Jane_Galt wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote :
Jordon wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
the truth.
anything at Fox news is suspect.
"Elec
On 10-12-15 11:15 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
"S. Beaulieu" wrote :
Jane_Galt a écrit :
Socialist types constantly smear him but he's right most of the time on
facts.
I have this nice bridge you might be interested in...
S.
Socialism must be your religion.
Hi Jane,
You're getting this
Phillip Jones wrote :
> Jordon wrote:
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>>
>>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>>
>> Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
>> the truth.
> anything at Fox news is suspect.
>
`
"S. Beaulieu" wrote :
> Jane_Galt a écrit :
>>
>> Socialist types constantly smear him but he's right most of the time on
>> facts.
>>
>
>
>
> I have this nice bridge you might be interested in...
>
> S.
>
Socialism must be your religion.
--
- Jane Galt
"Remember that there is no such
Phillip Jones wrote :
> Jordon wrote:
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>>
>>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>>
>> Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
>> the truth.
> anything at Fox news is suspect.
>
"E
> Phillip Jones wrote:
Jordon wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
the truth.
anything at Fox news is suspect.
Seamonkey is 100%, includi
Jordon wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
the truth.
anything at Fox news is suspect.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed,
Jane_Galt a écrit :
Socialist types constantly smear him but he's right most of the time on
facts.
I have this nice bridge you might be interested in...
S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozil
Jordon wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>
> Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
> the truth.
>
LOL That may be.
Socialist types constantly smear him but he's r
Jamey Fletcher wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the stats for my small business website and only
>> about 2.5% of visits come from people using SM.
>
> I don't know about you, but I can't afford to turn away 2.5% of my
> potential customers. Things are just too tight these day
Daniel wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> NoOp wrote :
>>
>>> On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>>
>>> One would think so...
>>>
>>> According to:
>>> http://www.mozilla.org/
>>> we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
> Jamey Fletcher wrote:
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> I was looking at the stats for my small business website and only
>>> about 2.5% of visits come from people using SM.
>>
>> I don't know about you, but I can't afford to turn away 2.5% of my
>> potential customers.
>
> The
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells
the truth.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@list
> Jamey Fletcher wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
I was looking at the stats for my small business website and only
about 2.5% of visits come from people using SM.
I don't know about you, but I can't afford to turn away 2.5% of my
potential customers. Things are just too tight these days. Especially a
Jane_Galt wrote:
I was looking at the stats for my small business website and only
about 2.5% of visits come from people using SM.
I don't know about you, but I can't afford to turn away 2.5% of my
potential customers. Things are just too tight these days. Especially
as it's not so much a m
Le 9 décembre 2010, Jane_Galt a écrit :
I dropped out of this discussion awhile back at the request of the moderator,
but you keep posting about it.
Did you have a look at the date of my message you're answering to?
--
LL
The third sentence of your sig supports Marx.
_
Jane_Galt wrote:
NoOp wrote :
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to be
Lucas Levrel wrote :
> Le 26 novembre 2010, Jane_Galt a écrit :
>
>> Same thing. Free market demand creates a supply.
>
> "Out of its ass"?
>
>> The sun dont shine down on us, out of the ass of government.
>
I dropped out of this discussion awhile back at the request of the moderator,
but
Robert Kaiser wrote :
> NoOp schrieb:
>> On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> One would think so...
>>
>> According to:
>> http://www.mozilla.org/
>> we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
>> icon on the main se
NoOp wrote :
> On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>
> One would think so...
>
> According to:
> http://www.mozilla.org/
> we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
> icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to be of
Rick Merrill wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section.
Rick Merrill schrieb:
What IS the mission statement, and how might the rest of us help?
Mozilla's mission is to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on
the web.
See http://www.mozilla.org/about/mission.html for more details, the
Manifesto that talks about it in more detail, Drumbeat a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to
NoOp schrieb:
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to be of more importance
On 10-11-28 7:07 PM, Jim wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As the group's administrator, I beg you to take political and social
arguments into a group that is about those topics and not about
SeaMonkey support. Which political/social views fit whom better or make
more sense for whom are not topics th
On 11/28/2010 7:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to b
On 11/24/2010 10:52 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
One would think so...
According to:
http://www.mozilla.org/
we've been relegated to the "More Projects" section and don't deserve an
icon on the main section. "Drumbeat" seems to be of more importance than
SeaMonkey t
Robert Kaiser wrote:
I may not disagree with a lot of things you are saying (I still believe
that over-regulation in the form of politics giving bonuses to large
companies that small ones never would get was the real problem of the
recent crisis) but this really doesn't belong in the SeaMonkey
Le 26 novembre 2010, Jane_Galt a écrit :
Same thing. Free market demand creates a supply.
"Out of its ass"?
The sun dont shine down on us, out of the ass of government.
--
LL
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Jane_Galt schrieb:
Yeah socialists go ballistic like the wicked witch being soaked with water,
then it's "GET BACK ON TOPIC!"
I may not disagree with a lot of things you are saying (I still believe
that over-regulation in the form of politics giving bonuses to large
companies that small ones
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 11/25/2010 1:52 AM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
no.
ROFLMAO. Best answer so far.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
How do you tell when you run out of invisible ink?
___
support-seamonkey
On 11/25/2010 1:52 AM, Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
no.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Jane_Galt wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote :
Jane_Galt wrote:
No, an investment can only be private. Private parties invest the money
they've EARNED. Government loots people and destroys wealth. They cant
"invest", they can only consume other peoples' wealth, taken at gunpoint.
It's like c
On 11/26/10 1:46 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> "David E. Ross" wrote :
>
>> So when the government invests in new roads or repairing old bridges to
>> facilitate the transportation of goods and the commute of workers, that
>> money is wasted?
>
> Being it was taken at gunpoint by enslaving people to p
"David E. Ross" wrote :
> So when the government invests in new roads or repairing old bridges to
> facilitate the transportation of goods and the commute of workers, that
> money is wasted?
Being it was taken at gunpoint by enslaving people to pay for it, it's
slavery not "investment".
The p
"Paul B. Gallagher" wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>
>> No, an investment can only be private. Private parties invest the money
>> they've EARNED. Government loots people and destroys wealth. They cant
>> "invest", they can only consume other peoples' wealth, taken at gunpoint.
>>
>> It's like call
Lucas Levrel wrote :
> Le 26 novembre 2010, Jane_Galt a écrit :
>
>> Webshots built a huge base of excellent wallpaper photos ( now in HD too )
>> and then got bought out by American Greetings, which IMO screwed up their
>> site with too much high techy crapola.
>
> Another great victory of t
So when the government invests in new roads or repairing old bridges to
facilitate the transportation of goods and the commute of workers, that
money is wasted? How about when the government invests in water plants
so that we don't get sick from typhoid or cholora or invests in
aquaducts so that m
On 11/25/10 8:31 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 11/25/10 5:30 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> "David E. Ross" wrote :
>>
>>> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
> WLS wrote:
>
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
On 11/25/10 8:39 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> "David E. Ross" wrote :
>
>> On 11/25/10 5:29 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> chicagofan wrote :
>>>
Jane_Galt wrote:
> chicagofan wrote :
>> Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them
>> about the problem. In a week
Jane_Galt wrote:
No, an investment can only be private. Private parties invest the money
they've EARNED. Government loots people and destroys wealth. They cant
"invest", they can only consume other peoples' wealth, taken at gunpoint.
It's like calling a burglar an "investor" when he takes your
Le 26 novembre 2010, Jane_Galt a écrit :
Webshots built a huge base of excellent wallpaper photos ( now in HD too )
and then got bought out by American Greetings, which IMO screwed up their
site with too much high techy crapola.
Another great victory of the free market.
--
LL
Jane_Galt wrote:
Oh, at the end of that video by Shaw, he gave the nazi salute. Seems he was
a big fan of Hitler too.
It's not extremely strong evidence. Whereas in the case of Henry Ford
and James Mooney of General Motors, the evidence is personal
acknowledgment by Hitler.
_
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Lemuel Johnson wrote :
>>
>>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>>
> The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
> recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main
> page (Jane didn't specify any specific page
JeffM wrote :
>>JeffM wrote :
>>>Finding a service that isn't run by bozos would be a good plan.
>>>
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>Webshots is it, pretty much, for HD color photo downloading.
>>
> That pretty much sucks.
> Some competition in that segment would be good.
> I wonder why there isn't any.
W
NoOp wrote :
>
> I doubt it is a sniffing issue:
> http://www.webshots.com/pro/
> works for me with:
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16)
> Gecko/20101125 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.11
>
>
Now I wonder if Webshots got the word from someone here. It jus
"David E. Ross" wrote :
> On 11/25/10 5:29 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> chicagofan wrote :
>>
>>> Jane_Galt wrote:
chicagofan wrote :
> Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them
> about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I
> d
On 11/25/10 5:30 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> "David E. Ross" wrote :
>
>> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
>>>
WLS wrote:
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
>> I cant even get it to work any
On 11/25/10 5:29 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> chicagofan wrote :
>
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> chicagofan wrote :
Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them
about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I
don't know if that was because I swit
Jane_Galt wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote :
Jane_Galt wrote:
The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page
(Jane didn't specify any specific page)
http://www.webshots.com/pro/
Is there something I can
>Jane_Galt wrote:
>>Is anyone else getting a parsing error at this site?:
>>http://www.memory4less.com/
>>
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>New problem, eh? I see the same error in several browsers.
>
The only thing surprising here is that someone is surprised:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=htt
On 11/25/2010 12:40 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
...
>> http://www.webshots.com/pro/
>>
>>> looks for "Internet Explorer",
>>> "Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Netscape" (!), "Opera", but not
>>> "SeaMonkey". (Yet another
>JeffM wrote :
>>Finding a service that isn't run by bozos would be a good plan.
>>
Jane_Galt wrote:
>Webshots is it, pretty much, for HD color photo downloading.
>
That pretty much sucks.
Some competition in that segment would be good.
I wonder why there isn't any.
...and Seamonkey is an old Nets
Jane_Galt wrote:
> Is anyone else getting a parsing error at this site?:
> http://www.memory4less.com/
New problem, eh? I see the same error in several browsers.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonk
JeffM wrote :
>>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote :
>>>looks for "Internet Explorer",
>>>"Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Netscape" (!), "Opera", but not
>>>"SeaMonkey". (Yet another example of author bungle.)
>>>
>:David E. Ross wrote:
>:another example of why sniffing is generally bad.
>:
> Jane_G
Lemuel Johnson wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
>>> recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page
>>> (Jane didn't specify any specific page)
>>
>> http://www.webshots.com/pro/
>>
>>
>> Is there somet
Phillip Jones wrote :
> your screen shot indicates the video is loading from your first
> description I thought you had a problem with the system.
It's not a video, those two spinning things are supposed to be pictures I can
DL. Try in Internet Explorer and see.
> You could use the extensio
"David E. Ross" wrote :
> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
>>
>>> WLS wrote:
>>>
Jane_Galt wrote:
> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
> Yet FF
chicagofan wrote :
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> chicagofan wrote :
>>> Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them
>>> about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I
>>> don't know if that was because I switched from SM 2.09 to SM 2.10
>>> during that pe
>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote :
>>looks for "Internet Explorer",
>>"Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Netscape" (!), "Opera", but not
>>"SeaMonkey". (Yet another example of author bungle.)
>>
:David E. Ross wrote:
:another example of why sniffing is generally bad.
:
Jane_Galt wrote:
>kept me from us
Jane_Galt wrote:
The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page
(Jane didn't specify any specific page)
http://www.webshots.com/pro/
Is there something I can do from here? Webshots wont even reply to m
On 11/25/10 1:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
>>>
WLS wrote:
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
>> I cant even get it to work anymore
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
WLS wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
Works fi
Jane_Galt wrote:
chicagofan wrote :
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
WLS wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent
string might help. WLS, have you done this?
It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration.
Build i
On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
>
>> WLS wrote:
>>
>>> Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> No.
>>
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>>>
Jane_Galt wrote:
chicagofan wrote :
Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them
about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I
don't know if that was because I switched from SM 2.09 to SM 2.10 during
that period, or because they changed something
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
> WLS wrote:
>
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent
>>> string might help. WLS, have you done this?
>>
>> It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration.
>>
>> Build identifier: Moz
"David E. Ross" wrote :
>
> However, the "pre" strings sometimes cause problems with servers
> sniffing for the Palm Pre smartphone, another example of why sniffing is
> generally bad.
>
I dont know the tech details of all this, but I wish I could make them sniff
something behind me, at th
chicagofan wrote :
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> WLS wrote:
>>
>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent
string might help. WLS, have you done this?
>>> It is already in there in the SM 2.1 bui
WLS wrote :
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> WLS wrote:
>>
>>> Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> No.
>>
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>>>
>>> Works fine here.
>>
>>
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote :
> WLS wrote:
>
>> Jane_Galt wrote:
>>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>
> No.
>
>>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>>> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>>
>> Works fine here.
>
> The usual answer is
Diddles wrote :
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:52:44 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:
>
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>>
>> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>
> Works fine here. I have Ver. 2.0.10.
> I use it to
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
WLS wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent
string might help. WLS, have you done this?
It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration.
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X1
On 11/25/10 6:21 AM, WLS wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> WLS wrote:
>>
>>> Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
>>
>> No.
>>
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>>>
>>> Works fine
WLS wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent
>> string might help. WLS, have you done this?
>
> It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration.
>
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
WLS wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
Works fine here.
The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffi
WLS wrote:
> Jane_Galt wrote:
>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
>> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
>
> Works fine here.
The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
recognize
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
Works fine here. I can even delete newsgroup messages now!
WLS
--
SeaMonkey 2.1b2pre
__
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
--
- Jane Galt
By taxing, borrowing and wasting money that the tax slaves must be forced to
pay back, Government does NOT "create jobs", it NEV
79 matches
Mail list logo
