Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/08/2019 11:41 PM:
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/08/2019 4:17 PM:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website
about my
user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play
unti
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/08/2019 4:17 PM:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website about my
user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play until
I prove that I have at least Firefox 47 [sic].
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/08/2019 4:17 PM:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website about my
user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play until
I prove that I have at least Firefox 47 [sic].
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/08/2019 4:17 PM:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website about my
user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play until
I prove that I have at least Firefox 47 [sic].
Here are two e
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website about my
user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play until
I prove that I have at least Firefox 47 [sic].
Here are two examples from my user.js:
user_pref("general.us
Paul B. Gallagher:
>Could someone remind me again how to lie to a specific website about my
>user agent? They're doing bad browser sniffing and refuse to play until
>I prove that I have at least Firefox 47 [sic].
Here are two examples from my user.js:
user_pref("general.useragent.override.inde
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Manuel Reimer schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one in the future.
I don't think t
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Finally they did switch to add support for Firefox. however to this day
there sniffing code is /FireFox, not /gecko
Welcome to our world! :-/
To Georg, Manuel, and others who are affronting me over bug 591617 and
things like that, this is just one very small case of tho
Georg Maaß schrieb:
When my XulRunner applications starts spamming Firefox UA telling a lie
to the world, I will start FF spoofing on my web sites to ban all UAs
containing FireFox.
Please do that.
I hate FireFox.
Then stop using Gecko, as Gecko isn't nothing more than the Firefox web
rend
Manuel Reimer schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one in the future.
I don't think this is a good idea. We
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/28/10 7:43 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to s
Georg Maaß wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> But what is the need to inflict your personal problems on your
>> visitors?
>
> Exactly this is, what stupid web authors do with UA name spoofing
> instead of doing needed feature testing.
I'll agree with that. Web developers should strive t
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
But what is the need to inflict your personal problems on your visitors?
Exactly this is, what stupid web authors do with UA name spoofing
instead of doing needed feature testing.
Firefox is an enemy, because it is an egoist make a lot of unnecessary
trouble t
In mozilla.support.seamonkey, Georg Maaß wrote:
> When my XulRunner applications starts spamming Firefox UA telling a
> lie to the world, I will start FF spoofing on my web sites to ban all
> UAs containing FireFox.
One hopes you are talking about your personal web sites, not business
ones. It wo
When my XulRunner applications starts spamming Firefox UA telling a lie
to the world, I will start FF spoofing on my web sites to ban all UAs
containing FireFox.
I hate FireFox. I do not accept UA containing FireFox, if it is not a
FireFox but only uses the Mozilla toolkit.
It is ok, if the
On 8/28/10 7:43 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
> Manuel Reimer wrote:
>> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>>> Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
>>> browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
>>> not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one i
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one in the future.
I don't think this is a good idea. Webm
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one in the future.
I don't think this is a good idea. Webmasters should learn to
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Actually, as much as I hate appending "Firefox" to any UA string of
browsers that are not Firefox, I just filed a bug to make any Gecko that
not has "Firefox" in its UA string right now to send one in the future.
Bug #, please? -JW
_
David Cox schrieb:
On 27/08/2010 11:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee schrieb:
New is:
general.useragent.compatMode.firefox
Which should be the "weapon of choice" now when spoofing Firefox. And we
might even add UI for that.
Thanks Robert, please do. I admit I'm lazy and use
general.u
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:19:32 -0400, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> On 8/27/2010 7:21 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
>> New is:
>>
>> general.useragent.compatMode.firefox
>
> In addition for the RFDocumentation, I'd love bug/cset link.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581008
Bug 581008 - Remov
On 8/27/2010 7:21 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:10:20 +0100, Neil wrote:
NoOp wrote:
And yes... I'll modify the UA's on the Win machines before doing browser checks
:-)
If you are going to spoof Firefox, it might be an idea to spoof the
version of Firefox with the same Geck
On 27/08/2010 11:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee schrieb:
New is:
general.useragent.compatMode.firefox
Which should be the "weapon of choice" now when spoofing Firefox. And we
might even add UI for that.
Thanks Robert, please do. I admit I'm lazy and use
general.useragent.extra.spoof
On 08/27/2010 04:21 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:10:20 +0100, Neil wrote:
>> NoOp wrote:
>>
>>>And yes... I'll modify the UA's on the Win machines before doing browser
>>>checks :-)
>>>
>>>
>> If you are going to spoof Firefox, it might be an idea to spoof the
>> version of
Philip Chee schrieb:
New is:
general.useragent.compatMode.firefox
Which should be the "weapon of choice" now when spoofing Firefox. And we
might even add UI for that.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very of
25 matches
Mail list logo
