[sword-devel] Strong's

The Strong's modules contain cross references. Is there a simple way to follow them, short of cutting/pasting them by hand, adding leading zeros if necessary? Can they be turned into hyperlinks? -- Justus H. Piater, Ph.D. http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~piater Institut Montefiore, B28

[sword-devel] Strong's referance's

Hi​ Just a question on the Strong's! it doesn't seem to match up with the Strong's that I have. Note that 1249 Greek reference lists a deacon as specially, a Christian teacher and pastor, this doesn't appear in the Exhaustive Strong's Concordance. The Strongest Strong's 2001zondervan, doesn't have

[sword-devel] Strong's dictionaries

I have made a correction to the Strong's Hebrew dictionary on bf.org (str4olbd.zip). I have changed: 08483  8383 Tachtiym Chodshiy takh-teem' khod-shee' to: 08483  8483 Tachtiym Chodshiy takh-teem' khod-shee' Are both numbers, 08483 and 8483, needed for the SWORD Project version of these files

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's

In BibleCS you can use the muse menu by right clicking on them. Jerry At 09:24 AM 3/13/2003 +0100, Justus Piater wrote: The Strong's modules contain cross references. Is there a simple way to follow them, short of cutting/pasting them by hand, adding leading zeros if necessary? Can they be turned

[sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew

Hello-- I asked Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen a question about his XML version of Strong's Greek Dictionary. He replied that Dr. David Instone-Brewer has put together an Excel version of Strong's Hebrew using (I assume) Unicode Hebrew characters for Sword. What I would like, eventually, is a version o

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers

I'm finding that the Strong's reference numbers are missing from large portions of the New Testament. Is this just a bad install, or is this still in progress? Thanks. -- Jeffrey Needle [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's referance's

Hi Peter, The KJV is based upon the TR with Scrivener’s variations as provided by Maurice Robinson. Likewise for the Strong’s numbers for the NT. The tagging was done by CrossWire volunteers. If you have particular verses where you see the problem, I’d be glad to check, analyze and give you a d

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's referance's

On 07/11/2016 09:47 PM, Peter Simon wrote: > The Strongest Strong's 2001zondervan, doesn't have a *deacon* as a > pastor or teacher. > Which has made me to wonder about the rest of the translations that > the app is using. > What is the Greek that the end bible is using? There are both several flav

[sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

I am trying to understand the various forms that Strong's references can have. Let me explain with an example from BibleTime when we hover over a word and automatically display the Strong's reference text. In the new testament (KJV and ESV2011) the Strong's reference for "angel" is  "G32". In

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's dictionaries

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Jerry Hastings wrote: > I have made a correction to the Strong's Hebrew dictionary on bf.org > (str4olbd.zip). Thanks for this correction. > It would also be nice to restore the missing Hebrew and Greek, add the > missing punctuation, and restore the bold and Italic fonts. I

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's dictionaries

I'm in the process of fixing up the Strong's modules with cross-references (removing the see HEBREW... type lines) and with Greek/Hebrew letters. Very good. If we want to do bold & italics, maybe Troy will want to set up something collaborative like the KJV2003 project. That is what I was

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

On Saturday 03 December 2005 18:13, Jeff Needle wrote: > I'm finding that the Strong's reference numbers are missing from large > portions of the New Testament. Is this just a bad install, or is this > still in progress? It should be finished, you probably have an older version. Try downloading i

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:20:25PM -0500, David Blue (Mailing List Addy) wrote: > On Saturday 03 December 2005 18:13, Jeff Needle wrote: > > I'm finding that the Strong's reference numbers are missing from large > > portions of the New Testament. Is this just a bad install, or is this > > still in

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:20:25PM -0500, David Blue (Mailing List Addy) wrote: On Saturday 03 December 2005 18:13, Jeff Needle wrote: I'm finding that the Strong's reference numbers are missing from large portions of the New Testament. Is this just a bad install, or is this still in progress?

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

Are you using Sword for Windows aka bible cs? If so I believe the version for downloading may still not be updated to include all the strongs. At least this summer it was still the old KJV from 2003 not completed. Troy would know the answer to this. Geoff On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:13:16 -0500 "Jeff

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

Yes, I'm using Sword for Windows. I found other odd things -- from time to time, when I pass the cursor over a Strong's number, I get the correct definition, it gets stuck on that definition. When I move the cursor to another Strong's number, the previous definition appears, and stays ther

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:20:25 -0500, David Blue (Mailing List Addy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 03 December 2005 18:13, Jeff Needle wrote: I'm finding that the Strong's reference numbers are missing from large portions of the New Testament. Is this just a bad install, or is this st

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers update

As suggested, I re-downloaded the KJV with Strong's, and sure enough, they all seem to be there. Thanks much! -- Jeffrey Needle [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://

[sword-devel] Strong's Numbers assignment

Hi, all. Is there any king of guidelines or manual on Strong's numbers assignment on text? Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or i should add those strongs on any most appropriate w

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

STEP suggests that leading zeros do not belong in between the letter and the digits. https://stepweb.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TYNSTEP/pages/36569098/OSIS+samples#OSISsamples-OSISofaBiblewithstrongnumbers(ESV) On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Gary Holmlund wrote: > I am trying to understand

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

I don't see anywhere the document suggest not having the zeros. I do see several examples with zeros between the letter and the digits. H0776 H01961 H08414 H0922 Even if the document had suggested no zeros, we have documents (MLStrong, Dodson) that do have these zeros. If I have "G32" how do I

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

On 09/27/2017 03:12 AM, Michael H wrote: > STEP suggests that leading zeros do not belong in between the letter > and the digits. It does? The very section you reference contains numerous examples: |<||w| |lemma||=||"strong:H02822"||>darkness |On 09/27/2017 02:12 PM, Gary Holmlund wrote: > Even

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

I’m curious whether your question is as a module creator or otherwise. Are you creating a Strong’s module or a module having Strong’s numbers? The KJV module uses Strong’s numbers of the form G975, that is, a G or H followed by an unpadded number. That’s the current standard. There’s a new set

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

As a module creator, this has been a source of untold hours of frustration and experimentation in order to discover what works. From memory, the most widely supported format in practice is to have G or H followed by a padded number. It would be ideal if all the front-ends supported the same f

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

On 09/27/2017 08:33 PM, Daniel Owens wrote: > It would be ideal if all the front-ends supported the same format so > modules would work the same way everywhere. Two things: 1. Any idea that needs to be carried out in "all the front-ends" is stillborn. If you ask for it today, you'll be lucky if

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

My question is about a frontend, BibleTime. Your suggestion about establishing a pattern from an arbitrary key was what I was thinking about. I am glad to hear that it is used by JSword. This is the answer I needed. Gary On 09/27/2017 05:11 PM, DM Smith wrote: I’m curious whether your questi

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Standards

On 09/27/2017 08:11 PM, DM Smith wrote: > The KJV module uses Strong’s numbers of the form G975, that is, a G or > H followed by an unpadded number. That’s the current standard. That's simply not the case in current KJV. $ mod2imp KJV | grep 'strong:H[1-9]' returns no output. Every single Hebre

[sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance

Greetings, I'm new to the list but am impressed with the e-Sword engine. I am wondering if a Greek or Hebrew Concordance (e.g. Strong's Concordance) is in development anywhere? Obviously the STrong's numbers are attached, but I'd like something where I can jump from the Strong's number to all the

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers assignment

On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:37 AM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote: > Hi, all. > > Is there any king of guidelines or manual on Strong's numbers > assignment on text? In OSIS they should surround the text to which they pertain. In other markup, they are placed after the word or phrase. > > Or ca

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers assignment

>> Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in >> original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or >> i should add those strongs on any most appropriate word, if omitted >> word is sentence beginning/ending can i also just put strong number on >>

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers assignment

On 08/31/2011 08:30 AM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote: Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or i should add those strongs on any most appropriate word, if omitted word is sentence beginning/ending

[sword-devel] strong's numbers in KJV-1769

Hi folks... I was trying to do a study looking up strong's greek and hebrew numbers, searching for the verses that have a particular strong's number. I could not do it with 0112 in xiphos 3.1.5 (all I get is a dialog saying how, making reference to buttons - only see 1 button), but I could in Th

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers and revisions thereof ...

I also put this question to *Tyndale STEP Development*: Have there been any corrections to Strong's numbers for the modules that STEP maintains? Here's their reply: Yes, lots. STEP uses lexemes rather than forms based on lexemes, and converts common phrases in Strongs to individual words. Also i

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

I have a Xiphos bug in which the facility to take a Strong's dict entry and search the Bible module for all its occurrences sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. The mechanism is straightforward: Take the key from the dict pane, note whether t

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance

Justin, just for the sake of clarification: e-sword and the Sword Project have nothing to do with each other. e-sword is a personal effort by Rick Meyers to create a Windows-based bible software. The Sword Project is an open group effort (GPLed) to create a cross-platform framework for bible softw

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance Justin, just for the sake of clarification: e-sword and the Sword Project have nothing to do with each other. e-sword is a personal effort by Rick Meyers to create a Windows-based bible software. The Sword

Re: [sword-devel] strong's numbers in KJV-1769

On 01/16/2014 09:02 PM, Jim Michaels wrote: > In Xiphos, I am told to use advanced search, Attribute Search, which I > did, and got no results but a help dialog box. it states that I am > supposed to use a G or H in front of the number, which I did. In Xiphos' Advanced Search, use "lemma:G2316" (or

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Why not just add a normalization method to Sword? Ie. if the numeric reference starts with '0', pad it out to 5 digits? John Dudeck > > What Karl has observed is a long-standing problem. > > Might it be feasible to employ a suitable regular _expression_ to match the Strong’s H number > whe

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Le 27/01/2022 à 15:07, David Haslam a écrit : What Karl has observed is a long-standing problem. Might it be feasible to employ a suitable regular expression to match the Strong’s H number whether or not it has any leading zero[s]? This would have to be done under the hood for this type of

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Fixing this for the OSHB module should be trivial. Let me know if you want me to do it. On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 17:20, Fr Cyrille wrote: > > > > Le 27/01/2022 à 15:07, David Haslam a écrit : > > What Karl has observed is a long-standing problem. > > Might it be feasible to employ a suitable regula

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Le 27/01/2022 à 17:33, pierre amadio a écrit : Fixing this for the OSHB module should be trivial. Let me know if you want me to do it. You mean directly on OSHB? This is a possibility. All module "just" add a zero in the good place... On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 17:20, Fr Cyrille wrote: Le 27

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Hi Karl, Yes, this history of how to record Strong's numbers has a long and inglorious history.  The zero prefix was how the "Online Bible", from which came most free online Bible resources back in the 1980s, recorded Hebrew Strong's.  The Bible Foundation (the primary initial provider of dat

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

Dear Karl, I also just realized I answered the inversion of your question. You are not attempting to go from Bible to Lexicon, but from Lexicon to Bible. I am sorry for not taking more time to think about your example. Yes, you are correct, we don't yet have an inverse solution, but we could ad

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

No worries... On 1/27/22 12:53 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: Yes, you are correct, we don't yet have an inverse solution, but we could add one by using the same strongsPad function during the lemma search or lemma index creation. Yes, my deeper problem is that the search needs to match, style-

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers: Numbers or strings

The way I've been dealing with this (the dynamic translation-dependent 0 prefix in Hebrew Strong's) in node-sword-interface is prefixing the search term for H*** strong's searches only if the corresponding translation has those 0 prefixes. I simply have this piece of code in my search function

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

Would crosswire be interested in sponsoring a Strong's Numbers effort for the KJV Old Testament similar to their New Testament effort? If the infrastructure was in place, I'd be happy to run around and try to get some seminary professors to donate students; the OT is a bit bigger than the NT. I

[sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

I've just downloaded the Sword Project and it runs well on Windows XP. I have 2 questions and am wondering who can answer them. 1) There is a STrong's built into a KJV version with the Sword Engine. HOwever there doesn't seem to be Strong's the other way - e.g. for a specific word, listing all the

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

What's the precise nature of your objective? We already have Strong's numbers in the KJV and LXX modules. Are you looking to have the WLC module tagged with Strong's numbers and/or keying to KJV words? --Chris Ted Walther wrote: Would crosswire be interested in sponsoring a Strong's Numbers e

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:20:37PM -0800, Chris Little wrote: What's the precise nature of your objective? We already have Strong's numbers in the KJV and LXX modules. Are you looking to have the WLC module tagged with Strong's numbers and/or keying to KJV words? Yes, keying the greek words to

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:07:29PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:20:37PM -0800, Chris Little wrote: What's the precise nature of your objective? We already have Strong's numbers in the KJV and LXX modules. Are you looking to have the WLC module tagged with Strong's numbers

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

Ted Walther wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:07:29PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:20:37PM -0800, Chris Little wrote: What's the precise nature of your objective? We already have Strong's numbers in the KJV and LXX modules. Are you looking to have the WLC module tagg

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

I think he wants the Greek Strongs number and the Hebrew Strongs number for each word in the Old Testament where the Greek Strongs number would come from the LXX. This really is a mapping between the Hebrew text and the LXX. I think that this makes more sense for it to be placed in the LXX itse

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:48:08PM -0500, DM Smith wrote: I think he wants the Greek Strongs number and the Hebrew Strongs number for each word in the Old Testament where the Greek Strongs number would come from the LXX. This really is a mapping between the Hebrew text and the LXX. I think that t

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers in Septuagint/LXX module?

Martin Gruner is working on a LXX-MT Parallel from CATSS. Does this have any bearing? Ted Walther wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:48:08PM -0500, DM Smith wrote: I think he wants the Greek Strongs number and the Hebrew Strongs number for each word in the Old Testament where the Greek Strong

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance Win2K problem - found

: [sword-devel] Strong's Hebrew & Greek Concordance Thanks. I just downloaded the software. I'm running Windows 2000, and it won't open and install. Is this intended to be compatible with older versions of Windows? Cordially, Justin Long __

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:33 pm, Justin Long wrote: > 1) There is a STrong's built into a KJV version with the Sword Engine. > HOwever there doesn't seem to be Strong's the other way - e.g. for a > specific word, listing all the Scriptures where the word occurs. Has this > been built? Will it b

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:33 pm, Justin Long wrote: > 1) There is a STrong's built into a KJV version with the Sword Engine. > HOwever there doesn't seem to be Strong's the other way - e.g. for a > specific word, listing all the Scriptures where the word occurs. Has this > been built? Will it b

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Justin Long wrote: > On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:33 pm, Justin Long wrote: > > 1) There is a STrong's built into a KJV version with the Sword Engine. > > HOwever there doesn't seem to be Strong's the other way - e.g. for a > > specific word, listing all the Scriptures where

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

Justin Long wrote >... the ability to look at a Strong's entry > and find all the verses where it occurs... Chris Little wrote: ...I think concordances in software are just silly. That's what search is for. Do others feel like this is an important feature? ... I have printed copies Wigram. What th

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On 24-Aug-2003 Chris Little wrote: > Just do a search on the basis of a Strong's number. I think concordances > in software are just silly. That's what search is for. > > Do others feel like this is an important feature? We could possibly add > a new module for this, but I'm not sure which GNT

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Little Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Justin Long wrote: >

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Sunday 24 August 2003 07:18 am, Justin Long wrote: > Another thing that would be nice is the ability to search all versions at > once for a > particular word. When I'm doing Bible studies, I look at multiple versions. > Right > now what I have to do is go to each version and do a lookup... I mi

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

Justin Long wrote: ___ Justin writes: I never thought to search for a Strong's number, and I am technically literate (a programmer for over 15 years). I doubt must non-technically-literate people will. They expect a Hebrew/Greek concordance based either on KJV or AS

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

Side question - has anyone seen a problem where Sword stops displaying the Strong numbers in the NT?  I had it happen on two computers.  I got the OT back by searching for a Hebrew word (number) but this failed for the NT.  I eventually blew the Sword directory away and reinstalled.     Joel, the

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Thursday 28 August 2003 12:14 am, Chris Little wrote: > If people won't read the manual... remind me again why we should care > about helping them? Because it's the Christ-like thing to do? -- Preacher Dave As easy as 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993 AIM: Prchr Dave IC

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 12:14 am, Chris Little wrote: > > If people won't read the manual... remind me again why we should care > > about helping them? > > Because it's the Christ-like thing to do? Those who wrote the softwa

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The new KJV module doesn't contain all strongs of the NT. It's work in progress. Make sure you use the 1.5.6 software. Joachim > Side question - has anyone seen a problem where Sword stops displaying the > Strong numbers in the NT? I had it happen

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

In a message dated 8/28/2003 3:03:16 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The new KJV module doesn't contain all strongs of the NT. It's work in progress.Make sure you use the 1.5.6 software.Joachim> Side question - has anyone seen a problem where Sword stops displaying the> Stron

RE: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search Justin Long wrote: > ___ > Justin writes: > I never thought to search for a Strong's number, and I am technically > literate > (a programm

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Greek & Hebrew, and indexed word search

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Have a look at http://www.crosswire.org/sword/kjv2003/status/index.html Joachim > In a message dated 8/28/2003 3:03:16 AM Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > The new KJV module doesn't contain all strongs of the NT. It's work in

[sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

Dear Brothers, I hope you are well. A while back therw was a post regarding a python script that created first drafts of Strong's numbers for foreign languages. Was anyone able to find or obtain it? In Christ, Kamal ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword

[sword-devel] Strong's Bible Dictionary ver 2.0 from Crosswire -> without G01438

Hi! KJV John.20.10 word "their own home" It has number G1438. And my Andorid I have: - Bishop - shows me G1437 instead of G1438 - AndBible - shows me *NO* entry for G1438 On Telegram AndBible users group they suggested me to change Strong's source: "Ok, you might try to delete/reinstall the d

[sword-devel] Strong's numbers missing in Matthew etc...In Starter pack

I double checked this morning. I downloaded the Starter Pack from http://www.crosswire.org/sword/software/biblecs/index.jsp The Strongs numbers are incomplete. (If you open Matthew you will see they are missing.) On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:13:16 -0500 "Jeff Needle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm f

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/04/2011 13:28, Kamal Abou Mikhael wrote: > A while back there was a post regarding a python script that created first > drafts of Strong's numbers for foreign languages. That was me, and I haven't found that script, yet. :( It probably will be

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

Hi Johathon, I had some questions regarding the script and the whole topic of Srong's for foreign languages. 1. You mentioned the script being tied to Bibletech talk... was that your talk? are there any remaining artifacts from that talk? mp3... slides... notes... I wasn't able to locate it on

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

On 28/06/2011 16:52, Kamal Abou Mikhael wrote: > 1. You mentioned the script being tied to Bibletech talk... was that your talk? No. >are there any remaining artifacts from that talk? mp3... slides... notes... They should be on the BibleTech website. > 2. How does the script work? Does it u

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

Is this the software being used for the *Tyndale STEP project*? i.e. As described in overview here https://www.facebook.com/notes/tyndale-step-development-team/step-interlinears-whats-involved-/108024985957123 David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Re-Stron

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/06/2011 15:24, David Haslam wrote: > Is this the software being used for the *Tyndale STEP project*? AFAIK, what I described is not being used there. jonathon - -- All emails sent to this with email address with a precedence other than bulk

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

A search for "Python" in the http://www.bibletechconference.com/speakers/ BibleTech speakers page brings up the name of *James Tauber* and the three talks that he gave. * MorphGNT: The Next Generation * A New Kind of Graded Reader * Using Pinax and Django For Collaborative Corpus Linguistics S

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

Hello Everyone, It turns out that the talk was titled "Automatic Concordancing for Scripture in Any Language" and it was given by Neil Rees. The paper can be found here: http://www.bibletechconference.com/media/2010/NeilRees2010_ReesRidingGlossing_1.pdf Blessings, Kamal Message-ID: <13094176011

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers Python Script for Foreign Language Bibles

Though we have yet to meet face to face, 'Studge' (Neil Rees) is one of my friends. He's in contact with a number of CrossWire volunteers here in the UK. He also helps Arfon Jones with some technical stuff for the beibl.net Welsh translation. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's numbers missing in Matthew etc...In Starter pack

It seems they haven't put the updated Strong's into the starter pack. I downloaded the Strong's module separately, and it's fine. On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:18:04 -0500, Geoffrey w Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I double checked this morning. I downloaded the Starter Pack from http://www

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers in Greek Modules was Domain changed hands, should be deleted

Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote: > I know it doesn't make sense, but I kinda wish the greek had strongs... > (well a bibletime "mouse-over" brings up the dictionary /strongs meaning > of the greek word) Three of our Greek modules do have Strong's Numbers: byz, tr and whnu. The KJV is not only keyed to

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's Numbers in Greek Modules was Domain changed hands, should be deleted

On 4/27/07, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote: > > I know it doesn't make sense, but I kinda wish the greek had strongs... > > (well a bibletime "mouse-over" brings up the dictionary /strongs meaning > > of the greek word) > Three of our Greek modules do have Strong's N

[sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

Hi all, The Strong's search does not return results if the Strong's numbers in the text point to a part of a verse. Example: G5179 This should actually yield 15 results (according to Blue Letter Bible). One example result is John 20:25. The source text in NASB contains this: the imprint Another e

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result ifStrong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

Thanks for the feedback, Troy! Best regards, Tobias From: Troy A. Griffitts Sent: Samstag, 18. Juli 2020 10:16 To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result ifStrong's number in text points to different parts of a ve

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

On 7/14/20 4:09 PM, Tobias Klein wrote: > > The Strong's search does not return results if the Strong's numbers in > the text point to a part of a verse. > No, it's because the Strong's numbers in NASB are keyed to their own lexicons, the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons, which have multiple entries at 5179,

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

Thanks, Karl. Makes sense now. @Troy: Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons, but just standard Strong's keyed lexicons, would it make sense to "normalize" the way how Sword searches in this case? Would it be correct to simply return all verses that have either 5179a or 5179b? I guess th

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

On 7/15/20 2:15 AM, Tobias Klein wrote: > Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons Actually, we (well, I) do...which is why I could explain your difficulty, after all. I just moved them from my private repo to the Xiphos repo.  Feel free to refresh and install. Troy and I discussed making th

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

On 7/15/20 1:23 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: On 7/15/20 2:15 AM, Tobias Klein wrote: Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons Actually, we (well, I) do...which is why I could explain your difficulty, after all. I just moved them from my private repo to the Xiphos repo.  Feel free to refr

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

On 7/15/20 5:08 PM, Tobias Klein wrote: > Is there any other translation out there that uses these special > Strong's keys? I don't think any other uses the NAS lexicons. However, those are not the only "not-Strong's Strong's".  For example, there is the Berean Bible (http://berean.bible) who have

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

One or more of the modules hosted by Tyndale House for STEP Bible makes use of the TH augmented Strong’s numbers. Some of these modules can be manually installed in other front-end apps. AFAIK, TH has still not set up a proper repository that the SWORD module manager could access, were the conn

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

On 7/16/20 4:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: On 7/15/20 5:08 PM, Tobias Klein wrote: Is there any other translation out there that uses these special Strong's keys? I don't think any other uses the NAS lexicons. However, those are not the only "not-Strong's Strong's".  For example, there is the

Re: [sword-devel] Strong's search does not return result if Strong's number in text points to different parts of a verse

That looks nice, Tobias. Thanks to everyone who commented on this. I think we do similar normalization in the engine for the lookup, but not in the search. You'd know if the NASB on the the live swordweb site allows a word click at one of these locations with a letter suffix and it still produce