NO wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
NO wrote:
/snip/
View>>Messages>>All
and, if using a threaded view:
Views>>Threads>>All
Lee
Lee,
Thank you, it was so basic, that it worked. Leave nothing to chance.
Warmest regards,
Bo
I am so glad it worked!
Lee
_
Leonidas Jones wrote:
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I Am using SM 2.0 under Win XP Pro. The issue I have as of
late is that when viewing email in some of my folders, after opening the
message and leaving the folder, the message disappears completely. I
have tried compacting the folders and that did not
NO wrote:
Hello all.. I Am using SM 2.0 under Win XP Pro. The issue I have as of
late is that when viewing email in some of my folders, after opening the
message and leaving the folder, the message disappears completely. I
have tried compacting the folders and that did not work.
Any suggestions
Hello all.. I Am using SM 2.0 under Win XP Pro. The issue I have as of
late is that when viewing email in some of my folders, after opening the
message and leaving the folder, the message disappears completely. I
have tried compacting the folders and that did not work.
Any suggestions or ideas
On 12/03/2009 01:34 AM, Neil wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
...
>>-1215547552[b7511060]: SMTP Send: AUTH LOGIN
>>-1215547552[b7511060]: SMTP connection dropped after 147 total bytes read
>>
>>So I took a look at the Password manager and find that the old password is
>>still listed. Only deleating all the pw
NoOp wrote:
I was able to reproduce the issue... copied a SM 2.0 from a backup system; first
time I attempted to send I got a password prompt, entered the new smtp password,
worked ok. Then had to reboot for other reasons & got the:
Sending of message failed.
The message could not be sent bec
On 11/29/2009 08:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
>
> So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
> gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
> I'm not sure how to test further.
I was able to reproduce the issue... copied a SM 2.0 from a backup
system
NoOp ha scritto:
Ran into an interesting problem today; ATT (my isp) had issues with
their email server today. I opened up SM 2.0 (linux) and found that all
but one account (this one) were working. I couldn't send msgs, couldn't
receive msgs etc. I couldn not even log on to the A
NoOp wrote:
I'm not sure how to test further.
Make an SMTP log?
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Session_logging_for_mail/news
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mo
7;m not sure how to test further.
>>
>> If you could get a log that would be helpful.
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
>>
>> Hartmut
>
> Excellent! Thanks for that & I'll set one up as I reckon that the
> ATT/Yahoo radius servers will pr
log that would be helpful.
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
>
> Hartmut
Excellent! Thanks for that & I'll set one up as I reckon that the
ATT/Yahoo radius servers will probably have issues again.
Gary
___
support-seamonkey m
NoOp:
>So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
>gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
>I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log that would be helpful.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Hartmut
___
Ran into an interesting problem today; ATT (my isp) had issues with
their email server today. I opened up SM 2.0 (linux) and found that all
but one account (this one) were working. I couldn't send msgs, couldn't
receive msgs etc. I couldn not even log on to the ATT webmail.
So... I bit
this version due to major
changes in our architecture. Please report any issues to the maintainer of
the extension. Extensions and Themes for SeaMonkey 2.0 can be installed
from the SeaMonkey Add-Ons website or the "Get Add-Ons" section in the
Add-Ons manager.
Known Issues
This list covers so
n due to major
changes in our architecture. Please report any issues to the maintainer of
the extension. Extensions and Themes for SeaMonkey 2.0 can be installed
from the SeaMonkey Add-Ons website or the "Get Add-Ons" section in the
Add-Ons manager.
Known Issues
This list covers some of
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Phillip Jones:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
I don't have a desktop *g*.
Yes you do the screen you see when you open your computer after it boots
up is called the desktop on Macintosh computers. Other computer users,
using Windows Machines may also call it the Desktop as well. U
Phillip Jones:
>Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> I don't have a desktop *g*.
>
>Yes you do the screen you see when you open your computer after it boots
>up is called the desktop on Macintosh computers. Other computer users,
>using Windows Machines may also call it the Desktop as well. Unix and
>Linux d
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Marisa Ciceran:
Marisa Ciceran wrote:
I have been a faithful user of SeaMonkey and all its predecessors going
back to the early 1990s. Currently, I have version 1.1.18 installed on
my system and two days ago I downloaded and installed version 2 -
immediately running into
Marisa Ciceran:
>Marisa Ciceran wrote:
>> I have been a faithful user of SeaMonkey and all its predecessors going
>> back to the early 1990s. Currently, I have version 1.1.18 installed on
>> my system and two days ago I downloaded and installed version 2 -
>> immediately running into an unexpec
I have had a host of additional problems with SeaMonkey version 2.0
since this original post (which remains unanswered), some of which have
been described by others. Regretfully, I had no choice but to return to
version 1.1.18 before any more damage was done to my extensive mail
archives. Thank
I have been a faithful user of SeaMonkey and all its predecessors going
back to the early 1990s. Currently, I have version 1.1.18 installed on
my system and two days ago I downloaded and installed version 2 -
immediately running into an unexpected and totally avoidable problem.
I expected the
Robert Kaiser wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the
Robert Kaiser wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the FF bookmarks system.
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the FF bookmarks system.
This being said, ku
John Doue wrote:
I nevertheless believe it will take quite some time before SM 2.x offers
the features - or the adequate workarounds for those which are not
replaced - that lots of users appreciate in 1.1.xx. Updating add-ons and
probably creating new ones will also be necessary.
We're trying a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
More realistically, would not it be better if users would start threads
for specific issues related to SM 2.x, by mentioning "SM 2. Issue ..."
in the subject line? Anything the moderators can do about this?
You're right, that would be bet
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
snip
Since both 1.xx and 2.x will coexist for a long time, it is more
important than ever to mention the version in the subject line.
I just hope that 1.x will die very fast - to be blunt, it was outdated
to a certain part already when it was released
John Doue wrote:
More realistically, would not it be better if users would start threads
for specific issues related to SM 2.x, by mentioning "SM 2. Issue ..."
in the subject line? Anything the moderators can do about this?
You're right, that would be better, but that's com
r specific issues related to SM 2.x, by mentioning "SM 2. Issue ..."
in the subject line? Anything the moderators can do about this?
Since both 1.xx and 2.x will coexist for a long time, it is more
important than ever to mention the version in the subject line.
Just my two ce
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
Eric wrote:
Recently I had trouble downloading email from my ISP. They told me what
to do to fix it, they wanted me to change my port to 445 and turn on
ssl. Well that didn't work so I set it back to Port 110 with ssl off,
that almost seemed to work.
Seamonkey sh
Eric wrote:
> Recently I had trouble downloading email from my ISP. They told me what
> to do to fix it, they wanted me to change my port to 445 and turn on
> ssl. Well that didn't work so I set it back to Port 110 with ssl off,
> that almost seemed to work.
>
> Seamonkey showed that it was d
Recently I had trouble downloading email from my ISP. They told me what
to do to fix it, they wanted me to change my port to 445 and turn on
ssl. Well that didn't work so I set it back to Port 110 with ssl off,
that almost seemed to work.
Seamonkey showed that it was downloading the message,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:26:26 -0500
Ed Mullen wrote:
> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> > sorry to say, but I disagree. Icons should be on by default. I've
> > got lots of favicons with no text. I just look at the icon and I
> > know what is about.
>
> Interesting. I have never seen any
On 12/16/2008 10:24 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500, Ed Mullen wrote:
>
>> /* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
>> toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
>>display: none;
>> }
>> /* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
>>
>>
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:39:39 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
It's not a bug in the sense that I copied the Firefox CSS which did:
/* Prevent [mode="icons"|"text"] from hiding the label and icon */
#bookm
keith_w wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
[...]
I suggest that having Personal Toolbar icons off by default is
preferable. The text hover state adequately shows me if the text is a
single bookmark/link or a folder by the different representations. A
folder is shown as a raised button, a link is underlin
Ed Mullen wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:39:39 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
It's not a bug in the sense that I copied the Firefox CSS which did:
/* Prevent [mode="icons"|"text"] from hiding the label and icon */
#bookmarks-ptf .bookmark-item> .toolbarbutt
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Interesting. The only place I could right-click on the Personal Toolbar
to get that particular pop-up menu was the collapse widget at the left
of the toolbar. Anyplace else (other than on an actual bookmark) gives a
different pop-up menu (New Folder, Sort Fo
Ed Mullen wrote:
[...]
I suggest that having Personal Toolbar icons off by default is
preferable. The text hover state adequately shows me if the text is a
single bookmark/link or a folder by the different representations. A
folder is shown as a raised button, a link is underlined. Perfect
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:39:39 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
It's not a bug in the sense that I copied the Firefox CSS which did:
/* Prevent [mode="icons"|"text"] from hiding the label and icon */
#bookmarks-ptf .bookmark-item> .toolbarbutton-text,
#bookmark
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:39:39 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Philip Chee wrote:
>> It's not a bug in the sense that I copied the Firefox CSS which did:
>>
>> /* Prevent [mode="icons"|"text"] from hiding the label and icon */
>> #bookmarks-ptf .bookmark-item> .toolbarbutton-text,
>> #bookmarks-ptf .b
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:38:02 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Ed Mullen wrote:
>> Interesting. The only place I could right-click on the Personal Toolbar
>> to get that particular pop-up menu was the collapse widget at the left
>> of the toolbar. Anyplace else (other than on an actual bookmark) gives
Philip Chee wrote:
It's not a bug in the sense that I copied the Firefox CSS which did:
/* Prevent [mode="icons"|"text"] from hiding the label and icon */
#bookmarks-ptf .bookmark-item> .toolbarbutton-text,
#bookmarks-ptf .bookmark-item> .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: -moz-box !important;
}
Ed Mullen wrote:
Interesting. The only place I could right-click on the Personal Toolbar
to get that particular pop-up menu was the collapse widget at the left
of the toolbar. Anyplace else (other than on an actual bookmark) gives a
different pop-up menu (New Folder, Sort Folder, Sort Folder by N
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:31:59 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Ed Mullen wrote:
>> 2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
>>
>> /* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
>> toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
>> display: none;
>> }
>> /* END Kill bookmark icons in the Pe
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500, Ed Mullen wrote:
> /* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
> toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
>display: none;
> }
> /* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
>
> which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar whic
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar
Ed Mullen wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
which turns off th
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
which turns off the icons in the Per
»Q« wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item> .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
whic
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500, /Ed Mullen/:
Just trying SM 2.0a2 and immediately noticed:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Ki
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar which, a
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500
Ed Mullen wrote:
> 2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
>
> /* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
> toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
>display: none;
> }
> /* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
>
> w
Ed Mullen wrote:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
which turns off the icons in the Personal Toolbar whic
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:14:27 -0500, /Ed Mullen/:
Just trying SM 2.0a2 and immediately noticed:
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar */
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
display: none;
}
/* END Kill bookmark icons in the
Just trying SM 2.0a2 and immediately noticed:
1. The pref browser.show_about_as_stupid_modal_window no longer
functions. I have long used this to show the Help - About screen in a
pop-up, which I greatly prefer.
2. In my userChrome.css file is the following:
/* Kill bookmark icons in the
401 - 457 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
