Re: SM2.2 odd installation behaviour

On 7/24/2011 12:59 AM, Geoff Walker wrote: Updated my OS to MacOS Lion earlier this week. Unfortunately there are some serious known issues with MacOS Lion at this time, those issues should be fixed with SeaMonkey 2.3 (such as 2.3 beta 1) I am unsure if those issues you mention are [all] ca

SM2.2 odd installation behaviour

Updated my OS to MacOS Lion earlier this week. SM Update today offered me the 2.2 update which I accepted. On starting the update it first brought up a "Checking Compatibility of Add-ons" window, which warned that "This may take a few minutes". After an hour I gave up and pressed the cancel b

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

Ant wrote: On 7/20/2011 6:20 PM PT, Paul B. Gallagher typed: http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=r&c=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459&z=4 The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine. Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing la

Re: Welcome to SeaMonkey Mail & Newsgroups!

stan wrote: I got latest update and would like to remove annoying screen in my email window titled "Welcome to SeaMonkey Mail& Newsgroups!" Where is the magic box to unchecked. Edit / Preferences... / Mail & Newsgroups / Mail Start Page. Uncheck it, or pick your own location to display. -JW

Welcome to SeaMonkey Mail & Newsgroups!

I got latest update and would like to remove annoying screen in my email window titled "Welcome to SeaMonkey Mail & Newsgroups!" Where is the magic box to unchecked. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.m

Re: Password Manager workaround

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:45:04 -0700, /David E. Ross/: The simple tweak in nsLoginManager.js that worked in SM 2.0.x no longer works in SM 2.1 or 2.2 even if I unzip omni.jar to get at nsLoginManager.js and then rezip after doing the tweak. This was described at

Re: Password Manager workaround

On 7/23/11 1:43 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:11:48 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: > >> Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, >> additionally: >> >> let lm = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/login-manager;1"] >> .getService(Components.interfaces.

Visited Links' Color and about:config

For some reason, my Visited Links do not change color from the non-visited ones. I noticed this recently on the mozillaZine Forums and also Google groups (using SeaMonkey 2.2). However, if I have the about:config page open (using the ViewAbout extension) the different colors appear, but once I

Personal toolbar and delete

Running a Mac with Leopard and Sea Monkey 2.2. Under Seamonkey 2.1 and using a personal toolbar drop down menu it was possible to right click and delete an unwanted site. Seamonkey 2.2 will only delete unwanted sites via top menu 'Manage Bookmarks'. The 2.1 right click > Delete was very usefu

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

On 7/20/2011 6:20 PM PT, Paul B. Gallagher typed: http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=r&c=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459&z=4 The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine. Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing label, in case

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

On 7/23/2011 5:17 PM PhillipJones submitted the following: Rufus wrote: Personally, I'll champion the 1.1.x series because even though I didn't use the Forms Manager there were enough people here who did to make it seem a very desired feature. 2.0.14 is working just fine for me...I'll be stickin

Re: will there be an update to make classic default .7 work with newest Seamonkey?

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:30:49 -0400, /Acharya Swami Rudra Kali Das/: I use Classic Default theme and the newer Seamonkey update does not support this. Any time frame on an update for this add on theme...thanks I guess you should best contact the theme author: https://addons.mozilla.org/user/49734

will there be an update to make classic default .7 work with newest Seamonkey?

I use Classic Default theme and the newer Seamonkey update does not support this. Any time frame on an update for this add on theme...thanks Rudra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Rufus wrote: Personally, I'll champion the 1.1.x series because even though I didn't use the Forms Manager there were enough people here who did to make it seem a very desired feature. 2.0.14 is working just fine for me...I'll be sticking with it. I agree. But if you have to go to 2 series. th

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Ken wrote: And, if so, might somebody be kind enough to recommend me a good, stable version to install - with which I'm prepared to stay until I die. You must know that with SM you always need to upgrade, upgrade, upgrade and upgrade forever The developpers don't want to maintain ONE st

Re: Password Manager workaround

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:11:48 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally: let lm = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/login-manager;1"] .getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager); function fillForms(doc) {

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Mike wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Please, I do not want tabs. At all. Period. Maybe at least give them a try for a while? If you did, fine. I just know that change is inevitable. Changes in browsers, OS's, Office suites, etc bug /me/ sometimes because I'm used to how it work

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Robert Kaiser wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb: I have managed to find a work-around : simply enter "about:addons" in the location field and hit return; the current page will be replaced by the add-on manager, and a return can be made to the previous page when use of the add-on ma

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

PhillipJones wrote: Paul wrote: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based

Re: Password Manager workaround

Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:11:48 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames, additionally: let lm = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/login-manager;1"] .getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager); function fillForms(doc) { let forms = doc

Re: Unwanted tab opening from hyperlink in e-mail

Keith Whaley wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Hallo. I have just upgraded to Seamonkey V2.2, and for the first time, have encountered a change behaviour which is both unexpected and unwanted. In all previous versions, clicking on an http: hyperlink in an e-ma

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:26:54 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: I've also mailed the extension author asking him to include SeaMonkey in the official version. Unfortunately the author has replied he's not going to support SeaMon

Re: [Linux] Updating 2.0.14 to 2.2 a disaster for the bookmarks.

Bernard Mercier a formulé ce vrijdag : > Up to now I happily migrated from 1.x.x to 2.0.14 through the proposed update > facility. > When the proposal came to update to 2.2 I was confident to choose to update. > Horror > When 2.2 openend I didn't have my bookmarks any more. > I looked in the for

Re: More on unwanted tabs

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/23/11 6:06 AM, Lee wrote: On 7/23/11, David E. Ross wrote: On 7/22/11 8:23 PM, Lee wrote: On 7/22/11, David E. Ross wrote: On 7/22/11 4:38 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: With help from Michael and WLS, I have now managed to get e-mail http: hyperlinks

Re: Method to migrate blocked cookies & images from 2.0.14 to 2.2? (Win XP)

On 7/23/11 11:50 AM, D. K. Kraft wrote: > I'm currently using SM 2.0.14 on Win XP SP3 + security patches, and am > gearing up for an update to 2.2. However, given the significant > architectural changes to 2.2, I plan to do a clean install of the program, > then manually migrate my profile. I pla

Method to migrate blocked cookies & images from 2.0.14 to 2.2? (Win XP)

I'm currently using SM 2.0.14 on Win XP SP3 + security patches, and am gearing up for an update to 2.2. However, given the significant architectural changes to 2.2, I plan to do a clean install of the program, then manually migrate my profile. I place my profile files within a whimsically-named

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Personally, I'll champion the 1.1.x series because even though I didn't use the Forms Manager there were enough people here who did to make it seem a very desired feature. 2.0.14 is working just fine for me...I'll be sticking with it. -- - Rufus PhillipJones wrote: Best version ever pu

Re: 2.2 upgrade

WLS wrote: It's your choice - use whatever best suits you. As a side remark, I find IE Tab one of the most useless extensions there are. Sorry to take the topic somewhat off topic, but just what site(s) or site would I require IE Tab to view? I have never installed or found a need for that ex

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: I guess that's a 2.1.x thing...one more reason I'll stick with 2.0.14 for now. Well, if you love tabs, as you said, then it's no problem that they open in tabs. I really don't understand what you are saying. Robert Kaiser I'm saying that it sounds like

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Paul wrote: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based programs. Don't peo

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Best version ever put out in the 2 serious is 2.0x version. From 2. on goes down hill fast. Ken wrote: Gratitude to Philip Taylor for his response. Thanks, Philip. I saw one of your earlier posts (I think it was yours) about unwanted tabs in SM 2.2 and understood and sympathised completely.

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

> Philip Taylor. who understands the "the world must move on" philosophy, > but who nonetheless finds Windows/XP, Classic View, Office 2003 > and so on infinitely more user friendly than any of the more recent > developments). And 4x3 screens on laptops! ___

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Mike wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Please, I do not want tabs. At all. Period. Maybe at least give them a try for a while? If you did, fine. I just know that change is inevitable. Changes in browsers, OS's, Office suites, etc bug /me/ sometimes because I'm used to how it work

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

On 7/23/11 3:16 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > In endeavouring to persuade Seamonkey 2.2 to behave more > as I would wish (and as earlier versions always did), > I find that I am making far more use than normal of > > about:config > > What makes this so intensely frustrating

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:16:08 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Philip Chee schrieb: >> There are at least two bugs filed, but IanN and by Neil. No need to file >> another one. It appears to be a core XUL bug. > > Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to > work around on

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:47:41 +0100, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > This may seem a naive question, but how on earth can those > several thousand preferences not already be documented ? How This is open source. Developers hate documenting anything. Often the only documentation is the so

Re: More on unwanted tabs

On 7/23/11 6:06 AM, Lee wrote: > On 7/23/11, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 7/22/11 8:23 PM, Lee wrote: >>> On 7/22/11, David E. Ross wrote: On 7/22/11 4:38 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > With help from Michael and WLS, I have now managed > to get e-mail http: hyperlinks t

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT), /Paul/: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with

Re: 2.2 upgrade

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:39:02 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/: I've started getting the automatic upgrade to SM 2.2 box; but when I naively started the upgrade I got a notice that there is no version of IE Tab that works with SM 2.2. So I aborted the upgrade since I find that IE Tab

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser wrote: > > Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to > work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based programs. Don't people work ou

Re: 2.2 upgrade

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:39:02 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/: I've started getting the automatic upgrade to SM 2.2 box; but when I naively started the upgrade I got a notice that there is no version of IE Tab that works with SM 2.2. So I aborted the upgrade since I find that IE Tab is one of the few extension

Re: Unwanted tab opening from hyperlink in e-mail

Michael Gordon wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Hallo. I have just upgraded to Seamonkey V2.2, and for the first time, have encountered a change behaviour which is both unexpected and unwanted. In all previous versions, clicking on an http: hyperlink in an e-mail message caused a n

Re: this is what i hink ...

E. Wong wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/21/2011 6:15 PM, km wrote: ... it is gud for people to make comments abt what needs to be fixed with 'sm' BUTT these same people should suggest a way to implement their solution . ... if you are NOT technical you should STFU! I'm not sure if yo

2.2 upgrade

I've started getting the automatic upgrade to SM 2.2 box; but when I naively started the upgrade I got a notice that there is no version of IE Tab that works with SM 2.2. So I aborted the upgrade since I find that IE Tab is one of the few extensions that I use a lot. So I came here and starte

H.D. Icon Q.

SM 2.0.14 iMac w/OS 10.6.8 Suddenly, the other day, just as my ext. backup H.D. went south, my Internal H.D. icon turned to display like a Time Machine drive, with the 3/4 arrowed circle and clock hands inside. It used to display as an ordinary enclosed disc drive. I can derive no clue from

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:10:17 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:47:41 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/: Philip Chee wrote: Alternatively find someone who has already done all that. Sadly that potentia

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Try downloading the "whats_that_preference-0.3-fx.xpi" extension file locally. > At the end, ZIP the unpacked and modified thing back, preserving the file name > (i.e. having *.xpi extension) and drop into SeaMonkey to install. Works fine for me. Excellent, many th

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:47:41 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/: Philip Chee wrote: Alternatively find someone who has already done all that. Sadly that potential solution, interesting though it is, is apparently not

Re: Automatic Upgrade 2.0.14 to 2.2?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Justin, to get the auto-update from 2.0.14 to 2.2, is it just a case of Help->Check for updates and then apply the update found?? I'm not Justin, but your words just as good, Robert! but yes, that should just be it. And you should even get an offer auto

Re: Automatic Upgrade 2.0.14 to 2.2?

On 7/23/2011 8:44 AM, Daniel wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/22/2011 6:45 PM, John Mckenzie wrote: On 7/21/2011 9:44 AM, Larry wrote: Currently on 2.0.14 on XP SP3. Used to get automatic upgrades through the 2.0.x series. Did I miss these for 2.1 and then 2.2? Or is that still to come?

Re: Automatic Upgrade 2.0.14 to 2.2?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/22/2011 6:45 PM, John Mckenzie wrote: On 7/21/2011 9:44 AM, Larry wrote: Currently on 2.0.14 on XP SP3. Used to get automatic upgrades through the 2.0.x series. Did I miss these for 2.1 and then 2.2? Or is that still to come? (There are some concerns about the n

Re: National Geographic: Why can't I see their maps?

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/22/11 1:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I have success with this site, and I have disabled the automatic spoofing of Firefox. My UA string is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 SeaMonkey/2.2 I tried spoofing as "SeaMonkey/

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb: Is there any obvious reason why the "about:config" interface cannot/does not support hyperlinks to the relevant documentation, rather than requiring the user to search for it in hyperspace ? Yes, it's not supposed to be used by normal users, and it give

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Rufus schrieb: I guess that's a 2.1.x thing...one more reason I'll stick with 2.0.14 for now. Well, if you love tabs, as you said, then it's no problem that they open in tabs. I really don't understand what you are saying. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how p

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb: I have managed to find a work-around : simply enter "about:addons" in the location field and hit return; the current page will be replaced by the add-on manager, and a return can be made to the previous page when use of the add-on manager is complete usin

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Philip Chee schrieb: There are at least two bugs filed, but IanN and by Neil. No need to file another one. It appears to be a core XUL bug. Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine -

Re: More on unwanted tabs

On 7/23/11, David E. Ross wrote: > On 7/22/11 8:23 PM, Lee wrote: >> On 7/22/11, David E. Ross wrote: >>> On 7/22/11 4:38 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: With help from Michael and WLS, I have now managed to get e-mail http: hyperlinks to open in a new window, not in a

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:16:55 +0100, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Is there any obvious reason why the "about:config" interface cannot/does not support hyperlinks to the relevant documentation, rather than requiring the user to search for it in hyperspace ? Mos

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

On 7/23/11, Ken wrote: > Gratitude to Philip Taylor for his response. Thanks, Philip. I saw one > of your earlier posts (I think it was yours) about unwanted tabs in SM > 2.2 and understood and sympathised completely. > > Please, anyone, what earlier version of SM might you recommend as > partic

Re: More on unwanted tabs

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:38:17 +0100, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > With help from Michael and WLS, I have now managed > to get e-mail http: hyperlinks to open in a new > window, not in a new tab. > > But now I find that the add-on manager opens in > a new tab (I have to use the add-on m

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:07:07 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: > stevesteve schrieb: >> Please how do I get my old version of SeaMonkey back!? >> >> I updated to v2.2 in good faith. The new version is a nightmare. >> Have you tried to right-click? All I want to do is copy-paste and >> spell check, all

Re: about:config -- why no hyperhelp

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:16:55 +0100, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > In endeavouring to persuade Seamonkey 2.2 to behave more > as I would wish (and as earlier versions always did), > I find that I am making far more use than normal of > > about:config > > What makes this so intens

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

On 7/23/2011 6:54 AM Ken submitted the following: Gratitude to Philip Taylor for his response. Thanks, Philip. I saw one of your earlier posts (I think it was yours) about unwanted tabs in SM 2.2 and understood and sympathised completely. Please, anyone, what earlier version of SM might you reco

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Gratitude to Philip Taylor for his response. Thanks, Philip. I saw one of your earlier posts (I think it was yours) about unwanted tabs in SM 2.2 and understood and sympathised completely. Please, anyone, what earlier version of SM might you recommend as particularly stable? Also - slightl

about:config -- why no hyperhelp

In endeavouring to persuade Seamonkey 2.2 to behave more as I would wish (and as earlier versions always did), I find that I am making far more use than normal of about:config What makes this so intensely frustrating is that there is no hyperhelp associated with the keys, and I have to l

Re: Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Ken -- Hi guys. I have already posted the following as an adjunct to other threads but got no response. I will clarify below what I am seeking: >Looks like I can't go back to SM 2.0.18 (I think it was - but it may have been 2.0.11). The 'Known Issues' note for SM 2.2 is headed (in bold), 'Da

Separate post: please help, I want to go back to an earlier version of SM

Hi guys. I have already posted the following as an adjunct to other threads but got no response. I will clarify below what I am seeking: >Looks like I can't go back to SM 2.0.18 (I think it was - but it may have been 2.0.11). The 'Known Issues' note for SM 2.2 is headed (in bold), 'Data los

Re: More on unwanted tabs

Rufus wrote: David E. Ross wrote: That does not work for the Add-ons Manager or the Data Manager. They still open in tabs in the window where they were requested. I guess that's a 2.1.x thing...one more reason I'll stick with 2.0.14 for now. I have managed to find a work-around : simpl

Re: More on unwanted tabs

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/22/11 9:31 PM, Rufus wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: With help from Michael and WLS, I have now managed to get e-mail http: hyperlinks to open in a new window, not in a new tab. But now I find that the add-on manager opens in a new tab (I have to use th