On 15/12/09 14:35, Seth Mos wrote:
> Paul Mansfield schreef:
>> On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
>>> As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink
>>> NIC.
>>> (MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
>>> I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
>>
Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
(MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
pfSense or?
realtek != ralink
I've previously have
On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
> As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
> (MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
> I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
> pfSense or?
realtek != ralink
yup, that's a realtek
since reading some
>> Just stumbled over this:
>> MSI Industrial WindBOXII
>> http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9a25
>>
>> Not cheap - but it's got everything in a nice pre-packaged box.
>
> nice! it has an Intel NIC.
As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
(MS-6894, Ralink chi
On 13/12/09 05:07, Jeppe Øland wrote:
> Just stumbled over this:
> MSI Industrial WindBOXII
> http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9a25
>
> Not cheap - but it's got everything in a nice pre-packaged box.
nice! it has an Intel NIC. not sure what options there are for mini-PCIe
cards with gigabit
Just stumbled over this:
MSI Industrial WindBOXII
http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9a25
Not cheap - but it's got everything in a nice pre-packaged box.
Regards,
-Jeppe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.
On 27/10/09 15:42, Jeppe Øland wrote:
Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
"Dual Marvell 88E8053 Gigabit Ehternet"
hmmm.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubs
>>> Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
>>> http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
>>
>> those seem good :)
>> jsut couldn't find anywhere to sell (thus no price tag). If you have any,
>
> I am getting a price directly from Avalue USA.
> The board is in production, and there
Jim Pingle wrote:
> Curtis Maurand wrote:
>> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
>>
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
>>
>
> I mentioned that one elsewhere in the thread. Three of them just arrived
> in my office and I'm getting ready
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Ryan wrote:
> I have actually looked at this. We use supermicro for some of our servers
> and they make a great product. This has 2 onboard nics, but they are both
> realtek. I guess I am too picky. Realtek seems ok in a regular desktop pc,
> but for a router
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:27:47PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> >> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
> >>
> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
> >
I have actually looked at this. We use supermicro for some
Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> Newegg says the board only has a PCI-Ex8 slot. I'm not sure which board that
> would be, as all the Atom boards I've seen are PCI-only.
It has 2 PCI-E x8 and a PCI, but it looks like only the PCI-E x8 would
be usable with the riser.
Here's a pic I took of the mainboard
Newegg says the board only has a PCI-Ex8 slot. I'm not sure which board that
would be, as all the Atom boards I've seen are PCI-only.
Re: Noise - In my experience, Atom servers can run without chassis fans - they
only need the CPU fan and the PSU fan.
Nice find. I love the Atom platform.
Bes
Paul Mansfield wrote:
> On 16/10/09 17:27, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>>
>> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
>>
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
>>
>
>
> pretty good box at the price; I guess it would be a bit noisy for a home
> or offic
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:27:47PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
>>
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
>
> What kind of internal slot and riser is this? PCI, I presume?
>
Ther
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:27:47PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
What kind of internal slot and riser is this? PCI, I presume?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.o
Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
>
I mentioned that one elsewhere in the thread. Three of them just arrived
in my office and I'm getting ready to test them out. :-)
Fi
On 16/10/09 17:27, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
pretty good box at the price; I guess it would be a bit noisy for a home
or office environment, 1U server fans tend to be
Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
Paul Mansfield wrote:
On 15/10/09 18:25, Ryan wrote:
Does anyone make an atom board with intel onboard. I'd rather intel if
i had my choice. I have seen a coupl
On 16/10/09 16:41, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:35:07PM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
I built a box with a jetway atom board and triple intel gigE daughter
board - search the mail archives - pfSense booted fine and detected the
onboard realtek as re0 and the intels as em0 to em2
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:35:07PM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> I built a box with a jetway atom board and triple intel gigE daughter
> board - search the mail archives - pfSense booted fine and detected the
> onboard realtek as re0 and the intels as em0 to em2.
Are you happy with it so far?
On 15/10/09 18:25, Ryan wrote:
Does anyone make an atom board with intel onboard. I'd rather intel if
i had my choice. I have seen a couple of flexatx atom boards that look
real promising, but they don't have intel nics.
I built a box with a jetway atom board and triple intel gigE daughter
b
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>I'd rather have neither.
>
> Won't argue that:) All of this has me concerned, I am waiting on
> some other issues but was about to order a 3 nic Alix board and saw
> it uses Via VT6105M 10/100 nics? I haven't used Via in years, how
> do th
>I'd rather have neither.
Won't argue that:) All of this has me concerned, I am waiting on
some other issues but was about to order a 3 nic Alix board and saw
it uses Via VT6105M 10/100 nics? I haven't used Via in years, how
do these perform, and issues you have seen Chris?
Thanks!
jlc
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>Anybody else?
>>I don't have any experience with Marvell other than in my Laptop.
>>I assume they are better than Realtek...
>
> I have a myriad of Intel, Broadcom, 1 marvell now and several realtek
> nics on various equipment I manage. A
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I'm just testing an atom wth re(4) but the NIC-Chip shouldn't
> be the problem.
> I started a thread in the Forum, so i don't want to crosspost here.
>
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,19808.0.html
>
> I just try to build a Kernel working with that board and PF-Sense .
: (985) 853-0134
radiote...@aaremail.com
From: Philippe LeCavalier [mailto:supp...@plecavalier.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 12:16 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] potential pfsense hardware
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:32 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I'd rather
Ryan wrote:
> Does anyone make an atom board with intel onboard. I'd rather intel if
> i had my choice. I have seen a couple of flexatx atom boards that look
> real promising, but they don't have intel nics.
MSI has a board with 2x1GB Intel NICs, the IM-945GSE
http://www.mini-box.com/MSI-IM-945
5, 2009 12:16 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] potential pfsense hardware
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:32 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I'd rather have a Realtek if I had to.
I second that!
Cheers,
Phil
__ NOD32 4511 (20091015) Information __
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:32 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I'd rather have a Realtek if I had to.
I second that!
Cheers,
Phil
>Anybody else?
>I don't have any experience with Marvell other than in my Laptop.
>I assume they are better than Realtek...
I have a myriad of Intel, Broadcom, 1 marvell now and several realtek
nics on various equipment I manage. Although the realtek's aren't performers
like the Broadcoms or Intel
> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
> for use with pfSense:
>>
>> Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
>> http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
>
> those seem good :)
> jsut couldn't find anywhere to sell (thus no price tag). If you have an
>Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
>http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
I don't know about FreeBSD's support of Marvell nics,
but based on my experience with them in Solaris and RHEL
I won't even let one in my site without calling the janitor
and his garbage cart.
Jus
On Wed, October 14, 2009 21:52, Jeppe Ãland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Ryan wrote:
I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
for use with pfSense:
>
> Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
> http://www.avalue.com.tw/pro
Jeppe Øland [mailto:jol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:52 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] potential pfsense hardware
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> > Ryan wrote:
> >>> I'm thinkin
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
>>> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
>>> for use with pfSense:
Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
Regards,
-Jeppe
Ryan wrote:
>> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
>> for use with pfSense:
>>
>> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-H.
>> cfm?typ=H
>>
>> Any thoughts on potential issues with running pfSense on this
>> hardware?
>
> The realtek nics they use
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan"
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:02:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] potential pfsense hardware
> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
>
> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
> for use with pfSense:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-H.
> cfm?typ=H
>
> Any thoughts on potential issues with running pfSense on this
> hardware?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sterling Windmill
>
39 matches
Mail list logo
