaged
in RPMforge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send suggest mailing list submissions to
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PR
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
No can do. libotr is no problem, but EL5 does not have pidgin and EL4 and
EL3 do not have glib2 >= 2.6.
So pidgin-otr fails to build for all of the distributions.
I don't suppose the pidgin from sourceforge.net
What are the chances of getting the Nagios::Plugin module from CPAN into the
repository?
I'd like to use it for the nagios-of-plugins from
http://www.openfusion.com.au/labs/dist/nagios-of-plugins-0.8.3.tar.gz, which
builds nicely with "rpmbuild -ta nagios-of-plugions-0.8.3.tar.gz", and would
also
naming that
.spec file to be .spec.in.
Nico Kadel-GArcia
On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:31:14 +0100
> From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:55:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [suggest] perl module additions in repo
To: Michael Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "suggest lists.rpmforge.net"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
Would it be possible to add "mkrdns" to your wonderful repository? It's an
old and quite stable too, and very useful for doing reverse DNS generation
from a existing DNS infrastructure.
http://www.mkrdns.org/ftp/mkrdns_v3/
The SRPM's could use modificaton to be "noarch" instead of architect
While mgetty, built into RHEL, is OK, I prefer HylaFAX for various
reasons. I'd love to get HylaFAX or the latest HylaFAX+ fork, which
seems to be better supported, into RPMforge. This latest fork and
release are at http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/.
Any chance of getting them into your reposito
ommend it for Dag's wonderful repository,
because replacing such a central system component is begging for pain.
But I went through this a lot last year, when working with Musicbrainz,
and I'm going through it right now with Lilac and its necessary
I'm trying to work with Lilac, the new version of the 'Fruity' Nagios
configuration tool. Unfortunately, I'm not a PHP expert, and it relies
on the PHP 'propel' package. That package is normally installed online,
with ' I'm unclear on what parts of the installation I need to do: just
dump it in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:13:52 +1100
From: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [suggest] awstats 6.8 RPM
To: "suggest lists.rpmforge.net"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Dag,
I noticed the ne
HylaFAX+ has had a recent update, to version 5.2.6, at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=148904&package_id=164873.
Can our faithful repository maintainers update this?
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rp
There is a useful web search engine called Mnogosearch: I was involved in
early Linux testing with it, years ago, and would like to have RPM's
available for RHEL/Fedora.
The source repository is at www.mnogosearch.org: there are RPM's
discoverable at rpmbone.net, and I'm happy to test and submit t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Ignacio Bustamante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Problems with spamassassin 3.2.5-1.el5.rf
To: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Mes
Michael wrote:
Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:57:17 +1100
> From: "Michael Mansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 38, Issue 12
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
> Message-I
I'm working with some tools for Kerberos single-sign-on that would
benefit from OpenSSH 5.x features in RHEL 5, and am wondering how our
faithful leader here feels about publishing updated versons of such core
components. Would an 'openssh5' named RPM be reasonable for RHEL, built
from the Fedo
testing out a
Nagios 3 .spec file, called 'nagis3.spec' to rename it to reflect the
major release change, but I'm testing it on Fedora 9 for various reasons
and want to be assured that it will work well there for RPMforge.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
__
Good afternoon:
The SRPM from Fedora 9 updates, for cvs2svn-2.1.1, compiles well on RHEL 5
and works well there when recompiled. Would it be feasible to get this into
the RPMforge packages? Or should I try to get it into EPEL?
___
suggest mailing list
su
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Hi, folks. What's going on, if anything, to add Fedora 9 to the
RPMforge targets? I'd like to update my Subversioin to be compatible
with my RPMforge supplied Subversion-1.5.2, but I'm tripping over the
h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:20:02 -0400
From: Peter Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [suggest] package for Net::MAC perl module
To: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; char
Hi, folks.
Fedora 10 just hit the servers. Dag, what can we do to support providing
Fedora 9 and 10 build environments and updates from your very helpful site?
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listi
Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi Dag,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Fedora 10 just hit the servers. Dag, what can we do to support providing
Fedora 9 and 10 build environments and updates from your very helpful site?
Good question. Relevant answers to the following
I see the Nagios 3.0.x in place, it's a nice and helpful upgrade to
Nagios. But, it is absolutely *NOT* a drop-in replacement for Nagios
2.x. The layout of hte configuration files is considerably different,
and the old standard configuration files are not quite compatible with
it. In particular
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote:
Send suggest mailing list submissions to
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:52:27 +1100
> From: "Michael Mansour"
> Subject: Re: [suggest] rkhunter 1.3.2 update?
> To: Dag Wieers
> Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
> Message-ID: <20081220034542.m81...@npgx.com.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> > But the E
spec files and patches as necessary by next week. (I'm in the midst
of moving right now, and cleaning up old notes from my last consulting
work.)
Nico Kadel-Garcia
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
ht
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote:
Send suggest mailing list submissions to
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote:
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:56:58 -0400
From: Jason
Subject: [suggest] Unable to find a specific package.
To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID:
<2a8b31640904180656r61960e5emc2f076f99e189...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="is
suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 16:09:45 -0400
From: Matthew Saltzman
Subject: [suggest] subversion tools not built
To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1241294985.4964.310.
There is an unfortunate dependency for Subversion 1.6.x on a very
recent sqlite3, and a workaround built into Subversion where it simply
uses a local copy of the sqlite3.c source file from
sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.11.tar.gz. Rather than including the full
tarball, I think it makes more sense to sim
I'd *just* gotten subversion 1.6.1 working, and now 1.6.2 popped out
today. (Sigh.)
One question I'm finding for compiling on RHEL 5/CentOS 5 is how to
handle the SQLite version 3.x dependency. It requires a more recent
version than RHEL 4 and 5 provide, but leaves in a hook to put in the
sql
Attached files are for subversion 1.6.2 compilation. The other patches
already exist in the 1.5.6 subversion in RPMforge, although I can
attach them as well if desired. I'd love to get some testing by other
people, especially Fedora users.
subversion-1.6.2-pie.patch
Description: Binary data
sub
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Attached files are for subversion 1.6.2 compilation. The other patches
>> already exist in the 1.5.6 subversion in RPMforge, although I can
>> attach them as well if desired. I&#x
Greg Bailey wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
That SRPM reports:
# rpm -U subversion-1.6.1-4.fc11.src.rpm
warning: subversion-1.6.1-4.fc11.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
signature: NOKEY, key ID d22e77f2
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist
From: Christoph Maser
Subject: Re: [suggest] Subversion 1.6.2 .spec and patch files
Eh? These patches are from fedora cvs. I was just about to use them.
Fedora 10 has subversion 1.5, Fedora 11 (wich will be released in just a
few days). Why would fedora users use the subversion from rpmforge?
W
t/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am Dienstag, den 12.05.2009, 13:12 +0200 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
Fedora users might have excellent reasons to stay away from Fedora 11
until after it's released, and since Fedora 7 through 10 are still
active, they might appreciate an updated subvers
Can we add the Term-ReadLinie-Perl module? I've got people using it,
and I'd much prefer to have it in RPMforge than locally maintained.
The spec file is attached, which I built using cpan2rpm. I did disable
the 'make test', because this particular silly program demands console
access to type thing
From: Dag Wieers
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Jason wrote:
Searching though rpmforge, I notice in the packages list a driver labeled
nvidia-x11-drv-173.08-1.beta.el5.
I am wondering how up to date this package is, and if any security patches
were applied, as the currently available driver from niv
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> Send suggest mailing list submissions to
> sugg...@lists.rpmforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'hel
RPM version tracking is confused by numbers like '0.4305', and the
"mock" utility for CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 doesn't properly detect
perl-DateTime-0.4305 them as being more recent than 0.42. This is
particularly confusing since Dave Rolsky, being a CPAN sort of guy,
keeps changing his numbering sche
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:35:59 +0200
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] perl-DateTime numbering issue with "0.4305"
> release
> I worked on a perl module with the same version number problem last
> week. I solved that by appending zeros. eg cpan version 0.38, rpmforge
> ve
> From: Pavel Kankovsky
> Subject: Re: [suggest] perl-DateTime (was: Re: suggest Digest, Vol 48,
> Issue 15)
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> And if, for example, RPMforge has a perl-DateTime-0.5000 (since that
>> module is up to 0.5
There is a new "IO-Compress-2.020' tarball over at CPAN. It includes
what used to be in IO-Compress-Base-2.015, and subsumes it. It also
has some new dependencies, on Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020 or later, and
Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020 or later.
Can we get these added to our helpful RPMforge repository?
The published patches and .spec file for Subversion 1.6.2 work fine
for the new Subversion 1.6.3 release, with the release number updated.
May I ask politely for an update of that package?
Getting it working for RHEL 4 or older is work I've had trouble with:
It requires a local compilation of a mo
> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:47:23 +0200
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not
> RPMforge package
> To: "suggest@lists.rpmforge.net"
> Message-ID: <1246567643.2540.15.ca...@l3f8946.financial.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> 1) I'll managed to compile 1.6.3 against the included python 2.3 on my
>> out-of-the-box CentOS 4.7 (with a couple of patches :-) )
>>
>> 2) I can't compile subversion 1.6.3 with the system-included neon. I can
>> however compile it using
> From:
> Subject: Re: [suggest] subversion 1.6.3 for EL4
> To be honest, I do not like all these "hacks" with locally build
> replacements.
Subversion is a bear this way: the new feature sets are not
well-modularized, and if you want the software, it *cannot* be easily
reverse-engineered to av
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] collectd dependancies
> Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb
> anthony.caet...@sanlam.co.za:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I wish to start using collectd on my servers. I am testing the
>> install, but for some reason it wants to install xmms, libogg
I'm looking at the jmxterm utility, from
http://wiki.cyclopsgroup.org/jmxterm, which some acquaintances like.
It's published as .jar files, and I've not worked out the fun of
compiling it from the source files since there is no obvious
'build.xml' or 'Makefile' structure.
Does anyone have .spec fi
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:40:39 +0200
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Request: Required Perl Packages for Bugzilla
> 3.4
> To: "suggest@lists.rpmforge.net"
>
> Am Freitag, den 17.07.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Max Kanat-Alexander:
>> Bugzilla 3.4 will be coming out s
I've got some folks using the DateTime::Format::DBI module from CPAN.
Can we get that into the RPMforge repository?
I've attached a working .spec file for RHEL 4 and RHEL 5, and am
happy to provide my .spec files for other required components.
perl-DateTime-Format-DBI.spec
Description: Binary d
> From: Chris
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Updates for sarg and nut
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:55:29 +0800
> Richard Chapman wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am running Centos 5.3 x86_64. I have installed "sarg" from rpmforge
>> and "nut" from the epel repository.
>> I have some problems with both of these pack
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:37:26 +0800
> From: Richard Chapman
> Subject: [suggest] nut rpmforge and epel
> To: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
> Message-ID: <4a88c266.6060...@aardvark.com.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> I note that there is a fairl
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Steve Huff wrote:
>> $ sudo echo 'exclude = perl-DBD-mysql' >> /etc/yum.conf
>>
>> that will fix your problem quite well without requiring us to break
>> with our naming convention :)
>
> i must be on crack. I don't think i've run into this one previousl
Subversion 1.6.6 is out: I've tested the existing RPMforge .spec file
with the new tarball on CentOS 5, and didn't need any changes except
updating the version. Can our faithful maintainers update that
package? And for such modest updates, would you prefer that we send a
new .spec file, or simply r
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] cfengine 3.0 ?
>
> Am Montag, den 02.11.2009, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Bjarne Saltbaek:
>> And here is a diff against
>> http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/cfengine/cfengine3.spec :
>
>
> Thanks, will apply check it...
Careful: When I tried personal
> From: Christoph Maser
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 53, Issue 1
>> Careful: When I tried personally updating to cfengine 3.x last summer,
>> I found the format different enough to be incompatible with my
>> existing CFengine layout. And since CFengine is used to edit system
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:00 AM, wrote:
> From: Victor
> Subject: [suggest] OpenSSH 4.9 (or later?)
>
> Just wondering what the thought is with having OpenSSH 4.9 or later included
> as available download on RPM (or even on the official CentOS repo's... but
> don't think i can request that here
I've just done a test build of proj-4.7.0 with a modified .spec file
from RPMforge. It's attached: can we get that package updated, along
with its incorporated proj-datumgrid updated to version 1.5?
Nico Kadel-Garcia
proj.spec
Description: B
Good morning:
I've got a client using clearsilver: I'd like to update RPMforge's
version to 0.10.5 from the existing 0.10.3, to get it under RPM
deployment.
I've attached the updated .spec file and patches, from EPEL, but I'm
afraid it will take them a log longer to update.
clearsilver.spec
Des
2
hooks as unneeded for RedHat OS's, updated to version 2.3, and threw
out the Perl module requirements (which postfixadmin 2.3 does not use,
it does it all in PHP).
Can we get this in as well? Again, I'm submitting it because a client uses it.
Nico Kade
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:00 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> I've got a client using clearsilver: I'd like to update RPMforge's
>> version to 0.10.5 from the existing 0.10.3, to get it under R
Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2009, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Yury V. Zaytsev:
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 19:52 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I've just done a test build of proj-4.7.0 with a modified .spec file
> > from RPMforge. It's attached: can we get that package up
ng time on
it.
> 2) Lacking version numbers in changelog will trigger rpmlint warnings
>
> Sorry, I don't have time to clean up this mess. Hopefully you can do
> this, or maybe someone else have time to thoroughly review and fix /
> commit this SPEC.
>
> --
> Sincerely y
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 05:54 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:00 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
> On 2010-01-05 08:35 , Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 03:21 +, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>> The attached patch replaces a sqlite hard coded version
>>> number by the sqlite_version macro.
>>
>> Thanks!!! Makes sense. Committed.
>
> Thanks for committing the patch (it's no
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 14:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> Did the requirements for Subversion get updated, or are you merely
>> pointing to the latest releases? If the requirements didn't update in
>
There's an old Web search tool called "mnogosearch", rather powerful,
rather flexible, better than most I've encountered. I've attached a
.spec file, and the source is at the "Source0:" site listed in the
.spec file. Can we get this added to RPMforge?
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 15:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> I'm just concerned that we might be forcing unnecessary upgrades. If
>> Subversion is *compatible* with the older releases, and the feature
>> c
> From: Ingvar Hagelund
> Another small matter about the rrdtool specfile that had to be changed
> before it worked in mock: It's very seldom (probably never) it's
> possible to run rpm from within a mock changeroot. So the following does
> not work:
>
> Requires: perl >= %(rpm -q --qf '%%{epoch}
> From: Greg Bailey
> Subject: [suggest] tweak - an efficient hex editor
> I've built an RPM of "tweak", an "efficient hex editor" written by Simon
> Tatham, of "putty" fame...
>
> It's a great, lightweight hex editor. I'm attaching an old spec file I
> used a long time ago as a reference--some
Would it be possible to put copies of the subversion.i386 and
subversion-devel.i386 packages in the x86_64 repositories? The issue
is that, with "yum", if you say "yum install subversion" on RHEL 4 and
5, it detects the built-in RHEL version of the ancient 1.4.2 , i386
version of these packages and
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 14:04 +0100 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
>> Would it be possible to put copies of the subversion.i386 and
>> subversion-devel.i386 packages in the x86_64 repositories? The issue
>> is that, with "yum", if you say "yum install subver
Subversion 1.6.9 has been out for a while now, and running on my local
RHEL 5 i386 and x86_64 boxes. It seems stable: I'm attaching a .spec
file for it. Can we encourage an update, to remain consistent with the
published TortoiseSVN for Windows client and the latest releases for
other OS's?
subve
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 16:09 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Subversion 1.6.9 has been out for a while now, and running on my local
>> RHEL 5 i386 and x86_64 boxes. It seems stable: I'm attaching a .spec
>> fil
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev"
> Subject: Re: [suggest] ganglia and libconfuse
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 18:49 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> I attempted to build the latest version on CentOS4.8, but the latest
>> ganglia also requires apr-1, and CentOS4 has apr-0, so I'm guessing that
>> the latest ga
> From: Victor
>
> I'd like to see rpmforge look to update OpenSSH to 4.8p1 or later.
> Reason is this version (from what I can determine) has the built-in ability
> to Jail users to their home directory if you enabled SSH (IE: SFTP).
>
> But in the versions available in centos / rpm / epel they
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev"
> Subject: Re: [suggest] OpenSSH 4.8p1 or above.
> To: Victor
> FYI,
>
> OpenSSH 5.4p1 for CentOS 5 RPMs
>
> are available here:
>
> http://centos.alt.ru/?p=373
>
> Apologies for the page being in Russian.
I don't see your SRPM. But I don't read Russian.
Installing su
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev"
> Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 57, Issue 5
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 07:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> I don't see your SRPM. But I don't read Russian.
>
> These packages are not mine and I am in
> From: "J. Allen Crider"
> I would very much like to see RPMs for RHEL for Eclipse and jEdit
> plug-ins added. In the case of Eclipse, I am most interested in Python,
> C++, and UML related plug-ins, although others may be useful as well.
This is tricky to do. JPackage seems to be the leading
Good morning:
Subversion 1.6.11 came out recently. (They skipped right over 1.6.10.)
I've attached a new .spec file. It does have a new dependency for RHEL
5, on the 'gcc-c++' package: I've not tried it on other releases.
The changes for 1.6.11 are below:
User-visible changes:
* fix for repos
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Why couldn't you attach a diff against svn at
>
> http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/subversion/subversion.spec
>
> ?
>
> Would save us a diff and merge.
>
> Thanks!
I'm happy to do so in the future. Historically, I prefer send
Good morning!
lftp has an update published to version 4.0.8 with some minor
bugfixes. I just tested the existing 4.0.7 spec file from RPMforge,
updated to the 4.0.8 release, and it works fine. Should I send a .spec
file with the one line change and a forged updated '%changelog', or
can I ask you
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 06:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Should I send a .spec file with the one line change and a forged
>>> updated '%cha
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:45:13 +0200
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev"
> Subject: Re: QRe: [suggest] please update libdvbpsi
> To: arnebjarn...@hotmail.com
> Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
> Message-ID: <1276508713.7686.35.ca...@mypride>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 22:0
The latest Trac software release, trac-0.12, is very nice. But it
requires a more recent version of the python-sqlite utilities to use
sqlite databases. This is found in the python-sqlite2 packages from
RPMforge and even from EPEL: can we get a 'Requires:" line added for
that?
_
> From: Dave B
> Subject: [suggest] broken "mrtg" package for RHEL4
> One of my 64-bit RHEL4 machines, last night, ended up with:
>
> mrtg-2.16.4-1.el4.rf
>
> Two problems...
>
> 1. this overrides the Redhat included package mrtg-2.10.15-2a
Not really surprisingly. That MRTG is *ancient*. If you
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> From: Dave B
>> Subject: [suggest] broken "mrtg" package for RHEL4
>> 2. the package is missing MRTG_lib.pm:
>>
>> Can't locate MRTG_lib.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/../lib/mrtg2
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, wrote:
> Send suggest mailing list submissions to
> sugg...@lists.rpmforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'he
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> FYI, regularly updated packages are available here:
>
> http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/
>
> I guess we have to check out what can be taken from there...
Good morning, Yuri.
I had cons
rssh is up to version 2.3.3 at Sourceforge. There is a bug in its
Makefile.am and Makefile.in that tries to do a 'chmod' on a target
without "DESTDIR" in front of it, that breaks non-root compilation.
The updates in the new release are modes: I've attached a .diff file
for the .spec file: can we g
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 13:39 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> rssh is up to version 2.3.3 at Sourceforge. There is a bug in its
>> Makefile.am and Makefile.in that tries to do a 'chmod' on a target
>> without
I'm doing some work with "neatx", at http://code.google.com/p/neatx//
The source code is published via Subversion at
http://neatx.googlecode.com/svn/trunk//neatx/. Now, I've sent them
.spec file updates to allow complete installations but they don't
currently publish tarballs, only Subversion acces
There's a recent security update for Subversion HTTP and HTTPS
servers, due to a flaw in the mod_dav_svn modu The announcement and
the security notice are at http://subversion.apache.org/. (I'm very
glad that Subversion is now hosted there: it lends additional open
source credit to it.)
I've just
> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:55:23 +0200
> From: "Yury V. Zaytsev"
> Subject: Re: [suggest] How to introduce git hosted projects to RPMforge?
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:34 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Does RPMforge have a setup that can build from Sub
Subversion has just been released with version 1.6.15. The release
announcement is at http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-11/0475.shtml.
The change list at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.6.15/CHANGES shows
some interesting but mostly minor bug fix changes.
Can we plan an update
I'm taking a look at updating git for some clients, but note that the
git at RPMforge is 1.7.3. That's cool: the latest release is 1.7.3.2,
but that's plenty recent.
But when I recompile the src.rpm, I get the following message:
error: lin 48: Unknown tag: %filter_from_requires /^perl(packed-
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
