to solve this issue ?
Perhaps the Message filters works only if the newsgroup have the
optionSelect this newsgroup for offline use set ?
Could someone confirm ?
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have improved in SM 2.0
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
/snip/
Same for me, i am unable to get filter working - i just test one last case:
Mark as read for Match all messages: All the messages were marked as
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Phillip Jones a utilisé son clavier pour écrire :
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have
On 1/24/2010 4:29 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/24/2010 4:29 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
On 01/24/2010 05:47 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
...
I never could get filtering working in SM 1.1.8. I kept trying as I
upgraded from version to version. I realize you can only set to mark as
read (if you don't download for reading later). Never did get working. I
haven't tried in 2.0 SM as I
NoOp wrote:
On 01/24/2010 05:47 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
...
/snip/
Firefox = Fx
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/releases/1.5.html
quote
8. How do I capitalize Firefox? How do I abbreviate it?
Only the first letter is capitalized (so it's Firefox, not FireFox.) The
preferred abbreviation
Ray_Net:
[Filter not working]
Any idea to solve this issue ?
Post to mozilla.test so that we have an example to play with.
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of
I believe he meant Match any of the following but typed Contains by
mistake, he only messed up one out the five words, but what do I know!
Ray_Net wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
On 1/23/2010 8:56 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
of the following:
From contains j...@lion.org
From contains j...@lion.org
From contains jmB jmB@lion.org
From contains jmB jmB@Lion.org
And the posts are still marked as Not Read
Any idea to solve this issue ?
Perhaps the Message filters works only if the newsgroup have the
optionSelect
: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of the following:
From contains j...@lion.org
From contains j...@lion.org
From contains jmB jmB@lion.org
From contains jmB jmB@Lion.org
And the posts are still marked as Not Read
Any idea to solve this issue ?
Perhaps the Message filters works
filters works only if the newsgroup have the
optionSelect this newsgroup for offline use set ?
Could someone confirm ?
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have improved in SM 2.0 in previous versions filters were
useless
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positioned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of
On 1/22/2010 6:49 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
To my knowledge Filters have never worked on newsgroups all the way back
to communicator days whenever Filtering first Started. (at least I never
was able to get filters to work on newsgroups.
What? I've used filters on newsgroups as long as I can
as long as I can remember. I've
never had a problem.
Same here. The only problem I've ever had is for the file to get
corrupted and have to be rebuilt. I thought it was because I had too
many filters on one newsgroup, but I was assured that there was no limit
on message filters. Still
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of the following:
Smiles wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Smiles wrote:
The first part, =?ISO-2022-JP? defines the character st. If you have
that set installed you would then see the subject in clear text.
Unless you read Japanese you you not understand it any better, but at
least it would be clear.
I don't
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one
as text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a single '?' but
Smiles wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one
as text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Smiles wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one
as text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
NoOp wrote:
On 12/16/2009 06:39 AM, Smiles wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
I _think_ you can create a header filter to filter on the charset. Of
course it won't stop those from being sent to you, but if it works, you
can easily tag them as junk and delete automatically.
Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one as
text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a single '?' but nothing gets filtered
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one as
text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a single '?' but nothing gets filtered out
thanks
On 12/07/2009 05:52 AM, Smiles wrote:
Good day
one of my email accounts is being hit by over 20 emails daily with ?
marks of different length in subject and sender field. if I save one as
text it is blank, so I set up a filter up to send all to trash by
setting from value a a single '?'
Smiles wrote:
Fun times
regrettable as it is my boss has made a Google group for subcontractor
to contact
I would like to set up a mail filter based on emails forwarded from
them. I could enter all 500 emails in to a list but would prefer to use
the from email address which Google uses but
Fun times
regrettable as it is my boss has made a Google group for subcontractor
to contact
I would like to set up a mail filter based on emails forwarded from
them. I could enter all 500 emails in to a list but would prefer to use
the from email address which Google uses but there is no
Hello all, my challenge today is with the message filter in SM 2.0 on an
XP Pro machine.
Each time I go to Tools Run Filters on Folder the function does not
work, as expected. I expect that I would be able to filter out messages
in the folder selected to move emails to the folders in which
On 5/31/2009 9:37 PM, Jim Caligiuri wrote:
I'm trying to migrate to a new computer and having all sorts of
problems. I had a large number of message filters saved and they are all
not working. I've managed to delete them all thinking that I could
recreate them but the new filters
I'm trying to migrate to a new computer and having all sorts of
problems. I had a large number of message filters saved and they are all
not working. I've managed to delete them all thinking that I could
recreate them but the new filters are not working. after creation, I
click on 'run now
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
My new msgFilterRules.dat has 1KB [from today's entries] and there
is a rulesbackup.dat file *created when that happened, that has
15KB. Is that the same file, or is that backup for something else
on that date?
I've never heard nor
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
I am in mourning! Apparently I exceeded the number of filters SM
could handle and the file exploded. I got a message that my filter
files were being rebuilt. I see today, that meant... that they
had been wiped out, and I'll have to
Leonidas Jones wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Do you have a back up? Try putting the backup filter back.
Don't have a backup unless SM created one, when I got that message
it was rebuilding. :(
I'll check out the files, and come back. Thanks... :) bj
I'm
chicagofan wrote:
My new msgFilterRules.dat has 1KB [from today's entries] and there is a
rulesbackup.dat file *created when that happened, that has 15KB. Is
that the same file, or is that backup for something else on that date?
I've never heard nor seen a rulesbackup.dat and I
really don't
I am in mourning! Apparently I exceeded the number of filters SM could
handle and the file exploded. I got a message that my filter files were
being rebuilt. I see today, that meant... that they had been wiped out,
and I'll have to start over.
To avoid this in the future, can anyone tell me
chicagofan wrote:
I am in mourning! Apparently I exceeded the number of filters SM could
handle and the file exploded. I got a message that my filter files were
being rebuilt. I see today, that meant... that they had been wiped out,
and I'll have to start over.
To avoid this in the future,
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
I am in mourning! Apparently I exceeded the number of filters SM could
handle and the file exploded. I got a message that my filter files were
being rebuilt. I see today, that meant... that they had been wiped out,
and I'll have to
chicagofan wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
I am in mourning! Apparently I exceeded the number of filters SM could
handle and the file exploded. I got a message that my filter files were
being rebuilt. I see today, that meant... that they had been wiped out,
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
