Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread Hartmut Figge
Daniel: >NoOp wrote: >> Right, a 64bit build looks like this: >> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; >> rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre > >Oh!! Well that then prompts the question > >Where can I find true 64 bit versions?? Well, if you need

Re: Installing SM v.2.x in a HD Partition OTHER Than c:\

2010-01-10 Thread HenriK
HenriK wrote: My memory is that a workaround was required when one wanted to have SM v.1.x installed in a HD partition other than c:\. Does SM v.2.x also require some sort of a workaround if one desires it to be installed in a HD partition other than c:\? If so, where do I find the instructi

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:07:33 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend >> to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things >> work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox upgrades. For on

check only

2010-01-10 Thread user
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

browsing

2010-01-10 Thread user
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

test

2010-01-10 Thread user
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Test only

2010-01-10 Thread user
jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 10/1/2010 16:07, Phillip Jones told the world: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compi

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread Daniel
NoOp wrote: On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1 Note the x86_64... That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine. Robert Kaiser Right, a

Bookmarks, etc, question repost..

2010-01-10 Thread jim
(This is a repost, I got no reply previously. Feel free to ask questions in case I left something pertinent out.) On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:36:32 -0500, jim in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: >On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:03:31 -0800, NoOp in >mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: > > >> but having the abi

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread NoOp
On 01/10/2010 04:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> Revisiting this... regarding the lack of 64bit build on linux. > > Decent Linux distributions offer them, no need for us to do so. > >> Why is it that the 'nightly' builds of SeaMonkey generally include a >> 64bit build, but the fina

Why only 8,192 entries for disk cache?

2010-01-10 Thread Ant
I noticed in both SeaMonkey v1.x and v2.x, its about:cache shows its number of disk cache entries can only go up to 8,192. Why is that? Is this value customizable to be higher? An example of my current SeaMonkey v2.0.1's about:cache: Disk cache device Number of entries: 8192 Maximum stor

Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.

2010-01-10 Thread Ant
On 1/10/2010 1:43 PM PT, Bernard Mercier typed: I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, delete

Re: Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.

2010-01-10 Thread Bernard Mercier
Il se trouve que Ant a formulé : > Hello! > I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I > can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail > address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. > I removed this account, delete

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 10/1/2010 16:07, Phillip Jones told the world: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: >> >>> Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and >>> change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling >

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread NoOp
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Daniel schrieb: >> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; >> rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1 >> >> Note the x86_64... > > That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine. > > Robert Kaiser Right

Can't figure out where SM2 is keeping datas to prompt me to log in twice for usenet/news server.

2010-01-10 Thread Ant
Hello! I am trying to redo my nntp.earthlink.net usenet/newsgroup setup so I can log in with only one prompt since it requires me to enter my e-mail address and its password. However, I am still getting two login prompts. I removed this account, deleted this specific account files and folder

Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.

2010-01-10 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server "home" page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the posi

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this f

Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.

2010-01-10 Thread Rufus
Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server "home" page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the wind

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
JeffM wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: [...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX]. Yup. Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with. Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly has also been mentioned. Folks wh

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated the site has abandoned the site. Well

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a pr

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread JeffM
>>Phillip Jones wrote: >>>[...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX]. >>> Yup. Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with. Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly has also been mentioned. Folks who go to s

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Philip Chee schrieb: The ability to import/migrate *some* data (I think global history) from 1.x profiles will be lost in 1.9.2. Download history actually. From all I know, global history will work for a longer time. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamo

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Phillip Jones schrieb: One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated the site has abandoned the site. Well, what we can't do any

Re: Transfer mail from old account to new

2010-01-10 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: > Phil, it's better to give the url instead of speaking about Google Teach a man to fish etc. > My test using google > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=seamonkey+folder+pane+tools > give me as the first link this page > http://foru

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Martin Freitag wrote: > Philip Chee schrieb: >> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: >>> You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? >> >> Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have >> lit a fire under the Firefox

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: > Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and > change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling > the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer > to use a product inste

Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server "home" page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the wind

Re: History search function

2010-01-10 Thread jim
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:58:26 +0100, Martin Freitag in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: >jim schrieb: >> Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its >> history search function. >> >> I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found >> it wou

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffMwrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open I

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
John Doue wrote: On 1/10/2010 12:13 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Philip Chee schrieb: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Devils_Advocate wrote: Phillip Jones wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: "Rinaldi J. Montessi"wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again. Is SM a dying product that I sh

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Robert Kaiser wrote: Jesse Molina schrieb: I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care abo

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Phillip Jones
Ray_Net wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we pr

Re: Email Address Autocompletion

2010-01-10 Thread George Carden
nr wrote: Using 2.0.1. When entering an email address in the To: box, after entering a few characters, prior versions of SeaMonkey would have the most recently used address at the top of the list (IIRC), but 2.0.1 brings up the list in alphabetical order. Is there any way to get the most recent

Re: History search function

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Freitag
jim schrieb: Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its history search function. I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found it would bring up the original url that contained that text fragment -- though the text fragment was not in

Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link

2010-01-10 Thread Mark Hansen
On 1/9/2010 8:13 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > Press F7 to go into caret browsing mode. Use the keyboard cursor keys to > move it to where you want to start, highlight the text you want to copy, > CTRL-C, and Bob's your Uncle. > > Phil > Thanks, Phil. That's a new one on me! Works like a charm :) ___

History search function

2010-01-10 Thread jim
Sometime back, i had to use IE for a while and noticed something about its history search function. I could search for a remembered text fragment in the http url and if found it would bring up the original url that contained that text fragment -- though the text fragment was not in the URL. It ap

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:02:59 +0100, /Ray_Net/: > Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > >> Don't you thinkg updating SeaMonkey, Firefox or Thunderbird through >> the automated updates mechanism is a piece of cake? > > I hate automatic updates. Just because updates have been automated doesn't mean you need to le

2 Noticed features in SM -- possibly documented (somewhere)

2010-01-10 Thread jim
In the email client -- If you wish to reply to only part of an email, swipe it with the mouse (select it) and hit reply. Only the selected portion is transferred (quoted) to the composition window. In the email client -- Images on the clipboard can be inserted into email composition. (I use ctr

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
Jesse Molina wrote: I did this. I tried it for 90 days. I tried real hard. But, I switched back to Seamonkey and I don't plan on trying to go back to FF/TB any time soon. The first reason was simple utility. Seamonkey is built for people who are experienced at using the Internet and don

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer to use a pr

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Daniel schrieb: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1 Note the x86_64... That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mai

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Devils_Advocate schrieb: Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already? SeaMonkey 2.x is well-alive and should work well with most websites out there, I very rarely have any problems. SeaMonkey 1.x is mostly dead though and if you are still using those versions, you probably s

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Jesse Molina schrieb: I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care about Seamonkey at all.

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Philip Chee schrieb: We had originally planned to keep 2.0 as our current branch for most of 2010. Not true, the plan was to come to a more rapid, ideally roughly 6-month release cycle so that updates to newer releases means fewer changes for users and so an easier upgrade path. And I still t

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
Ray_Net schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: YMMV, but in any case, if we would not have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now. Why ? Because our team would be unable to maintain the whole Mozilla code for the Gecko 1.8.1 branch, and in terms of website support as well as features like cras

Email Address Autocompletion

2010-01-10 Thread nr
Using 2.0.1. When entering an email address in the To: box, after entering a few characters, prior versions of SeaMonkey would have the most recently used address at the top of the list (IIRC), but 2.0.1 brings up the list in alphabetical order. Is there any way to get the most recently used addr

Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac - Mail/News Tabs.

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Freitag
Rufus schrieb: Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the Account/Server "home" page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the window is remembered and op

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
NoOp schrieb: Revisiting this... regarding the lack of 64bit build on linux. Decent Linux distributions offer them, no need for us to do so. Why is it that the 'nightly' builds of SeaMonkey generally include a 64bit build, but the final releases do not? Because we do have too little build p

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Freitag
Philip Chee schrieb: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ? Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5 (Gecko 1.9.1) branch once Firefox

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread John Doue
On 1/10/2010 12:13 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, howeve

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Freitag
Jesse Molina schrieb: Here is a real-word-right-now example of incompatibility with Seamonkey. Earlier today I tried to sell an item on eBay but they use some goofy Javascript that doesn't work with Seamonkey. As a result, I am unable to add pictures to the listing, or save the listing as a tem

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Jesse Molina
I did this. I tried it for 90 days. I tried real hard. But, I switched back to Seamonkey and I don't plan on trying to go back to FF/TB any time soon. The first reason was simple utility. Seamonkey is built for people who are experienced at using the Internet and don't need their hand he

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 1/10/2010 2:10 AM, NoOp typed the following: > On 01/09/2010 07:03 PM, BeeNeR wrote: > .. >> Hmm - only getting the top line - rest of the page is blank (or white on > > And are do you have cookies turned on? > > The site has nothing to do with browser sniffing etc. It works just fine

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/: > Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and > change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling > the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer > to use a product instead of inst

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Arne
JAS wrote: Jesse Molina wrote: Hi! I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care about Se

Re: Frustrated by lack of support by most Add-on projects

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
Jesse Molina wrote: Hi! I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey. I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps, but I really don't think Firefox developers care about Seamonkey a

Re: Back to 1.18 - More

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: YMMV, but in any case, if we would not have moved to it, SeaMonkey would be dead by now. Why ? The Gecko 1.8 branch was abandoned by the Mozilla Core devs a long, long time ago. Only security and s

Re: Transfer mail from old account to new

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:44:31 -0200, MCBastos wrote: Oh crap, turns out that there IS an even easier way... Chortle! Philip Chee has made available a version of Folderpane Tools that will install directly on Seamonkey with no need of disabling compatibility check or anythi

Re: Transfer mail from old account to new

2010-01-10 Thread Ray_Net
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 9/1/2010 18:57, OldTimer told the world: The install instruction at the download site (www.chuonthis.com)stated to save the file to [SeaMonkey] but I don't know which file to use. 1) c:\Documents & Settings\sony\Application Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey ? (Ther

Re: Is SM a dying product?

2010-01-10 Thread Daniel
David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote: JeffM wrote : Devils_Advocate wrote: I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey, then I have to open Internet Explorer

Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link

2010-01-10 Thread Hartmut Figge
Philip Chee: [http://i.am.a.link] >Press F7 to go into caret browsing mode. Use the keyboard cursor keys to >move it to where you want to start, OK until here, but then ... >highlight the text you want to copy, ... how? No luck with my SM 2.1 to highlight only the 'am'. With the mouse. Another

Re: Selecting arbitrary text from a link

2010-01-10 Thread Daniel
Mark Hansen wrote: On 1/9/2010 10:04 AM, jim wrote: If I read you right, sure you can. But beware, it takes two mouseclicks! Click on the link and the whole link is selected. Click again and the entire link is unselected, but any portion can now be swiped with the mouse and selected for copy

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2010-01-10 Thread Daniel
NoOp wrote: On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Subject: says it all. :) I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7 as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically, about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm