On 4/02/2017 7:17 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
You may have inadvertently reset (cleared) the training data, in
which case SM will have forgotten all it ever learned and started
over. If you resume training it, it'll eventually learn again, but
PhillipJones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
You may have inadvertently reset (cleared) the training data, in
which case SM will have forgotten all it ever learned and started
over. If you resume training it, it'll eventually learn again, but
not in one day.
Don't remember ever resetting
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
You don't I've been marking the same sends and subjects on a
Particular email add res as junk then delete and I still get the
same Identical subjects and senders day after day after day. I
thought when you marked a subject and sender as spam it
PhillipJones wrote:
You don't I've been marking the same sends and subjects on a
Particular email add res as junk then delete and I still get the
same Identical subjects and senders day after day after day. I
thought when you marked a subject and sender as spam it was supposed
to go
sean wrote:
Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:
On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
[snippage]
Are you using "contains"?
Yes, I'm using contains... its not that I dunno how to filter it out of
my inbox, but I like defeating the source. I've had
Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:
On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
[snippage]
Are you using "contains"?
Yes, I'm using contains... its not that I dunno how to filter it out of
my inbox, but I like defeating the source. I've had zero spam for a
sean wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:
>> On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
[snippage]
>>> Are you using "contains"?
>>
>> Yes, I'm using contains... its not that I dunno how to filter it out of
>> my inbox, but I like defeating the source. I've had zero spam for a
>> number
On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:
On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
On 01/17/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
[snippage]
No, not headers. By the "nature" I meant general content.
same sorts of things from back in the olden days, viagra, cialis,
insurance, rate
On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
On 01/17/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
[snippage]
No, not headers. By the "nature" I meant general content.
same sorts of things from back in the olden days, viagra, cialis,
insurance, rate notices, gift cards for you, $100 amaz0n
sean wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
>> [snippage]
>> No, not headers. By the "nature" I meant general content.
>
> same sorts of things from back in the olden days, viagra, cialis,
> insurance, rate notices, gift cards for you, $100 amaz0n rwards, this 1
> thing,
So then,
On 01/17/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
On 01/10/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net) about a
flood of new spam from (AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to matter
how many times I mark their whole domain
sean wrote:
> On 01/10/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
>> sean wrote:
>>> funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net) about a
>>> flood of new spam from (AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to matter
>>> how many times I mark their whole domain as spam, I seem to be getting
On 01/10/2017 06:06 PM, Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net) about a
flood of new spam from (AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to matter
how many times I mark their whole domain as spam, I seem to be getting
exponentially more...
A
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I ordered some machine stuff out of China on the
Internet and have gotten the items
quickly and w/o BS (Spam). But just lately I
think the last one sold my address to spammers.
COACH Outlet
Pandora
DoctorBill wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I ordered some machine stuff out of China on the
Internet and have gotten the items
quickly and w/o BS (Spam). But just lately I
think the last one sold my address to spammers.
COACH Outlet
Pandora Store
If I understood what to
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I ordered some machine stuff out of China on the
Internet and have gotten the items
quickly and w/o BS (Spam). But just lately I
think the last one sold my address to spammers.
COACH Outlet
Pandora Store
If I understood what to do with the SM
DoctorBill wrote:
I ordered some machine stuff out of China on the Internet and have gotten the
items
quickly and w/o BS (Spam). But just lately I think the last one sold my
address to spammers.
COACH Outlet
Pandora Store
If I understood what to do with the SM Filter(s),
maybe I could at
DoctorBill wrote:
> If I understood what to do with the SM Filter(s),
> maybe I could at least get those dumped as they come in.
If you haven't yet .. start with the Bayesian filter tool which is a part
of SeaMonkey. You have to train it.
> My problem is that if I don't work with these tools
DoctorBill wrote:
I ordered some machine stuff out of China on the Internet and have
gotten the items quickly and w/o BS (Spam). But just lately I think
the last one sold my address to spammers. COACH Outlet Pandora Store
It's possible that the merchant sold your address, but there's some
On 1/11/2017 9:51 AM, NFN Smith wrote:
[snip]
Several years ago, when I left Cox, my new provider provided me
an email account. I don't remember even what the address is, and
I don't think I ever activated the account, because for years,
I've done my mail through a dedicated mail service
NFN Smith wrote:
Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
funny, I was just on the line with our ISP
(freaking cox.net) about
a flood of new spam from
(AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to
matter how many times I mark their whole domain
as spam, I seem to
be getting exponentially more...
A WHOIS
Richard Alan wrote:
sean wrote:
funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net) about
a flood of new spam from (AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to
matter how many times I mark their whole domain as spam, I seem to
be getting exponentially more...
A WHOIS lookup indicates
sean wrote:
> funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net) about a
> flood of new spam from (AT)onmicrosoft.com... doesn't seem to matter
> how many times I mark their whole domain as spam, I seem to be getting
> exponentially more...
A WHOIS lookup indicates that
DoctorBill wrote:
I used to know this, but do not remember anymore.
I can't get the filter to work.
Using SM 2.33.1.
Suddenly getting "Pandora Outlet" adverts and unsubscribing must not be
in the Chinese Lexicon !
DoctorBill
funny, I was just on the line with our ISP (freaking cox.net)
NFN Smith composed on 2017-01-10 09:28 (UTC-0700):
There's more than one way of designating a message as Junk or Not Junk,
when viewing the folder list pane:
- Use lower case "j" to mark as junk, capital "J" to mark as not junk
- Right click on the message, go to "Mark", then select either
DoctorBill wrote:
I used to know this, but do not remember anymore. I can't get the
filter to work. Using SM 2.33.1.
Suddenly getting "Pandora Outlet" adverts and unsubscribing must not
be in the Chinese Lexicon !
DoctorBill
As noted separately, it's not a good idea to unsubscribe from
DoctorBill wrote:
> I used to know this, but do not remember anymore. I can't get the filter
> to work. Using SM 2.33.1.
>
> Suddenly getting "Pandora Outlet" adverts and unsubscribing must not be
> in the Chinese Lexicon !
All unsubscribing will do is alert the spammer you have a valid email
I used to know this, but do not remember anymore.
I can't get the filter to work.
Using SM 2.33.1.
Suddenly getting "Pandora Outlet" adverts and
unsubscribing must not be in the Chinese Lexicon !
DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
28 matches
Mail list logo
