On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the > option to compile it in our Makefile. > > Instead, we should update the documentation to tell the users that they > should obtain the thing separately and what to do to get everything right. Well than we agree;) > The static linking is possible in either case, isn't it? Yes sure, I would think dynamic linking would work as well, but we can document that they should call something 'make static' or so. grts Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
