Re: [Suspend-devel] [patch] move to vbetool-1.0

2007-03-20 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the > option to compile it in our Makefile. > > Instead, we should update the documentation to tell the users that they > should obtain the th

Re: [Suspend-devel] [patch] move to vbetool-1.0

2007-03-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 March 2007 23:46, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:16 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hm, I think I misunderstood the issue. > > > > Can anyone please explain to me what the current situation is and why it may > > be a good idea to change

Re: [Suspend-devel] ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);

2007-03-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 20 March 2007 20:52, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:43 +0100 > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue 2007-03-20 11:37:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for > > > s2both. I thou

Re: [Suspend-devel] AIO for s2disk

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > When I use the compression with uswsusp, the suspend step take longer than > without. This is in fact because uswsusp write the data synchronously to the > disk. So while it take time to compress the data the disk is idle, and while > it take time to write to disk the processor wait ... >

Re: [Suspend-devel] ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2007-03-20 20:52:07, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:43 +0100 > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue 2007-03-20 11:37:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for > > > s2both. I thought i

Re: [Suspend-devel] ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);

2007-03-20 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:43 +0100 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue 2007-03-20 11:37:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for > > s2both. I thought it would use a function from s2ram.c to do that, but > > it seems

[Suspend-devel] new machine for s2ram

2007-03-20 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Hi, the following notebook works with "s2ram -f -s": sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS" sys_product = "AMILO M" sys_version = "-1 " bios_version = "R01-S0Z " Would be cool, if anyone can include it in the whitelist. Thank you. Reiner pgpSDYAjP85wZ.pgp Des

Re: [Suspend-devel] My machine is not in the whitelist

2007-03-20 Thread Aleksandar Markovic
I have new version of suspend and my machine is in the whitelist. With default option machine allways come back from suspend (let say I have done it about 100 times). But, console (text console) is, after resume, unusable. This is description of the console unusability: it is possible to switch

Re: [Suspend-devel] ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2007-03-20 11:37:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for > s2both. I thought it would use a function from s2ram.c to do that, but > it seems it uses > ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0); > > Just to be sure, this wil

[Suspend-devel] whitelist: s2ram on a HP nx6310

2007-03-20 Thread Peter
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that s2ram works perfectly on a HP nx6310 using s2ram -f I tried this with Opensuse10.2. I was able to use s2ram from console within KDE. Unfortunately I can't find any information on how to change scripts etc. to use s2ram -f automatically. Thanks for your wor

[Suspend-devel] ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);

2007-03-20 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for s2both. I thought it would use a function from s2ram.c to do that, but it seems it uses ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0); Just to be sure, this will probably do precisely the same thing as echo 'mem > /sys/pow

Re: [Suspend-devel] [patch] move to vbetool-1.0

2007-03-20 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:56:45 +0100 Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is > > > only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram works but kernel panic after a few seconds

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I succeeded to suspend-to-ram my system (home-mounted NForce 4 + Athlon 64 + > Geforce TC), with the default settings (no need to use s3_bios, vbe, etc...) > > But a few seconds after the resume (I can type commands like ls during these > few seconds), my system hangs with this error : >

Re: [Suspend-devel] [patch] move to vbetool-1.0

2007-03-20 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is > > only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they > > will have to get it anyway. The only difference is that instead of > > typing two

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram on HP Compaq nx7300

2007-03-20 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:01:40AM +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > > > > Just try them in the order written in the documentation on > > http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram > > I'd guess that probably "s2ram -f -p -m" is ok. > > This works ok from console. I can suspend and resume now from console > with