Sigh... Sad stuff. That's quite some act of snipping though, LOL! And
the relevance of the Ford Pinto remains undiscovered, like everything
else. Well, nothing else for it...
<>
Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/
Biofuel list owner
>Apparently my
Apparently my mail server stumbled...
>>I've never had a Ford of any sort.
>:-) You demonstrate your ignorance. From the useless list archives:
No, I think I'd know if I'd ever owned a Ford, so no ignorance there. What
I did was ignore your argumentum ad hominem (gotta love that latin) much as
>Just check the ingredients (if you can) used to manufacture charcoal
>briquettes.
Really? Damn. Hm. I see brown coal and paraffin, nothing more sinister though.
Best
Keith
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Keith Addison
>Sent: Thursda
If you say so...
> > I'll stick with the precautionary principle, you ride off into the
>>sunset in your Ford Pinto.
>
>I've never had a Ford of any sort.
:-) You demonstrate your ignorance. From the useless list archives:
http://www.motherjones.com/mother_jones/SO77/dowie.html
Pinto Madness
I
> If you say so. :-)
ROFL :-)
> I don't think there's any need for me to spell out the difference
>between a genuine request for evidence and mere deliberate and
>cynical (criminal?) delaying tactics.
And how does one know which is which? There are occasions when it's more
justifiable to jump
Just check the ingredients (if you can) used to manufacture charcoal
briquettes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:10 PM
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Depleted Uranium Sh
Critical Pesticide Program Cut
By Annie Bell Muzaurieta
The Daily Green, May 21 2008
http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/pesticide-data-program-cut-44052108
The USDA Is Eliminating a Program That Many Groups Rely on to Track
Pesticide Use and Safety - but Why?
Every year the USDA's N
's natural state,
>unrefined, and not touched, the way it should be. Doing anything
>else with it, is just insane. That's my take.
>
>Proving that, otoh, has proven to be pretty difficult.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofue
Hi Andy
I wonder what happened to the US plans to recycle radioactive nuclear
wastes into common household appliances like kitchen cutlery and
babies' prams and so on? The proposals came up a couple of times. Did
they just drop it or are they going ahead without telling anybody?
Similar sort o
Hello Craig
If you say so. :-)
>ExxonMobil has every right to ask for the proof. If not, where does one
>draw the line? If you were running a business and I told you you had to
>spend a whole lot of money to change the way you do business based on a
>claim I had about damage you were causing,
Mr Burke sure didn't get much right. The industry view:
>So far, members of the National Biodiesel Board haven't reported
>feedstock thefts, but that doesn't mean they aren't happening on a
>small scale, said Amber Thurlo Pearson, a spokeswoman for the
>industry's national trade association.
>
> I didn't defend the article, all I did was debunk your statement that
>it didn't give any references.
No, you didn't, since the only reference the article gives is one to another
article that similarly doesn't give any actual information beyond numbers
with no context. The numbers in the two a
Here in Florida we have 'gypsum stacks' which are huge piles of ... Gypsum a
by-product from the processing of phosphate to "fertilizer". It is somewhat
(very low level) radio-active, and as such cannot be used for road beds,
construction etc. I'll bet that DU is stronger, and worse for the imbib
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/05/22/are-you-being-controlled-by-corn.aspx?source=nl
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080522/1172c672/attachment.html
Craig
I didn't defend the article, all I did was debunk your statement that
it didn't give any references.
Your response is much the same: "I haven't read the report, perhaps I
will if I can find it and have time...", "I don't have the links
anymore..."
>Other pages I found (I
>don't have the
Hi
The linked article (the second reference from the Gulf War page) also
doesn't really give anything useful. It gives numbers, but not reasons.
11000 dead, but how many actually died due to the Gulf War? Perhaps the
eminent scientist is being misquoted and did actually specifically say that
all
16 matches
Mail list logo
