There are several evalf problems that were fixed with edits I made in
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1028 . But it would be great to
have anyone that understands how mpmath/evalf works to do some more
review of it. Mateusz has already said he won't have time for sympy
for a while and I haven't
Nope. You should be able to edit the wiki if you are logged in.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Gagan Deep wrote:
> i have github accountdo i need to register explicitly?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:51 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> I think that you need a gi
i have github accountdo i need to register explicitly?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:51 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com <
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that you need a github account.
> https://github.com/plans
>
> On 6 February 2012 22:13, Gagan Deep wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am new Sym
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:04 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of you know me as I have a few minor contributions to sympy and I
> helped a bit with GCI. I would like to know whether it is possible for
> me to apply for a GSoC project this year?
>
> About the project I have in mi
Le mardi 07 février 2012 à 00:25 +0100, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com a
écrit :
> Add and Mul are AssocOp for obvious reasons. Pow is just an expression
> because it is not associative and the next simplest thing is Expr. Why
> Mod is a Function and not an Expr?
>
Yes, this seems inconsistent. Mod sh
To enable MathJax printing in the notebook do:
* Start with the sympy profile:
ipython notebook --profile sympy
OR
* Load the sympyprinting extension in a notebook:
%load_ext sympyprinting
Cheers,
Brian
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, lutusp wrote:
> The sympy sampler located at http://liv
Add and Mul are AssocOp for obvious reasons. Pow is just an expression
because it is not associative and the next simplest thing is Expr. Why
Mod is a Function and not an Expr?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send
On 6 February 2012 21:06, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Right. Stefan, can you update the ideas page to reflect the new
> module, and any potential project(s) that can be made of it?
I have done it. Especially interesting will be to have an "asymptote
detector", manupulate() and animation() functions and
I should point out that the linear algebra vision page was just something I
started after your e-mail. It reflects my thoughts and not necessarily
those of the community in general.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com <
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks fo
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. I will try to prepare some kind of a
blueprint (at least some imaginary code examples) and then we can
discuss them.
Matt has also sent me https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Linear-Algebra-Vision
There are some points from it that were not in my vision of the
potenti
I think that you need a github account.
https://github.com/plans
On 6 February 2012 22:13, Gagan Deep wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new Sympy. I am not able to register in wiki(https://github.com/
> sympy/sympy/wiki).Can anyone tell where is the option for this. In
> this wiki its written that its in top r
Hi,
I am new Sympy. I am not able to register in wiki(https://github.com/
sympy/sympy/wiki).Can anyone tell where is the option for this. In
this wiki its written that its in top right. but i am not able to find
it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sy
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:44 PM, miham wrote:
> In case you can't find it in the previous post, here it is again:
>
> Matrix(3, 3, lambda i,j: Symbol('a_%d%d' % (i,j)))
Very nice!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group,
Hi.
Some of these things are SymPy bugs, and some are IPython bugs. If
--profile=sympy doesn't work, and you are in fact using the newest
version of SymPy/IPython, it should work. If not, it is an IPython
bug, and should be reported to them.
As far as adding a GUI to the notebook to enable this,
Hi.
This is great. I think we definitely need to improve that module.
You've already completed the patch requirement, so I would spend time
discussing your idea with the community. Once you've got a solid
idea, you can start writing an application (though it's still early,
so don't worry about t
Right. Stefan, can you update the ideas page to reflect the new
module, and any potential project(s) that can be made of it?
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:48 PM, miham wrote:
> The framework with matplotlib and Pyglet backends is right now beeing
> reviewed for inclusion in master. See
The framework with matplotlib and Pyglet backends is right now beeing
reviewed for inclusion in master. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/673.
This doesn't mean you couldn't imporove it even further though.
On Feb 6, 5:42 pm, Edyta Przymus wrote:
> Hello SymPy,
>
> I am an undergraduate stu
If you search the list you will find that there have been long but
unfruitful discussions about this. The main reason why this structure
was proposed was (iirc) because it allows to implement a clean
assumptions and caching system. Some people find it generally cleaner
than the current structur
> A number of posts say that an invocation of --
>
> $ ipython --profile=sympy
>
> -- will automatically enable "pretty printing" but the term "pretty
> printing" is ambiguous, and in my experience, this invocation never enables
> Latex / Mathjax rendering.
You mean
$ ipython notebook --profile=s
In case you can't find it in the previous post, here it is again:
Matrix(3, 3, lambda i,j: Symbol('a_%d%d' % (i,j)))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Try this:
>>> Matrix(3, 3, lambda i,j: Symbol('a_%d%d' % (i,j)))
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups
I was wandering around in the wiki and found this
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Algebras-in-SymPyCore
which points to this
http://sympycore.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/html/structure.html
Generally I like this idea. Are there reasons, other than inertia, why this
hasn't been implemented?
T
Hello SymPy,
I am an undergraduate student loving Python and because of my field of
study (control engineering) connected closely to scientific software.
I am successful participant of GSoC 2011. A project called Plotting
module (from your ideas wiki page) sounds very exciting for me. Could
you pl
Hi everyone,
My name is Gagan Deep doing major in computer science and
engineering. I am new to Sympy and i find it interesting. I want to
participate this year in GSoC for sympy. I know python and i started
playing with Sympy. I am now trying to fix bugs.
I am deeply interested in p
Stefan,
Getting physics to utilize the tensor module sounds like a great idea. If
you are looking for more things to flesh out a project, I know the spin
module could be greatly improved with a well integrated tensor module,
things like Wigner-Eckart theorem and irreducible spherical tensor
operat
Hi Stefan,
As someone who has followed and used many of your "minor" contributions
(optics, plotting) I'll say that you should definitely apply for a GSoC
project this year. I'm confident that your contributions will be very
useful.
My summer plans are up in the air but I may also end up applying
I read documentation before some days and I was playing around with SymPy.
I had a look at ideas page and SymPy road-map. But due to midterm at my
university I don't have enough time give in. I have a plan to get my hands
dirty and fix something to get comfortable with SymPy's code. I'll discuss
id
Hi,
Some of you know me as I have a few minor contributions to sympy and I
helped a bit with GCI. I would like to know whether it is possible for
me to apply for a GSoC project this year?
About the project I have in mind: It is the tensor module. It is quite
bare-bones at the moment. I would like
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Is there a good reason to use numpy.random.random instead of just
> random.random?
Because that's what I was playing with at the time, so no real reason.
Is it faster?
Nope
In [23]: %timeit random.random()
1000 loops, best of 3: 137 ns
Is there a good reason to use numpy.random.random instead of just
random.random? Is it faster?
Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:19 PM, scripts wrote:
>> Is easier to explain my question with an example, what i'm seeking is
>> somet
Do you care about the distribution of these numbers? There are many
ways to generate random rational numbers, and they will be distributed
differently. For example, you could do
(random_integer)/(random_integer) (with the integers coming from some
distributions).
If you want an even distribution
31 matches
Mail list logo