Re: view headers all option

On 03/30/2011 01:24 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:02:50 -0400, /Rick Merrill/: > >> When you REceive one of these scams you MAY forward (send) >> it to phish...@irs.gov but it is only useful if you send >> full headers. >> >> In other words :-) what I was asking is a one-time

Re: view headers all option

On 03/30/2011 01:11 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> You are better off (and they will appreciate it more) if you use >> 'View|Message Source' (Ctrl+U), and then Ctrl+A Ctrl+C (select all / >> copy all) and then paste in to the response with 'Pa

Re: Browser unsupported ?

On 03/31/2011 11:07 AM, W3BNR wrote: > On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote: >> On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote: >>> J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: > This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile. > https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/ > > my

Re: autoloading of SM 1.1.18

On 03/31/2011 07:21 PM, Norvin wrote: > Just had to format and reload Win XP, SP3 and using SM 1.1.18. My > problem is that after a power up and sitting idle at the desktop, SM > will do an autoload without any action on my part. I remember having > this problem some years ago and was able to ma

Re: autoloading of SM 1.1.18

On 04/01/2011 01:49 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 03/31/2011 07:21 PM, Norvin wrote: >> Just had to format and reload Win XP, SP3 and using SM 1.1.18. My >> problem is that after a power up and sitting idle at the desktop, SM >> will do an autoload without any action on my pa

[Linux] High CPU - Pandora.com / Flash

Not sure if this is related to linux/SeaMonkey specifically, but I found that using SeaMonkey2.1b2/FireFox4/Chromium to play pandora.com (I use pulseaudio from a standalone machine to stream it over to a system with speakers) was sucking up all of the cpu on the machine. Finally figured out that t

SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

Ok, who's bright idea was this? Right clicking a link in 2.1b2 brings up: o Open Link in a New Window o Open Link in a New Tab 2.1b3 brings up: o Open Link in a New Tab o Open Link in a New Window Who's idea was this? I must have opened about 10 new windows (instead of tabs) this morning before

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

On 04/08/2011 06:43 PM, WLS wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Ok, who's bright idea was this? >> >> Right clicking a link in >> 2.1b2 brings up: >> o Open Link in a New Window >> o Open Link in a New Tab >> >> 2.1b3 brings up: >> o Open Link in

Re: [2.1b3] Cannot connect to IRC

On 04/12/2011 12:50 AM, P.N. wrote: > > Hello! > > Cannot connect to any chat using ChatZilla. Getting error message: > > ReferenceError: MSG_NETWORK_OPENED is not defined @ > 4183 Don't know, but Chatzilla is working fine for me on: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0pre)

Re: SeaMonkey "outages"

On 04/12/2011 12:58 PM, George Carden wrote: > After years of no problems, suddenly, and totally at random, my > SeaMonkey seems to just lose power...and occasionally totally loses it's > web connection for some reason. > > This happened a few minutes ago, and I used the site > http://www.speed

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

On 04/09/2011 08:09 AM, Errol Smith wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Ok, who's bright idea was this? >> >> Right clicking a link in >> 2.1b2 brings up: >> o Open Link in a New Window >> o Open Link in a New Tab >> >> 2.1b3 brings up: >> o Ope

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

On 04/09/2011 02:34 PM, Roger Fink wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Ok, who's bright idea was this? >> >> Right clicking a link in >> 2.1b2 brings up: >> o Open Link in a New Window >> o Open Link in a New Tab >> >> 2.1b3 brings up: >> o Ope

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

On 04/09/2011 03:58 PM, Roger Fink wrote: > Roger Fink wrote: ... >> I'm glad they finally listened to me and made that change but you can >> reorder the menu items any way you like and moreover hide the many >> items I assume you don't use by installing the Menu Editor extension. >> The version I

Re: Support for large mail boxes

On 04/11/2011 09:56 PM, Mike wrote: > I use Seamonkey (2.0.13) to check several mail boxes. I've used this > software since before Moz Suite supported tabbed browsing. My point is, > I have a lot of email. And I like SM but it's crawling. I've compacted > all the folders, but changing from one a

Re: FEATURE REQUEST: email in new tab (just like opera)

On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote: > Viliam Kubis wrote: >> ... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any >> plans to implement it in the future? Please? :) >> >> Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good >> but is unstable, maybe only li

Re: FEATURE REQUEST: email in new tab (just like opera)

On 04/12/2011 12:52 PM, Viliam Kubis wrote: > ... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any plans > to implement it in the future? Please? :) > > Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good > but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are

Re: SM 2.1b3

On 04/18/2011 07:59 AM, ejdelet...@edmullen.net wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> ejdelet...@edmullen.net schrieb: >>> Have you guys tried your solutions? Have you tried to replicate my >>> problem? >> >> I don't need to replicate anything, as know what the code does, because >> I wrote that code th

Re: New control of mouse-click-menus - additional click necessary now - drives my hand crazy

On 04/18/2011 09:37 PM, Philip Chee keeps writing new threads: Yo Philip... google up on how to post in newsgroups using your new gmail account so that your replies remain in the same thread you are replying to. You keep splattering this newsgroup with new threads everytime you reply. ___

Re: New control of mouse-click-menus - additional click necessary now - drives my hand crazy

On 04/20/2011 12:12 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> On 04/18/2011 09:37 PM, Philip Chee keeps writing new threads: >> >> Yo Philip... google up on how to post in newsgroups using your new gmail >> account so that your replies remain in the same thre

(Error code: sec_error_ocsp_bad_http_response)

Every so often I get the following alert message when accessing news.eternal-september.org: An error occurred during a connection to news.eternal-september.org:563. The OCSP server returned unexpected/invalid HTTP data. (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_bad_http_response) At first I thought

Re: (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_bad_http_response)

On 04/22/2011 09:29 AM, Ken wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Every so often I get the following alert message when accessing >> news.eternal-september.org: >> >> An error occurred during a connection to news.eternal-september.org:563. >> >> The OCSP serve

Re: Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.14 candidates - help wanted!

On 04/22/2011 05:16 PM, MCBastos wrote: > Interviewed by CNN on 22/04/2011 17:58, Robert Kaiser told the world: > >> Interesting, as AFAIK all Core architecture chips support EM64T - could >> be that it's only Core2 though and Apple shipped some of the older >> "crap" that was called "Core" but

Re: (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_bad_http_response)

On 04/22/2011 09:57 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 04/22/2011 09:29 AM, Ken wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> Every so often I get the following alert message when accessing >>> news.eternal-september.org: >>> >>> An error occurred during a connection to news.etern

Re: SM 2.1b3 Mac and 64 bit mode - default?

On 04/23/2011 03:11 PM, Rufus wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Rufus schrieb: >>> BUT - when I did the same thing on my iMac running 10.6.7 booted with >>> the 32 bit kernel (which is the only way I can boot this machine) I >>> still had the "Launch in 32 bit mode" option displayed and unchecked >>

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/25/2011 04:42 PM, WLS wrote: > Thomas Pamin wrote: >> Yahoo wants me to upgrade to their new email application. When I try, it >> says Seamonkey is not a supported browser. How can I get the new Yahoo >> mail to work with Seamonkey? > > No problem here. > Also works for me, but I suspect t

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/25/2011 04:51 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: > Thomas Pamin wrote: > >> This is the only message I get: >> >> "Your web browser doesn’t support Yahoo! Mail Beta. ... > > I get a different message. > > One of my computers gives me... > > "Your bowser is not officially supported by the new AT&T Ya

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/25/2011 05:01 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 04/25/2011 04:51 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: >> Thomas Pamin wrote: >> >>> This is the only message I get: >>> >>> "Your web browser doesn’t support Yahoo! Mail Beta. > ... >> >> I get a differen

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/25/2011 05:41 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> >> Rob, he's referring to the new 'Yahoo! Mail Beta' - AT&T Yahoo! Mail is >> still using their own modified version. (I also have AT&T Yahoo! Mail) >> ... >> > > OK,

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/25/2011 06:43 PM, Jay O'Brien wrote: > On 04/25/2011 04:52 PM, NoOp wrote: > >>Also works for me, but I suspect that is because we have the 'Firefox' >>in the UI: >> >>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0pre) >>Gecko

Re: New Yahoo Mail

On 04/27/2011 04:36 PM, Jay O'Brien wrote: > On 4/27/2011 3:27 PM, NoOp wrote: ... >> http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/browserfaq/UAspoofing >> http://www.rossde.com/internet/sniffing.html >> >> I prefer PrefBar: >> http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/ >> http:/

Re: video question

On 04/28/2011 12:32 PM, Norvin wrote: > Michael Gordon wrote: >> cyberzen wrote: >>> Norvin a écrit : Had a problem and had to reload XP, and everything else. Now when I am watching a video (u-tube, etc) and click on the full screen button, all I get is a white screen and the sound.

Re: Upgrade to new version

On 05/01/2011 08:18 AM, Neil Winchurst wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> Neil Winchurst wrote: >>> I have installed version 2.0.13 in /usr/local/bin which works fine. >>> There is now version 2.0.14 ready as an upgrade. I have downloaded it >>> but it will not install. I get a message about having other ve

Re: Upgrade to new version

On 05/02/2011 05:30 AM, Neil Winchurst wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> >> Do the same for 2.0.14 - download the full .deb and install the same way >> that you did for 2.0.13. I suspect that the upgrade is having permission >> issues due to the installation location. >>

Re: Security lock icon

On 05/01/2011 08:31 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 5/1/11 8:13 PM, Bl wrote: >> Philip Chee wrote: >>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 11:41:29 +1000, Bl wrote: Hi, Just noticed that lock icon is missing! :( Now we don't have an easy indication of encryption status of the Web Page. Or am I missi

Re: 'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application' - strange error message

On 05/03/2011 02:52 PM, HenriK wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> HenriK wrote: >> >>> My wife now tells me that she MAY have updated Seamonkey to v.2.0.14. >>> Accordingly, I don't know what version is loaded because I can't get >>> past the error message to get Seamonkey to open and identify it

Re: Still can't see videos

On 05/07/2011 03:26 PM, FDVS wrote: ... > What is SM2.1b3 and how do you get it?? > Mine is as previously listed, 2.0.14 and when I click Get Updates, it says > there are none. http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b3/ http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b3/#dow

Re: PrefBar

On 05/07/2011 03:04 PM, Norman Fuchs wrote: > In a recent thread ("Windows 7 crashes") the comment was made that > >> User-agent will let SM pretend to be "Firefox/3.6" and soon all Comcast >> users will have to do that! > > My PrefBar only lists some very old browsers: Moz 1.7.13 Lin, NS 4.7 >

Re: Still can't see videos

On 05/08/2011 04:41 PM, Paul wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 5/7/11 8:17 PM, Paul wrote: >>> FDVS wrote: "Works fine with SM2.1b3, using Flash Player 10.2, maybe you need to install Shockwave (http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/ ) besides of Flash Player." I installed Shoc

Re: ask me before downloading xxx number of newsgroup messages?

On 05/09/2011 04:05 PM, sean bean wrote: > i can't seem to locate where this option has migrated? > anyone? > > in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0a1) Gecko/20110508 Firefox/6.0a1 > SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre > > sean > Not sure about 2.2 (I'm using 2.1) but right clicking on the primary news serv

Re: Setting up AT&T dial up email

On 05/10/2011 12:51 PM, lawi...@att.net wrote: > Ok. > > Tried all suggestions here. > > Tried set up per Thunderbird. > > I can get emails IN but I cannot get emails to SEND. > > What I've got > > SERVER NAME: smtp.att.yahoo.com > > PORT: 465 (defaulted for security) > > USER NAME: lawi..

Re: When 2.1?

On 05/12/2011 05:36 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 5/12/11 4:55 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >> WLS schrieb: >>> Robert Kaiser wrote: WLS schrieb: > Is WebGL going to be disabled by default or is that something we will > need to do in about:config? Why should it? >>> >>> Because o

Re: prefetch web pages

On 05/19/2011 01:33 PM, Jay Garcia wrote: ... > > And it appears that the page header must contain > in order to work, dunno, really haven't researched that much. And apparently didn't read the faq and haven't look at: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type-prefetch tha

Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/22/2011 07:32 AM, Ant wrote: ... > Thanks Jens on the confirmation SM2's video acceleration. When I meant > lock up, I meant my PC/Windows and not the web browser. :) And yes, SM2 > leaks a lot with all my tabs, addons, etc. Like right now, it is using > over 500 MB of memory. Not sure if

SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/22/2011 10:07 PM, Ant wrote: > Oh, it isn't? It seems excessive to me. :/ Actually, about:memory doesn't jive with memstat. For example about:memory is currently showing on my system as: Memory mapped: 479,199,232 Memory in use: 465,726,340 Ho

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/23/2011 02:57 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: > Ant wrote: >> Interesting. "about:memory" didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 > > As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and > later. > > HTH > > Jens > Correct.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/24/2011 02:33 AM, Philip Chee wrote: > On 24/05/2011 13:36, Ant wrote: >> On 5/23/2011 4:44 PM PT, NoOp typed: >>>>> Interesting. "about:memory" didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 >>>> >>>> As the subject

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 05:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> $ memstat -w | grep seamonkey > > I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell > how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what > actual memo

Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sun, 22 May 2011 07:32:50 -0700, /Ant/: >> On 5/22/2011 7:27 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: >>> Ant wrote: >>> If so, then is there a way to disable it? >>> >>> SM 2.1 (ETA next week) will support all accelerations Firefox 4 >>> supports, i.e. D2

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 09:59 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared >> libraries that are using up virtual memory. > > The important hing to note here is the last two words: "virtual memory"

Re: Plan to Eliminate Address Area (URL Bar) Panned at Slashdot

On 05/25/2011 03:07 PM, PhillipJones wrote: ... > It is the most Dumba** idea anyone has ever come up with. I have a 17" > LapTop and 17" Monitor for my desktop if I can see what I need to > missing a 1/8 of an inch or less, I have more problems than just an > extra 1/8' inch. ... Ah, but all th

Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/26/2011 12:00 AM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> Interesting& thanks for the link. Running the test in SeaMonkey 2.1RC1 >> (linux 32bit) I finally had to kill the test (it was just flipping >> between 1& 2 fps). In Opera I get 8 fps (I have an

Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 10:15 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Wed, 25 May 2011 11:17:19 -0700, /NoOp/: ... >> Interesting & thanks for the link. Running the test in SeaMonkey 2.1RC1 >> (linux 32bit) I finally had to kill the test (it was just flipping >> between 1 & 2 fps). In

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/26/2011 02:30 AM, Philip Chee wrote: > Hi! > > SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the > Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need > volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 > > Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: > htt

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/27/2011 01:05 AM, Michael Ströder wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: >> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/ >> SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here: >> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/late

Re: weatherspark.com stopped working with 2.0.14

On 05/28/2011 10:04 AM, d...@kd4e.com wrote: > Setup: Seamonkey 2.0.14 Linux Shockwave Flash 10.2 d151 > > This page was working fine then suddenly stopped: > > > > I made no changes here since yesterday. > > Might Mozilla/

Re: Yahoo email upgrade - possible problem with SeaMonkey?

On 05/29/2011 08:48 AM, WLS wrote: > John wrote: ... >> I know SeaMonkey is based on Firefox, but I've encountered some websites >> which work with Firefox but don't recognize SeaMonkey as a valid browser. >> >> If this Yahoo email upgrade doesn't work with SeaMonkey, I will not be a >> happy campe

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: > Stéphane Grégoire wrote: >> RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in >> mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web >> server was Lightning 1.0b4pre! > > Thanks for catching this error. I filed Bug 660522. >

[RSS] Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: >> On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: >>> Stéphane Grégoire wrote: >>>> RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in >>>> mail, news,

Re: [RSS] Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/29/2011 08:52 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: >>> On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: >>>> Stéphane Grégoire wrote: >>>>> RSS still worked but I had a very c

Re: Mime type of sent attachment

On 05/30/2011 03:27 AM, Hana Skoumalova wrote: > Hello, > > a colleague of mine has a problem with an attachment sent to certain > addresses. The attachment is rejected because of a suspicious mime type. > And I agree the the mime type is wrong. The document was first edited in > MS word, then

Re: Not supported

On 06/07/2011 05:12 PM, PhillipJones wrote: ... > > Unlike FF/Aurora which will allow you to work from same Profile > evidently SM wont. > > I just tried to test. > > I'll have to stay with 2.0.x kills too many of my extensions. > Good for you. Perhaps you could consider abiding by: http://ww

Re: SeaMonkey and IPv6?

On 06/07/2011 05:22 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Does anyone know if SeaMonkey 2.1 is ready to use IPv6. Yes. I've no problem using IPv6 with SeaMonkey 2.x. You can test here: http://test-ipv6.com/ I am suspecting > SeaMonkey can use IPv6, but am not sure. Unfortunately my ISP Shaw has > not upd

Re: SeaMonkey and IPv6?

On 06/07/2011 05:48 PM, NoOp wrote: ... > Google has an issue with there IPv6 browser site: > http://ipv6.google.com/ > results in an error. However: > $ ping6 ipv6.google.com > PING ipv6.google.com(2001:4860:4001:803::1013) 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 2001:4860:4001:803::1013:

Re: SeaMonkey and IPv6?

On 06/08/2011 02:37 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 06/07/2011 05:48 PM, NoOp wrote: > ... >> Google has an issue with there IPv6 browser site: >> http://ipv6.google.com/ ... > > Looks like I need to add some IPv6 DNS servers. Nope - guess not. These work just fine: http://i

Re: SeaMonkey and IPv6?

On 06/08/2011 04:20 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 6/8/2011 6:15 PM NoOp submitted the following: >> On 06/08/2011 02:37 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> On 06/07/2011 05:48 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> ... >>>> Google has an issue with there IPv6 browser site: >>>> http://i

Re: SeaMonkey and IPv6?

On 06/08/2011 04:31 PM, NoOp wrote: ... > Note that I am using an IPv6 tunnel client: miredo/toredo on linux. You > can do the same on Windows: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb968771%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > [Using Teredo in Windows XP] > <http://www.google.com/search?&a

Re: "2.1pre" (RC2) and search results--can't do much in "Search Messages" window

On 06/09/2011 09:11 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote: > I am running RC2 on Windows 7, 64-bit and find that when I use the > "search messages" window, there is very little I can do with the listed > search results. > > Click, double-click, and right-click do nothing on a search result item. > > While I

Re: "2.1pre" (RC2) and search results--can't do much in "Search Messages" window

On 06/09/2011 03:02 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: > Bob Fleischer wrote: >> I am running RC2 on Windows 7, 64-bit and find that when I use the >> "search messages" window, there is very little I can do with the listed >> search results. >> >> Click, double-click, and right-click do nothing on a search res

Re: No Software Updater to upgrade SM2.0.x to 2.1?

On 06/11/2011 10:13 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Ant schrieb: >>> On 6/11/2011 4:32 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: >>> > Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and > Debian/Linux)? Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 w

Re: seamonkey 2.1 - menu change - minor annoyance

On 06/11/2011 05:47 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Re. Seamonkey 2.1, at least on the Mac: > > It looks like the right-click pop-up menu over links has changed from: > open in new window > open in new tab > > to: > open in new tab > open in new window > > what with muscle memory, and other browsers

Re: [Linux Mint 11 / Ubuntu 11.04 / SM 2.1] Frequent Black Screens

On 06/11/2011 06:16 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: > Has anyone else seen the following? I've had this problem from the > moment I installed SM2.1... > > I am getting frequent "back screens" in SM 2.1. When I'm doing > something (e.g., attempting to drag a map in Google Maps, opening a new > webpage

Re: seamonkey 2.1 - menu change - minor annoyance

On 06/12/2011 05:33 AM, Lee wrote: > On 6/11/11, NoOp wrote: >> On 06/11/2011 05:47 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: >>> Re. Seamonkey 2.1, at least on the Mac: >>> >>> It looks like the right-click pop-up menu over links has changed from: >>> open in new wi

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 08:34 AM, Ant wrote: > On 6/12/2011 8:14 AM PT, W3BNR typed: > >> My favorite add-ons are not up-to-date for 2.1, but I'll stay with the >> latest version. Everything else seems to be working fine for me. >> >> So I'll be waiting for the updates to: >> Download Helper >> Prefbar > >

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 11:04 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 06/12/2011 08:34 AM, Ant wrote: >> On 6/12/2011 8:14 AM PT, W3BNR typed: >> >>> My favorite add-ons are not up-to-date for 2.1, but I'll stay with the >>> latest version. Everything else seems to be working fine for

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 02:31 PM, Ant wrote: > On 6/12/2011 2:28 PM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: > >> No, Sync transfers only the changes you make, and you can select what >> should be synced per profile and device (e.g. just sync bookmarks from >> one device, and everything from another). >> >> On top of that, S

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 03:53 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 6/12/2011 4:01 PM David E. Ross submitted the following: >> On 6/12/11 12:39 PM, JD wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: ... >>>> Sorry, forgot to mention that I had modified install.rdf: >>>> >>>>

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 05:25 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 11-06-12 3:57 PM, JD wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >> >>> Sorry, forgot to mention that I had modified install.rdf: >>> >>> >>> >>> {92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} >>> 2.0 >&

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

On 06/12/2011 04:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote: ... > > NO for me. besides extensions If I switch I'll have to 2.1 I am going to > have to keep a Notepad beside my computer just for usernames and > passwords that won't save. > I find that hard to believe. I suspect the problem may honestly be PEB

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 06/12/2011 07:00 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 6/12/2011 7:58 PM NoOp submitted the following: >... >> You can redownload the xpi here without >> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/addons/67148/ >> An xpi is a zip archive, so you could unzip, modify the install.rdf, >> rezip and

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

On 06/12/2011 05:32 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 11-06-12 3:10 PM, Rufus wrote: >> So far, SM 2.1 has generated the largest number of problems/user >> complaints I've ever read here regarding any version/release...and it's >> only been a week or so. > > Where exactly are you getting that info? > Se

SM 2.1 Password Manager

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Since upgrading from 2.1b2 I have been having odd issues with POP3 email stored passwords. On this system I've 4 POP3 accounts & occasionally I get a password failed error on one or another of the

Re: A stupid underlined thread

On 06/14/2011 02:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > Some times a see some thread being underlined ... but did not contain > any un-readed post. > > Is it a problem with SM or the server "news.mozilla.org" owning > "mozilla.support.seamonkey" ? > > This situation is ennoying. FWIW I do get that occasional

Re: V2.1 problem in Composer mode

On 06/15/2011 01:27 PM, Helene wrote: > Hi there, > I test-installed v.2.1 yesterday, but was completely unable to use the > Composer mode (in > Wysiwyg) - the Code page is OK ;) > My problem is I mainly use Seamonkey as HTML-editor : it's simple, produces > clean HTML and has > both WYSIWIG an

Re: SM 2.1 Password Manager

On 06/13/2011 09:29 AM, NoOp wrote: > Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 > Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 > > Since upgrading from 2.1b2 I have been having odd issues with POP3 email > stored passwords. On this system I've 4 POP3 accounts &a

Re: V2.1 problem in Composer mode

On 06/16/2011 03:04 PM, Helene wrote: > NoOp a écrit : ... >> I'll admit that I've not used Composer for quite some time. However, >> when I go to http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ and use File|Edit Page >> I can see the page w/o issue in Normal/HTML Tags/Sour

Re: SM 2.1 Password Manager

On 06/16/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:29:09 -0700, NoOp wrote: >> On 06/13/2011 09:29 AM, NoOp wrote: >>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 >>> Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 >>> >>>

Re: SM 2.1 Password Manager

On 06/16/2011 07:41 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 06/16/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Chee wrote: ... >> If it is only sometimes, then this implies a network or connectivity >> problem. >> >> Phil >> > > I thought of that. However, as mentioned when the popup occurs &

Re: Weird MySQL error

On 06/17/2011 10:40 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > d...@kd4e.com wrote: > >> Linux - Puppy - dpup009 - Seamonkey 2.0.14 - laptop/notebook >> >> At the http://www.faithout.com/ site (a Christian-friendly alternative >> to Facebook) I went to post a reply on their Discussion Board and >> rece

Re: Weird MySQL error

On 06/17/2011 11:51 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >>> You could try spoofing your UA to something that won't say 'netbook' >>> too, to give him a better clue. >> >> His UA shows: >> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X1

Re: Corrupt download to Network share on Windows 7

On 06/17/2011 07:34 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 6/17/2011 9:05 PM, David Wilkinson wrote: >> I have had a long-standing problem in SeaMonkey with corrupt downloads >> to a network share on a Windows 7 machine (my HTPC/Server). >> >> Apparently this problem is present in FireFox also >> >>

Re: Corrupt download to Network share on Windows 7

On 06/18/2011 05:10 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> And the url to the bug report is where? This is not a casual issue, so >> any details that you can provide will be helpful. > > I based my question on this link > > <http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/

Re: SM 2.1 Password Manager

On 06/18/2011 05:51 AM, cyberzen wrote: > NoOp a écrit : ... >> Here is a screenshot. >> >> <http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/51/screenshotenteryourpass.png/> >> >> As you can see, the password is already filled in (and shows properly >> when I o

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

On 06/20/2011 01:06 PM, James E. Morrow wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: ... >> I'm not too far away, but not here as much as previously. And I feel >> good getting less vitriol about my work and working with people who can >> do Mozilla stuff full-time. ;-) >> >> Robert Kaiser >> > > As one who has

Re: SM & Yahoo Mail???

On 06/24/2011 12:03 PM, No wrote: > cyberzen wrote: >> No a écrit : >>> Hello all, for the last two (2) days, my SM 2.014 & 2.1 (two (2) >>> different machines) are not retrieving any yahoo mail. I have checked my >>> SM & Yahoo settings and they appear to be fine. >>> >>> Has anyone else encounter

Re: Yahoo REfuses to allow the new version of their Yahoo mail on SeaMonkey

On 06/30/2011 01:30 PM, sean nathan bean wrote: > cyberzen sent me the following:: >> PhillipJones a écrit : >>> Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go >>> to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA >>> set to show FireFox 4. still does

Re: WHY ?

On 06/21/2011 02:00 PM, Ray_Net wrote: > Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911 Probably because you can't put valid/helpful information in the Subject? Why? I reckon that whatever you are trying to resolve we definately help others later when they search the news

Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail

On 07/01/2011 06:54 PM, Jim wrote: > Well-- > > I still can't access it. I found out there is a "lite" view on the menu > bar, and I clicked that, and it works, but doesn't have full features. > At leadt I can check my mail that way. ... Can you access it from Firefox? And if so what version (t

Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon

On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ > icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back > (alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version): ... Which builds would those be?

Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon

On 07/01/2011 09:37 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >>> In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ >>> icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back &g

Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon

On 07/01/2011 10:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 7/1/2011 11:33 PM, NoOp wrote: ... >> Which builds would those be? >> >> All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. >> >> > > Tony means the "Window" icon for chatzil

<    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   >