David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/19/2010 1:04 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
The remember the password function does not work after installing
2.0.2 and then 2.0.3 for my main profile. I have several other profiles
where it works okay. Is there anything in about:config I can look for to
set it to True or
The remember the password function does not work after installing
2.0.2 and then 2.0.3 for my main profile. I have several other profiles
where it works okay. Is there anything in about:config I can look for to
set it to True or False to make the remember function work
Why do I get an empty chatzilla after migrate? No preference, no scripts, empty
virgin CZ like I downloaded it from the website.
It's bad enough that users have to migrate every profile totally manually if
they have more than one, but the CZ didn't migrate it looks like a clean new
install.
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Why do I get an empty chatzilla after migrate? No preference, no
scripts, empty virgin CZ like I downloaded it from the website.
It's bad enough that users have to migrate every profile totally
manually if they have more than one, but the CZ didn't migrate it looks
like
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Jeffrey Needle wrote:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working
well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows)
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Jeffrey Needle wrote:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working
well in SM 2.0.2. Get
On 2/19/2010 1:04 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote:
The remember the password function does not work after installing
2.0.2 and then 2.0.3 for my main profile. I have several other profiles
where it works okay. Is there anything in about:config I can look for to
set it to True or False to make the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Jeffrey Needle wrote:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working
Jeffrey Needle wrote:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
Lightning 1.0b2pre installed with no problems and seems to be working
well in SM 2.0.2. Get the latest (Windows) nightly build from this
dominique wrote:
Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server)
Dom
Thanks!
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Jeffrey Needle wrote, On 2/16/2010 8:44 AM:
Is there a newsgroup for Lightning support? Or is there some other way
for me to ask some questions? I'm having some problems. Thanks.
mozilla.support.calendar is the place (same news server)
Dom
___
Hello
I know that the there is an app for thunderbird (vs 2 or 3)
which allows you to use an external editor. Unfortunately
this app does not work for seamonkey.
- how different is the code between the mail
application for Seamonkey and Thunderbird?
- does anybody know about
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS
Evan Davidson wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up
Graham wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Just had opportunity today to try it. failed. I even clicked the button,
it added to ToolBar.
Fail? Why is that a fail? Sure, it adds a button to the toolbar, but
that's not all of it (and you can remove that button).
It failed in that it didn't fill out a
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Now where are all those people screaming around time and again,
demanding bring back form manager? It'll be interesting to see what
they say, or if they react at all to this.
All those people aren't using SM 2 yet, so we can't test it
You can.
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Spikowski wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Now where are all those people screaming around time and again,
demanding bring back form manager? It'll be interesting to see what
they say, or if they react at all to this.
All those people aren't using SM 2 yet, so we can't test
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:13 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:13 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1 I
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even
Hi!
I've just ported Autofill Forms to SeaMonkey 2.0. Before I push this
public I would like some brave souls to beta test this. I've gotten it
to install and the UI to show up and there are no obvious JS errors.
Since I don't normally auto-fill forms even with SeaMonkey 1.1 I haven't
tested
Hello,
I am trying to upgrade to 2.0 from 1.1.18. but I can not get the File,
Open, Save.. menu to appear in the browser. I'm have both Firefox 3.5.4
and IE8 installed. I have tried the following.
Here's what to do (using Win-XP): in the browser navigator window
type about:config
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
Where can I find true 64 bit versions??
On Jan 11, 2:24 am, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then
On 01/11/2010 02:24 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;
rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1
Note the x86_64...
That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine.
Robert Kaiser
Right, a 64bit
On 01/10/2010 04:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Revisiting this... regarding the lack of 64bit build on linux.
Decent Linux distributions offer them, no need for us to do so.
Why is it that the 'nightly' builds of SeaMonkey generally include a
64bit build, but the final
NoOp wrote:
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;
rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1
Note the x86_64...
That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine.
Robert Kaiser
Right,
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
Where can I find true 64 bit versions??
Well, if you need such a
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7
as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically,
about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the
Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:24:31 +0100, Ray_Net
tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
very poor choice--a well designed program would not require that kind of
work.
Fully agreed, and as a volunteer project we like any help we can
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks,
Tom wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on
Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
/snip/
I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit
View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main
menu bar. whereas other items such as send address
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
/snip/
I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit
View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main
menu bar. whereas other items
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
/snip/
I always consider the Menu bar that contains the major task (File Edit
View Option Tools window and help and other at the Main level) the Main
menu
Phillip Jones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom wrote:
snip
I suspect the is some type of short cut key for
Linux/UNIX people as well.
Funny you mention this, Phillip.as I was reading your reply, I was
thinking 'Should I be using the Windows key in Linux.'
I suppose, if I
Daniel wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom wrote:
snip
I suspect the is some type of short cut key for
Linux/UNIX people as well.
Funny you mention this, Phillip.as I was reading your reply, I was
thinking 'Should I be using the Windows key in Linux.'
I
On 31.12.2009 20:55, Phillip Jones wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
In addition to the other responses, I would note that almost every
Windows program will respond to CTRL-P, even those that
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
In addition to the other responses, I would note that almost every
Windows program will respond to
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
Click on the menubar and hold, a menu should pop up choose customize.
when menu opens drag the printer icon to desired location
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
Click on the menubar and hold, a menu should pop up choose customize.
when menu
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Thanks, Tom
Click on the
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking on FILE--PRINT?
Phillip Jones wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.12.2009 19:49, Mark Hansen wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 12/31/2009 5:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom wrote:
I can't see how to add a Print button to my email client in Version
2.0.1. Is the only way to print an email by clicking
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:10:04 -0800 (PST), Billy billy...@comcast.net in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this. I now
have completely lost my entire email address books
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:31:43 -0500, Mort m...@cloud9.net in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote
snip
Your mention of the name abookhowever, makes me think you are talking
about you e-mail addressbook. If this is your problem, click on the
Addressbook Icon at the bottom left of your mail screen,
All the users email is on one server they access it through SSH.
What I mean is that seemingly to move to 2.x will mean huge loss of
features and all kinds of tricks to use 2.x
I never said users must set up their own email, and they do not here. It
is all on one server.
I think you place
ad...@mmri.us schrieb:
Does this mean that, it is eventually the end of all 1.x mail?
What about all my filters? Stored Passwords? etc
I use this in a corporate environment and it is going to be very painful
to tell everyone that this is now the end of their email and they will
have to
I realized that Seamonkey 2.0 and 2.01 behaves different than previous
versions
during installation.
It does not simply overwrite the previous version but installes another
file under programme/seamonkey. The previous versions have been
installed at
programme/mozilla.org/seamonkey.
When I
Klaus Weber schrieb:
I realized that Seamonkey 2.0 and 2.01 behaves different than previous
versions
during installation.
It does not simply overwrite the previous version but installes another
file under programme/seamonkey. The previous versions have been
installed at
programme/mozilla.org
I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this. I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them). More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
also gone.
I
Billy wrote:
I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this. I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them). More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:24:31 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
That's a good idea,... but what programming knowledge is required to
help ? (if we don't have it , should we learn it ? (i have knowledge of
cobol, fortran, rpg, Linc-4GL, VisualBasic4.0, DMSII, UPL SDL,
Mainframes-Harware, MCPII ... would
of your address books, e-mail, settings, etc. are stored in your
Profile. None of the instructions should have told you to delete
your profile.
It sounds more like you installed SM 2.0 and your SM 1.1.X profile was
not migrated properly. When you run SM 2.0, you won't see any of your
personal data
setting up everything.
I think it is a bit irresponsible to just drop all users on the path to 2.0.
Sure it is trivial for me to write a bash script to do all you mention
below but I am not so sure it will be easy to decipher how to create the
same user accounts and folders on 2.0 before
Billy wrote:
I followed the instruction to completely clear my older version
of Seamonkey and have now paid a terrible price for doing this. I now
have completely lost my entire email address books (3 of them). More
importantly, my complete bookmark file with many years of research was
John wrote:
very poor choice--a well designed program would not require that kind of
work.
Fully agreed, and as a volunteer project we like any help we can get to
actually work on improving that design.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
very poor choice--a well designed program would not require that kind of
work.
Fully agreed, and as a volunteer project we like any help we can get to
actually work on improving that design.
That's a good idea,... but what programming knowledge is required
I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But
now, when I try to send an email I get this message:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
smtp.earthlink.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you
marstokyo wrote:
I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But
now, when I try to send an email I get this message:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
smtp.earthlink.net. It does not support authentication
marstokyo wrote:
I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But
now, when I try to send an email I get this message:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
smtp.earthlink.net. It does not support authentication
On Dec 21, 12:54 pm, marstokyo marsto...@gmail.com wrote:
I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0. I like it for its mail feature. But
now, when I try to send an email I get this message:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked
in the selection what should be imported.
After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still
shows blank mail folders.
If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want to configure email
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked
in the selection what should be imported.
After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still
shows blank mail folders.
If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want
of SeaMonkey 2.0. All I found was a
short thread from June 2008 that intimated that Composer was not being
supported any longer. That is too bad. Of course, if Kompozer was
still being updated, and it was integrated into SeaMonkey, that would
be great. I use Kompozer (and wondered if it had
Mobius wrote:
I have looked around for the specific information I was looking for
regarding the Composer component of SeaMonkey 2.0. All I found was a
short thread from June 2008 that intimated that Composer was not being
supported any longer. That is too bad. Of course, if Kompozer was
still
Devil's Advocate schrieb:
Ok, I'm finally trying to setup and use SM 2.0. It seems decent but it
didn't import my passwords from 1.1.18.
How can I do that?
It should have asked you to migrate your profile on the first start.
You can start migration manually, too:
http://kb.mozillazine.org
Ray_Net wrote:
In SM 1.1.xx the second method was prefered because the first method did
not clean all registry entries. After a while, there are in the registry
traces about 1.1.9 , 1.1.10, 1.1.11, 1.1.12, etc
Is this little bug corrected ? Sure ?
As far as I know, it is. We completely
Le 11 décembre 2009, »Q« a écrit :
Not in 2.0, but in a future version there should be the option to have
them display as long as the cursor is stationary over the element.
It's already in the Firefox 3.6 betas.
There's a 'No Tooltip Timeout' extension for current versions of Fx,
but I don't
Lucas Levrel wrote:
1) force its installation
- in about:config, create a new string general.useragent.extra.firefox and
set it to Firefox/3.5
- in about:config set extensions.checkCompatibility to false
- install from the above link
This isn't how you should go about things. It's a bit
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/16/2009 3:31 PM, taz043 wrote:
When I opened SeaMonkey this afternoon it started automatically to
update itself to 2.01. How do I shut off automatic updating? I don't
want any software to update itself without asking me first.
taz
On the SeaMonkey menu bar,
OBones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/16/2009 3:31 PM, taz043 wrote:
When I opened SeaMonkey this afternoon it started automatically to
update itself to 2.01. How do I shut off automatic updating? I don't
want any software to update itself without asking me first.
taz
On the SeaMonkey
OBones wrote:
On the SeaMonkey menu bar, select [Edit Preferences]. In the
Preferences window, select [Advanced Software Install]. On the
Software Installation pane, uncheck the checkboxes under Updates.
Unlike some other update capabilities, however, you will then no longer
get even a
Ok, I'm finally trying to setup and use SM 2.0. It seems decent but it
didn't import my passwords from 1.1.18.
How can I do that?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support
Hi Hawker,
I now have Image Zoom 0.4-mod working in SeaMonkey 2.0 and Thunderbird 3.0.
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#imagezoom
Changes in Image Zoom 0.4 Mod.
+ install.rdf and chrome.manifest updated for SeaMonkey 2.0.
+ Revived overlay_mozilla.xul from v0.3 and
synced
the
mangled internet situation, and reinstalled 1.1.18, and downloaded 2.0.
Now, before I do anything , I wanted to let you know I have almost
nothing on this reconstituted version. Would everything transfer over to
2.0 if I were to reinstall 2.0, now
When I opened SeaMonkey this afternoon it started automatically to
update itself to 2.01. How do I shut off automatic updating? I don't
want any software to update itself without asking me first.
taz
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 12/16/2009 3:31 PM, taz043 wrote:
When I opened SeaMonkey this afternoon it started automatically to
update itself to 2.01. How do I shut off automatic updating? I don't
want any software to update itself without asking me first.
taz
On the SeaMonkey menu bar, select [Edit
John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: Well, I had a man I trust come and clean out the
mangled internet situation, and reinstalled 1.1.18, and downloaded 2.0.
Now, before I do anything , I wanted to let you know I have almost
nothing on this reconstituted version. Would everything transfer over
David E. Ross wrote:
Unlike some other update capabilities, however, you will then no longer
get even a notice about updates. For SeaMonkey itself, updates are
announced in this newsgroup.
You still can manually go into Help Check For Updates... though to
trigger installing updates
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Unlike some other update capabilities, however, you will then no longer
get even a notice about updates. For SeaMonkey itself, updates are
announced in this newsgroup.
You still can manually go into Help Check For Updates... though to
trigger
NoOp wrote:
On 12/13/2009 05:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter
Manger|Filters for:) and elect to
On 12/14/2009 01:12 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/13/2009 05:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager
Daniel wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser, Leonidas Jones, NoOp, Mark Hansen: Clean slate, new
thread. However, it does have to start with the suggestions of Robert
Kaiser. First, I reinstalled 2.0, it seems the profile and the bookmarks
were still there from my first attempt, which
Daniel wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser, Leonidas Jones, NoOp, Mark Hansen: Clean slate, new
thread. However, it does have to start with the suggestions of Robert
Kaiser. First, I reinstalled 2.0, it seems the profile and the bookmarks
were still there from my first attempt, which
John Boyle wrote:
To Daniel: Well, I must have done something wrong, as I managed to
delete the profile as you suggested, plus all my 1.1.18 DATA!
That's strange as well, but maybe you deleted the whole Mozilla folder
instead of just the SeaMonkey one below it - and the Mozilla one
contains
and click on create filter.
This doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps I'm just not understanding
what you're trying to say. Also, perhaps it's different between SM 1.1.X
and SM 2.0.
In SM 1.1.X, you create message filters. They are created for the account,
not for a mailbox. You create them
On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
each account or mailbox has it own set of filters.
And?
If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter
Manger|Filters for:) and elect to 'Run selected filter(s) on: xyz
what happens? Is that not available on
101 - 200 of 1713 matches
Mail list logo
